[Bug 4258] Review request: libav - Audio and video processing libraries
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4258 --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Chauvet --- (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #7) ... > I think that if it's possible, we can provide both and leave the choice to > the developers. A very good quote about this: http://www.islinuxaboutchoice.com/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 4258] Review request: libav - Audio and video processing libraries
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4258 --- Comment #7 from Antonio Trande --- (In reply to Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski from comment #6) > Is there any real need for this package in RPMFusion? FFmpeg is almost 100% > backwards compatible with libav. The one package that I thought still used > bundled libav (gstreamer1-libav) actually switched back to FFmpeg last year. > > Most of the symbols in the provided libraries have the same names, so you'd > have to be extremely careful not to end up with another package depending on > both ffmpeg-libs and libav in the future. Since libvdpau-va-gl (the > vaapi-to-vdpau bridge that's required to use Intel GPUs via vdpau) depends > on ffmpeg-libs, this might be trickier than you think. Even renaming the > libraries and their sonames won't help here. You'd have to rename the > symbols, too. > We could set Conflicts tag to prevent 'libav' installation if FFmpeg is already installed (and viceversa). I don't know which one is the better today, but upstream says that 'FFmpeg' and 'libav' are different especially at API level. I think that if it's possible, we can provide both and leave the choice to the developers. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 3940] Review Request: fdkaac - Command line frontend for libfdk-aac encoder
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3940 Nicolas Chauvet changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: fdkaac-cli |Review Request: fdkaac - |- Command Line Frontend for |Command line frontend for |Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec|libfdk-aac encoder |Library | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 3940] Review Request: fdkaac-cli - Command Line Frontend for Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3940 Nicolas Chauvet changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|3 |4 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Chauvet --- Package is approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 4258] Review request: libav - Audio and video processing libraries
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4258 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||domi...@greysector.net --- Comment #6 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski --- Is there any real need for this package in RPMFusion? FFmpeg is almost 100% backwards compatible with libav. The one package that I thought still used bundled libav (gstreamer1-libav) actually switched back to FFmpeg last year. Most of the symbols in the provided libraries have the same names, so you'd have to be extremely careful not to end up with another package depending on both ffmpeg-libs and libav in the future. Since libvdpau-va-gl (the vaapi-to-vdpau bridge that's required to use Intel GPUs via vdpau) depends on ffmpeg-libs, this might be trickier than you think. Even renaming the libraries and their sonames won't help here. You'd have to rename the symbols, too. So, I'm against including this package in RPMFusion because it introduces a world of potential trouble without any clear technical benefits. But of course I'm open to any counter-arguments. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 4222] cAudio-freeworld - MP3 support for cAudio
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4222 Antonio Trande changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Blocks|2 |3 Assignee|rpmfusion-package-review@rp |anto.tra...@gmail.com |mfusion.org | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 3940] Review Request: fdkaac-cli - Command Line Frontend for Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3940 --- Comment #6 from Christopher Atherton --- Added autoconf automake build requires. SPEC: https://cjatherton.fedorapeople.org/fdkaac.spec SPRM: https://cjatherton.fedorapeople.org/fdkaac-0.6.3-3.fc24.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 1742] Review Request: vo-aacenc - VisualOn AAC encoder library
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1742 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||domi...@greysector.net --- Comment #23 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski --- FYI this is no longer relevant for FFmpeg as vo-aacenc is not supported. fdk-aac is for HE-AAC, and the native encoder is good enough for most cases. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 4258] Review request: libav - Audio and video processing libraries
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4258 Ben Rosser changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rosser@gmail.com Assignee|rpmfusion-package-review@rp |rosser@gmail.com |mfusion.org | --- Comment #5 from Ben Rosser --- Taken. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
Re: Review swap
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Antonio Trande wrote: > Hi. > > I can review in return of > http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4258. > > Any chance? > > Taken, any chance you could look at either https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4222 (cAudio-freeworld) or dwarffortress (https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3953)? Ben Rosser
Re: Unable to do scratch build on rawhide
2016-09-16 17:05 GMT+02:00 Antonio Trande : > Hi all. > > Since 2 days at least, scratch builds on rawhide branch are impossible > because of missing downloads: Thx for the report Antonio, I've re-enabled the koji regen-repo tasks, once they have succeed, you should be abble to resubmit. -- - Nicolas (kwizart)
[Bug 1742] Review Request: vo-aacenc - VisualOn AAC encoder library
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1742
rc040...@freenet.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rc040...@freenet.de
--- Comment #22 from rc040...@freenet.de ---
(In reply to Hans de Goede from comment #21)
- MUSTFIX: Building is non-verbose
Please append --disable-silent-rules to %configure
- /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/vo-aacenc.pc seems broken to me.
It uses includedir=/usr/include, but the headers below /usr/include/vo-aacenc
are expecting to find vo-aacenc's headers under /usr/include/vo-aacenc:
e.g.
/usr/include/vo-aacenc/voAMRWB.h:#include "voAudio.h"
i.e. they expect -I/usr/include/vo-aacenc and not -I/usr/include.
- Consider to remove the "rm -rf %{buildroot}" from %install
It's not needed anymore unless you plan to build this package for really
ancient rhels.
- Consider to remove the "Group" tags. They aren't used for anything in Fedora.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
Review swap
Hi. I can review in return of http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4258. Any chance? -- --- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: 0x6CE6D08A Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[Bug 1742] Review Request: vo-aacenc - VisualOn AAC encoder library
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1742 --- Comment #21 from Hans de Goede --- Hi, Ok, lets revive / reboot this review request. Here is an updates spec and srpm: http://jwrdegoede.danny.cz/vo-aacenc.spec http://jwrdegoede.danny.cz/vo-aacenc-0.1.3-1.fc26.src.rpm Changes since the list version: * Fri Sep 16 2016 Hans de Goede - 0.1.3-1 - New upstream release 0.1.3 - Stop building and packaging a statically linked lib Regards, Hans -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 4258] Review request: libav - Audio and video processing libraries
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4258 Antonio Trande changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 4258] Review request: libav - Audio and video processing libraries
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4258 --- Comment #4 from Antonio Trande --- 'libav-11' looks incompatible with 'opencv-3.1.0', it's disabled on Fedora >24. Package ready for reviewing. SPEC: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0Bz6cHSZ6ZzsYN2NXSUdFSUdpUkU SRPM: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0Bz6cHSZ6ZzsYbVdxcmhSX3ZYb1k -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
Unable to do scratch build on rawhide
Hi all. Since 2 days at least, scratch builds on rawhide branch are impossible because of missing downloads: http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/getfile?taskID=32719&name=root.log&offset=-4000 http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=32719 -- --- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: 0x6CE6D08A Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[Bug 3940] Review Request: fdkaac-cli - Command Line Frontend for Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3940 rc040...@freenet.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rc040...@freenet.de --- Comment #5 from rc040...@freenet.de --- (In reply to Nicolas Chauvet from comment #4) > Build failed in mock: > /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.8M6Uvz: line 31: autoreconf: command not found > > You are probably missing a BuildRequires: BR: autoconf automake are missing -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 3940] Review Request: fdkaac-cli - Command Line Frontend for Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3940 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Chauvet --- Build failed in mock: /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.8M6Uvz: line 31: autoreconf: command not found You are probably missing a BuildRequires: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
