Re: Request of bundling exception
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > > On 10/03/2013 07:48 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > >> I figured I'd give it a few days and haven't seen any real objections. Is >> it safe to assume he's good to go? >> > > I believe so. Thanks... The game looks awesome, it will be nice when save/load is implemented :) Too bad you have to buy it to get the content. Richard
MythTv 027 Fedora Package
Hallo, Since I couldn't find a MythTV 0.27 fedora package I rolled my own based on a git checkout and the spec file located at https://github.com/MythTV/packaging/tree/master/rpm I had to throw out some references to files and directories in the mythgame portion of the spec but it seems to compile and work fine for me under fedora 17 and 19. SRPM and spec file can be found under http://oncaphillis.net/mythtv/ Any critic and tips for improvement will be appreciated O.
Re: Request of bundling exception
Hi, On 10/03/2013 07:48 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: I figured I'd give it a few days and haven't seen any real objections. Is it safe to assume he's good to go? I believe so. Regards, Hans
[Bug 2978] Review request: skype - Skype Messaging and Telephony Client
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2978 Sérgio Basto changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ser...@serjux.com --- Comment #8 from Sérgio Basto 2013-10-03 21:35:20 CEST --- Hi, Simone Caronni good to see you around :) you may get so ideas from russianfedora https://github.com/RussianFedora/skype http://koji.russianfedora.ru/koji/packageinfo?packageID=97 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
Re: BuildSys restored re-submit/verify your build
On Qui, 2013-10-03 at 00:32 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Hi, > > Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > > Since the buildsys is now functional again, please verify that your > > package submitted during the outage was requeued and please have a quick > > test on the related rpmfusion updates-testing binaries. > > Looking at http://rpmfusion.org/ , I don't see ANY recent builds in > updates-testing nor devel, only builds from August 23. Does the RepoView > need a refresh? Or where are the packages that got pushed? > > Kevin Kofler Hi, you are talking about freetype-freeworld-2.4.10-4.fc18 ? according this email https://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/2013-October/015620.html is was pushed to testing/18 and it is here : http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/updates/testing/18/SRPMS/ but seems repoview aren't updated and mirrors also aren't refreshed. -- Sérgio M. B.
Re: Request of bundling exception
I figured I'd give it a few days and haven't seen any real objections. Is it safe to assume he's good to go? Thanks, Richard
[Bug 2518] vdr-burn - DVD writing plugin for VDR
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2518 --- Comment #13 from Nicolas Chauvet 2013-10-03 17:58:34 CEST --- OK, so this was fixed already. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 2518] vdr-burn - DVD writing plugin for VDR
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2518 --- Comment #12 from MartinKG 2013-10-03 17:53:59 CEST --- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #10) > > (In reply to comment #9) > > > (In reply to comment #7) > > > > @Martin why you needed a CVS request ? FYI We haven't branched F-20 yet > > > > > > But again, which problem ? there is no separte F-20 branch yet (only > > > devel F-19 > > > F-18). > > > > ok, I'll remember that. > > New Branches: devel, F-18, F-19 > > Ok, but then what is the problem ? The branches already exist and you already > have commit on 14/09 in devel and today in F-19 ?!? the problem was this message i already posted on https://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/2013-September/015594.html ? F-19/.cvsignore ? F-19/import.log cvs commit... Log message unchanged or not specified a)bort, c)ontinue, e)dit, !)reuse this message unchanged for remaining dirs Action: (continue) ? F-19/import.log ? F-19/.cvsignore Access denied: martinkg is not in ACL for rpms/vdr-burn/F-19 cvs commit: Pre-commit check failed cvs [commit aborted]: correct above errors first! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 2518] vdr-burn - DVD writing plugin for VDR
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2518 --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Chauvet 2013-10-03 17:36:15 CEST --- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #9) > > (In reply to comment #7) > > > @Martin why you needed a CVS request ? FYI We haven't branched F-20 yet > > > > But again, which problem ? there is no separte F-20 branch yet (only devel > > F-19 > > F-18). > > ok, I'll remember that. > New Branches: devel, F-18, F-19 Ok, but then what is the problem ? The branches already exist and you already have commit on 14/09 in devel and today in F-19 ?!? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 2518] vdr-burn - DVD writing plugin for VDR
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2518 --- Comment #10 from MartinKG 2013-10-03 16:33:39 CEST --- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #7) > > @Martin why you needed a CVS request ? FYI We haven't branched F-20 yet > > But again, which problem ? there is no separte F-20 branch yet (only devel > F-19 > F-18). ok, I'll remember that. New Branches: devel, F-18, F-19 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 2978] Review request: skype - Skype Messaging and Telephony Client
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2978 --- Comment #7 from Simone Caronni 2013-10-03 16:06:28 CEST --- ...and guess what: recently (don't know when) skype recreated the rpm package with all dependencies in place, I can install it on my systems without dependency issues. Last time I've looked at it; it did not have any dependency; now it has and even the prelink configuration files are marked as config: $ rpm -qp --requires skype-4.2.0.11-fedora.i586.rpm /bin/sh /bin/sh alsa-lib >= 1.0.23 config(skype) = 4.2.0.11-fc16 libQtCore.so.4 libQtDBus.so.4 libQtGui.so.4 libQtNetwork.so.4 libQtWebKit.so.4 libQtXml.so.4 libX11.so.6 libXScrnSaver libXext.so.6 libXss.so.1 libXv libXv.so.1 libasound.so.2 libasound.so.2(ALSA_0.9) libasound.so.2(ALSA_0.9.0rc4) libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.7) libdl.so.2 libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.0) libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.1) libgcc_s.so.1 libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0) libgcc_s.so.1(GLIBC_2.0) libm.so.6 libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libpng libpthread.so.0 libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.0) libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.1) libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.2) libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.3.2) librt.so.1 librt.so.1(GLIBC_2.2) libstdc++.so.6 libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.11) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.15) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.9) qt >= 4.6 qtwebkit rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) $ rpm -qplc skype-4.2.0.11-fedora.i586.rpm /etc/dbus-1/system.d/skype.conf /etc/prelink.conf.d/skype.conf It's missing only the %post scriptlets for the icon cache. The only difference from the dynamic non-rpm version it's that it does not contain the avatars pngs. Now I'm asking myself why people keep telling me that installing skype is hard. The only thing that would need to be put in the wrapper package is the alias command (alias skype='PULSE_LATENCY_MSEC=30 skype')... is a package really needed? Probably this ticket can be closed down. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 2978] Review request: skype - Skype Messaging and Telephony Client
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2978 --- Comment #6 from Simone Caronni 2013-10-03 15:41:25 CEST --- I'm looking at Vavoom and it's in Fedora: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/vavoom.git/tree/ Does this mean that a wrapper package for Skype could go into mainline Fedora? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 2978] Review request: skype - Skype Messaging and Telephony Client
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2978 --- Comment #5 from Simone Caronni 2013-10-03 15:37:35 CEST --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > Since installing skype is a bit of a pain, you could consider doing a package > which will download and install it for the user, > > You could use auto-downloader for the download. And then pkexec to do the > rpm -i of the rpm from skype. > > This way people could still just do yum install skype ... > > See the usbview package of an example of using pxexec, and see the vavoom > package for an example of using autodl. Thanks, I will try; but I'm not sure Skype leaves the tarballs/packages in place on the servers when a new version comes out and this would need to be sorted out. Is an example of using autodl with tarballs also available? > You could then make this a package with the necessary extra requires (not sure > if the requires of the skype rpm are complete), and make it ExclusiveArch i686 > and x86_64. No, package requirements are missing entirely in Skype's official package; there are no dependencies at all. > You should then also drop in a /etc/profile.d file with the following in > there: > > alias skype='PULSE_LATENCY_MSEC=30 skype' > > Otherwise audio won't work in F20+, the latter alone is worth doing a wrapper > package like this. Thanks for the hint, I will do. Does it make any harm on lower Fedora or RHEL distributions? I was also planning to submit the purple-skype plugin after the Skype review; do you think that could use that as the main "wrapper" package? Spec file and source rpm here: Spec URL: http://slaanesh.fedorapeople.org/purple-skype.spec The x86_64 build runs fine with an installed i686 package. I will update the Review Request when I will have something more to share; thanks everybody for inputs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 2978] Review request: skype - Skype Messaging and Telephony Client
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2978 Hans de Goede changed: What|Removed |Added CC||j.w.r.dego...@gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Hans de Goede 2013-10-03 15:02:02 CEST --- (In reply to comment #3) > Ouch. Since in the wishlist there's a separate section for things that cannot > be redistributed I thought the one in the upper section were check already for > redistribution. On behalf of the rpmfusion community, welcome to rpmfusion and sorry about this. Since installing skype is a bit of a pain, you could consider doing a package which will download and install it for the user, You could use auto-downloader for the download. And then pkexec to do the rpm -i of the rpm from skype. This way people could still just do yum install skype ... See the usbview package of an example of using pxexec, and see the vavoom package for an example of using autodl. You could then make this a package with the necessary extra requires (not sure if the requires of the skype rpm are complete), and make it ExclusiveArch i686 and x86_64. You should then also drop in a /etc/profile.d file with the following in there: alias skype='PULSE_LATENCY_MSEC=30 skype' Otherwise audio won't work in F20+, the latter alone is worth doing a wrapper package like this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
Re: Introducing myself
On Thu, 2013-10-03 at 12:06 +0200, Simone Caronni wrote: > Hello, > > just joined RPMFusion. Was planning to do it much earlier but work > keeps getting in the way. Welcome! Great to have you onboard! Lubo
[Bug 2979] Review request: steam - Installer for the Steam software distribution service
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2979 --- Comment #3 from Simone Caronni 2013-10-03 14:29:00 CEST --- Update with removal of dependency on the repositories (it was for my repository..): Spec URL: http://slaanesh.fedorapeople.org/steam.spec SRPM URL: http://slaanesh.fedorapeople.org/steam-1.0.0.42-2.fc19.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 2979] Review request: steam - Installer for the Steam software distribution service
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2979 --- Comment #2 from Simone Caronni 2013-10-03 14:27:02 CEST --- A(In reply to comment #1) > Looks promising... Once in RPM Fusion you won't need the Requires: for the RPM > Fusion repos since this will have to go in non-free the user will already have > them installed. Yep, you're right. Removed them: > What's the redistributable status for this? It was intended for Ubuntu, right? > So I think the only question is do they allow for modification for Fedora? This can be redistributed (contrary to my other Skype review... sigh). Original announcement here: http://steamcommunity.com/groups/SteamClientBeta#announcements/detail/1748790515449094039 And directly from the license file inside the package there are notes on Linux repackaging: "LICENSE AGREEMENT 1.Grant of Licenses. A. Personal Use Limited Installation License. Valve hereby grants, and by installing the Program you thereby accept, a limited, non-exclusive license and right to install copies of the Program on each of your computers solely for your personal use. B. Limited Redistribution License. Valve hereby grants, and you accept, a limited, terminable, non-exclusive license to reproduce and distribute an unlimited number of copies of the Program; provided that the following conditions are met: (i) you must distribute the Program in its entirety; (ii) you may not modify the Program, except that, in the case of the Linux version of the Program, you may modify scripts and other documentary and graphical files, but not any files containing the term “bootstrap” in the file name, provided that you do not modify any icons, change any copyright or other notices, or alter this or any other license agreement that is included with the Program, and provided further that any modifications you make are identified by you as modifications from the original Program provided by Valve; (iii) you may repackage the Program and distribute it with another software program, provided that you do not integrate the Program in any way with that other software program, or combine the Program with that other software program in a manner that would require you to distribute the Program under any open source or other license terms different from these terms. (iv) you may not charge any separate fee or receive any compensation attributable to the Program; (v) you must include this License Agreement provided with the Program and ensure that it will display and be required to be accepted by the end user in the same manner as is required by the Program in the form received by you; and (vi) you must preserve in all copies of the Program all copyright and legal notices that are attached to the copy of the Program received by you." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 2518] vdr-burn - DVD writing plugin for VDR
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2518 --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Chauvet 2013-10-03 14:19:56 CEST --- (In reply to comment #7) > @Martin why you needed a CVS request ? FYI We haven't branched F-20 yet But again, which problem ? there is no separte F-20 branch yet (only devel F-19 F-18). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 2979] Review request: steam - Installer for the Steam software distribution service
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2979 Richard changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hobbes1...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Richard 2013-10-03 14:19:08 CEST --- Looks promising... Once in RPM Fusion you won't need the Requires: for the RPM Fusion repos since this will have to go in non-free the user will already have them installed. What's the redistributable status for this? It was intended for Ubuntu, right? So I think the only question is do they allow for modification for Fedora? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 2518] vdr-burn - DVD writing plugin for VDR
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2518 --- Comment #8 from MartinKG 2013-10-03 14:15:29 CEST --- (In reply to comment #7) > @Martin why you needed a CVS request ? FYI We haven't branched F-20 yet sorry meant a cvs ACL problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 2978] Review request: skype - Skype Messaging and Telephony Client
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2978 --- Comment #3 from Simone Caronni 2013-10-03 14:06:04 CEST --- Ouch. Since in the wishlist there's a separate section for things that cannot be redistributed I thought the one in the upper section were check already for redistribution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 2978] Review request: skype - Skype Messaging and Telephony Client
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2978 Mohamed El Morabity changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pikachu.2...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Mohamed El Morabity 2013-10-03 13:45:30 CEST --- The redistribution license of Skype seems very restrictive: http://www.skype.com/en/legal/tou/#4 Unless you're explicitely allowed to redistribute Skype through RPM Fusion, I'm not sure Skype could be repackaged and delivered through third-party means. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 2979] New: Review request: steam - Installer for the Steam software distribution service
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2979
Bug #: 2979
Summary: Review request: steam - Installer for the Steam
software distribution service
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-rev...@rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: negativ...@gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-rev...@rpmfusion.org
Blocks: 2
Installer for the Steam software distribution service.
Steam is a software distribution service with an online store, automated
installation, automatic updates, achievements, SteamCloud synchronized
savegame and screenshot functionality, and many social features.
Spec URL: http://slaanesh.fedorapeople.org/steam.spec
SRPM URL: http://slaanesh.fedorapeople.org/steam-1.0.0.42-1.fc19.src.rpm
This package cannot be in Fedora as it's not free and comes as a binary package
only. The package is i686 only but installs perfectly fine on an x86_64 system
just using yum. It's in the Fedora RPMFusion wishlist.
$ rpmlint steam.spec
steam.spec:31: W: macro-in-comment %{name}
steam.spec:32: W: macro-in-comment %{_isa}
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
These macro in comments are for the command line required for generating
dependencies on Steam downloaded binaries; it is nice to have them at hand to
check for new dependencies whenever a new Steam client is automatically
downloaded.
$ rpmlint steam-1.0.0.42-1.fc19.i686.rpm
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libICE(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libSM(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libX11(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libXau(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libXcomposite(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libXcursor(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libXdamage(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libXdmcp(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libXext(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libXfixes(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libXi(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libXinerama(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libXrandr(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libXrender(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libXtst(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libasyncns(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libattr(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libcap(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libcom_err(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libdrm(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libffi(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libgcc(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libgcrypt(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libgpg-error(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libgudev1(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libogg(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libpng12(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libselinux(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libsndfile(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libstdc++(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libusbx(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libuuid(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libvorbis(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libwayland-client(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libwayland-server(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libxcb(x86-32)
steam.i686: W: name-repeated-in-summary C steam
steam.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US savegame -> save game,
save-game, pregame
steam.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US screenshot -> screen shot,
screen-shot, screens hot
steam.i686: W: invalid-license Steam License Agreement
steam.i686: E: no-binary
steam.i686: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
steam.i686: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/steam-1.0.0.42/steam_install_agreement.txt
steam.i686: W: desktopfile-without-binary /usr/share/applications/steam.desktop
/usr/bin/steam
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 37 errors, 7 warnings.
Notes on rpmlint on the binary package: the explicit-lib-dependency can be
ignored; these are the dependencies used by the Steam client itself, and need
to be on the system BEFORE the actual Steam client is downloaded. The package
itself contains only a script; so the last errors are related to the fact that
the desktop files etc. point to a script and not a binary.
The package sets STEAM_RUNTIME=0 in /etc/profile.d/steam.*; so the download
client and the Steam client itself do NOT use Ubuntu libraries (the Steam
runtime) for running; but instead use the Fedora system provided ones.
For additional details on the setup please see her
[Bug 2978] Review request: skype - Skype Messaging and Telephony Client
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2978 --- Comment #1 from Simone Caronni 2013-10-03 13:13:38 CEST --- A note on the package: builds only for i686 but installs perfectly fine on x86_64 systems by just using yum; dependencies are downloaded correctly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2013-10-03
Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 19: 1 staging-kmod-addons-3.11.1-1.fc19.1 Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 19: staging-kmod-addons-3.11.1-1.fc19.1 --- * Thu Oct 03 2013 Nicolas Chauvet - 3.11.1-1.1 - Rebuilt
[Bug 2978] Review request: skype - Skype Messaging and Telephony Client
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2978 Simone Caronni changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
Introducing myself
Hello, just joined RPMFusion. Was planning to do it much earlier but work keeps getting in the way. I'm a Fedora contributor; currently listed as #35 (out of 3259) in the Fedora badges app [1]. My Fedora user page [2] list some additional information about reviews, bugs and the various Fedora activities I've performed in the last years. Some stuff I've packaged is very likely going into RHEL 7; like the Bacula backup software that is the default in RHEL 6 and used in the Fedora infrastructure. My idea is to eventually introduce all the packages hosted on my homepage to RPMFusion after the appropriate reviews, modifications, etc. Later on, I would also like to contribute to the Nvidia drivers. I have tons of Nvidia hardware (SLI, Optimus laptops, etc.) and some different views on the way it's packaged. I will post them later on after the other (easier) package reviews. I'm currently building and mantaining my packages in both Fedora and EPEL, so for all package reviews unless specified I'm targeting all current Fedora releases and EPEL 6. Here is my first review request for Skype, which is in the RPMFusion wishlist: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2978 Regards, --Simone [1] https://badges.fedoraproject.org/user/slaanesh [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Slaanesh -- You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight of the shore (R. W. Emerson). http://xkcd.com/229/ http://negativo17.org/
[Bug 2978] New: Review request: skype - Skype Messaging and Telephony Client
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2978 Bug #: 2978 Summary: Review request: skype - Skype Messaging and Telephony Client Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-rev...@rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: negativ...@gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-rev...@rpmfusion.org Millions of individuals and businesses use skype to make free video and voice calls, send instant messages and share files with other skype users. Everyday, people also use skype to make low-cost calls to landlines and mobiles. Spec URL: http://slaanesh.fedorapeople.org/skype.spec SRPM URL: http://slaanesh.fedorapeople.org/skype-4.2.0.11-3.fc19.src.rpm $ rpmlint skype.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint skype-4.2.0.11-3.fc19.i686.rpm skype.i686: W: name-repeated-in-summary C Skype skype.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US landlines -> landmines, land lines, land-lines skype.i686: W: invalid-license Skype End User License Agreement skype.i686: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/prelink.conf.d/skype.conf skype.i686: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/dbus-1/system.d/skype.conf skype.i686: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/skype-4.2.0.11/LICENSE skype.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary skype 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings. Notes on rpmlint on the binary: the license of course is not valid for Fedora inclsion. Config files in /etc/prelink.conf and /etc/dbus-1/system.d should actually be written exactly like this or Skype refuses to work properly (prelinking corrupts the binary, for example). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2013-10-03
Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 19: 1 (!) staging-kmod-addons-3.11.1-1.fc19 : INVALID rebuild, not published! Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 18: 5 ndiswrapper-kmod-1.58-3.fc18.3 openafs-kmod-1.6.5-1.fc18.8 staging-kmod-3.10.5-2.fc18.7 VirtualBox-kmod-4.2.16-2.fc18.10 xtables-addons-kmod-2.3-1.fc18.7 Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: 1 phonon-backend-vlc-0.6.2-2.fc20 Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 19: staging-kmod-addons-3.11.1-1.fc19 - * Fri Sep 20 2013 Thorsten Leemhuis - 3.11.1-1 - Update to 3.11.1 - drop csr, dropped upstream Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 18: ndiswrapper-kmod-1.58-3.fc18.3 -- * Tue Oct 01 2013 Nicolas Chauvet - 1.58-3.3 - Rebuilt for kernel openafs-kmod-1.6.5-1.fc18.8 --- * Tue Oct 01 2013 Nicolas Chauvet - 1.6.5-1.8 - Rebuilt for kernel staging-kmod-3.10.5-2.fc18.7 * Tue Oct 01 2013 Nicolas Chauvet - 3.10.5-2.7 - Rebuilt for kernel VirtualBox-kmod-4.2.16-2.fc18.10 * Tue Oct 01 2013 Nicolas Chauvet - 4.2.16-2.10 - Rebuilt for kernel xtables-addons-kmod-2.3-1.fc18.7 * Tue Oct 01 2013 Nicolas Chauvet - 2.3-1.7 - Rebuilt for kernel Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: phonon-backend-vlc-0.6.2-2.fc20 --- * Wed Oct 02 2013 Rex Dieter 0.6.2-2 - rebuild (vlc)
RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) Package Build Report 2013-10-03
Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/19: 1 frogatto-1.3.3-1.fc19 Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 18: 8 broadcom-wl-6.30.223.141-1.fc18 catalyst-kmod-13.8-0.2.beta1.fc18.6 nvidia-173xx-kmod-173.14.37-2.fc18.8 nvidia-304xx-kmod-304.88-2.fc18.6 nvidia-kmod-319.32-2.fc18.6 nvidia-kmod-319.60-1.fc18 wl-kmod-6.30.223.141-1.fc18.1 xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-319.60-1.fc18 Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/19: frogatto-1.3.3-1.fc19 - * Wed Sep 25 2013 Andrea Musuruane - 1.3.3-1 - Updated to upstream v1.3.3 as of Aug 21, 2013 - Fixed crash when attempting to enter in editor mode (#2966) - Used Mac OS X icons - Removed Group tag * Mon Aug 26 2013 Hans de Goede - 1.3.1-3 - Rebuild for new boost Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 18: broadcom-wl-6.30.223.141-1.fc18 --- * Sat Sep 14 2013 Nicolas Viéville - 6.30.223.141-1 - Upstream update to 6.30.223.141 catalyst-kmod-13.8-0.2.beta1.fc18.6 --- * Tue Oct 01 2013 Nicolas Chauvet - 13.8-0.2.beta1.6 - Rebuilt for kernel nvidia-173xx-kmod-173.14.37-2.fc18.8 * Tue Oct 01 2013 Nicolas Chauvet - 173.14.37-2.8 - Rebuilt for kernel nvidia-304xx-kmod-304.88-2.fc18.6 - * Tue Oct 01 2013 Nicolas Chauvet - 304.88-2.6 - Rebuilt for kernel nvidia-kmod-319.32-2.fc18.6 --- * Tue Oct 01 2013 Nicolas Chauvet - 1:319.32-2.6 - Rebuilt for kernel nvidia-kmod-319.60-1.fc18 - * Wed Oct 02 2013 Nicolas Chauvet - 1:319.60-1 - Update to 319.60 wl-kmod-6.30.223.141-1.fc18.1 - * Tue Oct 01 2013 Nicolas Chauvet - 6.30.223.141-1.1 - Rebuilt for kernel * Sat Sep 14 2013 Nicolas Viéville - 6.30.223.141-1 - Upstream update to 6.30.223.141 * Sat Aug 31 2013 Nicolas Chauvet - 5.100.82.112-11.8 - Rebuilt for kernel xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-319.60-1.fc18 - * Wed Oct 02 2013 Nicolas Chauvet - 1:319.60-1 - Update to 319.60 - Avoid to exclude libcuda.so in devel - Add libnvidia-ifr.so
