Re: [RDD] Resample Library

[Aaron]

I compiled rdconvert.c and can confirm it's working...

So running:

for f in 0*.wav; do echo $f; rdconvert --destination-sample-rate=48000
--destination-file=/var/newsnd/$f /var/snd/$f; done

Then shutting down rd services, reconfiguring for 48000, moving newsnd to
snd and firing it up should work?  The waveforms etc will all be OK
(because they're stored in the wav files themselves)?

Many thanks

On Wed, 4 Dec 2019 at 23:01, Fred Gleason  wrote:

> On Dec 4, 2019, at 16:37, Aaron  wrote:
>
> However I am getting a Segmentation Fault (CentOS 7 with RD 3.2 binaries):
>
>
> Fixed in git ‘master’.
>
> Cheers!
>
>
> |-|
> | Frederick F. Gleason, Jr. | Chief Developer |
> |   | Paravel Systems |
> |-|
> | A room without books is like a body without a soul. |
> | |
> | -- Cicero   |
> |-|
>
>
___
Rivendell-dev mailing list
Rivendell-dev@lists.rivendellaudio.org
http://caspian.paravelsystems.com/mailman/listinfo/rivendell-dev

Re: [RDD] RDImport and Disk Space

[nathaniel.steele]

Doeas anyone here have any opinions on ZFS? Does anyone host their /var/snd on 
a NAS? I’ve been looking at building a  freenas system to use around the 
office, which use ZFS.

 

In the past I used two Rivendell servers, with one rsyncing to the other 
nightly, and backing up the db nightly. I also rsynced to a NAS appliance, so 
the data lived in three places.

 

From: rivendell-dev-boun...@lists.rivendellaudio.org 
 On Behalf Of Alan Smith
Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2019 7:03 PM
To: User discussion about the Rivendell Radio Automation System 

Subject: Re: [RDD] RDImport and Disk Space

 

Again, still consider myself very new to this, but what I have started to do is 
use Raid1, and setup postfix to send email/text failure notifications. 

 

I haven't had a real failure yet, but during testing (including simulated 
failure on the bench) it works pretty well.

 

-Alan

 

On 11/30/2019 6:47 PM, Rob Landry wrote:

On Thu, 28 Nov 2019, Lorne Tyndale wrote: 




That's overall good advice, the only things I'd add is that I'm not a 
big fan of Raid 5, I prefer Raid 1 which provides as full 1:1 mirror for 
better redundancy and robustness.  When hard disks cost a lot I could 


I don't like RAID at all. I prefer to build a second, fully functioning RD 
machine and have it mirror the first one. If I lose the first one, I switch to 
the backup. 

My problem with RAID boils down to the reality that most of the RD systems I 
build are for stations with no resident technical person. If a drive in a RAID 
array fails, no one will notice. I'll hear about it when a second drive fails 
and the station goes off the air. 


Rob 





___
Rivendell-dev mailing list
Rivendell-dev@lists.rivendellaudio.org 
 
http://caspian.paravelsystems.com/mailman/listinfo/rivendell-dev

 

___
Rivendell-dev mailing list
Rivendell-dev@lists.rivendellaudio.org
http://caspian.paravelsystems.com/mailman/listinfo/rivendell-dev