[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-13422][SQL] Use HashedRelation instead ...

2016-02-22 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11291


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-13422][SQL] Use HashedRelation instead ...

2016-02-22 Thread rxin
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11291#issuecomment-187452867
  
Thanks - merging in master.



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-13422][SQL] Use HashedRelation instead ...

2016-02-22 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11291#issuecomment-187451668
  
**[Test build #2567 has 
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2567/consoleFull)**
 for PR 11291 at commit 
[`eaf851d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/eaf851d5374bd80f37e48a8e11d533893cfd6910).
 * This patch passes all tests.
 * This patch merges cleanly.
 * This patch adds no public classes.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-13422][SQL] Use HashedRelation instead ...

2016-02-22 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11291#issuecomment-187423403
  
**[Test build #2567 has 
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2567/consoleFull)**
 for PR 11291 at commit 
[`eaf851d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/eaf851d5374bd80f37e48a8e11d533893cfd6910).


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-13422][SQL] Use HashedRelation instead ...

2016-02-22 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11291#issuecomment-187367833
  
**[Test build #2566 has 
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2566/consoleFull)**
 for PR 11291 at commit 
[`eaf851d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/eaf851d5374bd80f37e48a8e11d533893cfd6910).


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-13422][SQL] Use HashedRelation instead ...

2016-02-22 Thread hvanhovell
Github user hvanhovell commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11291#issuecomment-187109425
  
retest this please


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-13422][SQL] Use HashedRelation instead ...

2016-02-22 Thread hvanhovell
Github user hvanhovell commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11291#issuecomment-187109363
  
LGTM - pending tests


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-13422][SQL] Use HashedRelation instead ...

2016-02-21 Thread xguo27
Github user xguo27 commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11291#issuecomment-186923232
  
@hvanhovell I just rebased with your new PR, do you mind reviewing again?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-13422][SQL] Use HashedRelation instead ...

2016-02-21 Thread hvanhovell
Github user hvanhovell commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11291#issuecomment-186909702
  
@xguo27 you'll need rebase this. We just merged a PR that changes broadcast 
joins.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-13422][SQL] Use HashedRelation instead ...

2016-02-21 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11291#issuecomment-186909052
  
**[Test build #2558 has 
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2558/consoleFull)**
 for PR 11291 at commit 
[`a84975a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a84975a5fcee4b59cd144e23cca806970dc58164).
 * This patch passes all tests.
 * This patch merges cleanly.
 * This patch adds no public classes.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-13422][SQL] Use HashedRelation instead ...

2016-02-21 Thread hvanhovell
Github user hvanhovell commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11291#issuecomment-186896296
  
@xguo27 how expensive is the no-op? I'd rather avoid a pointless iteration 
in a hot code section.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-13422][SQL] Use HashedRelation instead ...

2016-02-21 Thread xguo27
Github user xguo27 commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11291#issuecomment-186893918
  
@hvanhovell In hashSemiJoin() function, when condition is empty, the 
boundCondition always evaluates to true here:


https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/8f744fe3d931c2380613b8e5bafa1bb1fd292839/sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/HashSemiJoin.scala#L42-L43

so the exists{...} part of these lines behaves as a No-Op.


https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/8f744fe3d931c2380613b8e5bafa1bb1fd292839/sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/HashSemiJoin.scala#L87-L89


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-13422][SQL] Use HashedRelation instead ...

2016-02-21 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11291#issuecomment-186892930
  
**[Test build #2558 has 
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2558/consoleFull)**
 for PR 11291 at commit 
[`a84975a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a84975a5fcee4b59cd144e23cca806970dc58164).


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-13422][SQL] Use HashedRelation instead ...

2016-02-21 Thread hvanhovell
Github user hvanhovell commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11291#issuecomment-186888525
  
I don't think I have enough karma to trigger a build... @rxin could you 
trigger a build?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-13422][SQL] Use HashedRelation instead ...

2016-02-21 Thread hvanhovell
Github user hvanhovell commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11291#issuecomment-186885302
  
@xguo27 Could you also take a look at the `hashSemiJoin(...)` function and 
see how this treats an empty condition?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-13422][SQL] Use HashedRelation instead ...

2016-02-21 Thread hvanhovell
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11291#discussion_r53571028
  
--- Diff: 
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/BroadcastLeftSemiJoinHash.scala
 ---
@@ -45,18 +45,15 @@ case class BroadcastLeftSemiJoinHash(
   row.copy()
 }.collect()
 
-if (condition.isEmpty) {
-  val hashSet = buildKeyHashSet(input.toIterator)
-  val broadcastedRelation = sparkContext.broadcast(hashSet)
+val hashRelation =
+  HashedRelation(input.toIterator, rightKeyGenerator, input.size)
+val broadcastedRelation = sparkContext.broadcast(hashRelation)
 
+if (condition.isEmpty) {
--- End diff --

I think it is safe to remove the entire block.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-13422][SQL] Use HashedRelation instead ...

2016-02-21 Thread xguo27
Github user xguo27 commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11291#issuecomment-186878372
  
@hvanhovell  I see, sorry for my lack of patience. : )


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-13422][SQL] Use HashedRelation instead ...

2016-02-21 Thread hvanhovell
Github user hvanhovell commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11291#issuecomment-186876984
  
It usually takes about 15 min before a test is triggered


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-13422][SQL] Use HashedRelation instead ...

2016-02-21 Thread xguo27
Github user xguo27 commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11291#issuecomment-186876120
  
Looks like the command did not trigger a test?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-13422][SQL] Use HashedRelation instead ...

2016-02-21 Thread hvanhovell
Github user hvanhovell commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11291#issuecomment-186875493
  
ok to test


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-13422][SQL] Use HashedRelation instead ...

2016-02-21 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11291#issuecomment-186872985
  
Can one of the admins verify this patch?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-13422][SQL] Use HashedRelation instead ...

2016-02-21 Thread xguo27
Github user xguo27 commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11291#issuecomment-186872660
  
@hvanhovell Could you please advise whether this is the right fix? All Left 
Semi related tests passed, but I'm not sure what other impact there might be to 
remove HashSet related methods.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-13422][SQL] Use HashedRelation instead ...

2016-02-21 Thread xguo27
GitHub user xguo27 opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11291

[SPARK-13422][SQL] Use HashedRelation instead of HashSet in Left Semi Joins



You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/xguo27/spark SPARK-13422

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11291.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #11291


commit a84975a5fcee4b59cd144e23cca806970dc58164
Author: Xiu Guo 
Date:   2016-02-21T17:10:01Z

[SPARK-13422][SQL] Use HashedRelation instead of HashSet in Left Semi Joins




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org