Re: volunteers to move kwave and twolame to Fedora proper

[Zamir Sun]

Hi,

On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 11:32 PM, Sérgio Basto  wrote:
> Hello,
> To do the things properly, we should finish the move of mp3 to Fedora
> proper, my concern is mainly because audacity which use twolame , lame,
> libmad to be correct and finished , all should be enabled in Fedora
> proper ...
>
> who help me or do alone the move on these packages [1] ?
>
> Thanks,
>
> [1]
> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4459
> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4754
>

I will work on twolame.
And just submitted to Fedora review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533719

> --
> Sérgio M. B.
> ___
> rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org



-- 
Ziqian SUN (Zamir)
z...@fedoraproject.org
GPG : 1D86 6D4A 49CE 4BBD 72CF FCF5 D856 6E11 F2A0 525E
Want to know more about Fedora?
Visit https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

[Bug 908] Review request: Mupen64Plus - Emulates the Nintendo 64 game console

[RPM Fusion Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=908

--- Comment #23 from Wade Berrier  ---
Submitted package request here:

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4757

(In reply to Jeremy Newton from comment #22)
> Considering the change in Fedora policy a while back, I would assume this
> should go into Fedora proper, rather than rpmfusion.

Good idea.  Maybe we start with rpmfusion with the intent of moving that
direction.  (There are several emulators still in rpmfusion).

> I maintain dolphin-emu,
> VBA-M, and PCSXR and they've all been in Fedora's main repo's for quite some
> time.

I use these regularly, thanks!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

[Bug 4757] New: Review Request: mupen64plus - Nintendo 64 Emulator

[RPM Fusion Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4757

Bug ID: 4757
   Summary: Review Request: mupen64plus - Nintendo 64 Emulator
   Product: Package Reviews
   Version: Current
  Hardware: x86_64
OS: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: enhancement
  Priority: P1
 Component: Review Request
  Assignee: rpmfusion-package-rev...@rpmfusion.org
  Reporter: wberr...@gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-rev...@rpmfusion.org
 namespace: free

There have been some previous review requests:

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=908

It was also suggested to try to get this package into fedora since they allow
emulators now.  Baby steps...

Here's a link to the src rpm:

http://berrier.org/tmp/mupen64plus-2.5-2.fc27.src.rpm

I got the src.rpm from:

   
https://versaweb.dl.sourceforge.net/project/postinstaller/fedora/releases/25/SRPM/mupen64plus-2.5-1.fc25.src.rpm

but made a few changes, which are listed in the spec file.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

[Bug 908] Review request: Mupen64Plus - Emulates the Nintendo 64 game console

[RPM Fusion Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=908

--- Comment #22 from Jeremy Newton  ---
Considering the change in Fedora policy a while back, I would assume this
should go into Fedora proper, rather than rpmfusion. I maintain dolphin-emu,
VBA-M, and PCSXR and they've all been in Fedora's main repo's for quite some
time.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

[Bug 4640] Review request: slowmoVideo - Creates slow-motion videos from your footage

[RPM Fusion Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4640

--- Comment #15 from Nicolas Chauvet  ---
(In reply to Riku Seppälä from comment #14)
> Any progress getting this to rpmfusion?

Since there is no answer from the original reporter,
feel free to take over the maintenance. (open a new bug).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

[Bug 908] Review request: Mupen64Plus - Emulates the Nintendo 64 game console

[RPM Fusion Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=908

Andrea Musuruane  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |WONTFIX

--- Comment #21 from Andrea Musuruane  ---
Please open a new bug(In reply to Wade Berrier from comment #20)
> It would be great to get this included in rpmfusion.  (There were two
> package requests and it's on the wishlist).
> 
> I've been using the src.rpm from this project for years:
> 
> https://versaweb.dl.sourceforge.net/project/postinstaller/fedora/releases/25/
> SRPM/mupen64plus-2.5-1.fc25.src.rpm
> 
> How to proceed?

Please open a new bug report following:
https://rpmfusion.org/Contributors

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

[Bug 908] Review request: Mupen64Plus - Emulates the Nintendo 64 game console

[RPM Fusion Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=908

Wade Berrier  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
 CC||wberr...@gmail.com
  namespace||free
 Resolution|WONTFIX |---

--- Comment #20 from Wade Berrier  ---
It would be great to get this included in rpmfusion.  (There were two package
requests and it's on the wishlist).

I've been using the src.rpm from this project for years:

https://versaweb.dl.sourceforge.net/project/postinstaller/fedora/releases/25/SRPM/mupen64plus-2.5-1.fc25.src.rpm

How to proceed?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

mupen64plus rpm?

[Wade Berrier]

Hello,

I see that mupen64plus is on the wishlist, and there are several old bug 
reports about adding it:


https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=908

This src.rpm works great:

https://versaweb.dl.sourceforge.net/project/postinstaller/fedora/releases/25/SRPM/mupen64plus-2.5-1.fc25.src.rpm

I'd be willing to maintain this package if we could get it added.

Thoughts?  How to proceed from here?

Wade
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld

[Nicolas Chauvet]

2018-01-04 23:31 GMT+01:00 Nicolas Chauvet :
> 2018-01-04 15:22 GMT+01:00 Kevin Kofler :
>> Hi,
>>
>> Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
>>> For this specific issue, I (one?) can probably find the option to
>>> raise the koji task timeout.
> Probably because the build was resubmitted before i've set the change in kojid
> So I've resubmitted the build and verified that the option was
> correctly propagated from kojid.conf to the mock site-default.conf
> Thx Dan btw ;)
>
> While at it, I've also migrated the remaining f24 armv7 builders to
> current f26. But it will not affects the qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld
> build (as it already failed on f26 builders).

So to sum-up the current situation.
The last qt5-qtwebengine 5.10 build succeeded and took about 2 days
and 2,5 hours to build.
Compaired with last 5.9 build which took 1,5 day to build on arm, it's
a rather big jump but it's comparable with the x86_64 ratio.

The way forward is to build armv7 on aarch64 (using guest vm), But
this requires to have an armv7 fedora cloud image (and if our cloud
provider for aarch64 can run armv7 guests..).

Thx

-- 
-

Nicolas (kwizart)
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

volunteers to move kwave and twolame to Fedora proper

[Sérgio Basto]

Hello,
To do the things properly, we should finish the move of mp3 to Fedora
proper, my concern is mainly because audacity which use twolame , lame,
libmad to be correct and finished , all should be enabled in Fedora
proper ... 

who help me or do alone the move on these packages [1] ? 

Thanks,

[1] 
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4459
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4754

-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: Self-introduction: zsun

[Zamir SUN]

On 01/09/2018 09:35 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> 2018-01-09 14:07 GMT+01:00 Zamir SUN :
>>
>>
>> On 01/09/2018 09:06 PM, Zamir SUN wrote:
>>> Hi RPMFusion developers,
>>>
>>> I am Zamir from China. I am one of the maintainers of Fedora Zhongwen
>>> User Group repo[1] and also a Fedora packager. I am available as zsun in
>>> both Fedora Account System and RPMFusion Account System.
>>>
>>> Recently we are working on pushing Deepin Desktop Environment related
>>> packages into Fedora so that people can use them more easily[2]. Since
>>> some of the packages depends on packages that is in RPMFusion, so we are
>>> recently sending review requests here.
>>>
>>> I'm a newcomer to RPMFusion packaging so I believe I need a sponsor.
>>> I've send two review requests[3][4]. And hope this can be reviewed soon.
> Hello,
> 
> Welcome to RPM Fusion,
> 
> As you already are a Fedora package contributor, you don't need to be
> sponsored within RPM Fusion.
> So I've approved you in our FAS.
> 
Hi,

Thanks for the quick response!

> Best is to offer review swap to get faster review...

I guess it is just like the Fedora review process then.
Currently I have problems running fedora-review against rpmfusion mock
config files. I will get this resolved before reaching out for review swap.

Thanks.

> Thx
> 

-- 
Ziqian SUN (Zamir)
GPG : 1D86 6D4A 49CE 4BBD 72CF FCF5 D856 6E11 F2A0 525E
Want to know more about Fedora?
Visit https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/
Ready to contribute? See https://whatcanidoforfedora.org/
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org