Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add builtin macro %undefine_all (#820)
I gave you some hints already, I'm not going to spell it all out for you, why don't you think about it by yourself a bit? It'd indeed be trivial to implement, and looks like an easy solution to a common problem on first sight, but in the bigger picture such an operator would be harmful to rpm in more than one way. I can think of 3-4 offhand. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/820#issuecomment-524185258___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add builtin macro %undefine_all (#820)
Closed #820. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/820#event-2578624539___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add builtin macro %undefine_all (#820)
> Please, how does it break the stack semantics? I am asking because I think that it is easy to implement such a builtin macro. E.g. popMacro() can be changed such that it returns 1 if an macro was deleted and 0 if no macro was deleted. After that it will be easy to call popMacro() in some function similar to doUndefine() until popMacro() returns 0. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/820#issuecomment-523944629___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add builtin macro %undefine_all (#820)
Please, how it breaks the stack semantics? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/820#issuecomment-523881821___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add builtin macro %undefine_all (#820)
The thought has crossed my mind too, but there's a reason such a thing is not implemented: it breaks the stack semantics, which various parts of rpm rely on. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/820#issuecomment-523880858___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
