Re: [atlas] LLDP Support for RIPE Probes

[Rickard Östman]

awesome idea.

another useful feature would be to let the probe share via the atlas portal
what device and port it's connected to. To the owner alone, that is.

/Rickard

On Tuesday, 22 December 2015, Max Gebert  wrote:

> Hey!
>
> I could definitely see the appeal of such a function in our network.
> +1 from me!
>
> Best regards/ Hälsningar
> Max Gebert
>
> 22 dec 2015 kl. 18:23 skrev Chris Elliott  >:
>
> +1
>
> On Tuesday, December 22, 2015, Annika Wickert  > wrote:
>
>> Hi everybody,
>>
>> I would like to see LLDP support in the future on the RIPE probes.
>>
>> It would be a really helpful feature, to see on what Port the RIPE Probe
>> resides at the moment.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Annika
>>
>>
>
> --
> Chris Elliott
> CCIE # 2013
>
> “You and I are mirages that perceive themselves”
> --Douglas Hofstadter
>
>

Re: [atlas] LLDP Support for RIPE Probes

[Daniel Suchy]

+1

On 22.12.2015 22:31, Rickard Östman wrote:
> awesome idea.
> 
> another useful feature would be to let the probe share via the atlas
> portal what device and port it's connected to. To the owner alone, that is.
> 
> /Rickard
> 
> On Tuesday, 22 December 2015, Max Gebert  > wrote:
> 
> Hey!
> 
> I could definitely see the appeal of such a function in our network. 
> +1 from me! 
> 
> Best regards/ Hälsningar
> Max Gebert
> 
> 22 dec 2015 kl. 18:23 skrev Chris Elliott :
> 
>> +1
>>
>> On Tuesday, December 22, 2015, Annika Wickert
>>  wrote:
>>
>> Hi everybody,
>>
>> I would like to see LLDP support in the future on the RIPE probes.
>>
>> It would be a really helpful feature, to see on what Port the
>> RIPE Probe resides at the moment.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Annika
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Chris Elliott
>> CCIE # 2013
>>
>> “You and I are mirages that perceive themselves”
>> --Douglas Hofstadter
>>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [atlas] LLDP Support for RIPE Probes

[Max Gebert]

Hey!

I could definitely see the appeal of such a function in our network. 
+1 from me! 

Best regards/ Hälsningar
Max Gebert

> 22 dec 2015 kl. 18:23 skrev Chris Elliott :
> 
> +1
> 
>> On Tuesday, December 22, 2015, Annika Wickert  
>> wrote:
>> Hi everybody,
>> 
>> I would like to see LLDP support in the future on the RIPE probes.
>> 
>> It would be a really helpful feature, to see on what Port the RIPE Probe 
>> resides at the moment.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Annika
> 
> 
> -- 
> Chris Elliott
> CCIE # 2013
> “You and I are mirages that perceive themselves”
> --Douglas Hofstadter

Re: [atlas] LLDP Support for RIPE Probes

[Nick Hilliard]

yes.  YES!

Nick

Daniel Suchy wrote:
> +1
> 
> On 22.12.2015 22:31, Rickard Östman wrote:
>> awesome idea.
>>
>> another useful feature would be to let the probe share via the atlas
>> portal what device and port it's connected to. To the owner alone, that is.
>>
>> /Rickard
>>
>> On Tuesday, 22 December 2015, Max Gebert > > wrote:
>>
>> Hey!
>>
>> I could definitely see the appeal of such a function in our network. 
>> +1 from me! 
>>
>> Best regards/ Hälsningar
>> Max Gebert
>>
>> 22 dec 2015 kl. 18:23 skrev Chris Elliott :
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, December 22, 2015, Annika Wickert
>>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi everybody,
>>>
>>> I would like to see LLDP support in the future on the RIPE probes.
>>>
>>> It would be a really helpful feature, to see on what Port the
>>> RIPE Probe resides at the moment.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Annika
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Chris Elliott
>>> CCIE # 2013
>>>
>>> “You and I are mirages that perceive themselves”
>>> --Douglas Hofstadter
>>>
> 

Re: [atlas] LLDP Support for RIPE Probes

[Marco Slater]

Agreed! +1

-Marco

> On 22 Dec 2015, at 23:51, Nick Hilliard  wrote:
> 
> yes.  YES!
> 
> Nick
> 
> Daniel Suchy wrote:
>> +1
>> 
>>> On 22.12.2015 22:31, Rickard Östman wrote:
>>> awesome idea.
>>> 
>>> another useful feature would be to let the probe share via the atlas
>>> portal what device and port it's connected to. To the owner alone, that is.
>>> 
>>> /Rickard
>>> 
>>> On Tuesday, 22 December 2015, Max Gebert >> > wrote:
>>> 
>>>Hey!
>>> 
>>>I could definitely see the appeal of such a function in our network. 
>>>+1 from me! 
>>> 
>>>Best regards/ Hälsningar
>>>Max Gebert
>>> 
22 dec 2015 kl. 18:23 skrev Chris Elliott :
 
+1
 
On Tuesday, December 22, 2015, Annika Wickert
 wrote:
 
Hi everybody,
 
I would like to see LLDP support in the future on the RIPE probes.
 
It would be a really helpful feature, to see on what Port the
RIPE Probe resides at the moment.
 
Cheers,
Annika
 
 
 
-- 
Chris Elliott
CCIE # 2013
 
“You and I are mirages that perceive themselves”
--Douglas Hofstadter
> 
> 

[atlas] Using DomainMON instead of DSNMON

[Vesna Manojlovic]

Hi Klaus, all,

On 22-dec.-15 06:23, Klaus Darilion wrote:

Any plans to offer DNSMON also for the ngTLDs (maybe as paid service)?


For all those who do not fulfill current criteria, there is another way 
to use features of DNSMON -- it's called DomainMON:


https://atlas.ripe.net/domainmon

This enables all RIPE Atlas users to specify, as a target of 
measurements, their own domain: second level, third level,

or "ngTLD" (or "vanity domains" as I like to call them ;-)

Measurements are performed from probes instead of anchors, and need to 
be "paid" by user's own credits.


More details: 
https://labs.ripe.net/Members/suzanne_taylor_muzzin/ripe-atlas-domainmon-is-here


In order to earn more credits, users can:
0) have the credits transferred to them by another generous user
1) be an LIR/member, and claim 1.000.000 credits each month
2) host one or multiple probes
3) host one or more anchors
4) sponsor an anchor
5) become a sponsor for RIPE Atlas by "adopting" the probes, or 
distributing their sponsored probes themselves:

https://atlas.ripe.net/sponsors

Regards,
Vesna

ps

Klaus, if you think that the "ngTLDs" should be treated differently, 
please re-start the discussion on DNS-WG mailing list; after that, this 
would have to be approved by RIPE NCC membership since DNSMON is, in a 
way, "subsidized" by "free credits" from the RIPE Atlas system, since 
ccTLDs are considered important infrastructure "for the god of the 
Internet".

Re: [atlas] LLDP Support for RIPE Probes

[Alistair Mackenzie]

Is this really necessary?

The MAC address can be viewed from your ripe account which you can then use
in conjunction with the mac address table.

On 22 December 2015 at 13:21, Annika Wickert 
wrote:

> Hi everybody,
>
> I would like to see LLDP support in the future on the RIPE probes.
>
> It would be a really helpful feature, to see on what Port the RIPE Probe
> resides at the moment.
>
> Cheers,
> Annika
>
>

Re: [atlas] LLDP Support for RIPE Probes

[Annika Wickert]

For bigger networks it is necessary because not everyone of our network 
team has an RIPE account or access to LIR so I cannot share the 
information of the probe.


And it's always good for automatic documentation.

On 22/12/15 14:23, Alistair Mackenzie wrote:

Is this really necessary?

The MAC address can be viewed from your ripe account which you can 
then use in conjunction with the mac address table.


On 22 December 2015 at 13:21, Annika Wickert 
> wrote:


Hi everybody,

I would like to see LLDP support in the future on the RIPE probes.

It would be a really helpful feature, to see on what Port the RIPE
Probe resides at the moment.

Cheers,
Annika

Re: [atlas] LLDP Support for RIPE Probes

[Chris Elliott]

+1

On Tuesday, December 22, 2015, Annika Wickert 
wrote:

> Hi everybody,
>
> I would like to see LLDP support in the future on the RIPE probes.
>
> It would be a really helpful feature, to see on what Port the RIPE Probe
> resides at the moment.
>
> Cheers,
> Annika
>
>

-- 
Chris Elliott
CCIE # 2013

“You and I are mirages that perceive themselves”
--Douglas Hofstadter