[Bug 3667] Review request: tvheadend - a TV streaming server and DVR
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3667 --- Comment #8 from pe...@perex.cz 2015-05-29 13:39:08 CEST --- http://www.filebin.ca/23OKDPIhGEPO/tvheadend.spec http://www.filebin.ca/23OK2TmsgCIo/tvheadend-4.0.3-1.fc21.src.rpm Changes: Fixes for issues described in comment#3 . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
Re: k9copy - k9copy-reloaded
On Fri, 2015-05-29 at 00:26 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: 22573 (k9copy): Build on target fedora-21-rpmfusion_free succeeded. Build logs may be found at http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-21-rpmfusion_free/22573 -k9copy-3.0.3-1.fc21/ Done ! Thanks, Sergio, If/when you rebuild the package for devel and F22, can you please include the appdata file in the package too? https://raw.githubusercontent.com/sanjayankur31/rpmfusion -appdata/master/appdata-extra-free/desktop/k9copy.appdata.xml Of course, please feel free to improve it. -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha FranciscoD http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
http://rpmfusion.org/keys does not list F22 keys
Hi, A user just popped in to #fedora asking where he could find the rpmfusion key signatures for Fedora 22. They're not up on the page: http://rpmfusion.org/keys Could the page please be updated? I'd do it but I don't have write permissions to the page. The keys are available here, though: http://keys.fedoraproject.org/pks/lookup?search=0xA6708DA3op=vindex -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha FranciscoD http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: k9copy - k9copy-reloaded
On Fri, 2015-05-29 at 14:26 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: Lets try upload to upstream, please, is the better solution isn't ? https://bugs.launchpad.net/k9copy-reloaded I already put there patches from RPMFusion Yes, but I cannot possibly create 100+ upstream bugzilla accounts and send them the appdata files by myself - maintainers would probably already have accounts and could do it, hopefully :) Having said that, a number of RPMFusion packages do not have an active upstream, so for them, the appdata will just have to be carried in the srpm. -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha FranciscoD http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
