[Bug 1741] Review Request: vo-amrwbenc - VisualOn AMR-WB encoder library
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1741 --- Comment #7 from Prabin Kumar Datta 2011-05-10 23:25:04 --- @Thibault: Thank You! @Richard After reading your comment I also got confused for a moment. Thou, we are human and human do mistakes. :-| -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
Re: MLT / Kdenlive / OpenShot bugzilla questions
Hi, On 05/10/2011 04:58 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: It seems quite a mess has been made lately with these packages and I'd like to start getting them cleaned up and need some mentoring. 1. There are several bugs open for MLT that I'd like to consolidate, I know in general newer bugs should be marked as duplicates of older ones That is more or less the general rule, yes but exceptions based on common sense are quite normal too. but as most (all) of the discussion is happening in 1688 I'd like to mark all the other bugs duplicates of it. Yes that would be the sensible thing to do :) 2. The video preview problem in MLT has been fixed in GIT but I'd rather wait for an official point release if it will be available soon. To that end, kdenlive will need to be updated at the same time but I haven't heard from Ryan in a couple of weeks. I assume that this is due to college finals but I have no way of knowing for sure. It would be best if you could become a kdenlive co-maintainer, so that you can do rebuilds for newer MLT's yourself. AFAIK Ryan already has said that is fine with him, right? Then all we need is a CVS admin to adjust the ACL-s. Regards, Hans
[Bug 1741] Review Request: vo-amrwbenc - VisualOn AMR-WB encoder library
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1741 Thibault North changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 1741] Review Request: vo-amrwbenc - VisualOn AMR-WB encoder library
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1741 --- Comment #6 from Richard 2011-05-10 23:19:10 --- (In reply to comment #4) > @Richard > I have packaged this one month ago and submitted this under fedora from there > I > got suggestion to add this package here. I forget what I did and why I did. > > > This is the package which is submitted here: > http://sourceforge.net/projects/opencore-amr/files/vo-amrwbenc/ > > This is the package you are talking about. > http://sourceforge.net/projects/opencore-amr/files/opencore-amr/0.1.2/ > > > Both are different. That's fine, I just wanted to ask the question. So it looks like they are separate sub-projects from the same parent project? This world of codecs is really starting to confuse me and this isn't helping :) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 1741] Review Request: vo-amrwbenc - VisualOn AMR-WB encoder library
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1741 --- Comment #5 from Thibault North 2011-05-10 23:16:36 --- Ok! -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 1741] Review Request: vo-amrwbenc - VisualOn AMR-WB encoder library
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1741 Prabin Kumar Datta changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #4 from Prabin Kumar Datta 2011-05-10 23:13:10 --- @Richard I have packaged this one month ago and submitted this under fedora from there I got suggestion to add this package here. I forget what I did and why I did. This is the package which is submitted here: http://sourceforge.net/projects/opencore-amr/files/vo-amrwbenc/ This is the package you are talking about. http://sourceforge.net/projects/opencore-amr/files/opencore-amr/0.1.2/ Both are different. @Thibault: if you like you can continue review of this package Upgraded: Spec URL: http://prabindatta.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/vo-amrwbenc.spec SRPM URL: http://prabindatta.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/vo-amrwbenc-0.1.1-1.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 1742] Review Request: vo-aacenc - VisualOn AAC encoder library
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1742 --- Comment #5 from Prabin Kumar Datta 2011-05-10 22:53:55 --- Sorry for again updating this. But this is request from a friend to add F-14 under branch. Small change: Package CVS request == Package Name: vo-aacenc Short Description: VisualOn AAC encoder library Owners: prabindatta Branches: devel F-14 F-15 F-16 EL-6 InitialCC: -- License tag: free -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 1742] Review Request: vo-aacenc - VisualOn AAC encoder library
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1742 --- Comment #4 from Prabin Kumar Datta 2011-05-10 22:37:32 --- Since it is similar to opencore-amr which is already available and also based on VisualOn. I think this package will be under License tag: free (used opencore-amr as reference) Small change: Package CVS request == Package Name: vo-aacenc Short Description: VisualOn AAC encoder library Owners: prabindatta Branches: devel F-15 F-16 EL-6 InitialCC: -- License tag: free -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 1741] Review Request: vo-amrwbenc - VisualOn AMR-WB encoder library
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1741 Prabin Kumar Datta changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Comment #3 from Prabin Kumar Datta 2011-05-10 22:35:53 --- Thanks! Richard yup! it is same. Don't know how I did this mistake. I have already downloaded source code of opencore-amr. Also, I have installed opencore-amr in my system. Okay! I am closing this. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
Review requests: Should blocking bug 4 be removed?
I noticed that on the last couple of approved review requests that when bug 33 was added but 4 was removed. There is no instruction on the contributor page[1] to remove bug 4. Are review requests supposed to stay on in indefinitely? Thanks, Richard [1] http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors#head-8354059095aca6ccb5494f9dac8815b732cfe2fd
[Bug 1741] Review Request: vo-amrwbenc - VisualOn AMR-WB encoder library
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1741 Richard changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hobbes1...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Richard 2011-05-10 22:12:00 --- Quick question... How is this package different from opencore-amr which is already available? It says it's based on VisualOn as well... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 1718] Review request: spek - Free acoustic spectrum analyzer
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1718 Thibault North changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|4 |33 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 1718] Review request: spek - Free acoustic spectrum analyzer
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1718 --- Comment #11 from Thibault North 2011-05-10 22:06:35 --- Package CVS request == Package Name: spek Short Description: Free acoustic spectrum analyzer Owners: tnorth Branches: devel F-15 F-16 EL-6 InitialCC: -- License tag: free -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 1742] Review Request: vo-aacenc - VisualOn AAC encoder library
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1742 Prabin Kumar Datta changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|4 |33 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 1742] Review Request: vo-aacenc - VisualOn AAC encoder library
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1742 --- Comment #3 from Prabin Kumar Datta 2011-05-10 22:02:07 --- Thanks! Thibault Package CVS request == Package Name: vo-aacenc Short Description: VisualOn AAC encoder library Owners: prabindatta Branches: devel F-15 F-16 EL-6 InitialCC: -- License tag: nonfree -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 1718] Review request: spek - Free acoustic spectrum analyzer
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1718 --- Comment #10 from Thibault North 2011-05-10 21:57:08 --- Oops sorry for that, it totally forgot to check that myself (based on an old package). SPEC URL: http://tnorth.fedorapeople.org/spek.spec SRPM URL: http://tnorth.fedorapeople.org/spek-0.7-3.fc14.src.rpm Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 1718] Review request: spek - Free acoustic spectrum analyzer
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1718 Prabin Kumar Datta changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|3 |4 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 1718] Review request: spek - Free acoustic spectrum analyzer
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1718 --- Comment #9 from Prabin Kumar Datta 2011-05-10 21:41:14 --- * MUST - Buildroot is correct [OK ] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 1718] Review request: spek - Free acoustic spectrum analyzer
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1718
--- Comment #8 from Prabin Kumar Datta 2011-05-10
21:34:33 ---
Sorry, I missed one line.
* MUST - Buildroot is correct [Fix ]
Issues:
1. Fix the buildroot
(%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) and I will
approve it.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 1718] Review request: spek - Free acoustic spectrum analyzer
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1718 Prabin Kumar Datta changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|4 |3 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 1718] Review request: spek - Free acoustic spectrum analyzer
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1718 Prabin Kumar Datta changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|3 |4 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 1718] Review request: spek - Free acoustic spectrum analyzer
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1718
--- Comment #7 from Prabin Kumar Datta 2011-05-10
21:24:06 ---
* MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package [OK ]
* MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming [OK ]
Guidelines
* MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [OK ]
* Must: Spec file matches base package [OK ]
* Must: License must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
Licensing Guidelines [OK ]
* Must: License in spec must match actual license [OK ]
* Must: License file included in %doc [OK ]
* Must: Spec file written in American English [OK ]
* Must: Tar ball matches upstream [OK ]
$ md5sum spek*
c60e1e9f9a62c41dbbd61c3bb52af4f8 spek-0.7.tar.bz2
c60e1e9f9a62c41dbbd61c3bb52af4f8 spek-0.7.tar.bz2.1
* Must: Package successfully builds binary RPMs[OK ]
* Must: No duplicate files [OK ]
* Must: Macro use must be consistant [OK ]
* Must: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot}
[OK ]
* Must: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8 [OK ]
This package is APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 1718] Review request: spek - Free acoustic spectrum analyzer
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1718 --- Comment #6 from Thibault North 2011-05-10 19:21:39 --- Fixed: SPEC URL: http://tnorth.fedorapeople.org/spek.spec SRPM URL: http://tnorth.fedorapeople.org/spek-0.7-2.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 1718] Review request: spek - Free acoustic spectrum analyzer
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1718 --- Comment #5 from Prabin Kumar Datta 2011-05-10 19:06:29 --- > If you prefer, I can sed > s/Categories=AudioVideo;Audio/Categories=AudioVideo;Audio;/ in the .desktop > file and use desktop-file-validate only. Actually, this is the right way! (as much as I know) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
Re: rawhide to f15 branching
On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 04:02:55PM +1000, David Timms wrote: > On 29/04/11 21:59, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> P.S.: /me wonders if anybody cares enough about RPM Fusion these to get >> the process of branching for F15 kicked off(²), there are just 3 1/2 >> weeks left before F15 gets released > > Who has actually done the task before ? > > For this release, would you like to make a step by step document in the > wiki, so that others might be able to follow what is done, and take over > the task without missing important steps ? > > (copy pasting a terminal session or selected history would help me). > > For those with no knowledge of how or where such tasks need to occur, it > might also be good to estimate then time how long the process takes... > > David. Any updates on this? Jack -- Jack Neely Linux Czar, OIT Campus Linux Services Office of Information Technology, NC State University GPG Fingerprint: 1917 5AC1 E828 9337 7AA4 EA6B 213B 765F 3B6A 5B89
[Bug 1742] Review Request: vo-aacenc - VisualOn AAC encoder library
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1742
Thibault North changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|3 |4
--- Comment #2 from Thibault North 2011-05-10
17:03:24 ---
rpmlint output:
[tnorth@grouchy ~]$ rpmlint SRPMS/vo-aacenc-0.1.0-1.fc14.src.rpm
RPMS/x86_64/vo-aacenc-0.1.0-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm
RPMS/x86_64/vo-aacenc-devel-0.1.0-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm
RPMS/x86_64/vo-aacenc-debuginfo-0.1.0-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm
vo-aacenc.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) codec -> cosec, codex, code
vo-aacenc.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codec -> cosec, codex,
code
vo-aacenc.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) codec -> cosec, codex, code
vo-aacenc.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codec -> cosec,
codex, code
vo-aacenc-devel.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL:
http://opencore-amr.sourceforge.net/ HTTP Error 403: Forbidden
vo-aacenc-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
vo-aacenc-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL:
http://opencore-amr.sourceforge.net/ HTTP Error 403: Forbidden
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings.
(urls are okay, redirection breaks the rpmlint test)
# MUST: rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build
produces. The output should be posted in the review. [OK]
# MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines .
[OK]
# MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [OK]
# MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . [OK]
# MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines . [OK rpmfusion]
# MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.[OK]
# MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package must be included in %doc.[OK (NOTICE contains the licence of COPYING)]
# MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [OK]
# MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [OK]
# MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no
upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL
Guidelines for how to deal with this. [OK]
# MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture. [OK]
# MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in
bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on
that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the
corresponding ExcludeArch line. [NA]
# MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ;
[inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. [OK]
# MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.[9] [NA]
# MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library
files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must
call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [OK]
# MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. [OK]
# MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is
considered a blocker. [NA]
# MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does
create that directory.[OK]
# MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's
%files listings. (Notable exception: license texts in specific situations)[14]
[OK]
# MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set
with executable permissions, for example. [OK]
# MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [OK]
# MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [OK]
# MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition
of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to
size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [NA]
# MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime
of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run
properly if it is not present. [OK]
# MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [OK]
# MUST:
MLT / Kdenlive / OpenShot bugzilla questions
It seems quite a mess has been made lately with these packages and I'd like to start getting them cleaned up and need some mentoring. 1. There are several bugs open for MLT that I'd like to consolidate, I know in general newer bugs should be marked as duplicates of older ones but as most (all) of the discussion is happening in 1688 I'd like to mark all the other bugs duplicates of it. 2. The video preview problem in MLT has been fixed in GIT but I'd rather wait for an official point release if it will be available soon. To that end, kdenlive will need to be updated at the same time but I haven't heard from Ryan in a couple of weeks. I assume that this is due to college finals but I have no way of knowing for sure. I'm sure there's more that I haven't thought to ask yet but that should be enough to get started. Thanks, Richard
[Bug 1718] Review request: spek - Free acoustic spectrum analyzer
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1718 --- Comment #4 from Thibault North 2011-05-10 16:46:31 --- > 1. Where you have added missing semicolons in the desktop file? It seems that desktop-file-install takes care of that. There is indeed a missing one in the Categories. Using desktop-file-install instead of desktop-file-validate fixes that small problem. If you prefer, I can sed s/Categories=AudioVideo;Audio/Categories=AudioVideo;Audio;/ in the .desktop file and use desktop-file-validate only. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 1716] Review request: icegenerator Streaming Generator for Icecast/Shoutcast
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1716 NicolasChauvet changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|2 | -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) Package Build Report 2011-05-10
Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 14: 8 catalyst-kmod-11.4-1.fc14 catalyst-kmod-11.4-1.fc14.1 nvidia-173xx-kmod-173.14.28-1.fc14.11 nvidia-96xx-kmod-96.43.19-1.fc14.9 nvidia-kmod-260.19.36-1.fc14.4 psb-kmod-4.41.1-14.fc14.11 wl-kmod-5.100.82.38-1.fc14.4 xorg-x11-drv-catalyst-11.4-1.fc14 Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/14: 1 mame-0.142u3-1.fc14 Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/13: 1 mame-0.142u3-1.fc13 Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) development: 2 ec2-api-tools-1.4.2.4-1.fc15 mame-0.142u3-1.fc15 Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 14: catalyst-kmod-11.4-1.fc14 - * Mon May 02 2011 Stewart Adam 11.4-1 - Update to Catalyst 11.4 (internal version 8.84.1) catalyst-kmod-11.4-1.fc14.1 --- * Thu May 05 2011 Thorsten Leemhuis - 11.4-1.1 - rebuild for updated kernel nvidia-173xx-kmod-173.14.28-1.fc14.11 - * Thu May 05 2011 Thorsten Leemhuis - 173.14.28-1.11 - rebuild for updated kernel nvidia-96xx-kmod-96.43.19-1.fc14.9 -- * Thu May 05 2011 Thorsten Leemhuis - 96.43.19-1.9 - rebuild for updated kernel nvidia-kmod-260.19.36-1.fc14.4 -- * Thu May 05 2011 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1:260.19.36-1.4 - rebuild for updated kernel psb-kmod-4.41.1-14.fc14.11 -- * Thu May 05 2011 Thorsten Leemhuis - 4.41.1-14.11 - rebuild for updated kernel wl-kmod-5.100.82.38-1.fc14.4 * Thu May 05 2011 Thorsten Leemhuis - 5.100.82.38-1.4 - rebuild for updated kernel xorg-x11-drv-catalyst-11.4-1.fc14 - * Mon May 02 2011 Stewart Adam 11-4-1 - Update to Catalyst 11.4 (internal version 8.84.1) Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/14: mame-0.142u3-1.fc14 --- * Sun May 08 2011 Julian Sikorski - 0.142u3-1 - Updated to 0.142u3 - Disabled ldplayer Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/13: mame-0.142u3-1.fc13 --- * Sun May 08 2011 Julian Sikorski - 0.142u3-1 - Updated to 0.142u3 - Disabled ldplayer Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) development: ec2-api-tools-1.4.2.4-1.fc15 * Fri May 06 2011 Lubomir Rintel (GoodData) - 1.4.2.4-1 - New version mame-0.142u3-1.fc15 --- * Sun May 08 2011 Julian Sikorski - 0.142u3-1 - Updated to 0.142u3 - Disabled ldplayer
RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2011-05-10
Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 14: 14 buildsys-build-rpmfusion-14-11 em8300-kmod-0.18.0-2.fc14.4 kqemu-kmod-1.4.0-0.2.pre1.fc14.27 ndiswrapper-kmod-1.56-1.fc14.4 omnibook-kmod-2.20090714-0.5.svn288.fc14.11 open-vm-tools-kmod-0.0.0.301124-1.fc14.11 openafs-kmod-1.4.14-1.fc14.4 rt2860-kmod-2.4.0.0-1.fc14.11 rt2870-kmod-2.4.0.1-1.fc14.11 rt3070-kmod-2.3.0.4-1.fc14.11 staging-kmod-2.6.35.10-1.fc14.4 VirtualBox-OSE-kmod-4.0.2-2.fc14.3 west-chamber-kmod-0.0.1-6.20101017svn.fc14.10 xtables-addons-kmod-1.30-1.fc14.10 Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/14: 1 mixxx-1.9.0-2.fc14 Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: 1 mixxx-1.9.0-2.fc15 Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 14: buildsys-build-rpmfusion-14-11 -- * Thu May 05 2011 Thorsten Leemhuis - 10:14-11 - rebuild for kernel 2.6.35.13-91.fc14 em8300-kmod-0.18.0-2.fc14.4 --- * Thu May 05 2011 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.18.0-2.4 - rebuild for updated kernel kqemu-kmod-1.4.0-0.2.pre1.fc14.27 - * Thu May 05 2011 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.4.0-0.2.pre1.27 - rebuild for updated kernel ndiswrapper-kmod-1.56-1.fc14.4 -- * Thu May 05 2011 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.56-1.4 - rebuild for updated kernel omnibook-kmod-2.20090714-0.5.svn288.fc14.11 --- * Thu May 05 2011 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.20090714-0.5.svn288.11 - rebuild for updated kernel open-vm-tools-kmod-0.0.0.301124-1.fc14.11 - * Thu May 05 2011 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.0.0.301124-1.11 - rebuild for updated kernel openafs-kmod-1.4.14-1.fc14.4 * Thu May 05 2011 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.4.14-1.4 - rebuild for updated kernel rt2860-kmod-2.4.0.0-1.fc14.11 - * Thu May 05 2011 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.4.0.0-1.11 - rebuild for updated kernel rt2870-kmod-2.4.0.1-1.fc14.11 - * Thu May 05 2011 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.4.0.1-1.11 - rebuild for updated kernel rt3070-kmod-2.3.0.4-1.fc14.11 - * Thu May 05 2011 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.3.0.4-1.11 - rebuild for updated kernel staging-kmod-2.6.35.10-1.fc14.4 --- * Thu May 05 2011 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.6.35.10-1.4 - rebuild for updated kernel VirtualBox-OSE-kmod-4.0.2-2.fc14.3 -- * Thu May 05 2011 Thorsten Leemhuis - 4.0.2-2.3 - rebuild for updated kernel west-chamber-kmod-0.0.1-6.20101017svn.fc14.10 - * Thu May 05 2011 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.0.1-6.20101017svn.10 - rebuild for updated kernel xtables-addons-kmod-1.30-1.fc14.10 -- * Thu May 05 2011 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.30-1.10 - rebuild for updated kernel Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/14: mixxx-1.9.0-2.fc14 -- * Mon May 09 2011 John Brier - 1.9.0-2 - add BuildRequires phonon-backend-gstreamer since phonon-backend-vlc is broken in rpmfusion currently * Tue Feb 22 2011 John Brier - 1.9.0-1 - Update to 1.9.0 - Added BuildRequires to spec file for taglib-devel and flac-devel header files Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: mixxx-1.9.0-2.fc15 -- * Mon May 09 2011 John Brier - 1.9.0-2 - add BuildRequires phonon-backend-gstreamer since phonon-backend-vlc is broken in rpmfusion currently * Tue Feb 22 2011 John Brier - 1.9.0-1 - Update to 1.9.0 - Added BuildRequires to spec file for taglib-devel and flac-devel header files
