Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] rpmbuild fails with symbolic links (#1682)

[skysley]

My guess is that it is wrongly assumed that the size of a symbolic link equals 
the length of the path that the symbolic link points to.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1682#issuecomment-841154633___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] "%{?load:foo}" does not work with RPM 4.16.90 (#1669)

[Michael Schroeder]

Isn't the bug in rpmlint that broke using %{load:} fixed with  
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpmlint/pull/633 ?

I.e. you can now simply use `%{load:}` instead of the undocumented `%{?load:}`, 
right?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1669#issuecomment-841295343___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] "%{?load:foo}" does not work with RPM 4.16.90 (#1669)

[Jun Aruga]

Yes, the bug in the rpmlint was fixed. For now the `%{load:foo}` is used in 
`ruby.spec` on the Fedora rawhide (development version) branch instead of 
`%{?load:foo}`. 

We are asking here to understand more about the details and context.

* "If I am not mistaken, at that time, the question mark allowed to build at 
least SRPM via older RPM." Did you remember it? Why did you drop it as 
undocumented feature? I think It's more about a communication between us. 
* "The question mark was useful for backward compatibility."


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1669#issuecomment-841352926___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint