[GitHub] spark issue #22924: [SPARK-25891][PYTHON] Upgrade to Py4J 0.10.8.1

2018-11-01 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22924
  
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): 
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98362/
Test FAILed.


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #22924: [SPARK-25891][PYTHON] Upgrade to Py4J 0.10.8.1

2018-11-01 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22924
  
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #22924: [SPARK-25891][PYTHON] Upgrade to Py4J 0.10.8.1

2018-11-01 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22924
  
**[Test build #98362 has 
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98362/testReport)**
 for PR 22924 at commit 
[`78127fd`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/78127fdbafd4ec6bb9d5a6aeb6f86fbb480d7742).
 * This patch **fails SparkR unit tests**.
 * This patch merges cleanly.
 * This patch adds no public classes.


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #22924: [SPARK-25891][PYTHON] Upgrade to Py4J 0.10.8.1

2018-11-01 Thread dongjoon-hyun
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22924
  
Thank you for your interests and discussion, @srowen and @gatorsmile .
Let's close for now since we have a negative opinion.

Thank you again.


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #22924: [SPARK-25891][PYTHON] Upgrade to Py4J 0.10.8.1

2018-11-01 Thread gatorsmile
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22924
  
I would be more conservative in these cases. The new release of Py4J might 
introduce new regressions. Not all the changes are clearly documented in their 
release notes. It is kind of aggressive to change the dependence in our 
maintenance releases. 


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #22924: [SPARK-25891][PYTHON] Upgrade to Py4J 0.10.8.1

2018-11-01 Thread srowen
Github user srowen commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22924
  
Yeah I get that. I haven't heard the bugs that are fixed here impact users, 
but a few sound kind of bad.  Maybe this should depend more on: how much do 
people need Python 3.7 in 2.4.x? that seems like a valid basis to back-port, if 
it were in demand. A 'bug fix' of a different sort, fixing incompatibilities 
with 3.7


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #22924: [SPARK-25891][PYTHON] Upgrade to Py4J 0.10.8.1

2018-11-01 Thread gatorsmile
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22924
  
I am against this change in 2.4 branch unless the bugs are critical for our 
end users. 


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #22924: [SPARK-25891][PYTHON] Upgrade to Py4J 0.10.8.1

2018-11-01 Thread srowen
Github user srowen commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22924
  
I think it's OK to backport at 3.7 support is actually fairly important, 
and this also fixes bugs: https://www.py4j.org/changelog.html

It drops 2.6 support but we did so as well a long time ago in 2.2.0.


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #22924: [SPARK-25891][PYTHON] Upgrade to Py4J 0.10.8.1

2018-11-01 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22924
  
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #22924: [SPARK-25891][PYTHON] Upgrade to Py4J 0.10.8.1

2018-11-01 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22924
  
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #22924: [SPARK-25891][PYTHON] Upgrade to Py4J 0.10.8.1

2018-11-01 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22924
  
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): 

https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/4700/
Test PASSed.


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #22924: [SPARK-25891][PYTHON] Upgrade to Py4J 0.10.8.1

2018-11-01 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22924
  
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): 

https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/4701/
Test PASSed.


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #22924: [SPARK-25891][PYTHON] Upgrade to Py4J 0.10.8.1

2018-11-01 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22924
  
**[Test build #98362 has 
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98362/testReport)**
 for PR 22924 at commit 
[`78127fd`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/78127fdbafd4ec6bb9d5a6aeb6f86fbb480d7742).


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #22924: [SPARK-25891][PYTHON] Upgrade to Py4J 0.10.8.1

2018-11-01 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22924
  
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #22924: [SPARK-25891][PYTHON] Upgrade to Py4J 0.10.8.1

2018-11-01 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22924
  
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): 
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98361/
Test FAILed.


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #22924: [SPARK-25891][PYTHON] Upgrade to Py4J 0.10.8.1

2018-11-01 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22924
  
**[Test build #98361 has 
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98361/testReport)**
 for PR 22924 at commit 
[`9ce825e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9ce825eee9e05ec63ade8466d2903afc5e9cc037).
 * This patch **fails build dependency tests**.
 * This patch merges cleanly.
 * This patch adds no public classes.


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #22924: [SPARK-25891][PYTHON] Upgrade to Py4J 0.10.8.1

2018-11-01 Thread dongjoon-hyun
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22924
  
Since 2.4.0 is out, I think we can start to discuss this. This is for Spark 
2.4.1 to support Python 3.7 more officially.

@HyukjinKwon , @BryanCutler , @srowen , @cloud-fan , @gatorsmile . Could 
you guys give me some advice on this? And, do I need to change the JIRA issue 
types to a `BUG` since we don't allow a backport improvement?


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #22924: [SPARK-25891][PYTHON] Upgrade to Py4J 0.10.8.1

2018-11-01 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22924
  
**[Test build #98361 has 
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98361/testReport)**
 for PR 22924 at commit 
[`9ce825e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9ce825eee9e05ec63ade8466d2903afc5e9cc037).


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org