[Bug 1958] Review request: gmtk - Library of common functions and widgets for gnome-mplayer and gecko-mediaplayer
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1958 --- Comment #4 from Julian Sikorski 2011-10-09 19:22:51 --- New release: Spec URL: http://belegdol.fedorapeople.org/gmtk.spec SRPM URL: http://belegdol.fedorapeople.org/gmtk-1.0.5b1-2.fc15.src.rpm Changes: - Updated to upstream 1.0.5b1 sources Sources should contain proper license file now. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
Re: End of life for rtxxx0 kmods
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 7:11 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > 2011/10/8 Orcan Ogetbil: >> Hello RpmFusion, >> >> I wanted to make an announcement that I am dropping my maintainership >> for the packages: >> rt2860 >> rt2870 >> rt3070 >> kmod-rt2860 >> kmod-rt2870 >> kmod-rt3070 >> >> These were my first packages ever in the Fedora/RPMFusion world, so it >> is a sad departure. However I believe that the time has come. >> Currently the stock kernel modules fully support the devices covered >> by the above kmods, so I don't think there is a reason to keep them. >> >> Please remove them from the development tree(s). > > > Can you mark them as dead.package like I did for kino for example. > I will remove them from the next development push. > Sure. Done (I think). Best, Orcan
[Bug 1943] Review request: Butt - Broadcast using this tool to Icecast or Shoutcast servers
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1943
Andrea Musuruane changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||musur...@gmail.com
--- Comment #7 from Andrea Musuruane 2011-10-09 16:31:48
---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Thaks for your help. I got some questions, just to understand everything
> correct ;).
>
> 1. "You must never patch the LICENSE file. Please ask upstream to fix it."
> What should I do right now? You mean, I'm not allowed to patch it, thats ok.
> But where to ask, for a fix? The author of the code or who?
There are usually several ways to ask upstream for a fix:
* open a ticket in their bug reporting system
* send a message to their mailing list
* mail one of the author
* etc
To keep track of what is upstream doing, opening a ticket is really suggested.
> 2. "Please use the same indentation:
> > Name: butt
> > Version:0.1.12
> > [..]"
> What do you mean? I really have no idea, what you mean. Is something with the
> version incorrect?
As you can see there is just a space between "Name:" and butt. But you used
tabs for all the other fields.
Name: butt
Version:0.1.12
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Broadcast using this tool to Icecast or Shoutcast servers
[...]
Please use the same indentation (either one space or one tab) for every field.
I hope things are clearer now.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 1943] Review request: Butt - Broadcast using this tool to Icecast or Shoutcast servers
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1943 --- Comment #6 from s.bau...@gmx.net 2011-10-09 16:18:30 --- Also what does that mean? > * Compilers used to build packages must honor the applicable compiler flags > set > in the system rpm configuration: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Compiler_flags Thanks for informing me ;)! -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 1943] Review request: Butt - Broadcast using this tool to Icecast or Shoutcast servers
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1943 --- Comment #5 from s.bau...@gmx.net 2011-10-09 16:10:54 --- Thaks for your help. I got some questions, just to understand everything correct ;). 1. "You must never patch the LICENSE file. Please ask upstream to fix it." What should I do right now? You mean, I'm not allowed to patch it, thats ok. But where to ask, for a fix? The author of the code or who? 2. "Please use the same indentation: > Name: butt > Version:0.1.12 > [..]" What do you mean? I really have no idea, what you mean. Is something with the version incorrect? On the rest I'm working at the moment :D. Hope you can help me understanding everything. Greets. (In reply to comment #4) > I had a quick look at your package. Some remarks: > > * The changelog format is wrong: > "Changelog entries should provide a brief summary of the changes done to the > **package** between releases, including noting updating to a new version, > adding a patch, fixing other spec sections, note bugs fixed, and CVE's if any. > They must never simply contain an entire copy of the source CHANGELOG > entries." > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Changelogs > > * Patches must have an upstream bug link or a comment: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment > > * You must never patch the LICENSE file. Please ask upstream to fix it. > > * Use desktop-file-install to install the desktop file (and therefore remove > the desktop-file-validate call): > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#desktop-file-install_usage > > * "BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils" is missing: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Desktop_files > > * Have you tried to build this package with mock to verify > BuildRequires? > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRequires > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Projects/Mock > > * About "./configure --prefix /usr". Isn't "%configure" working? > > * Compilers used to build packages must honor the applicable compiler flags > set > in the system rpm configuration: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Compiler_flags > > * Summary can probably be shortened to "Broadcast to Icecast or Shoutcast > servers" > > * Please use the same indentation: > Name: butt > Version:0.1.12 > [..] > -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 1975] Review request: arista - An easy to use multimedia transcoder for the GNOME Desktop
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1975 --- Comment #7 from leigh scott 2011-10-09 14:36:02 --- (In reply to comment #6) > > I forgot ti remove them. I should have revrite this spec file from sratch. I > just modified the one from mandriva. > Install rpmdevtools and run this to generate a spec file rpmdev-newspec -t python arista -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 1975] Review request: arista - An easy to use multimedia transcoder for the GNOME Desktop
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1975
--- Comment #6 from Lionel Félicité 2011-10-09 14:12:20 ---
Thanks Leigh Scott.
(In reply to comment #3)
> Just a few comments
>
> 1. it requires nautilus-extensions
> 2. what propose do these macros serve as there not called
>
> %define python_compile_opt python -O -c "import compileall;
> compileall.compile_dir('.')"
> %define python_compile python -c "import compileall;
> compileall.compile_dir('.')"
>
>
I forgot ti remove them. I should have revrite this spec file from sratch. I
just modified the one from mandriva.
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python#System_Architecture
>
>
> It's noarch so opt flags aren't required, use this instead
>
>
> %build
> %{__python} setup.py build
>
> %install
> %{__python} setup.py install -O1 --skip-build --root $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
>
>
> 3. %fupes is not correct, use fupes instead
>
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 1975] Review request: arista - An easy to use multimedia transcoder for the GNOME Desktop
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1975 --- Comment #5 from Lionel Félicité 2011-10-09 14:04:14 --- (In reply to comment #1) > (In reply to comment #0) > > Hi guys! > > > > It's my first rpm. > > > I see no links to the srpm or spec file. > Hi, I thought the links were saved when I put them in the URL from field. So here they are : http://deogracia.free.fr/RPMS/arista.spec http://deogracia.free.fr/RPMS/arista-0.9.7-2.fc15.src.rpm Lionel -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
Re: lives vs openshot
Hi, hope nobody shots me for prolonging the thread which is a bit offtopic here, but ... :-) On Thursday 06 of October 2011 21:35:08 Richard Shaw wrote: > 2011/10/6 Sérgio Basto : > > Hi, > > What the big differences of LIVES-1.4.6 for openshot-1.4.0 ? > > > > I Just want edit my videos take in my holidays. > > LiVES is probably considered to be more of a professional > video editor meaning it's more powerful but also less > intuitive to use. > > Openshot is designed to be very intuitive to use and still has > some pretty powerful and feature complete. I only edit home > movies which is why I packaged Openshot so I'm a little > biased :) as for basic home/holiday videos editing, is LiVES or OpenShot worth investigating as a replacement for Kdenlive? K. -- Karel Volný QE BaseOs/Daemons Team Red Hat Czech, Brno tel. +420 532294274 (RH: +420 532294111 ext. 8262074) xmpp ka...@jabber.cz :: "Never attribute to malice what can :: easily be explained by stupidity." signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: End of life for rtxxx0 kmods
2011/10/8 Orcan Ogetbil : > Hello RpmFusion, > > I wanted to make an announcement that I am dropping my maintainership > for the packages: > rt2860 > rt2870 > rt3070 > kmod-rt2860 > kmod-rt2870 > kmod-rt3070 > > These were my first packages ever in the Fedora/RPMFusion world, so it > is a sad departure. However I believe that the time has come. > Currently the stock kernel modules fully support the devices covered > by the above kmods, so I don't think there is a reason to keep them. > > Please remove them from the development tree(s). Can you mark them as dead.package like I did for kino for example. I will remove them from the next development push. Thx Nicolas (kwizart)
[Bug 1975] Review request: arista - An easy to use multimedia transcoder for the GNOME Desktop
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1975
Nicolas Chauvet changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|http://deogracia.free.fr/RPM|
|S/arista.spec |
|http://deogracia.free.fr/RPM|
|S/arista-0.9.7- |
|2.fc15.src.rpm |
Summary|"Review request: arista - An|Review request: arista - An
|easy to use multimedia |easy to use multimedia
|transcoder for the GNOME|transcoder for the GNOME
|Desktop |Desktop
--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Chauvet 2011-10-09 12:49:03 ---
SPEC: http://deogracia.free.fr/RPMS/arista.spec
SRPM: http://deogracia.free.fr/RPMS/arista-0.9.7-2.fc15.src.rpm
Summary: An easy to use multimedia transcoder for the GNOME Desktop
Thx for your submission
For forgot to mention why this package cannot be in fedora ?
I expect it will be because of the gstreamer-ffmpeg and others requirements,
but please remind that adding gstreamer-plugins-bad-nonfree will make this
package fall into the nonfree section.
For the same reason that we should avoid package in the nonfree section, I
think this package should also be eligible for fedora by removing some explicit
requirements.
This need to be tested in order to prove a basic usability such as transcoding
from theora to webm, but also to fail with a message telling the user that some
codec are missing (and eventually to install them if the RPM Fusion repository
is installed).
Other comments:
- Please use english for comments
- duplicate license field for the subpackage:
License:LGPLv2+
The main and subpackage use the same license, please keep only the main license
field.
- CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" %{__python} for noarch package is not needed, please
remove.
- BR on fdupes is dubious. Files listed twice in a spec file are detected
automatically nowadays. I don't see the point of this check.
Also as the macro doesn't even exist , it should probably be conditionalised:
%{?fdupes:%fdupes %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/arista/}
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
Re: FFmpeg update to 0.7.x in F-15
Hi, I installed updates with ffmpeg-0.7.5 from F15 rpmfusion-free-updates-testing. Looks like Avidemux, VLC and mplayer works fine after update. There are ffmpeg 0.7.6 and 0.8.5 available with security fixes http://ffmpeg.org/#pr7dot6and8dot5 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > On Friday, 23 September 2011 at 20:58, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: >> On Friday, 23 September 2011 at 20:46, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: >> > 2011/9/23 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski : >> > > Hi All, >> > > I've just finished a round of rebuilds against FFmpeg-0.7.3 (upstream >> > > is at 0.7.5 already and I'll update shortly) in F-15 branch. There >> > > are no FFmpeg-related issues, only kino and xdtv FTBFS due to v4l1 >> > > being removed from the kernel. >> > > >> > > Of course, no rebuilds are actually necessary. >> > > >> > > Therefore, I intend to commit and build the update tonight. >> > > It should fix a number of currently open bugs. >> > >> > That's fine for me, >> > But which version of x264 will we rely on ? >> > Last time I've checked, ffmpeg used ABI 115 where, we only have 114 in F15. >> > Is it stil the case ? >> >> Yes, 115 is required. >> >> > Then what to do for F15, and for F14 ? >> >> Bump x264 to 115 ABI. Everything builds fine against the newer x264. >> >> We only need to rebuild these: >> avidemux >> gstreamer-plugins-ugly >> libquicktime >> mplayer >> vlc >> >> > Note that I will be away for the week-end, so it can probably wait >> > until monday ? > > Can we do it this week? > > Regards, > Dominik > -- Alexey Kurov
[Bug 1975] "Review request: arista - An easy to use multimedia transcoder for the GNOME Desktop
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1975
--- Comment #3 from leigh scott 2011-10-09
12:46:15 ---
Just a few comments
1. it requires nautilus-extensions
2. what propose do these macros serve as there not called
%define python_compile_opt python -O -c "import compileall;
compileall.compile_dir('.')"
%define python_compile python -c "import compileall;
compileall.compile_dir('.')"
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python#System_Architecture
It's noarch so opt flags aren't required, use this instead
%build
%{__python} setup.py build
%install
%{__python} setup.py install -O1 --skip-build --root $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
3. %fupes is not correct, use fupes instead
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 1975] "Review request: arista - An easy to use multimedia transcoder for the GNOME Desktop
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1975 --- Comment #2 from leigh scott 2011-10-09 12:24:17 --- (In reply to comment #0) > Hi guys! > > It's my first rpm. So can someone sponsor me please? > > Arista is an easy to use multimedia transcoder for the GNOME Desktop. Arista > focuses on being easy to use by making the complex task of encoding > for various devices simple. Pick your input, pick your target device, > choose a file to save to and go. > > As someone said in the wish-list, arista transcoder depends on some RPM Fusion > packages. > > Here's the rpmlint logs on the source rpm and the binairies pacakges. > > rpmlint rpmbuild/SRPMS/arista-0.9.7-2.fc15.src.rpm > arista.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) transcoder -> trans coder, > trans-coder, transponder > arista.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US transcoder -> trans coder, > trans-coder, transponder > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. > > rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/arista-0.9.7-2.fc15.noarch.rpm > arista.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) transcoder -> trans coder, > trans-coder, transponder > arista.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US transcoder -> trans > coder, trans-coder, transponder > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. > > rpmlint > /home/deogracia/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/nautilus-extension-arista-0.9.7-2.fc15.noarch.rpm > > nautilus-extension-arista.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US > transcoder -> trans coder, trans-coder, transponder > nautilus-extension-arista.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US > transcoding -> trans coding, trans-coding, transcending > nautilus-extension-arista.noarch: W: no-documentation > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. > > I chose to ignore these warning because for the spelling error, it 's on the > name / baseline of the software. For the no documentation, since it's an > extension, the documention lies with the core package > > Thank you ! > Spec: http://deogracia.free.fr/RPMS/arista.spec Srpm: http://deogracia.free.fr/RPMS/arista-0.9.7-2.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 1975] "Review request: arista - An easy to use multimedia transcoder for the GNOME Desktop
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1975 leigh scott changed: What|Removed |Added CC||leigh123linux@fedoraproject. ||org --- Comment #1 from leigh scott 2011-10-09 12:06:29 --- (In reply to comment #0) > Hi guys! > > It's my first rpm. I see no links to the srpm or spec file. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) Package Build Report 2011-10-09
Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/15: 1 rpmfusion-nonfree-remix-kickstarts-0.15.0-1.fc15 Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/14: 1 rpmfusion-nonfree-remix-kickstarts-0.14.0-1.fc14 Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) development: 1 rpmfusion-nonfree-remix-kickstarts-0.16.0-0.1.fc16 Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/15: rpmfusion-nonfree-remix-kickstarts-0.15.0-1.fc15 * Mon Jun 01 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis 0.11.1-5 - add disabled repo definitions for f11 release - make the base config "includepkgs=rpmfusion-nonfree-release" Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/14: rpmfusion-nonfree-remix-kickstarts-0.14.0-1.fc14 * Sat Oct 08 2011 Nicolas Chauvet - 0.14.0-1 - Update to 14.0 - Fix rfbz#904 Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) development: rpmfusion-nonfree-remix-kickstarts-0.16.0-0.1.fc16 -- * Sat Oct 08 2011 Nicolas Chauvet - 0.16.0-0.1 - Update to pre 16.0
RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2011-10-09
Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/15: 5 avidemux-2.5.5-6.fc15.1 gstreamer-plugins-ugly-0.10.18-1.fc15.1 libquicktime-1.2.3-3.fc15.1 rpmfusion-free-remix-kickstarts-0.15.0-1.fc15 vlc-1.1.12-1.fc15 Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/14: 1 rpmfusion-free-remix-kickstarts-0.14.0-1.fc14 Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: 2 rpmfusion-free-remix-kickstarts-0.16.0-0.1.fc16 vlc-1.1.12-1.fc16 Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/15: avidemux-2.5.5-6.fc15.1 --- * Fri Oct 07 2011 Nicolas Chauvet - 2.5.5-6.1 - Rebuilt for x264 update in F15 gstreamer-plugins-ugly-0.10.18-1.fc15.1 --- * Fri Oct 07 2011 Nicolas Chauvet - 0.10.18-1.1 - Rebuilt for x264 update in F15 libquicktime-1.2.3-3.fc15.1 --- * Fri Oct 07 2011 Nicolas Chauvet - 1.2.3-3.1 - Rebuilt for x264 update in F15 * Sun Sep 04 2011 Hans de Goede - 1.2.3-3 - Rebuilt for ffmpeg-0.8 * Fri Jul 15 2011 Nicolas Chauvet - 1.2.3-2 - Rebuilt for x264 ABI 115 * Mon Jul 11 2011 Nicolas Chauvet - 1.2.3-1 - Update to 1.2.3 rpmfusion-free-remix-kickstarts-0.15.0-1.fc15 - * Sat Oct 08 2011 Nicolas Chauvet - 0.15.0-1 - Update to 15.0 - Fix rfbz#903 vlc-1.1.12-1.fc15 - * Fri Oct 07 2011 Nicolas Chauvet - 1.1.12-1 - Update to 1.1.12 - Add 2 already merged patches * Tue Sep 20 2011 Nicolas Chauvet - 1.1.11-2 - Update to current bugfix - Add patch for FFmpeg-0.8 Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/14: rpmfusion-free-remix-kickstarts-0.14.0-1.fc14 - * Sat Oct 08 2011 Nicolas Chauvet - 0.14.0-1 - Update to 14.0 - Fix rfbz#903 Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: rpmfusion-free-remix-kickstarts-0.16.0-0.1.fc16 --- * Sat Oct 08 2011 Nicolas Chauvet - 0.16.0-0.1 - Update to 16.0 vlc-1.1.12-1.fc16 - * Fri Oct 07 2011 Nicolas Chauvet - 1.1.12-1 - Update to 1.1.12 - Add 2 already merged patches
