Re: ffmpeg: here we go again

[Peter Lemenkov]

2013/1/8 Nicolas Chauvet :
> 2013/1/7 Julian Sikorski 
>>
>> Hi list,
>>
>> ffmpeg-1.1 was released today. Out of 32 deps we are carrying, only 2
>> failed to rebuild (bino and motion). Given how early in F-19 cycle we
>> are, I'm inclined to push it sooner than later. Keep in mind that
>> dvdstyler and kmediafactory can only be rebuilt in the 2nd round.
>> I'll commit the changes and submit a build a few days later.
>
>
> Is there any ABI changes ? Where ?

Lots of API/ABI changes.

* http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/ffmpeg.html


-- 
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.

Re: ffmpeg: here we go again

[Julian Sikorski]

W dniu 07.01.2013 23:13, Nicolas Chauvet pisze:
> 2013/1/7 Julian Sikorski
>  >
> 
> W dniu 07.01.2013 21:53, Nicolas Chauvet pisze:
> > 2013/1/7 Julian Sikorski
> >  
> >  >>
> >
> > Hi list,
> >
> > ffmpeg-1.1 was released today. Out of 32 deps we are carrying,
> only 2
> > failed to rebuild (bino and motion). Given how early in F-19
> cycle we
> > are, I'm inclined to push it sooner than later. Keep in mind that
> > dvdstyler and kmediafactory can only be rebuilt in the 2nd round.
> > I'll commit the changes and submit a build a few days later.
> >
> >
> > Is there any ABI changes ? Where ?
> >
> > Thx
> >
> > Nicolas (kwizart)
> $ rpmsodiff ffmpeg-libs-1.0.1-1.fc18.x86_64.rpm
> ffmpeg-libs-1.1-1.fc19.x86_64.rpm   sonames only in
> 
> 
> Ok, can we do that after the F-18 release thx ?
> 
> Nicolas (kwizart)
Sure. The updated spec is committed so that maintainers can fix their
packages, but the build can wait.

Julian

Re: ffmpeg: here we go again

[Nicolas Chauvet]

2013/1/7 Julian Sikorski 

> W dniu 07.01.2013 21:53, Nicolas Chauvet pisze:
> > 2013/1/7 Julian Sikorski
> >  > >
> >
> > Hi list,
> >
> > ffmpeg-1.1 was released today. Out of 32 deps we are carrying, only 2
> > failed to rebuild (bino and motion). Given how early in F-19 cycle we
> > are, I'm inclined to push it sooner than later. Keep in mind that
> > dvdstyler and kmediafactory can only be rebuilt in the 2nd round.
> > I'll commit the changes and submit a build a few days later.
> >
> >
> > Is there any ABI changes ? Where ?
> >
> > Thx
> >
> > Nicolas (kwizart)
> $ rpmsodiff ffmpeg-libs-1.0.1-1.fc18.x86_64.rpm
> ffmpeg-libs-1.1-1.fc19.x86_64.rpm   sonames only in
>

Ok, can we do that after the F-18 release thx ?

Nicolas (kwizart)

Re: ffmpeg: here we go again

[Julian Sikorski]

W dniu 07.01.2013 21:53, Nicolas Chauvet pisze:
> 2013/1/7 Julian Sikorski
>  >
> 
> Hi list,
> 
> ffmpeg-1.1 was released today. Out of 32 deps we are carrying, only 2
> failed to rebuild (bino and motion). Given how early in F-19 cycle we
> are, I'm inclined to push it sooner than later. Keep in mind that
> dvdstyler and kmediafactory can only be rebuilt in the 2nd round.
> I'll commit the changes and submit a build a few days later.
> 
>  
> Is there any ABI changes ? Where ?
> 
> Thx
> 
> Nicolas (kwizart)
$ rpmsodiff ffmpeg-libs-1.0.1-1.fc18.x86_64.rpm
ffmpeg-libs-1.1-1.fc19.x86_64.rpm   sonames only in
ffmpeg-libs-1.0.1-1.fc18 [1]:
libavutil.so.51 /usr/lib64/libavutil.so.51.73.101

sonames only in ffmpeg-libs-1.1-1.fc19 [2]:
libavutil.so.52 /usr/lib64/libavutil.so.52.13.100

common sonames:
libavcodec.so.54/usr/lib64/libavcodec.so.54.59.100
/usr/lib64/libavcodec.so.54.86.100
libavdevice.so.54   /usr/lib64/libavdevice.so.54.2.101
/usr/lib64/libavdevice.so.54.3.102
libavfilter.so.3/usr/lib64/libavfilter.so.3.17.100
/usr/lib64/libavfilter.so.3.32.100
libavformat.so.54   /usr/lib64/libavformat.so.54.29.104
/usr/lib64/libavformat.so.54.59.106
libpostproc.so.52   /usr/lib64/libpostproc.so.52.0.100
/usr/lib64/libpostproc.so.52.2.100
libswresample.so.0  /usr/lib64/libswresample.so.0.15.100
/usr/lib64/libswresample.so.0.17.102
libswscale.so.2 /usr/lib64/libswscale.so.2.1.101
/usr/lib64/libswscale.so.2.1.103

--- ffmpeg-libs-1.0.1-1.fc18/libavcodec.so.54   2013-01-07
22:33:35.062762231 +0100
+++ ffmpeg-libs-1.1-1.fc19/libavcodec.so.54 2013-01-07
22:37:56.665074000 +0100
@@ -38,2 +38,3 @@
 av_frame_get_pkt_pos   T
+av_frame_get_pkt_size  T
 av_frame_get_sample_rate   T
@@ -46,2 +47,3 @@
 av_frame_set_pkt_pos   T
+av_frame_set_pkt_size  T
 av_frame_set_sample_rate   T
@@ -162,2 +164,3 @@
 avpriv_align_put_bits  T
+avpriv_bprint_to_extradata T
 avpriv_check_timecode_rate T
@@ -166,2 +169,3 @@
 avpriv_dirac_parse_sequence_header T
+avpriv_dnxhd_get_frame_sizeT
 avpriv_dv_codec_profileT
@@ -183,2 +187,3 @@
 avpriv_split_xiph_headers  T
+avpriv_tak_parse_streaminfoT
 avpriv_timecode_to_string  T
@@ -198,3 +203,3 @@
 ff_dct_initT
-ff_dct_init_mmxT
+ff_dct_init_x86T
 ff_dct_quantize_c  T
@@ -212,3 +217,3 @@
 ff_fdct_mmxT
-ff_fdct_mmx2   T
+ff_fdct_mmxext T
 ff_fdct_sse2   T
@@ -218,3 +223,3 @@
 ff_fft_init_fixed  T
-ff_fft_init_mmxT
+ff_fft_init_x86T
 ff_find_pix_fmtT
@@ -223,7 +228,7 @@
 ff_idct_xvid_mmx   T
-ff_idct_xvid_mmx2  T
-ff_idct_xvid_mmx2_add  T
-ff_idct_xvid_mmx2_put  T
 ff_idct_xvid_mmx_add   T
 ff_idct_xvid_mmx_put   T
+ff_idct_xvid_mmxextT
+ff_idct_xvid_mmxext_addT
+ff_idct_xvid_mmxext_putT
 ff_idct_xvid_sse2  T

6 symbols removed
T ff_dct_init_mmx
T ff_fdct_mmx2
T ff_fft_init_mmx
T ff_idct_xvid_mmx2
T ff_idct_xvid_mmx2_add
T ff_idct_xvid_mmx2_put

11 symbols added
T av_frame_get_pkt_size
T av_frame_set_pkt_size
T avpriv_bprint_to_extradata
T avpriv_dnxhd_get_frame_size
T avpriv_tak_parse_streaminfo
T ff_dct_init_x86
T ff_fdct_mmxext
T ff_fft_init_x86
T ff_idct_xvid_mmxext
T ff_idct_xvid_mmxext_add
T ff_idct_xvid_mmxext_put

# template for libavcodec.so.54 version script
FFMPEG_1.1 {
global:
av_frame_get_pkt_size;
av_frame_set_pkt_size;
avpriv_bprint_to_extradata;
avpriv_dnxhd_get_frame_size;
avpriv_tak_parse_streaminfo;
ff_dct_init_x86;
ff_fdct_mmxext;
ff_fft_init_x86;
ff_idct_xvid_mmxext;
ff_idct_xvid_mmxext_add;
ff_idct_xvid_mmxext_put;
};

libavdevice.so.54 definitions unchanged

--- ffmpeg-libs-1.0.1-1.fc18/libavfilter.so.3   2013-01-07
22:33:35.062762231 +0100
+++ ffmpeg-libs-1.1-1.fc19/libavfilter.so.3 2013-01-07
22:37:56.665074000 +0100
@@ -24,3 +24,5 @@
 avfilter_af_anull  D
+avfilter_af_apad   D
 avfilter_af_aresample  D
+avfilter_af_aselectD
 avfilter_af_asendcmd   D
@@ -36,2 +38,3 @@
 avfilter_af_earwax D
+avfilter_af_ebur128D
 avfilter_af_join   D
@@ -63,2 +66,3 @@
 avfilter_get_audio_buffer_ref_from_arrays  T
+avfilter_get_audio_buffer_ref_from_arrays_channels T
 avfilter_get_audio_buffer_ref_from_frame   T
@@ -90,2 +94,3 @@
 avfilter_link_free T
+avfilter_link_get_channels T
 avfilter_link_set_closed   T
@@ -98,2 +103,3 @@
 avfilter_ref_bufferT
+avfilter_ref_get_channels  T
 avfilter_register  T
@@ -124,2 +130,3 @@
 avfilter_vf_fade   D
+avfilter_vf_field  D
 avfilter_vf_fieldorder D
@@ -130,4 +137,6 @@
 avfilter_vf_frei0r D
+avfilter_vf_geqD
 avfilter_vf_gradfunD
 avfilter_vf_hflip  D
+avfilter_vf_histeq D
 avfilter_vf_hqdn3d D
@@ -135,2 +144,3 @@
 avfilter_vf_idet   D
+avfilter_vf_kerndeint  D
 avfilter_vf_lutD
@@ -146,2 +156,3 @@
 avfi

Re: ffmpeg: here we go again

[Nicolas Chauvet]

2013/1/7 Julian Sikorski 

> Hi list,
>
> ffmpeg-1.1 was released today. Out of 32 deps we are carrying, only 2
> failed to rebuild (bino and motion). Given how early in F-19 cycle we
> are, I'm inclined to push it sooner than later. Keep in mind that
> dvdstyler and kmediafactory can only be rebuilt in the 2nd round.
> I'll commit the changes and submit a build a few days later.
>

Is there any ABI changes ? Where ?

Thx

Nicolas (kwizart)

ffmpeg: here we go again

[Julian Sikorski]

Hi list,

ffmpeg-1.1 was released today. Out of 32 deps we are carrying, only 2
failed to rebuild (bino and motion). Given how early in F-19 cycle we
are, I'm inclined to push it sooner than later. Keep in mind that
dvdstyler and kmediafactory can only be rebuilt in the 2nd round.
I'll commit the changes and submit a build a few days later.

Regards,
Julian

[Bug 2150] Review request: geom - SALOME Geometry Module

[RPM Fusion Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2150

mrcer...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||mrcer...@gmail.com

--- Comment #25 from mrcer...@gmail.com 2013-01-07 17:20:55 CET ---
Hello Milos, hello Richard,
I am a user of Salome Meca on caelinux (http://www.caelinux.com/CMS/) and I
would like to see it in Fedora too. I'm curious why you packaged geom instead
of the original salome platform (maybe some licensing/funcionality/personal
preference issues?). Can I help speed up the review in some way?

Thanks, 

Mario

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.