occupancy

2007-12-04 Thread Igor Djerdj
Dear all,
The following question is addressed more to FULLPROF users. I want to refine 
atomic occupancies of Fe-doped TiO2 for instance. Assuming that Ti is 
substituted with Fe at some sites, how can I provide that the sum of 
occupancies of Fe and Ti is 1 or 100%?
Regards,
Igor Djerdj


RE: occupancy

2007-12-04 Thread Yokochi, Alexandre
Igor,

 

Back when I used to do this a lot, the easiest way was to just start the
occupancy of the two sites at 1 (e.g., 95% + 5%)  then give one site a
given variable and the second the opposite sign for the same variable
(e.g., 20.5 and -20.5).  I've been out of the XRD game for a few years,
so there may be a better way in Fullprof nowadays...

 

Alex Y

 


Dr. Alexandre (Alex) F. T. Yokochi
Assistant Professor
Department of Chemical Engineering
Oregon State University
Corvallis, OR 97331-2702

Voice:  (541) 737-9357
Fax:  (541) 737-4600
http://oregonstate.edu/~yokochia 



From: Igor Djerdj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2007 3:45 PM
To: rietveld_l@ill.fr
Subject: occupancy

 

Dear all,

The following question is addressed more to FULLPROF users. I want to
refine atomic occupancies of Fe-doped TiO2 for instance. Assuming that
Ti is substituted with Fe at some sites, how can I provide that the sum
of occupancies of Fe and Ti is 1 or 100%?

Regards,

Igor Djerdj

 



RE: occupancy

2007-12-04 Thread Matthew.Rowles
Can you set up equations in FullProf?
 
Refine the occupancy of Ti and set occ(Fe) = 1 - occ(Ti).
 


Cheers

Matthew


Matthew Rowles

CSIRO Minerals
Box 312
Clayton South, Victoria
AUSTRALIA 3169

Ph: +61 3 9545 8892
Fax: +61 3 9562 8919 (site)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

 

  _  

From: Igor Djerdj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, 5 December 2007 10:45
To: rietveld_l@ill.fr
Subject: occupancy


Dear all,
The following question is addressed more to FULLPROF users. I want to
refine atomic occupancies of Fe-doped TiO2 for instance. Assuming that
Ti is substituted with Fe at some sites, how can I provide that the sum
of occupancies of Fe and Ti is 1 or 100%?
Regards,
Igor Djerdj
 


Re: FullProf on Ubuntu 7.10

2007-12-04 Thread Jonathan Wright

Hi there,

Since I just got the graphics card working again after a similar 
upgrade, I'm feeling brave enough to try without wine (running).


$ file fp2k
ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1, statically linked, 
corrupted section header size


... which shows up on google/ubuntu forums as being a upx issue, so:

$ sudo apt-get install upx-ucl
$ upx -d fp2k
  Ultimate Packer for eXecutables
 Copyright (C) 1996,1997,1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007
UPX 3.00Markus Oberhumer, Laszlo Molnar  John Reiser   Apr 27th 
2007


   File size Ratio  Format  Name
     --   ---   ---
  6070937 -   1629094   26.83%linux/386fp2k

Unpacked 1 file.

$ ./fp2k
=**
=** PROGRAM FullProf.2k (Version 3.80 - Jan2007-ILL JRC) **
=**
=   M U L T I -- P A T T E R N
=Rietveld, Profile Matching  Integrated Intensity
= Refinement of X-ray and/or Neutron Data
= (Multi_Pattern: WindowsConsole-version)

 == Give the code of the files (xx for xx.pcr):


I haven't tested it any further than that. For winplotr_2006, after the 
upx -d, I also needed:


$ sudo apt-get install libmotif3

... and winplotr runs too.

What's so amazing about linux? Someone else will have found the problem 
before you, also solved the problem before you; and yet still it is your 
problem to work on! Not like research eh?


Best,

Jon

Wenduo Zhou wrote:

Dear Rietvelders,

I met a problem to use FullProf on Ubuntu 7.10.  I just installed this 
Linux system.  fp2k cannot run right now, but return 127 (-1) without 
any output.  In my another machine with Ubuntu 7.06, fp2k runs just 
fine.  Is there anyone who met this problem before and know how to 
 solve it?   


Thanks for your advices.

Best,

Wenduo Zhou




Re: occupancy

2007-12-04 Thread Daniel Toebbens

Igor Djerdj schrieb:


The following question is addressed more to FULLPROF users. I want to 
refine atomic occupancies of Fe-doped TiO2 for instance. Assuming that 
Ti is substituted with Fe at some sites, how can I provide that the 
sum of occupancies of Fe and Ti is 1 or 100%?

There are two options I'm aware of:

1) has been mentioned by Alexandre already: Using the same parameter 
code number for both occupancies, setting the starting values to the 
correct chemistry and coupling the damping factors to keep the chemistry 
fixed. This look like this:

Mn1  MN0.12500  0.12500  0.12500  0.38224   5.00252   0   0   0  0
   0.00 0.00 0.00   261.00   -271.00
Cr1  CR  0.12500  0.12500  0.12500  0.38224   2.99748   0   0   00
   0.00 0.00 0.00   261.00271.00
Mn2  MN  0.5  0.5  0.5  0.38923   2.99748   0   0   0
0 
   0.00 0.00 0.00   411.00271.00
Cr2  CR  0.5  0.5  0.5  0.38923  13.00253   0   0   0
0
   0.00 0.00 0.00   411.00   -271.00


2) If the distribution is over more than two positions, you can use 
linear restraints. You can set them in the pcr-Editor. In the .pcr-file 
it looks like this:

  a) NLI is the number of restraints.
  b) The linear restraints themselfs are given behind the distance and 
angular restraints:
Chemcomp  3   28.000.10  - Current 
calculated value:28.001480

 1.  5   2.  6   1.  7
This example couples the 3 parameters with the code numbers 5, 6, 7 to a 
total sum of 28. The value of
parameter 6 is multiplied by a factor 2 in this summation (to keep a 
constant charge in a distribution of Na+1 and Ca+2).




--
***
Daniel M. TöbbensTel.: +43 512 507-5532
Institut für Mineralogie und PetrographieFax : +43 512 507-2926
Universität Innsbruck
Innrain 52, Bruno-Sander-Haus
A-6020 Innsbruck, Österreich
***