Re: Docker support
Adam, I'll have someone give you a call to discuss your requirements. -- *Justin Pease* VP, Services Basho Technologies, Inc. On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Adam Winter wrote: > Jon, > > Is there anyone I can talk to to confirm that the licensed commercial > version with a support contract is or is not supported running in a Docker > container in production environments, assuming the technical challenges you > describe can be addressed? > > > Adam Winter > 614-446-9033 > Delivery Lead > Pillar Technology Group, LLC > awin...@pillartechnology.com > > Interact with me on: > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/adamwinter> | Twitter > <http://www.twitter.com/AdamWinter> > > > > > > On Jul 13, 2016, at 4:08 PM, Jon Brisbin wrote: > > I guess to answer at least one part of your question on whether it's > "encouraged" or not: it depends on what you want to do with it. > > I can't speak for the support side of things but on the engineering side > anyway we're using Docker containers fairly happily to do things like > create ephemeral clusters for doing adhoc testing. It makes for a very nice > way to run a small cluster on a laptop or on a Mesos slave in a Jenkins > build with very similar expectations (I won't say identical because > networking issues can rear their head). I created images based on the > latest TS and KV packages. There are docs in the READMEs: > > https://hub.docker.com/r/basho/riak-ts/ > https://hub.docker.com/r/basho/riak-kv/ > > Running a production Riak cluster, however, raises some concerns that I'm > pretty sure no one really has a good handle on. Networking issues can > become difficult unless you use something like Weave. Volumes could also be > an issue. docker-compose and Docker Swarm should help with some of this but > we don't have any docs that demonstrate how to use them. > > I'd say we also don't have a comprehensive picture of performance > characteristics of running a Dockerized Riak cluster since there's several > moving parts to consider. We need to investigate bridged vs host networking > mode and using different volume drivers, etc... There is some valid concern > that the key reasons you'd want to use Riak to begin with are somewhat > ameliorated by a Docker container's ephemeral nature; e.g. it's really easy > to kill off containers which might lead to accidental data loss. > > jb > > > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 1:47 PM Adam Winter > wrote: > >> Is a Docker-based deployment of Riak officially supported by Basho and >> encouraged? >> >> I see articles of how to configure Riak to run in Docker images, but no >> explicit mention of it within the list of supported platforms. >> >> >> Adam Winter >> 614-446-9033 >> Delivery Lead >> Pillar Technology Group, LLC >> awin...@pillartechnology.com >> >> Interact with me on: >> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/adamwinter> | Twitter >> <http://www.twitter.com/AdamWinter> >> >> >> >> >> >> ___ >> riak-users mailing list >> riak-users@lists.basho.com >> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com >> > > > ___ > riak-users mailing list > riak-users@lists.basho.com > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com > > ___ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
Re: is Riak S2 same as Riak CS 2.1.1??
Alex, Apologies for the confusion. Riak S2 is a rebranding of Riak CS. So yes, they are the same. -- *Justin Pease* VP, Services Basho Technologies, Inc. On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 8:35 AM, Alex De la rosa wrote: > Hi there, > > I was trying to download Riak S2 to do some testings on it, but seems the > download page takes you to Riak CS2.1.1: > > http://docs.basho.com/riak/cs/2.1.1/downloads/ > > Are they the same? > > Also, in https://packagecloud.io/basho there is no indications of Riak-s2 > but Riak-cs. > > Is very confusing. > > Thanks, > Alex > > ___ > riak-users mailing list > riak-users@lists.basho.com > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com > > ___ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
Re: Riak Enterprise Upgrade
Hello Pradheep, I will email you directly with information on how to contact support as an Enterprise user. -- *Justin Pease* VP, Services Basho Technologies, Inc. On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 5:09 PM, Pradheep s wrote: > Hi, > > Could anyone answer below queries with regard to upgrade? > > I am currently running Riak V1.4.11 enterprise version with multi-data > center replication. > I want to upgrade to Riak 2.0.6 version. > 1. Should i follow Rolling upgrade process as in below? > http://docs.basho.com/riak/latest/ops/upgrading/rolling-upgrades/ > I don't see any specific instructions to handle replications. I want to > verify if replication works after upgrade. > > 2. Is there any specific riak enterprise rpm to be used for upgrade or the > standard package avaialble in below can be used? > http://docs.basho.com/riak/2.0.6/downloads/ > > 3. Which would be a stable version to upgrade to for production, > 2.0.6/2.1.1/2.1.3? > > 4. Should the replication cluster also be upgraded on the same day or an > upgraded riak cluster can replicate to non-upgraded riak cluster? > > Thanks, > Pradheep > > > ___ > riak-users mailing list > riak-users@lists.basho.com > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com > > ___ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
Re: Reg. Keys not synced in RIAK Replication
Hello Ram, As you are inquiring about functionality of our Enterprise software, it would be preferable to address this within our support desk that you would have access to as an Enterprise customer. Please open a new support request at help.basho.com. If you need help doing so, please email me directly and I'd be happy to assist. -- *Justin Pease* VP, Services Basho Technologies, Inc. On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 2:59 AM, Ram C wrote: > Team, > > I have a couple of RIAK clusters, both running on RIAK version 1.4.10. The > reason for 2 clusters is we are moving from one set of hardware to another. > Full sync and real-time sync is enabled between them. Issuing the > "riak-repl > status" command says that the sync is working fine. > > The issue I am facing is, the count of the keys do not match between the > source and the destination cluster in a specific application bucket. Based > on the key count on source and destination cluster, I could see that 4000+ > keys that are present in the source, that are not present in the > destination. > > For example: > Source Cluster, Key Count - 104,000 > Destination Cluster, Key Count - 100,000 > > The Source Cluster is currently taking traffic, while Destination Cluster > is > idle. We plan to switch traffic once we have complete replication of keys. > > Could you please advise if there is a recommended way to identify/move > those > 4000 keys that are not synced to the destination cluster? > > Thanks, > Ram C > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://riak-users.197444.n3.nabble.com/Reg-Keys-not-synced-in-RIAK-Replication-tp4033690.html > Sent from the Riak Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > ___ > riak-users mailing list > riak-users@lists.basho.com > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com > ___ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
