Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RPM v6 package format, first public draft for commenting (Discussion #2374)
Relevant https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2462 -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/discussions/2374#discussioncomment-7149254 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RPM v6 package format, first public draft for commenting (Discussion #2374)
What does "dribble" mean in this context? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/discussions/2374#discussioncomment-7149210 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] rpm installation on MacBook M2 Pro (Discussion #2684)
I am trying to install `rpm` on MacBook M2 Pro using `brew`. But it fails with the below error. Same command works fine on M1 chip version of MacBook. ``` brew install rpm rpm: Linux is required for this software. attr: Linux is required for this software. acl: Linux is required for this software. elfutils: Linux is required for this software. libcap: Linux is required for this software. Error: rpm: Unsatisfied requirements failed this build. ``` -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/discussions/2684 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] WIP: Use Python Stable ABI for the bindings (PR #2674)
See my earlier comment, I don't WANT it to fall back to current behavior because then you never really know whether a patch is SABI compliant or not because your setup *may* depend on these factors. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2674#issuecomment-1740906819 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] WIP: Use Python Stable ABI for the bindings (PR #2674)
As it stands, we gracefully fall back to the current behavior anyway, so I don't think the CMake stuff is a reason to hold up this PR. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2674#issuecomment-1740870818 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] WIP: Use Python Stable ABI for the bindings (PR #2674)
Nah. It ain't that hard really. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2674#issuecomment-1740851046 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] WIP: Use Python Stable ABI for the bindings (PR #2674)
Well, I guess then we should hope for [my CentOS Stream MR](https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/rpms/cmake/-/merge_requests/11) to be merged? 😅 -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2674#issuecomment-1740838362 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] WIP: Use Python Stable ABI for the bindings (PR #2674)
I did look at the FindPython module, and to me that looks just the kind of gibberish we left autotools behind for. No thanks. I'm fine importing it as long as it's somebody elses headache but that's the end of that. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2674#issuecomment-1740826454 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] WIP: Use Python Stable ABI for the bindings (PR #2674)
@pmatilai I would just backport the FindPython module and conditionally use it if CMake is too old. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2674#issuecomment-1740820797 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] WIP: Use Python Stable ABI for the bindings (PR #2674)
I think, if we go for the stable ABI we should then stick to it too, meaning simply cut off support for versions where not available. Requiring Python >= 3.7 is not a problem, I'm just curious as to what makes that particular version special. Cmake >= 3.26 is too new for us to require though, but this shouldn't be hard to do manually. Looking at the cmake's FindPython module, something like `target_compile_definitions(_rpm PRIVATE Py_LIMITED_API=x)` in python/CMakeLists.txt I suppose. There's something about linking to a specific library too, but according to https://docs.python.org/3/c-api/stable.html that's a Windows-only thing. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2674#issuecomment-1740817395 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] rpm --import url shows non-specific error message when curl is not available (Issue #2683)
Snippet below first shows that import command works successfully, then it shows generic error message when curl is uninstalled from the system ``` # rpm --import https://yum.mariadb.org/RPM-GPG-KEY-MariaDB # echo $? 0 # rpm -e curl # rpm --import https://yum.mariadb.org/RPM-GPG-KEY-MariaDB error: https://yum.mariadb.org/RPM-GPG-KEY-MariaDB: import read failed(2). # rpm -vvv --import https://yum.mariadb.org/RPM-GPG-KEY-MariaDB ufdio: 1 reads,19077 total bytes in 0.05 secs error: https://yum.mariadb.org/RPM-GPG-KEY-MariaDB: import read failed(2). ``` rpm should e.g. show exact failing command, at least when verbosity is increased. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2683 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
