Re: MOC's packages review requests

[Nicolas Chauvet]

2012/10/6 Antonio Trande :
> Hi all.
>
> I purpose to include a MOC package in RPMFusion repositories. Within few
> days will be available a new beta release and I'm reading your Guide Lines
> in order to get ready for open a new package review request.
> In the meantime i would like ask you:
Hi Antonio,

Thx for your interest in RPM Fusion!

Looking at MOC, this sound like a deprecated software, there is no
update since 2005 at the first sight.Does it really worth to maintain
that package ? Can't you find another software for that purpose (such
as sox) ?

Just in case you want others packaging idea:
http://rpmfusion.org/Wishlist

Nicolas (kwizart)

Re: MOC's packages review requests

[Antonio Trande]

2012/10/6 Nicolas Chauvet 

> 2012/10/6 Antonio Trande :
> > Hi all.
> >
> > I purpose to include a MOC package in RPMFusion repositories. Within few
> > days will be available a new beta release and I'm reading your Guide
> Lines
> > in order to get ready for open a new package review request.
> > In the meantime i would like ask you:
> Hi Antonio,
>
> Thx for your interest in RPM Fusion!
>
> Looking at MOC, this sound like a deprecated software, there is no
> update since 2005 at the first sight.Does it really worth to maintain
> that package ? Can't you find another software for that purpose (such
> as sox) ?
>
> Just in case you want others packaging idea:
> http://rpmfusion.org/Wishlist
>
> Nicolas (kwizart)
>

Hi Nicolas.

MOC is still in development, see SVN repositories (
http://moc.daper.net/download).
My RPMs: http://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/moc/

The next beta will be released soon.


-- 
*Antonio Trande
"Fedora Ambassador"*
*"Fedora italian translation group"*
*"Blogger"

**mail*: mailto:sagit...@fedoraproject.org 
*Homepage*: http://www.fedora-os.org
*Sip Address* : sip:sagitter AT ekiga.net
*Jabber * :sagitter AT jabber.org
*GPG Key: 19E6DF27*

Re: MOC's packages review requests

[Andrea Musuruane]

On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Antonio Trande  wrote:
> Hi Nicolas.
>
> MOC is still in development, see SVN repositories
> (http://moc.daper.net/download).
> My RPMs: http://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/moc/
>
> The next beta will be released soon.

There is already a pending (and stalled?) review request for MOC in RPM Fusion:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=789

Bye,

Andrea.

Re: MOC's packages review requests

[Antonio Trande]

2012/10/6 Andrea Musuruane 

> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Antonio Trande 
> wrote:
> > Hi Nicolas.
> >
> > MOC is still in development, see SVN repositories
> > (http://moc.daper.net/download).
> > My RPMs: http://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/moc/
> >
> > The next beta will be released soon.
>
> There is already a pending (and stalled?) review request for MOC in RPM
> Fusion:
> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=789
>
> Bye,
>
> Andrea.
>

Hi Andrea.

No problem. I can complete the
Bug789or open
another one.
About libRCC/libRCD ?


-- 
*Antonio Trande
"Fedora Ambassador"*
*"Fedora italian translation group"*
*"Blogger"

**mail*: mailto:sagit...@fedoraproject.org 
*Homepage*: http://www.fedora-os.org
*Sip Address* : sip:sagitter AT ekiga.net
*Jabber * :sagitter AT jabber.org
*GPG Key: 19E6DF27*

Re: MOC's packages review requests

[Andrea Musuruane]

On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Antonio Trande  wrote:
> No problem. I can complete the Bug789 or open another one.

The rule is FIFO. So the original request have the precedence. Kindly
ask the submitter in #789 if he is still interested. If he is no
longer interested, we can close that request and you can open a new
one.

Since you are not sponsored yet you cannot review #789 if the original
submitter is still interested.

The review seems stalled to me.
> About libRCC/libRCD ?

You must open a review request for each new package you want to submit.

Regards,

Andrea.

Re: MOC's packages review requests

[Antonio Trande]

2012/10/6 Andrea Musuruane 

> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Antonio Trande 
> wrote:
> > No problem. I can complete the Bug789 or open another one.
>
> The rule is FIFO. So the original request have the precedence. Kindly
> ask the submitter in #789 if he is still interested. If he is no
> longer interested, we can close that request and you can open a new
> one.
>
> Since you are not sponsored yet you cannot review #789 if the original
> submitter is still interested.
>
> The review seems stalled to me.
> > About libRCC/libRCD ?
>
> You must open a review request for each new package you want to submit.
>
> Regards,
>
> Andrea.
>


Ah, ok. The last comment
of Raymond Lu is of
May 2010.
At the comment 17
Yuri Timofeev
says about a push of MOC to Fedora upstream (MOC cannot be
include on Fedora repositories because of its requested and rejected
packages) .

Actually is someone still interested to it ?

-- 
*Antonio Trande
"Fedora Ambassador"*
*"Fedora italian translation group"*
*"Blogger"

**mail*: mailto:sagit...@fedoraproject.org 
*Homepage*: http://www.fedora-os.org
*Sip Address* : sip:sagitter AT ekiga.net
*Jabber * :sagitter AT jabber.org
*GPG Key: 19E6DF27*

Re: ffmpeg 1.0

[Sérgio Basto]

On Qui, 2012-10-04 at 14:33 -0600, Ken Dreyer wrote: 
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Julian Sikorski  wrote:
> > Error building xbmc-11.0-8.fc19.src.rpm
> 
> XBMC already FTBFS with ffmpeg 0.11: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/2396
> 
> Alex and I are working on packaging the latest upstream version.
> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/2501
> 
> Can you point me at your ffmpeg 1.0 package, so we can do some
> experimenting? (Or maybe just put it into rawhide?)
> 
> - Ken

Hi, since you build XBMC on F19 please or may you ? push it to F18,
since XMBC doesn't install now  on F18. 

Thanks, 
-- 
Sérgio M. B.

list of packages from repo rpmfusion-free that doesn't install on F18

[Sérgio Basto]

Hi, 
I had made some tests, here is the report, hope that help to better
rpmfusion, some seems just need a rebuild to fix it. 

bino-1.2.1-4.fc18.x86_64 from rpmfusion-free
bombono-dvd-1.2.0-4.20120616gitcdab110.fc18.2.x86_64 from rpmfusion-free
cmus-2.4.2-4.fc18.x86_64 from rpmfusion-free
dvdrip-0.98.11-6.fc17.x86_64 from rpmfusion-free
dvdrip-master-0.98.11-6.fc17.x86_64 from rpmfusion-free
k3b-extras-freeworld-2.0.2-6.fc17.x86_64 from rpmfusion-free
kmediafactory-0.8.1-1.fc18.x86_64 from rpmfusion-free
kmediafactory-devel-0.8.1-1.fc18.x86_64 from rpmfusion-free
kmediafactory-libs-0.8.1-1.fc18.x86_64 from rpmfusion-free
lightspark-0.6.0.1-2.fc18.x86_64 from rpmfusion-free
lightspark-mozilla-plugin-0.6.0.1-2.fc18.x86_64 from rpmfusion-free
mlt-ruby-0.8.0-2.fc18.x86_64 from rpmfusion-free
motion-3.3.0-trunkREV534.fc18.2.x86_64 from rpmfusion-free
ndiswrapper-1.57-1.fc17.x86_64 from rpmfusion-free
pangzero-1.3-4.fc17.noarch from rpmfusion-free
picard-freeworld-1.0-1.fc18.x86_64 from rpmfusion-free
smc-1.9-11.fc18.x86_64 from rpmfusion-free
smc-music-4.1-2.fc17.noarch from rpmfusion-free
sox-plugins-freeworld-14.3.2-3.fc18.x86_64 from rpmfusion-free
vbam-wx-1.8.0.1054-5.fc18.x86_64 from rpmfusion-free
vdr-mp3-0.10.2-4.fc18.x86_64 from rpmfusion-free
vdr-mplayer-0.10.2-4.fc18.x86_64 from rpmfusion-free
west-chamber-0.0.1-8.20101017svn.fc18.x86_64 from rpmfusion-free
xbmc-11.0-5.fc18.x86_64 from rpmfusion-free
xmms2-avcodec-0.8-2.fc18.x86_64 from rpmfusion-free
xmms2-freeworld-0.8-2.fc18.x86_64 from rpmfusion-free

Packages skipped because of dependency problems: 27 Packages
Thanks,
-- 
Sérgio M. B.

[Bug 2444] Review request: mp3fs - A dynamic MP encoding fuse file-system

[RPM Fusion Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2444

MartinKG  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||mgans...@alice.de

--- Comment #1 from MartinKG  2012-10-06 18:40:21 CEST ---
a few notes:

BuildRoot tag isn't required in the spec file
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag
same with clean
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#.25clean
also rm -rf %{buildroot} isn't necessary in the install section

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 2400] Review request: xorg-x11-drv-catalyst-legacy - AMD's proprietary driver for ATI legacy graphic cards

[RPM Fusion Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2400

--- Comment #15 from Brendan Jones  2012-10-07 
06:22:02 CEST ---
Sorry Leigh, work has been fairly crazy this last 3 weeks. I will finish this
off this week

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.