Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Always open (and initialize) the entire database at once (#1119)
Conan-Kudo approved this pull request. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1119#pullrequestreview-374514672___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Always open (and initialize) the entire database at once (#1119)
Erk, oops, disregard that... I clicked the wrong thing... -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1119#issuecomment-598851749___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add support for fsverity signatures (#1121)
Care to explain to the uninitiated layman such as myself why would we want/need this in rpm, since there already is IMA? Adding per-file data to headers is costly, and IMA already bloats headers significantly. Adding more of the same (as it kinda seems to me on the outset) needs to have some pretty convincing benefits. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1121#issuecomment-598598663___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Make "rpmspec -q --srpm foo.spec" say .src, not .%{arch} (#1116)
Having rpmspec default query match with what rpmbuild produces seems like a nice idea, the implementation is what I have some issues with, primarily that the new default is a magic internal behavior that you can't use it in other queries. I think this belongs to a tag extension, RPMTAG_PKGNEVRA or something like that. Including or otherwise using stuff from build/ in lib/ is not okay, but you don't need access to spec struct for that, look for RPMTAG_NOSOURCE in the header, it should be populated at that point. And if it's not, maybe we can change that. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1116#issuecomment-598595985___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
