Re: [atlas] IPv4-only Anchors Now Supported

2016-08-12 Thread Nick Hilliard 
Peter Koch wrote:
> the article says "However, we will only support IPv4-only anchors hosted
> in ASNs that cannot announce IPv6 for technical reasons.".
> Could the NCC share examples (respectfully anonymized) of such
> _technical_ (as opposed to "technical") reasons?

anything in Iran probably falls into this category.

There are no real technical reasons left for not supporting ipv6, only
policy reasons.

Nick

Re: [atlas] IPv4-only Anchors Now Supported

2016-08-12 Thread Peter Koch 
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 10:44:39AM +0200, Robert Kisteleki wrote:

> We've decided to support "IPv4-only" anchors in ASNs where IPv6 is not
> available. You can learn more in this RIPE Labs article:

the article says "However, we will only support IPv4-only anchors hosted
in ASNs that cannot announce IPv6 for technical reasons.".
Could the NCC share examples (respectfully anonymized) of such
_technical_ (as opposed to "technical") reasons?

-Peter

Re: [atlas] IPv4-only Anchors Now Supported

2016-08-12 Thread Randy Bush 
where do i file a feature requenst for anchors with ipv6 to display
"connectivity may suck?"

randy

Re: [atlas] IPv4-only Anchors Now Supported

2016-08-12 Thread Gert Doering 
Hi,

On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 10:44:39AM +0200, Robert Kisteleki wrote:
> We've decided to support "IPv4-only" anchors in ASNs where IPv6 is not
> available. You can learn more in this RIPE Labs article:

Uh, what?

It is not April first.

Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AGVorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14  Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444   USt-IdNr.: DE813185279


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature