Re: polar ssl issues
On 09/30/2014 08:40 PM, Ken Dreyer wrote: > On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Jeremy Newton : >> Hi, >> >> So at the moment I can't update dolphin-emu because of RH#1069394. >> >> It seems the developer/maintainer is not responding to the bug and is >> reluctant to fix it. So the three approach that come to mind: >> >> - Bundle polarssl until it is fixed (I would assume I need approval) >> - Package polarssl-havege or whatever as an alternative to polarssl >> - Keep bugging the maintainer or contact someone who has the >> leverage to do more than me >> >> I just wanted to bounce it off you guys to see if anyone has any >> opinion on how to deal with this, because I'm getting no where fast. >> >> Thanks > Yeah, this is not a good situation. I'd ok with bundling in this case, along with a note in the .spec file that links to that bug. > > - Ken > +1 Jonathan
Re: polar ssl issues
Yeah, this is not a good situation. I'd ok with bundling in this case, along with a note in the .spec file that links to that bug. - Ken On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Jeremy Newton wrote: > Hi, > > So at the moment I can't update dolphin-emu because of RH#1069394. > > It seems the developer/maintainer is not responding to the bug and is > reluctant to fix it. So the three approach that come to mind: > > - Bundle polarssl until it is fixed (I would assume I need approval) > - Package polarssl-havege or whatever as an alternative to polarssl > - Keep bugging the maintainer or contact someone who has the leverage to do > more than me > > I just wanted to bounce it off you guys to see if anyone has any opinion on > how to deal with this, because I'm getting no where fast. > > Thanks
polar ssl issues
Hi, So at the moment I can't update dolphin-emu because of RH#1069394. It seems the developer/maintainer is not responding to the bug and is reluctant to fix it. So the three approach that come to mind: - Bundle polarssl until it is fixed (I would assume I need approval) - Package polarssl-havege or whatever as an alternative to polarssl - Keep bugging the maintainer or contact someone who has the leverage to do more than me I just wanted to bounce it off you guys to see if anyone has any opinion on how to deal with this, because I'm getting no where fast. Thanks
Re: mass rebuild plan
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 8:12 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > src/debug.cpp: In function 'void output_debug_message(const char*, ...)': > > src/debug.cpp:31:21: error: format not a string literal and no format > > arguments [-Werror=format-security] > > fprintf(fp, text); > > ^ > > is easy : > - printf(fp, text); > + printf(fp, "%s", text); Sorry for the noise, guys. I think I have misinterpreted a warning for an error :-/ It was almost trivial to fix. I'll commit a new version soon. Bye, Andrea
