[Citadel Development] Re: systemd: socket activation

[Stefan]

Mon Apr 02 2012 19:17:40 EDT from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored  Subject: Re: systemd: socket activation

Looks like a nice idea. Will we server software developers have to account for this if distribution vendors adopt it? 


The software developers can implement socket activation if they like to support it. But they don't have to.

[Citadel Development] Re: systemd: socket activation

[IGnatius T Foobar]

Looks like a nice idea.  Will we server software developers have to account
for this if distribution vendors adopt it? 
 

[Citadel Development] Re: systemd

[IGnatius T Foobar]

 >I'm looking into systemd stuff right now. I'm not sure if citadel is  
 >"systemd ready" (I haven't tested it yet), but this document  
 >(http://0pointer.de/public/systemd-man/daemon.html) describes  
 >systemd's requirements on a daemon. May be it's of interest for  
 >someone.   
  
 Irrespective of what systemd wants, that looks like a pretty good checklist
of things a program ought to be doing when running as a daemon.  I'll make
a note of it and run through the list when I'm done squashing this ONE LAST
BUG that's been holding up the 8.02 release. 
  
 (I did make a lot of progress on it and we're almost there!!)