Re: [atlas] check dns64/nat64 behavior ?
On 2020/02/21 14:50 , Thomas Schäfer wrote: > Am 21.02.20 um 14:38 schrieb Thomas Schäfer: >> Hi, >> >> is there a simple way to check the reachability of IPv6 targets by >> probes behind NAT64? > > IPv4 targets of course. On NAT64, an IPv4 address is accessed over IPv6. You do need to disable the check if the domainname exists.
Re: [atlas] check dns64/nat64 behavior ?
Am 21.02.20 um 14:38 schrieb Thomas Schäfer: Hi, is there a simple way to check the reachability of IPv6 targets by probes behind NAT64? IPv4 targets of course.
[atlas] check dns64/nat64 behavior ?
Hi, is there a simple way to check the reachability of IPv6 targets by probes behind NAT64? e.g. If I try to ping www.t-online.de with Adress Family IPv6 I get immediately the error " No IPv6 address found for target" instead of "measuremnet created". Same problem exists for DNS measurements. Regards, thomas
Re: [atlas] Probes were incorrectly not tagged with the stability tags
Chris Amin wrote on 21/02/2020 12:43: Just for clarity, we do not yet tag probes as being stable over IPv5. best to be prepared all the same. Nick
Re: [atlas] Probes were incorrectly not tagged with the stability tags
On 21/02/2020 13:32, Chris Amin wrote:
> Over the past month there have been issues with the
> "system-ipv[45]-stable-{1,30,90}d" tags
Just for clarity, we do not yet tag probes as being stable over IPv5.
[atlas] Probes were incorrectly not tagged with the stability tags
Dear colleagues,
Over the past month there have been issues with the
"system-ipv[45]-stable-{1,30,90}d" tags, which were not applied to many
of the probes that should have had them. This was caused by accidental
data format changes from a backend migration.
The issue should now be fixed, so probes will have the correct tags
applied. If you notice any persisting issues then please let us know!
Apologies for any inconvenience.
Kind regards,
Chris
