[GitHub] spark issue #13147: [SPARK-6320][SQL] Move planLater method into GenericStra...
Github user ueshin commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13147 @marmbrus Thank you for merging this! --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
[GitHub] spark issue #13147: [SPARK-6320][SQL] Move planLater method into GenericStra...
Github user marmbrus commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13147 Thanks, merged to master. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
[GitHub] spark issue #13147: [SPARK-6320][SQL] Move planLater method into GenericStra...
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13147 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60207/ Test PASSed. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
[GitHub] spark issue #13147: [SPARK-6320][SQL] Move planLater method into GenericStra...
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13147 Merged build finished. Test PASSed. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
[GitHub] spark issue #13147: [SPARK-6320][SQL] Move planLater method into GenericStra...
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13147 **[Test build #60207 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60207/consoleFull)** for PR 13147 at commit [`254381d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/254381d245cabf3cbad57f7ab06eec155ae79d96). * This patch passes all tests. * This patch merges cleanly. * This patch adds no public classes. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
[GitHub] spark issue #13147: [SPARK-6320][SQL] Move planLater method into GenericStra...
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13147 **[Test build #60207 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60207/consoleFull)** for PR 13147 at commit [`254381d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/254381d245cabf3cbad57f7ab06eec155ae79d96). --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
[GitHub] spark issue #13147: [SPARK-6320][SQL] Move planLater method into GenericStra...
Github user marmbrus commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13147 test this please --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
[GitHub] spark issue #13147: [SPARK-6320][SQL] Move planLater method into GenericStra...
Github user marmbrus commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13147 LGTM, I'm going to merge this into master after it passes tests once more (just want to check to make sure its not stale) --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
[GitHub] spark issue #13147: [SPARK-6320][SQL] Move planLater method into GenericStra...
Github user ueshin commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13147 @marmbrus Do you have any other thoughts on this? If so, let me know them and why don't we merge the minimal version same as for `branch-2.0` into `master` for now? I think the API difference between `master` and `branch-2.0` for a long time is not desirable. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
