Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] rpmbuild fails with symbolic links (#1682)
My guess is that it is wrongly assumed that the size of a symbolic link equals the length of the path that the symbolic link points to. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1682#issuecomment-841154633___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] "%{?load:foo}" does not work with RPM 4.16.90 (#1669)
Isn't the bug in rpmlint that broke using %{load:} fixed with https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpmlint/pull/633 ? I.e. you can now simply use `%{load:}` instead of the undocumented `%{?load:}`, right? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1669#issuecomment-841295343___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] "%{?load:foo}" does not work with RPM 4.16.90 (#1669)
Yes, the bug in the rpmlint was fixed. For now the `%{load:foo}` is used in `ruby.spec` on the Fedora rawhide (development version) branch instead of `%{?load:foo}`. We are asking here to understand more about the details and context. * "If I am not mistaken, at that time, the question mark allowed to build at least SRPM via older RPM." Did you remember it? Why did you drop it as undocumented feature? I think It's more about a communication between us. * "The question mark was useful for backward compatibility." -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1669#issuecomment-841352926___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint