[GitHub] spark issue #19557: [SPARK-22281][SPARKR] Handle R method breaking signature...
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19557 merged to master/2.2 --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
[GitHub] spark issue #19557: [SPARK-22281][SPARKR] Handle R method breaking signature...
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19557 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/83248/ Test PASSed. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
[GitHub] spark issue #19557: [SPARK-22281][SPARKR] Handle R method breaking signature...
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19557 Merged build finished. Test PASSed. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
[GitHub] spark issue #19557: [SPARK-22281][SPARKR] Handle R method breaking signature...
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19557 **[Test build #83248 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/83248/testReport)** for PR 19557 at commit [`1b41f73`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1b41f73a2cdea5ebc7a0c3346dd37d9841cc72df). * This patch passes all tests. * This patch merges cleanly. * This patch adds no public classes. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
[GitHub] spark issue #19557: [SPARK-22281][SPARKR] Handle R method breaking signature...
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19557 **[Test build #83248 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/83248/testReport)** for PR 19557 at commit [`1b41f73`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1b41f73a2cdea5ebc7a0c3346dd37d9841cc72df). --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
[GitHub] spark issue #19557: [SPARK-22281][SPARKR] Handle R method breaking signature...
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19557 rebased --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
[GitHub] spark issue #19557: [SPARK-22281][SPARKR] Handle R method breaking signature...
Github user shivaram commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19557 LGTM. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
[GitHub] spark issue #19557: [SPARK-22281][SPARKR] Handle R method breaking signature...
Github user shivaram commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19557 Is there a reason we can't use the same glm trick for attach ? I guess this was explained above but I'm wondering if there is a reason the base::attach is not compiled in the same way ? --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
[GitHub] spark issue #19557: [SPARK-22281][SPARKR] Handle R method breaking signature...
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19557 Merged build finished. Test PASSed. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
[GitHub] spark issue #19557: [SPARK-22281][SPARKR] Handle R method breaking signature...
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19557 **[Test build #82972 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82972/testReport)** for PR 19557 at commit [`7b145ba`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7b145bac854851e4a87935c80b3688513eb58cb7). * This patch passes all tests. * This patch merges cleanly. * This patch adds no public classes. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
[GitHub] spark issue #19557: [SPARK-22281][SPARKR] Handle R method breaking signature...
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19557 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82972/ Test PASSed. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
[GitHub] spark issue #19557: [SPARK-22281][SPARKR] Handle R method breaking signature...
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19557 **[Test build #82972 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82972/testReport)** for PR 19557 at commit [`7b145ba`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7b145bac854851e4a87935c80b3688513eb58cb7). --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
