Re: mpd for F16
On Tue, 2011-10-11 at 23:06 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > 2011/10/11 Ankur Sinha : > > Hello, > > > > I just updated to F16 beta. I've installed the rpmfusion repos but > > cannot find mpd in here. I can't find kmod-wl either. Could someone > > please shed light on when these will be availble? > > Hi, > > As said on IRC, you can set an ACL request on an existing bug such as: > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1954 > http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors/CVSRequests > As in the mpd case, the primary maintainer specially has requested some help. > > Please verify for existing bugs with the mdp component. > > The same for broadcom-wl and wl-kmod , they have been orphaned by the > previous primary maintainer, so you can take over the maintenance of > the driver. > > Thx > > Nicolas (kwizart) Hi Nicolas, I've updated the bug for mpd. I haven't taken over the wireless drivers yet, basically because I'm not going to have the time to maintain such an important package in the near future (and I don't have a clue about kmods). I'll wait a while and hope someone steps up, otherwise we'll see.. -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur: "FranciscoD" http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha http://dodoincfedora.wordpress.com/
Re: mpd for F16
2011/10/11 Ankur Sinha : > Hello, > > I just updated to F16 beta. I've installed the rpmfusion repos but > cannot find mpd in here. I can't find kmod-wl either. Could someone > please shed light on when these will be availble? Hi, As said on IRC, you can set an ACL request on an existing bug such as: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1954 http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors/CVSRequests As in the mpd case, the primary maintainer specially has requested some help. Please verify for existing bugs with the mdp component. The same for broadcom-wl and wl-kmod , they have been orphaned by the previous primary maintainer, so you can take over the maintenance of the driver. Thx Nicolas (kwizart)
Co-maintain mpd
Hello, I'd like to co-maintain mpd. Adrian, the current maintainer has agreed to this. Can someone please point me to the procedure? PS: kwizart: I didn't exactly understand what you mentioned over the irc, apologies :) https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1954 -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur: "FranciscoD" http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha http://dodoincfedora.wordpress.com/
[Bug 1943] Review request: Butt - Broadcast using this tool to Icecast or Shoutcast servers
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1943 Richard changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hobbes1...@gmail.com --- Comment #10 from Richard 2011-10-11 22:13:08 --- (In reply to comment #9) > > * About "./configure --prefix /usr". Isn't "%configure" working? > > No, without prefix, install is tried under rpmbuild path (with is afterwards > cleaned up). If you use %configure (the macro) it includes setting --prefix for you, try this: rpm -E %configure to see what I'm talking about. > > * Compilers used to build packages must honor the applicable compiler flags > > set > > in the system rpm configuration: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Compiler_flags > > Sorry, can you explain me, what to do? I really have no idea, what I should do > right now. %configure will probably take care of this too unless the makefile does not use the standard environment variables. Richard -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 1943] Review request: Butt - Broadcast using this tool to Icecast or Shoutcast servers
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1943 --- Comment #9 from s.bau...@gmx.net 2011-10-11 21:28:13 --- Some work has been done: SRPM: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3351272/Stuff/butt/SRPMS/butt-0.1.12-1.fc14.src.rpm SPEC: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3351272/Stuff/butt/SPECS/butt.spec ConfigurePatch: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3351272/Stuff/butt/SOURCES/butt-0.1.12-CONFIGURE.patch LicensePatch: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3351272/Stuff/butt/SOURCES/butt-0.1.12-LICENSE.patch Desktopfile: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3351272/Stuff/butt/SOURCES/butt.desktop Output rpmlint: [makerpm@Sven SPECS]$ rpmlint butt.spec ../RPMS/x86_64/butt-0.1.12-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm ../SRPMS/butt-0.1.12-1.fc14.src.rpm butt.spec:38: W: configure-without-libdir-spec Not supported but configure butt.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US alsa -> alas, ala, salsa Correct spelling! butt.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US oss -> oz, os, ss Correct spelling! butt.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pulseaudio -> pulse audio, pulse-audio, pulsation Correct spelling! butt.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary butt No manual available butt.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US alsa -> alas, ala, salsa Correct spelling! butt.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US oss -> oz, os, ss Correct spelling! butt.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pulseaudio -> pulse audio, pulse-audio, pulsation Correct spelling! butt.src:38: W: configure-without-libdir-spec 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 9 warnings. Not supported but configure (In reply to comment #4) > * You must never patch the LICENSE file. Please ask upstream to fix it. > Should I go here: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=206231&atid=996827 and open a ticket for this, correct?! > * Have you tried to build this package with mock to verify > BuildRequires? Yes, got no errors, if I used mock correct. > > * About "./configure --prefix /usr". Isn't "%configure" working? No, without prefix, install is tried under rpmbuild path (with is afterwards cleaned up). > > * Compilers used to build packages must honor the applicable compiler flags > set > in the system rpm configuration: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Compiler_flags Sorry, can you explain me, what to do? I really have no idea, what I should do right now. Thanks for support ;)! -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
mpd for F16
Hello, I just updated to F16 beta. I've installed the rpmfusion repos but cannot find mpd in here. I can't find kmod-wl either. Could someone please shed light on when these will be availble? -- Thanks a bunch, Regards, Ankur: "FranciscoD" http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha http://dodoincfedora.wordpress.com/
Re: FFmpeg update to 0.7.x in F-15
Hi Alexey, On Sunday, 09 October 2011 at 12:46, nucleo wrote: > Hi, > > I installed updates with ffmpeg-0.7.5 > from F15 rpmfusion-free-updates-testing. > Looks like Avidemux, VLC and mplayer works fine > after update. Great, thank you for testing. Although avidemux comes with ffmpeg bundled, so it's not affected. > There are ffmpeg 0.7.6 and 0.8.5 available > with security fixes > http://ffmpeg.org/#pr7dot6and8dot5 Yes, I know. I'll submit the updates soon. Thanks for the reminder. Regards, Dominik -- Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org | MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu "Faith manages." -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations"
