[Bug 467] Package Review: Mosaic - Web Browser
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=467 Lubomir Rintel changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #19 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-24 09:04:18 --- Imported and built. Thanks for review! -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 547] review request: LCD patches from Ubuntu finally in Fedora
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=547 --- Comment #17 from Kevin Kofler 2009-04-24 20:11:59 --- FYI, Qt 4.5.1-3 will support Freetype LCD filters if freetype-freeworld is available at runtime. The VRGB/VBGR bug got fixed in Qt 4.5.1, and we patched Qt to support the LCD filters even if Qt was built against a freetype (such as the Fedora freetype) which doesn't support them (4.5.1 checks again at runtime anyway). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 285] Review Request: VirtualBox-OSE - A general-purpose full virtualizer for PC hardware
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285 --- Comment #36 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-24 22:30:38 --- (In reply to comment #35) Done. Thanks for pointing that out. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 285] Review Request: VirtualBox-OSE - A general-purpose full virtualizer for PC hardware
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285 Lubomir Rintel changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 563] Review request: xorg-x11-drv-catalyst - AMD's proprietary driver for ATI graphic cards
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=563
--- Comment #5 from NicolasChauvet 2009-04-25 01:17:16 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
...
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > 1* Does this file remains needed with 9.4? (should be set as %config at
> > least)
> > %{_sysconfdir}/udev/makedev.d/40-catalyst-dri.nodes
> > (in other words, Is the module capable to create it own devices on
> > /dev/dri/card? )
> > the file need to be removed "then" the initrd regenerated in order to test
> > for
> > this feature.
> Will test at home tonight.
What tell the testing ?
> structure so we could create/destroy these files using r-c-d... I will try to
> continue working on this soon, and if it works then the need for files like
udev creation and other power management files shoudn't be the priority for
now.
> > 7* deprecated Obsoletes/Provides from fglrx package history:
> > This doesn't have to be introduced in the new package (could be dropped in
> > fglrx also actually.)
...
> If we get rid of these, then FreshRPM users who install RPM Fusion will have
> no
> upgrade path... If we no longer wish to support this upgrade path on new
> branches (ie, F-11), I'm OK with that but I think that we need to keep it for
> F-9/F-10.
Wrong., only fglrx should have kept them, not catalyst. We could also assume
users have upgraded since now. Furthermore, according that F-11 users aren't
supposed to upgrade from F-9 (but from a step by F-10), we can even drop it
from F-11 fglrx package.
> > So to sum-up , I expect this package to be introduced in F-10/F-11 (F-9?).
> F-10 and F-11 right away (will migrate from old to new scheme eventually), and
> F-9 afterwards (but kept at the old scheme).
>
> > Most of the above notes at pretty trivial to fix. (since that's just few
> > tweaks
> > from a fglrx->catalyst rename) But I note this is for the old scheme. I
> > really
> > think we need to work on the new scheme for both F-10/F-11.
> +1 - this is partially my fault, I don't have much time... I'm finishing the
> semester mid-may, at that point I'll have much more time to finish the last
> bits of r-c-d.
Okay, so we need to keep it the old way, and to convert eventually convert it
later (keeping Conflicts for now)
I'm still testing the new scheme on Rawhide with nvidia.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 532] Review Request: xmms2-nonfree - Nonfree plugins for XMMS2
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=532 --- Comment #9 from NicolasChauvet 2009-04-25 01:18:27 --- this bug should be closed -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 478] Review Request: dosemu - dos emulator for Linux
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478 --- Comment #11 from solarflo...@gmail.com 2009-04-25 02:54:59 --- (In reply to comment #10) > Justin, I've sponsored your account. > Please add source to the package as described above and apply for CVS. > > Thanks! > ok, its been completed, from the info page it says I have to wait for it to be approved now. Here is the link for the updated files: http://jzygmont.fedorapeople.org/ Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 563] Review request: xorg-x11-drv-catalyst - AMD's proprietary driver for ATI graphic cards
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=563
--- Comment #6 from Stewart Adam 2009-04-25 03:54:42 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> ...
> > (In reply to comment #3)
> > > 1* Does this file remains needed with 9.4? (should be set as %config at
> > > least)
> > > %{_sysconfdir}/udev/makedev.d/40-catalyst-dri.nodes
> > > (in other words, Is the module capable to create it own devices on
> > > /dev/dri/card? )
> > > the file need to be removed "then" the initrd regenerated in order to
> > > test for
> > > this feature.
> > Will test at home tonight.
> What tell the testing ?
9.4 works well without the udev configuration file, and overall the driver
seems to run much more smoothly.
> > If we get rid of these, then FreshRPM users who install RPM Fusion will
> > have no
> > upgrade path... If we no longer wish to support this upgrade path on new
> > branches (ie, F-11), I'm OK with that but I think that we need to keep it
> > for
> > F-9/F-10.
> Wrong., only fglrx should have kept them, not catalyst. We could also assume
> users have upgraded since now. Furthermore, according that F-11 users aren't
> supposed to upgrade from F-9 (but from a step by F-10), we can even drop it
> from F-11 fglrx package.
Okay, that makes sense - provides/obsoletes removed in the package below.
> Okay, so we need to keep it the old way, and to convert eventually convert it
> later (keeping Conflicts for now)
That will be best for now, we can implement the new scheme for fglrx once the
power management script integration in r-c-d is finished.
SPEC: http://downloads.diffingo.com/rpmfusion/xorg-x11-drv-catalyst.spec
SRPM:
http://downloads.diffingo.com/rpmfusion/xorg-x11-drv-catalyst-9.4-2.fc10.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Re: Build Error (Job 3629): mythtv-0_22-0_2_svn_r20448_fc11 on fedora-development-rpmfusion_free
On Friday 24 April 2009 21:45:55 rpmfusion-build...@lists.rpmfusion.org wrote:
> Job failed on arch x86_64
>
>
> Build logs may be found at
> http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3629-mythtv-0.22-0.2.svn.r20448.fc11/
>
>
> -
[...]
> {standard input}: Assembler messages:
> {standard input}:51908: Fatal error: can't write moc_scanwizard.o: No space
> left on device
> {standard input}:51908: Fatal error: can't close moc_scanwizard.o: No space
> left on device
> make[2]: Leaving directory
> `/builddir/build/BUILD/mythtv-0.22/mythtv-0.22/libs/libmythtv'
> make[2]: *** [moc_scanwizard.o] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory
> `/builddir/build/BUILD/mythtv-0.22/mythtv-0.22/libs'
> make[1]: *** [sub-libmythtv-make_default] Error 2
> make: *** [sub-libs-make_default-ordered] Error 2
> error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.UJHjrN (%build)
Seems the lisas.de builder is out of disk space...
http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/build-status/job.psp?uid=3629
--
Jarod Wilson
ja...@wilsonet.com
[Bug 532] Review Request: xmms2-nonfree - Nonfree plugins for XMMS2
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=532 Orcan Ogetbil changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #10 from Orcan Ogetbil 2009-04-25 05:30:41 --- There you go.. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 475] Review Request: terminatorX - Realtime Audio Synthesizer
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=475 Orcan Ogetbil changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #4 from Orcan Ogetbil 2009-04-25 05:31:28 --- Package in repos. Closing the bug. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 32] Review request: vdr-dvd - DVD playback plugin for VDR
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32 Orcan Ogetbil changed: What|Removed |Added CC||oget.fed...@gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Orcan Ogetbil 2009-04-25 07:05:48 --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 396] Review request: paintdotnet - A mono port of the Paint.NET image editor
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396
--- Comment #15 from Eric Moret 2009-04-25 07:24:24 ---
Thank you for spending the time reviewing this package. Please see inline
below.
(In reply to comment #14)
> Thanks. A few comments:
>
> * Upstream provides a tarball on their website:
>http://code.google.com/p/paint-mono/downloads/list
> Any reason why that one is not used?
Upstream posted its first file on March 25th while this package was submitted
in February. I have since moved to using upstream´s release.
> * Is it really not possible to replace the offending artwork by some free
> artwork?
I would like to think so, there is an open request for icon replacement at the
fedora wiki
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/DesignService#Paint.NET_icon_replacement
> * Any possible license issues with Sources 3-6 ? You should explain where and
> how to get them in the SPEC file.
I created a script to extract those icons.
> * Similarly, the patches should be explained, and if they are not Fedora
> specific, sent upstream. Links from their upstream should be provided.
It *seems* to me the change to using upstream´s tarball has taken care of this
patch therefore I have removed this patch but I do not currently have access to
an x86_64 box to test. Prior to including this patch I had also created an
upstream bug as seen at the following link:
http://code.google.com/p/paint-mono/issues/detail?id=20
> * Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for
> directory ownership and usability).
ok
> * Please don't use a --vendor flag on desktop-file-install
I had to include this for me to be able to build on CentOS5 which is one of my
target systems. What is the workaround there?
> * %attr(0644,root,root) is not needed
>
> ! %dir %{_libdir}/%{name}
>%{_libdir}/%{name}/*
>
> can be replaced by just
>
>%{_libdir}/%{name}/
ok
> * Any reason why you use
>./configure --prefix=%{_prefix} --libdir=%{_libdir}
> instead of just
>%configure
> ?
The configure script provided by upstream only supported the above 2 options
(has moved to only supporting --prefix now)
> * Please update to the latest icon cache scriptlets:
>http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache
ok
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 478] Review Request: dosemu - dos emulator for Linux
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478 --- Comment #12 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-25 07:26:06 --- I already approved this (see bottom of comment #1, and it blocks bug #4, which means it is accepted). So, to reiterate: APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
