Re: Status and maturity of riak-cs

[Stefan Funk]

Thanks again Russell and Steve for your input. I answered you before
without adding the group.

We found LeoFS, Ceph and Minio Server to be interesting alternatives - but
haven't tested them.

Furthermore there is Pithos, FakeS3, Eucalyptus, Scality .

And there is Swift.

On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 8:35 AM, Russell Brown 
wrote:

> I was really only thinking of LeoFS, Ceph, and Joyent Manta.
>
> There must be others.
>
> Or stay on CS. What do you need to stay on it? Basho were certainly not
> doing anything.
>
> On 20 Jul 2017, at 06:57, Alex De la rosa  wrote:
>
> > "However there are alternatives under active development."... can you
> please list them? I'm also interested on a CS alternative.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Alex
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 9:27 PM, Russell Brown 
> wrote:
> > Hi Stefan
> > On the one hand, even before the demise of Basho, they’d stopped
> supporting Riak CS. On the other, there is an organisation based in Japan,
> but with an international remote team, that supports other CS customers, so
> may well be a choice of support.
> >
> > The CS code base has not had a huge amount of recent attention, but
> there are plenty of people running at, in industry, at reasonable scale.
> >
> > There’s a genuine market of providers of ex-Basho products, and a
> community of CS users. However there are alternatives under active
> development.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Russell
> >
> > On 19 Jul 2017, at 17:27, Stefan Funk  wrote:
> >
> > > Hi everybody,
> > >
> > > I'm new to Riak-CS and just joined the group.
> > >
> > > We've been exploring Riak-CS now for a couple of days and consider it
> as a potential inhouse-alternative to external S3-based storage providers.
> > >
> > > Given the last commit was in January 2016, the question rose as to how
> well the project is supported and how mature the solution is.
> > >
> > > I'd be very thankful for any comments from the community on this.
> > >
> > > Best regards
> > > Stefan
> > >
> > >
> > > ___
> > > riak-users mailing list
> > > riak-users@lists.basho.com
> > > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
> >
> >
> > ___
> > riak-users mailing list
> > riak-users@lists.basho.com
> > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
> >
> > ___
> > riak-users mailing list
> > riak-users@lists.basho.com
> > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
>
>
> ___
> riak-users mailing list
> riak-users@lists.basho.com
> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
>
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com

Re: Status and maturity of riak-cs

[Alex De la rosa]

I never had the time to implement CS but my idea was using it as a
photo/video storage for the social network I was building on Raik-KV. But
seeing Basho's situation is better to look for a CS alternative.

LeoFS looks good, and seems Rakuten is one of its sponsors... might well
test it.

Thanks,
Alex

On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 10:35 AM, Russell Brown 
wrote:

> I was really only thinking of LeoFS, Ceph, and Joyent Manta.
>
> There must be others.
>
> Or stay on CS. What do you need to stay on it? Basho were certainly not
> doing anything.
>
> On 20 Jul 2017, at 06:57, Alex De la rosa  wrote:
>
> > "However there are alternatives under active development."... can you
> please list them? I'm also interested on a CS alternative.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Alex
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 9:27 PM, Russell Brown 
> wrote:
> > Hi Stefan
> > On the one hand, even before the demise of Basho, they’d stopped
> supporting Riak CS. On the other, there is an organisation based in Japan,
> but with an international remote team, that supports other CS customers, so
> may well be a choice of support.
> >
> > The CS code base has not had a huge amount of recent attention, but
> there are plenty of people running at, in industry, at reasonable scale.
> >
> > There’s a genuine market of providers of ex-Basho products, and a
> community of CS users. However there are alternatives under active
> development.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Russell
> >
> > On 19 Jul 2017, at 17:27, Stefan Funk  wrote:
> >
> > > Hi everybody,
> > >
> > > I'm new to Riak-CS and just joined the group.
> > >
> > > We've been exploring Riak-CS now for a couple of days and consider it
> as a potential inhouse-alternative to external S3-based storage providers.
> > >
> > > Given the last commit was in January 2016, the question rose as to how
> well the project is supported and how mature the solution is.
> > >
> > > I'd be very thankful for any comments from the community on this.
> > >
> > > Best regards
> > > Stefan
> > >
> > >
> > > ___
> > > riak-users mailing list
> > > riak-users@lists.basho.com
> > > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
> >
> >
> > ___
> > riak-users mailing list
> > riak-users@lists.basho.com
> > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
> >
> > ___
> > riak-users mailing list
> > riak-users@lists.basho.com
> > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
>
>
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com

Re: Status and maturity of riak-cs

[Russell Brown]

I was really only thinking of LeoFS, Ceph, and Joyent Manta.

There must be others.

Or stay on CS. What do you need to stay on it? Basho were certainly not doing 
anything.

On 20 Jul 2017, at 06:57, Alex De la rosa  wrote:

> "However there are alternatives under active development."... can you please 
> list them? I'm also interested on a CS alternative.
> 
> Thanks,
> Alex
> 
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 9:27 PM, Russell Brown  
> wrote:
> Hi Stefan
> On the one hand, even before the demise of Basho, they’d stopped supporting 
> Riak CS. On the other, there is an organisation based in Japan, but with an 
> international remote team, that supports other CS customers, so may well be a 
> choice of support.
> 
> The CS code base has not had a huge amount of recent attention, but there are 
> plenty of people running at, in industry, at reasonable scale.
> 
> There’s a genuine market of providers of ex-Basho products, and a community 
> of CS users. However there are alternatives under active development.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Russell
> 
> On 19 Jul 2017, at 17:27, Stefan Funk  wrote:
> 
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > I'm new to Riak-CS and just joined the group.
> >
> > We've been exploring Riak-CS now for a couple of days and consider it as a 
> > potential inhouse-alternative to external S3-based storage providers.
> >
> > Given the last commit was in January 2016, the question rose as to how well 
> > the project is supported and how mature the solution is.
> >
> > I'd be very thankful for any comments from the community on this.
> >
> > Best regards
> > Stefan
> >
> >
> > ___
> > riak-users mailing list
> > riak-users@lists.basho.com
> > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
> 
> 
> ___
> riak-users mailing list
> riak-users@lists.basho.com
> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
> 
> ___
> riak-users mailing list
> riak-users@lists.basho.com
> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com


___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com