[Bug 2909] Review request: gtkradiant - Level design program for video games
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2909 --- Comment #10 from Richard 2015-08-18 00:28:25 CEST --- (In reply to comment #9) > Don't know why Richard closed my review request. > I noticed only now. Umm... I explained it when I closed the ticket. The long version is that I was trying to clean up the review requests and close any stagnant tickets. If you'd like to pursue getting this package then that's great, but a long list of review requests doesn't help people know which ones are worth putting their time and effort into. While it's not impossible to get sponsored on RPM Fusion first, it's not typical. If you were to be sponsored in Fedora then you would automatically be sponsored here. Especially right now with the infrastructure upgrades tying up people. If you haven't already please review: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group The same rules apply here. Because your sponsor is ultimately responsible for your packages if you break something or leave, we really like to see more than just a single review request before deciding to sponsor someone. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 2909] Review request: gtkradiant - Level design program for video games
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2909 Bug 2909 depends on bug 3007, which changed state. Bug 3007 Summary: Review request: gtkradiant-data - Data files for the video games level editor https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3007 What|Old Value |New Value Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|WONTFIX | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 30] Tracker : Sponsorship Request
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30 Bug 30 depends on bug 3007, which changed state. Bug 3007 Summary: Review request: gtkradiant-data - Data files for the video games level editor https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3007 What|Old Value |New Value Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|WONTFIX | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 3007] Review request: gtkradiant-data - Data files for the video games level editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3007 Alberto Chiusole changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #3 from Alberto Chiusole 2015-08-18 00:21:06 CEST --- Don't know why Richard closed my review request. I noticed only now. Reopened because is still valid. If someone is interested please reply. I'll pay more attention on emails from rpmfusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 2909] Review request: gtkradiant - Level design program for video games
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2909 Alberto Chiusole changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #9 from Alberto Chiusole 2015-08-18 00:19:58 CEST --- Don't know why Richard closed my review request. I noticed only now. Reopened because is still valid. If someone is interested please reply. I'll pay more attention on emails from rpmfusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 30] Tracker : Sponsorship Request
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30 Bug 30 depends on bug 2909, which changed state. Bug 2909 Summary: Review request: gtkradiant - Level design program for video games https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2909 What|Old Value |New Value Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|WONTFIX | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 3576] Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576
--- Comment #12 from Momcilo Medic 2015-08-17
16:11:04 CEST ---
I noticed that versioning was counting either on .git or OBS_OVERRIDE_VERSION
to provide correct version (otherwise it was set to 0.0.1), so I used latter
which is appropriate for packaging. Also, upstream released OBS-studio 0.11.4
Updated .src.rpm and .spec files:
https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/0.11.4-0.1/obs-studio-0.11.4-0.1.fc21.src.rpm
https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/0.11.4-0.1/obs-studio.spec
rpmlint outputs:
$ rpmlint SRPMS/obs-studio-0.11.4-0.1.fc21.src.rpm
obs-studio.src:56: E: hardcoded-library-path in
%{buildroot}/usr/lib/libobs*.so*
obs-studio.src:79: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/cmake/LibObs
obs-studio.src:84: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/obs-plugins
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-0.11.4-0.1.fc21.x86_64.rpm
obs-studio.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libobs.so.0
exit@GLIBC_2.2.5
obs-studio.x86_64: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share
/usr/share/obs/obs-plugins/obs-ffmpeg/ffmpeg-mux
obs-studio.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary obs
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings.
$ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-devel-0.11.4-0.1.fc21.x86_64.rpm
obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
$ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-debuginfo-0.11.4-0.1.fc21.x86_64.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
Re: problem with branches/version tags
Hi, ... I've just updated qmmp and qmmp-plugin-pack in Rawhide. When trying to update their counterparts in RPMFusion, I've ended up with qmmp-plugins-freeworld-0.8.5-1.fc21[1] instead of ...fc23 and the problem bites again :-( https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3736#c2 is there anything else I could do, or is it completely upon Kwizart ... err, infrastructure team? K. -- Karel Volný QE BaseOs/Daemons Team Red Hat Czech, Brno tel. +420 532294274 (RH: +420 532294111 ext. 8262074) xmpp ka...@jabber.cz :: "Never attribute to malice what can :: easily be explained by stupidity."
