[Bug 472] Review request: dynamips - IOS Emulator/Hypervisor
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=472 --- Comment #9 from Chen Lei 2010-04-28 05:55:03 --- (In reply to comment #8) > updated files to 2.8.0-RC2 > SRPM: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/dynamips-0.2.8-0.1.RC2.fc13.src.rpm > SPEC: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/dynamips.spec Thanks, some people in redhat bugzilla request for this program as well as GNS3, I'll try to review this package in two weeks. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 775] Review request: xorg-x11-drv-psb - Intel GMA500 (Poulsbo) video driver (and associated packages)
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=775 --- Comment #25 from NicolasChauvet 2010-04-28 00:25:55 --- cvs request was proceded for the F-12 branch, but I'm not sure if ACL was setup. I'm currently investigating. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 775] Review request: xorg-x11-drv-psb - Intel GMA500 (Poulsbo) video driver (and associated packages)
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=775 NicolasChauvet changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|33 | -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 952] Review request: Maelstrom - Space combat game
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=952 NicolasChauvet changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|33 | -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 13] Review request: rpmfusion-package-config-smart - RPM Fusion configuration files for the Smart package manager
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13 NicolasChauvet changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kwiz...@gmail.com Blocks|33 | --- Comment #20 from NicolasChauvet 2010-04-27 21:46:36 --- This seems to have been fixed already, releasing cvs request -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 472] Review request: dynamips - IOS Emulator/Hypervisor
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=472 --- Comment #8 from Lucian Langa 2010-04-27 19:52:29 --- updated files to 2.8.0-RC2 SRPM: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/dynamips-0.2.8-0.1.RC2.fc13.src.rpm SPEC: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/dynamips.spec -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) Package Build Report 2010-04-27
Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 13: 1 rpmfusion-nonfree-release-13-2 Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) development: 1 rpmfusion-nonfree-release-14-0.2 Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 13: rpmfusion-nonfree-release-13-2 -- * Mon Apr 26 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 13-2 - fix compatibility symlink Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) development: rpmfusion-nonfree-release-14-0.2 * Mon Apr 26 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 14-0.2 - fix compatibility symlink
RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) Package Build Report 2010-04-27
Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 12: 1 NEW rpmfusion-nonfree-release-12-2 : RPM Fusion (nonfree) Repository Configuration Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 11: 3 mock-rpmfusion-nonfree-13.0-1.fc11 openmotif-2.3.3-1.fc11 rpmfusion-nonfree-release-11-2 Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 12: rpmfusion-nonfree-release-12-2 -- * Fri Apr 16 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 12-2 - Add keys for F13 and Rawhide/F14 Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 11: mock-rpmfusion-nonfree-13.0-1.fc11 -- * Tue Apr 13 2010 Nicolas Chauvet - 13.0-1 - Update to 13.0 openmotif-2.3.3-1.fc11 -- * Wed Mar 31 2010 Jochen Schmitt 2.3.3-1 - New upstream releasee - Make an unhappy RH employee happy rpmfusion-nonfree-release-11-2 -- * Fri Apr 16 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 11-2 - Add keys for F13 and Rawhide/F14 - mark config file as noreplace which was missing for some strange reason
Re: rpmfusion and no frozen rawhide
Adam Williamson wrote on 27.04.2010 14:57: > On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 14:42 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > >> That's basically how it's supposed to work except for the "nogpgcheck" >> -- that problem should vanish once I move the latest >> rpmfusion-free-release from updates-testing to updates >> /me wanders of to do that > > I've updated the text on the web page (now I realized I just needed a > Wiki account :>). > One other thing I noticed - the links for Rawhide seem to be 404. Noticed that in parallel :-/ Pushed a new release packages two days ago and forgot to adjust the link :-/ Cu knurd
Re: rpmfusion and no frozen rawhide
On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 14:42 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > That's basically how it's supposed to work except for the "nogpgcheck" > -- that problem should vanish once I move the latest > rpmfusion-free-release from updates-testing to updates > > /me wanders of to do that I've updated the text on the web page (now I realized I just needed a Wiki account :>). One other thing I noticed - the links for Rawhide seem to be 404. -- adamw
Re: rpmfusion and no frozen rawhide
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote on 27.04.2010 14:42: > Adam Williamson wrote on 27.04.2010 14:11: >> On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 13:05 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote: >> >>> Okay, so I used the link for 10, 11, 12 and that almost works, except >>> that it gets the GPG key stuff wrong: >>> >>> GPG key retrieval failed: [Errno 14] Could not open/read >>> file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-rpmfusion-free-fedora-13-x86_64 >>> >>> I have to use --nogpgcheck with yum, can't install things with >>> PackageKit. >> >> Sorry for the conversation with myself :) >> >> it seems that it initially installed >> rpmfusion-free-release-10-5.noarch , with >> rpmfusion-free-release-13-1.noarch available as an update (but PK >> refuses to update it because of the key issue). If I update to 13-1 with >> yum --nogpgcheck, the GPG key file now shows up. > > That's basically how it's supposed to work except for the "nogpgcheck" > -- that problem should vanish once I move the latest > rpmfusion-free-release from updates-testing to updates > > /me wanders of to do that Looks like it will take a little longer as one packages that is needed was not build for some reason. CU knurd
Re: Request for an F-12 branch for psb packages
On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 23:01 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > 2010/4/26 Adam Williamson : > > Hi, everyone. When I first brought xorg-x11-drv-psb into Fusion, I asked > > not to have an F12 branch, as it was impossible to use the driver on > > F12. However, now I have some patches from Olivier Blin which should > > make F12 use possible, so can I please request an F-12 branch for the > > packages: > > > > xorg-x11-drv-psb > > libdrm-poulsbo > > psb-firmware > > xpsb-glx > > psb-kmod > Can you do cvs request blocking #33 witth the appropriate updated cvs > request (with your email as login) > > Thx for your work. Thanks, Nic - I've re-opened the initial review request: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=775 made it block bug #33, and added the new CVS request. Thanks again. -- adamw
[Bug 775] Review request: xorg-x11-drv-psb - Intel GMA500 (Poulsbo) video driver (and associated packages)
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=775 Adam Williamson changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|4 |33 Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | --- Comment #24 from Adam Williamson 2010-04-27 14:45:12 --- Re-opening to request an F12 CVS branch, now there's a chance we can make the driver work on F12 (thanks to Olivier Blin). Package CVS request == Package Name: xorg-x11-drv-psb , libdrm-poulsbo , psb-firmware , psb-kmod , xpsb-glx Short Description: Intel GMA500 (Poulsbo) video driver (and associated packages) Owners: adamwill Branches: F12 InitialCC: -- License tag: nonfree -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug.
Re: rpmfusion and no frozen rawhide
Adam Williamson wrote on 27.04.2010 14:11: > On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 13:05 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote: > >> Okay, so I used the link for 10, 11, 12 and that almost works, except >> that it gets the GPG key stuff wrong: >> >> GPG key retrieval failed: [Errno 14] Could not open/read >> file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-rpmfusion-free-fedora-13-x86_64 >> >> I have to use --nogpgcheck with yum, can't install things with >> PackageKit. > > Sorry for the conversation with myself :) > > it seems that it initially installed > rpmfusion-free-release-10-5.noarch , with > rpmfusion-free-release-13-1.noarch available as an update (but PK > refuses to update it because of the key issue). If I update to 13-1 with > yum --nogpgcheck, the GPG key file now shows up. That's basically how it's supposed to work except for the "nogpgcheck" -- that problem should vanish once I move the latest rpmfusion-free-release from updates-testing to updates /me wanders of to do that Cu knurd
Re: rpmfusion and no frozen rawhide
2010/4/27 Adam Williamson : > On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 13:05 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote: > >> Okay, so I used the link for 10, 11, 12 and that almost works, except >> that it gets the GPG key stuff wrong: >> >> GPG key retrieval failed: [Errno 14] Could not open/read >> file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-rpmfusion-free-fedora-13-x86_64 >> >> I have to use --nogpgcheck with yum, can't install things with >> PackageKit. > > Sorry for the conversation with myself :) > > it seems that it initially installed > rpmfusion-free-release-10-5.noarch , with > rpmfusion-free-release-13-1.noarch available as an update (but PK > refuses to update it because of the key issue). If I update to 13-1 with > yum --nogpgcheck, the GPG key file now shows up. I think I've raised this point earlier, it could be better to have a symlink per fedora release That's what we were using during the livna lifetime IIRC. so rpmfusion-free-release-13.rpm at the root of the website will point to free/fedora/releases/13/Everything/i386/os/rpmfusion-release-13-1.noarch.rpm when populated. or eventually free/fedora/updates/13/i386/rpmfusion-release-13-2.noarch.rpm if updated. It will also be easier to maintain when one want to write docs and howto for a given fedora release and avoid key missmatch on legacy release. Nicolas (kwizart)
Re: rpmfusion and no frozen rawhide
On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 13:05 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote: > Okay, so I used the link for 10, 11, 12 and that almost works, except > that it gets the GPG key stuff wrong: > > GPG key retrieval failed: [Errno 14] Could not open/read > file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-rpmfusion-free-fedora-13-x86_64 > > I have to use --nogpgcheck with yum, can't install things with > PackageKit. Sorry for the conversation with myself :) it seems that it initially installed rpmfusion-free-release-10-5.noarch , with rpmfusion-free-release-13-1.noarch available as an update (but PK refuses to update it because of the key issue). If I update to 13-1 with yum --nogpgcheck, the GPG key file now shows up. -- adamw
Re: rpmfusion and no frozen rawhide
On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 08:53 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Adam Williamson wrote on 26.04.2010 21:06: > > [...] I > > don't know if the actual Fusion packages are built against F14 but > > labelled F13, but if they are that's a very big problem and we really > > shouldn't do it. Anything built against Fedora's Rawhide repo is for > > Fedora 14 and should be labelled .fc14, not .fc13. > > There iirc was a small window when rawhide branched when F13 builds > where done using rawhide. Xavier changed it back then and I did a lot of > other adjustments in the past weeks, so everything should be sane now > (and mostly was duing all that time; yes, that's the long story short, > but there is nothing to worry about afaics). > > The only remaining thing that need fixing is a rebuild for those > packages that were build against rawhide and contain "fc14" in their > name. (libmms, gnome-mplayer, gecko-mediaplayer). That's on my todo list. > > BTW, in you blog post you wrote > """ > There’s a secondary problem with F13, which is that as far as RPM Fusion > is concerned, F13 doesn’t seem to exist. > """ > That's incorrect. Everything is on the servers, but the 13 repo is not > under development/13 -- instead there is an empty one in the final place > and everything is in the updates and updates-testing repos for now, as > that's easier to handle with our push scripts. Okay, that's great - I'll post an update when I understand the process more. I have here a freshly installed F13 system; how am I supposed to enable Fusion on it? The download page gives me options for '10, 11 and 12' or 'Fedora Alpha, Beta, Preview, Rawhide, RC, Snapshot aka. what will become Fedora 13' (which seems to link to a 'rawhide' package); there should be separate links for Rawhide and 'Alpha, Beta, Preview, RC' etc. Should I use the 'rawhide' link? Is there no easy way to set it up? -- adamw
Re: rpmfusion and no frozen rawhide
On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 12:56 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote: > Okay, that's great - I'll post an update when I understand the process > more. I have here a freshly installed F13 system; how am I supposed to > enable Fusion on it? The download page gives me options for '10, 11 and > 12' or 'Fedora Alpha, Beta, Preview, Rawhide, RC, Snapshot aka. what > will become Fedora 13' (which seems to link to a 'rawhide' package); > there should be separate links for Rawhide and 'Alpha, Beta, Preview, > RC' etc. Should I use the 'rawhide' link? Is there no easy way to set it > up? Okay, so I used the link for 10, 11, 12 and that almost works, except that it gets the GPG key stuff wrong: GPG key retrieval failed: [Errno 14] Could not open/read file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-rpmfusion-free-fedora-13-x86_64 I have to use --nogpgcheck with yum, can't install things with PackageKit. So I guess that needs to be fixed, and the text on the page explaining how to set up Fusion does too (I'd be happy to do that but I don't think I have access to it). For maintainers, we can just push F13 stuff the same way as for stable releases? -- adamw
[Bug 472] Review request: dynamips - IOS Emulator/Hypervisor
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=472 Chen Lei changed: What|Removed |Added CC||supercy...@163.com --- Comment #7 from Chen Lei 2010-04-27 12:24:19 --- Lucian, ping? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
Re: Is there any plan to split ffmpeg into ffmpeg(without patent issue) and ffmeeg-freeworld?
2010/4/27 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski : > On Monday, 26 April 2010 at 06:39, Chen Lei wrote: >> Hi all. >> >> Debian guys already split ffmepg into two parts and ship them separately >> in debian and debian-multimedia. And I realized that RHEL5 also have >> a stripped patent-free qffmpeg package. >> See >> http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/5Server/en/os/SRPMS/qffmpeg-0.4.9-0.15.20080908.el5.src.rpm >> Could we also split it for fedora and rpmfusion? I think it'll benefit >> fedora a lot. > > Interesting, but I see the only codec it has is mjpeg. Everything else is > disabled and removed from the source tarball. I don't think it's useful > for much, but feel free to try to convince me otherwise. > > You could start with providing a list of applications that could go into > Fedora with a dependency on a stripped-down ffmpeg package and a list > of codecs that we would need to have in such package for it to be usable > with these applications. Above libavcodec and the related codec that would be involved, there are lot of others features that FFmpeg provides. One probably cannot imagine the number of fedora packages using or that could use one or the other FFmpeg library without requesting a particular patented codec. One example that we already have is picard-freeworld which rely on libavformat/libavcodec to extract some informations from the multimedia file and cannot be enabled in the fedora package itself because the FFmpeg headers aren't present. If we could have a basic FFmpeg in Fedora, with the whole set of headers, then we could avoid to split this package. Because that's a hard mess. The downside would be to verify each time either or not picard with FFmpeg enabled rely on a function that might not be present in the light fedora version of FFmpeg. Others packages that will benefit from this is blender, linphone (update to 3.0.0 is avoided in Fedora because it mandotary needs FFmpeg), vlc (currently in review within fedora), pulseaudio-libs. (using a static version currently) and probably many others. The other big subject is: "Is such patentless FFmpeg could enable GPU accelereated Video" , either with libvdpau or libva ? That's probably a question that worth to ask to FE-Legal. But technically having FFmpeg in Fedora can be possible and would worth it, even if no more codec are added. The other side of the question is , Will we experience unrecoverable regressions with such split ? Because if it is possible, then we might just simply do it. To have FFmpeg in Fedora, I would just built the library from stripped source with a special suffix SONAME and using alternatives with a low number for the pc files. Then with the same revision of the unstripped sources, the standard version only with libavcodec. (along with a tweaked library using the same SONAME). That way, codec that was not available in the package built with the fedora FFmpeg version will become available. Nicolas (kwizart)
