Re: F40 Mass rebuild in RPM Fusion

[Andrea Musuruane via rpmfusion-developers]

Hi Antonio,

On Sat, Mar 9, 2024 at 4:58 PM Antonio T. sagitter <
sagit...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:

> xbill and desmume are fixed.
>

Thank you very very much.


> dega-sdl and gens are i686 exclusive and maybe it's not convenient still
> maintaining them.
>

If I am not mistaken, gens is the only Sega Genesis/MegaDrive emulator we
have in Fedora. Maybe we can package BlastEm instead.
https://www.retrodev.com/blastem/

dega-sdl is a Sega Master System emulator. We also have osmose (old and
unmaintained too) and meka (maintained but currently broken - upstream
seems unable to fix it).
https://github.com/ocornut/meka/issues/69

BR,

Andrea
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: F40 Mass rebuild in RPM Fusion

[Andrea Musuruane via rpmfusion-developers]

Hi guys,
   I tried to fix the following packages, but my C/C++ experience seems to
be too limited (or non existent in case of C++) to solve these issues.

On Sun, Feb 4, 2024 at 3:40 PM Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-developers <
rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org> wrote:

> Package: dega-sdl
> Package: desmume
> Package: gambatte
> Package: gens
> Package: xbill
>

Any help is appreciated.

Thanks.

Best Regards,

Andrea
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: Wiki notifications

[Andrea Musuruane via rpmfusion-developers]

Hi Nicolas,
yes, I received two notifications.

But URLs are still wrong.

BR,

Andrea


On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 3:35 PM Nicolas Chauvet  wrote:

> Hi  Andrea,
>
> I didn't know there were notification. You are luck to have some.
> I've tried to setup an option to have better notification, but I don't
> see how it would hold...
>
> You should have received another one, can you confirm ? (or not ?)
>
> Le mer. 1 nov. 2023 à 20:46, Andrea Musuruane via rpmfusion-developers
>  a écrit :
> >
> > Hi!
> >  There's something wrong in these notifications. http links point to
> a non existing site.
> >
> > BR,
> >
> > Andrea
> >
> >
> > -- Forwarded message -
> > From: RPM Fusion Wiki 
> > Date: Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 8:33 PM
> > Subject: [RPM Fusion] Update of "Howto/VirtualBox" by Sérgio Basto
> > To: RPM Fusion Wiki 
> >
> >
> > Dear Wiki user,
> >
> > You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "RPM Fusion" for
> change notification.
> >
> > The "Howto/VirtualBox" page has been changed by Sérgio Basto:
> > http://moin01/Howto/VirtualBox?action=diff=58=59
> >
> >
> >   == Fedora as a Virtual Machine and VBoxGuestAdditions ==
> >
> > - Since Fedora 28 you got virtualBox-guest-additions working out of the
> box on Fedora proper , package is virtualBox-guest-additions all with
> lowercase, so just do `dnf install virtualBox-guest-additions` in a vm
> (guest system). For epel 7 and 8 we still have !VirtualBox-guest-additions
> on RPM Fusion.
> > + Since Fedora 28 you got virtualBox-guest-additions working out of the
> box on Fedora proper and is no need akmods anymore (in the vm), package is
> virtualBox-guest-additions all with lowercase, so just do `dnf install
> virtualBox-guest-additions` in a vm (guest system). For epel 7 and 8 we
> still have !VirtualBox-guest-additions on RPM Fusion.
> >
> >   If you want run Fedora in a vm, you may/should install
> !virtualBox-guest-additions. this replaces VBoxGuestAdditions provide by
> Oracle
> >
> > @@ -109, +109 @@
> >
> >   {{{
> >
> >   dnf install VirtualBox-guest-additions kernel-devel-$(uname -r)
> > - akmods
> >   systemctl restart vboxservice
> >   dmesg
> >   }}}
> > ___
> > rpmfusion-developers mailing list --
> rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to
> rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
>
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Wiki notifications

[Andrea Musuruane via rpmfusion-developers]

Hi!
 There's something wrong in these notifications. http links point to a
non existing site.

BR,

Andrea


-- Forwarded message -
From: RPM Fusion Wiki 
Date: Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 8:33 PM
Subject: [RPM Fusion] Update of "Howto/VirtualBox" by Sérgio Basto
To: RPM Fusion Wiki 


Dear Wiki user,

You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "RPM Fusion" for
change notification.

The "Howto/VirtualBox" page has been changed by Sérgio Basto:
http://moin01/Howto/VirtualBox?action=diff=58=59


  == Fedora as a Virtual Machine and VBoxGuestAdditions ==

- Since Fedora 28 you got virtualBox-guest-additions working out of the box
on Fedora proper , package is virtualBox-guest-additions all with
lowercase, so just do `dnf install virtualBox-guest-additions` in a vm
(guest system). For epel 7 and 8 we still have !VirtualBox-guest-additions
on RPM Fusion.
+ Since Fedora 28 you got virtualBox-guest-additions working out of the box
on Fedora proper and is no need akmods anymore (in the vm), package is
virtualBox-guest-additions all with lowercase, so just do `dnf install
virtualBox-guest-additions` in a vm (guest system). For epel 7 and 8 we
still have !VirtualBox-guest-additions on RPM Fusion.

  If you want run Fedora in a vm, you may/should install
!virtualBox-guest-additions. this replaces VBoxGuestAdditions provide by
Oracle

@@ -109, +109 @@

  {{{

  dnf install VirtualBox-guest-additions kernel-devel-$(uname -r)
- akmods
  systemctl restart vboxservice
  dmesg
  }}}
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: Mass rebuild results for F39

[Andrea Musuruane via rpmfusion-developers]

Hi!

On Fri, Aug 4, 2023 at 4:16 AM Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-developers <
rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Mass rebuild for F39 is complete .
>
> And we have this failures :
> https://www.serjux.com/rpms/failed_to_build.html
>
> Failed builds: 17
> Package: cannonball
>
Package: fs-uae-arcade
> Package: fs-uae-launcher
>

I fixed these.

BR,

Andrea
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: Fedora_36_Mass_Rebuild results

[Andrea Musuruane]

Hi!
   gens fails to build because: *No matching package to install:
'gtk2-devel >= 2.4.0'*

https://koji.rpmfusion.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/6569/526569/root.log

But AFAIK it is still available:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1886133

Ideas, suggestions?

Thanks,

Andrea


On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 12:34 PM Sérgio Basto  wrote:

> Hi,
> we are preparing compat-ffmpeg4 based on ffmpeg 4.3
>
> meanwhile mass rebuild was done and have this failures :
> https://www.serjux.com/rpms/failed_to_build.html
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Sérgio M. B.
> ___
> rpmfusion-developers mailing list --
> rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
>
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: [Broken appdata] pyskool

[Andrea Musuruane]

Hi!
   I'm pyskool maintainer.  I'm not sure how to solve this issue.

pyskool is basically an engine allowing you to play two games and make
customizations possible (three are shipped in the tarball). Upstream
doesn't provide desktop files but provides an AppData file therefore I
created the desktop files for the two supported games.

I read in the Packaging Guidelines that "The AppData file MUST be named
with the same root as the .desktop file". OK, so pyskool.appdata.xml is
wrong. But what should it be since there are two games with two different
desktop files?

Would fixing this be enough to fix parsing? Should "pyskool.desktop"
references in the AppData file be fixed too?

Thanks,

Andrea


On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 11:33 AM Leigh Scott 
wrote:

> pyskool.desktop doesn't exist so there isn't a icon to find
>
> 
> 
>   
> pyskool.desktop
> pyskool
> Pyskool
> Remake of Skool Daze and Back to Skool
> Pyskool is a faithful re-implementation of the classic
> ZX Spectrum games Skool Daze and Back to Skool.Each game revolves
> around the antics of Eric, the hero. In Skool Daze, Eric must steal his
> report card from the school safe - the combination of which must be
> extracted from the teachers' brains using flashing shields or, in the case
> of the history teacher, post-hypnotic suggestion. In Back to Skool, Eric
> must get his report card back into the school safe, this time with the
> extra help provided by a water pistol, stinkbombs, a bike, mice, a frog and
> a girlfriend.
> 
>   Has no Icon
> 
> GPL-3.0+ AND LicenseRef-proprietary
> http://pyskool.ca/
> 
>   
> http://pyskool.ca/xdg/pyskool-1.png
>   
>   
> http://pyskool.ca/xdg/pyskool-2.png
>   
>   
> http://pyskool.ca/xdg/pyskool-3.png
>   
> 
> 
>   
> 
> pyskool.desktop
>   
> 
> ___
> rpmfusion-developers mailing list --
> rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
>
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

xroar license change

[Andrea Musuruane]

Hi all,
xroar license changed from GPLv2+ to GPLv3+ in version 0.36. I will be
pushing this version to RPM Fusion in the coming days.

BR,

Andrea
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: github interaction

[Andrea Musuruane]

Hi,

On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 4:08 PM Nicolas Chauvet  wrote:

> Hi there,
>
> It seems like only a few of us that have github account are receiving
> github notifications from PR that are submitted via github. This has
> to be fixed. So please mention here if you have a github account that
> is not part of the packager team in github organization.
>

My github account is musuruan

BR,

Andrea
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: About multilibs support in RPM Fusion

[Andrea Musuruane]

Hi Sergio,
can you please include also the following:

nonfree/gens
nonfree/dega-sdl
free/zsnes

Thanks!

Andrea

On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 4:16 PM Sérgio Basto  wrote:

>
> With rfpkg 1.26.1 commit [1], rfpkg build should call target multilibs
> by default for packages [2], please test it . (I'm already testing it)
> You may test scratch builds for F30 and F29 [3] .
>
> Feedback is welcome .
>
> [1]
>
> https://github.com/rpmfusion-infra/rfpkg/commit/d94ede33e0cf55fbab9205a5c06ebb9e8ecbb495
>
> [2]
> ['buildsys-build-rpmfusion', 'libva-intel-driver', 'Cg', 'pcsx2',
> 'steam', 'xorg-x11-drv-nvidia', 'xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-390xx', 'xorg-x11-
> drv-nvidia-340xx']
>
> [3]
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=37857634
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=37857651
>
>
>
> On Tue, 2019-09-24 at 10:13 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > For the info, I've restored the capability to build for multilibs on
> > fedora 31+ (as we don't build i686 by default). There is a rfpkg
> > update that is been prepared by sergio to automate the appropriate
> > packages to be forwarded to the related koji build target.
> >
> > The current packages that will build on multilibs are currently
> > limited to steam, libva-intel-driver and nvidia driver. If other
> > components are missing, please let me know.
> >
> > For the long run, it's more complicated as i386 repos doesn't seem to
> > be published (el8) or are going to be less reliable (fedora 31+). So
> > instead, I envision to build using the x86_64 repos (using a x86_64
> > compiler and tools and i686 libraries).
> > For information, RHEL8 is obviously building i686 with -m32
> > -march=x86_64 by default, so I assume the i686 packages are already
> > built using a x86_64 userspace there.
> >
> > I've reported this issue to mock to investigate how this can be
> > achieved:
> > https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/issues/340
> >
> > Thx
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > -
> >
> > Nicolas (kwizart)
> > ___
> > rpmfusion-developers mailing list --
> > rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to
> > rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
> --
> Sérgio M. B.
> ___
> rpmfusion-developers mailing list --
> rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
>
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: RPM Fusion logo

[Andrea Musuruane]

Hi!

On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 5:28 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <
domi...@greysector.net> wrote:

> Hi!
> Does anyone have a vector version of the RPM Fusion logo? If not,
> then at least a high resolution version of what's on the wiki.
> I'm making a presentation for a conference and I've just found out
> I don't have a nice-looking RPM Fusion logo.
>

Have a look here:
https://rpmfusion.org/Logo

Bye,

Andrea
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Devedeng license change

[Andrea Musuruane]

Hi,
   Devedeng license has changed from GPLv3+ to GPLv3 only in v4.16.0.

I don't thing there is any problem since this is a leaf package.

I'm going to submit a build soon.

BR,

Andrea
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: RPM Fusion is branched for f31

[Andrea Musuruane]

Thanks!


Il mer 21 ago 2019, 21:51 Leigh Scott  ha scritto:

> @Andrea Musuruane
>
> I have manually tagged the builds and they will be in the next push (2-3
> days).
>
> $ koji-rpmfusion tag-build f32-free-updates-candidate  fs-uae-3.0.0-1.fc32
> fs-uae-arcade-3.0.0-1.fc32 fs-uae-launcher-3.0.0-1.fc32
> Created task 350487
> Created task 350488
> Created task 350489
> Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)...
> 350487 tagBuild (noarch): free
> 350488 tagBuild (noarch): free
> 350489 tagBuild (noarch): free
> 350487 tagBuild (noarch): free -> closed
>   2 free  0 open  1 done  0 failed
> 350488 tagBuild (noarch): free -> closed
>   1 free  0 open  2 done  0 failed
> 350489 tagBuild (noarch): free -> closed
>   0 free  0 open  3 done  0 failed
>
> 350487 tagBuild (noarch) completed successfully
> 350488 tagBuild (noarch) completed successfully
> 350489 tagBuild (noarch) completed successfully
> ___
> rpmfusion-developers mailing list --
> rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
>
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: RPM Fusion is branched for f31

[Andrea Musuruane]

Hi!

On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 8:22 PM Nicolas Chauvet  wrote:

> Le mar. 20 août 2019 à 19:44, Andrea Musuruane  a
> écrit :
> >
> > Hi Nicolas,
> > there seems to be something wrong. I can build for f32 but I get:
> >
> > fs-uae-launcher-3.0.0-1.fc32 unsuccessfully tagged into f32-free by
> musuruan
> > Operation failed with the error:
> > : policy violation (tag)
> Yep, there is something wrong int he koji target (fixed), but at the
> same time I feel like everything that things are still moving on the
> fedora side.
>
> Please remind to resubmit at some later point.
>

I can resubmit the build (only with--skip-nvr-check) but koji complains:
"GenericError: Build already exists (id=12230, state=COMPLETE): {'name':
'fs-uae', 'task_id': 350472, 'extra': '{"source": {"original_url": "git+
https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/git/free/fs-uae#bd39f17888c3861edf31679fb8d5f7316cca3566"}}',
'pkg_id': 525, 'epoch': None, 'source': 'git+
https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/git/free/fs-uae#bd39f17888c3861edf31679fb8d5f7316cca3566',
'state': 0, 'version': '3.0.0', 'completion_time': None, 'volume_id': 0,
'owner': 17, 'release': '1.fc32', 'start_time': 'NOW'}"

http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=350472

Regards,

Andrea
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: RPM Fusion is branched for f31

[Andrea Musuruane]

Hi Nicolas,
there seems to be something wrong. I can build for f32 but I get:

fs-uae-launcher-3.0.0-1.fc32 unsuccessfully tagged into f32-free by musuruan
Operation failed with the error:
: policy violation (tag)

Bye,

Andrea


On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 4:03 PM Nicolas Chauvet  wrote:

> Hi there,
>
> .. or actually this is still a work in progress because the fedora
> development/31 repos aren't published so far. and there is no rawhide
> release rpm yet on our side.
>
> But at least, the f31 branches are there, so please remind to push
> (and build) for f31 also.
> master now point to f32.
>
> Thx
>
> --
> -
>
> Nicolas (kwizart)
> ___
> rpmfusion-developers mailing list --
> rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
>
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: mp3gain moving to Fedora (was: Re: [mp3gain] Update to 1.6.2)

[Andrea Musuruane]

On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 8:33 PM Sérgio Basto  wrote:

>
> As I stated before we may / should have a list or task force to move
> some packages to Fedora [1]. We also have same games that are in
> RPMFusion (since the beginning of RPMFusion) like pangzero, gtetrinet,
> ltris , these games can give more work to move, since we need to check
> carefully if all sounds, artwork, etc are open and free ... . BTW like
> ufoai [2] move ufoai-data to Fedora is important because package have
> about 1 Giga and koji of RPMFusion haven't enough resources to handle
> it .
>
To complete a bit more the list, also 2 emulators still in RPMFusion
> [3]
>

The 2 bugzilla issues are correctly assigned to me and I still maintain
these emulators.

I haven't yet had the time to check if they can be really moved to Fedora.
Emulators are tricky and must be handled with extra care. Sometimes they
include non free bits (e.g. firmware) that are not so easy to spot.
Moreover, some may be dependant on software in RPM Fusion free repo. For
example, fs-uae BR libmpeg2-devel.

I'll try to move the emulators I maintain in the coming months.

BTW, there are much more than 2 emulators that could *potentially* be moved
to Fedora proper (dosemu, BasiliskII, SheepShaver, gcube, )

Bye,

Andrea
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: bug #1629418 cdrkit packages doesn't not provides anymore cdrecord and mkisofs

[Andrea Musuruane]

Hi Sergio,
thank you for noticing this issue.

As devedeng maintainer I thought it would be as simple as changing

Requires:   mkisofs

to

Requires:cdrkit

Isn't it? Am I missing something?

I've seen Leight Scott opted for requiring a different program,
genisoimage, that is also supported by devedeng.

BR,

Andrea



On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 5:56 AM Sérgio Basto  wrote:

> Hello ,
>
> Still not sure what the best solution for [1] but in F29 we can't
> install the follwing packages:
>
> - nothing provides mkisofs needed by devedeng-4.12.0-3.fc29.noarch
> - nothing provides mkisofs needed by dvd-slideshow-0.8.6.1-2.fc29.noarch
> - nothing provides cdrecord >= 2.01 needed by
> mytharchive-29.1-22.36.20180907.gdde16d475a.fc29.x86_64
> - nothing provides mkisofs >= 2.01 needed by
> mytharchive-29.1-22.36.20180907.gdde16d475a.fc29.x86_64
> - nothing provides mkisofs needed by
> vdrsync-0.1.3-24.PRE1.050322.fc29.noarch
>
>
> [1]
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1629418
>
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Sérgio M. B.
> ___
> rpmfusion-developers mailing list --
> rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
>
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: FTBFS for f27

[Andrea Musuruane]

On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 6:42 PM, Sérgio Basto <ser...@serjux.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, 2017-09-11 at 17:32 +0200, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 4:00 PM, Nicolas Chauvet <kwiz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Here is a list of packages without a f27 tag currently in rawhide:
> It's pretty much possible that the package fails at the
> buildSRPMFromSCM step, in which case it's only a matter to resubmit.
> I will handle the npapi-vlc.
> [..]
> Nonfree:
> [..]
> ./e/e-uae-0.8.29-0.19.wip4.fc26.src.rpm
>
>
> I don't know how to fix e-uae but since we now have fs-uae in RPM Fusion,
> I guess we can retire it for good (last release of e-uae was in 2007) in
> rawhide and F-27.
>
> What do you think?
>
>
>
> IMHO Retire it , and write in commit "now we have fs-uae"
>

Done. Can you please check I didn't miss anything?

Bugzilla ticket:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4652

Thanks,

Andrea
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: FTBFS for f27

[Andrea Musuruane]

On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 9:52 PM, Ben Rosser <rosser@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Andrea Musuruane <musur...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > BTW, to have a complete fs-uae experience we still miss fs-uae-launcher
> > (#4028) and fs-uae-arcade (#4029). I'm available to swap reviews.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Andrea
>
> I'd be happy to review both of these.
>
> Are you willing to review
> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4639 (dfhack) in
> exchange? It's a somewhat complex package, so if not, that's okay.


Taken. I'll try to review this package by the end of next weekend.

Thanks!

Andrea
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: FTBFS for f27

[Andrea Musuruane]

Hi!

On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 4:00 PM, Nicolas Chauvet  wrote:

> Here is a list of packages without a f27 tag currently in rawhide:
> It's pretty much possible that the package fails at the
> buildSRPMFromSCM step, in which case it's only a matter to resubmit.
> I will handle the npapi-vlc.
> [..]
> Nonfree:
> [..]
> ./e/e-uae-0.8.29-0.19.wip4.fc26.src.rpm
>
>
I don't know how to fix e-uae but since we now have fs-uae in RPM Fusion, I
guess we can retire it for good (last release of e-uae was in 2007) in
rawhide and F-27.

What do you think?

BTW, to have a complete fs-uae experience we still miss fs-uae-launcher
(#4028) and fs-uae-arcade (#4029). I'm available to swap reviews.

Regards,

Andrea
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: Does build notification from Koji are generally usefull ?

[Andrea Musuruane]

On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 5:27 PM, Nicolas Chauvet  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I wonder if generating package build notification (and tag migration
> from updates-testing to updates) is an useful feature ?
>

Most of the time, I cannot be in front of a PC to watch the outcome of each
package build therefore I think it is a useful feature.

In fact most of these notifications are missing (they do not reach my
inbox) and I have to manually query koji to see if the build was successful
or not. It wasn't nice for the mass rebuild

I also find useful the migration notification from updates-testing to
updates. It is the only way I can see that one of my updates has been
pushed to stable.

Bye,

Andrea
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: Cannot upload to the lookaside cache

[Andrea Musuruane]

On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 1:15 PM, Sérgio Basto  wrote:

> I guess you are using F26 , please try rfpkg-1.25.1-3.fc26 [1]
>
> [1]
> http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=4639
>
>
Thank you Sergio. It fixes the issue for me.

Bye,

Andrea
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Cannot upload to the lookaside cache

[Andrea Musuruane]

Hi,
I'm trying to update xroar but uploading to the lookaside cache fails:

$ rfpkg new-sources xroar-0.34.8.tar.gz
Deprecation warning: kojiconfig is deprecated. Instead, kojiprofile should
be used.
Could not execute new_sources: __init__() got an unexpected keyword
argument 'koji_config_type'

Do you know how to solve this issue?

Thanks,

Andrea
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: zsnes segfaults at start up

[Andrea Musuruane]

Hi Dominik,

On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 2:39 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <
domi...@greysector.net> wrote:

> On Saturday, 19 August 2017 at 18:54, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I've received the following bug report:
> > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4603
> >
> > Unluckily I cannot reproduce the issue. I have no problem. zsnes is fine
> on
> > my machine.
> >
> > From the stack trace it appears there is a problem in the audio init,
> where
> > zsnes calls libao.
> >
> > Can someone else please try and give me a feedback?
>
> I added my findings in the bug. It's reproducible on my machine. Can you
> post cat /proc/cpuinfo from yours?
>

Thanks for your support. I replied in the bug report.

Bye,

Andrea
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

zsnes segfaults at start up

[Andrea Musuruane]

Hi,
I've received the following bug report:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4603

Unluckily I cannot reproduce the issue. I have no problem. zsnes is fine on
my machine.

>From the stack trace it appears there is a problem in the audio init, where
zsnes calls libao.

Can someone else please try and give me a feedback?

Thanks,

Andrea
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: [leftovers] FTBFS in F26

[Andrea Musuruane]

On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 12:15 PM, Sérgio Basto <ser...@serjux.com> wrote:

> On Seg, 2017-04-17 at 11:38 +0200, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 12:17 AM, Sérgio Basto <ser...@serjux.com>
> > wrote:
> > > Hello
> > >
> > > These packages are the remain packages that not build in F26 mass-
> > > rebuild
> > >
> > >
> > > openmw-0.41.0-2.fc26
> > > pdflib-lite-7.0.5-10.fc26  (rfbz #3891)
> > > simplescreenrecorder-0.3.8-2.fc26
> > > stella-4.7.3-2.fc26
> >
> > This is a patch to build stella again. It also sets new upstream URL
> > and Source0.
> >
> > Bye,
> >
> > Andrea
>
> Andrea, Can I add you as maintainer of Stella ? :)
>

No, thanks. I really cannot cope with more packages.

Bye,

Andrea
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: [leftovers] FTBFS in F26

[Andrea Musuruane]

On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 12:17 AM, Sérgio Basto <ser...@serjux.com> wrote:

> Hello
>
> These packages are the remain packages that not build in F26 mass-
> rebuild
>
>
> openmw-0.41.0-2.fc26
> pdflib-lite-7.0.5-10.fc26  (rfbz #3891)
> simplescreenrecorder-0.3.8-2.fc26
> stella-4.7.3-2.fc26
>

This is a patch to build stella again. It also sets new upstream URL and
Source0.

Bye,

Andrea
From adf41ead6c10d7c247aa7f1196bf4668e06ee59b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrea Musuruane <musur...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 11:33:38 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Fix FTBFS with gcc7 Updated URL and Source0

---
 stella-4.7.3-gcc7.patch | 12 
 stella.spec | 12 +---
 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 stella-4.7.3-gcc7.patch

diff --git a/stella-4.7.3-gcc7.patch b/stella-4.7.3-gcc7.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000..7f6f795
--- /dev/null
+++ b/stella-4.7.3-gcc7.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+diff -durN stella-4.7.3.orig/configure stella-4.7.3/configure
+--- stella-4.7.3.orig/configure	2016-10-10 19:43:31.0 +0200
 stella-4.7.3/configure	2017-04-17 11:12:59.158157722 +0200
+@@ -420,7 +420,7 @@
+ 	fi
+ 
+ 	case $cxx_version in
+-		4.[7-9]|4.[7-9].[0-9]|4.[7-9].[0-9][-.]*|[5-6].[0-9]|[5-6].[0-9].[0-9]|[5-6].[0-9].[0-9][-.]*)
++		4.[7-9]|4.[7-9].[0-9]|4.[7-9].[0-9][-.]*|[5-7]|[5-7].[0-9]|[5-7].[0-9].[0-9]|[5-7].[0-9].[0-9][-.]*)
+ 			_cxx_major=`echo $cxx_version | cut -d '.' -f 1`
+ 			_cxx_minor=`echo $cxx_version | cut -d '.' -f 2`
+ 			cxx_version="$cxx_version, ok"
diff --git a/stella.spec b/stella.spec
index 2d88d85..4c7d170 100644
--- a/stella.spec
+++ b/stella.spec
@@ -1,11 +1,12 @@
 Name:   stella
 Version:4.7.3
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Release:3%{?dist}
 License:GPLv2+
 Summary:A multi-platform Atari 2600 Video Computer System emulator
 Group:  Applications/Emulators
-URL:http://stella.sourceforge.net
-Source0:http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}-src.tar.xz
+URL:https://stella-emu.github.io/
+Source0:https://github.com/stella-emu/%{name}/releases/download/release-%{version}/%{name}-%{version}-src.tar.xz
+Patch0: %{name}-4.7.3-gcc7.patch
 
 BuildRequires:  libpng-devel zlib-devel bison SDL2-devel
 BuildRequires:  desktop-file-utils
@@ -29,6 +30,7 @@ by considering a contribution.
 
 %prep
 %setup -q
+%patch0 -p1
 rm src/zlib src/libpng -rf
 sed -i "s/-c -s -m/-m/" Makefile
 
@@ -76,6 +78,10 @@ gtk-update-icon-cache %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor &>/dev/null || :
 
 
 %changelog
+* Mon Apr 17 2017 Andrea Musuruane <musur...@gmail.com> - 4.7.3-3
+- Fix FTBFS with gcc7
+- Updated URL and Source0
+
 * Mon Mar 20 2017 RPM Fusion Release Engineering <kwiz...@rpmfusion.org> - 4.7.3-2
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_26_Mass_Rebuild
 
-- 
2.9.3

___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: Fwd: Package: e-uae-0.8.29-0.19.wip4.fc26 Tag: f26-nonfree Status: complete Built by: kwizart

[Andrea Musuruane]

On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 2:44 PM, Nicolas Chauvet  wrote:

> >
> > Hi,
> >can you please check frogatto?
> >
> > http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=97138
> @Andrea
> This was a temporary failure since the f27-nonfree buildroot was not
> populated from any external repository.
> It's fixed now.
>
> That been said, I would suggest to use ExcludeArch: ppc64 ppc64le (or
> even aarch64) so it only build on others arches.
> As sergio said, the ppc builders are failing to download probably
> because of network bandwith limitation leading to timeout. I'm not
> going to look more deeply any time soon.
>

@Nicolas, I did as you suggested. It was fine for F26 but it seems there is
still an issue on rawhide:
http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=3619

Bye,

Andrea
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: Mass rebuild for f26 is almost finished

[Andrea Musuruane]

Hi,

On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 4:09 AM, Sérgio Basto  wrote:

> Hi,
> Almost all packages have been rebuilt, we have these FTBFS (so far) :
>
> ./bombono-dvd/ftbfs
> ./dhewm3/ftbfs
> ./libdvbcsa/ftbfs
> ./lightspark/ftbfs
> ./mythtv/ftbfs
> ./openmw/ftbfs
> ./qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld/ftbfs
> ./simplescreenrecorder/ftbfs
> ./sonic-visualiser-freeworld/ftbfs
> ./stella/ftbfs
> ./tvheadend/ftbfs
> ./xine-plugin/ftbfs
> ./zboy/ftbfs


I've just fixed zboy in master (it's rebuilding right now). But I can't see
an f26 branch.

BTW, also Frogatto is FTBFS right now. I'll work on it later.

Bye,

Andrea
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Fwd: Package: e-uae-0.8.29-0.19.wip4.fc26 Tag: f26-nonfree Status: complete Built by: kwizart

[Andrea Musuruane]

Hi,
when you rebuilt e-uae for the f26 mass rebuild, you didn't bump the
release.

https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/cgit/nonfree/e-uae.git/tree/e-uae.spec

Bye,

Andrea




-- Forwarded message --
From: RPM Fusion Koji Build System <build...@rpmfusion.org>
Date: Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 6:56 PM
Subject: Package: e-uae-0.8.29-0.19.wip4.fc26 Tag: f26-nonfree Status:
complete Built by: kwizart
To: kwiz...@rpmfusion.org, musur...@rpmfusion.org


Package: e-uae-0.8.29-0.19.wip4.fc26
Tag: f26-nonfree
Status: complete
Built by: kwizart
ID: 3434
Started: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 16:44:35 CET
Finished: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 17:56:31 CET
Changelog:
* Wed Sep 03 2014 Andrea Musuruane <musur...@gmail.com> - 0.8.29-0.19.wip4
- Fix FTBFS because of -Wno-format flag
- Added a patch to fix some new compiler warnings in GCC 4.3
- Added a patch to fix string bugs
- Added a patch to fix blitter handling when an active channel's address
  is zero
- Dropped desktop vendor tag
- Dropped obsolete Group, Buildroot, %clean and %defattr
- Dropped cleaning at the beginning of %install
- Updated icon cache scriptlets
- Fix file permissions
- Fix end-of-line encoding

* Sun Aug 31 2014 Sérgio Basto <ser...@serjux.com> - 0.8.29-0.18.wip4
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_22_Mass_Rebuild

* Tue Mar 12 2013 Nicolas Chauvet <kwiz...@gmail.com> - 0.8.29-0.17.wip4
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_19_Mass_Rebuild



SRPMS:
  e-uae-0.8.29-0.19.wip4.fc26.src.rpm

Closed tasks:
-

Task 92256 on buildvm-01.online.rpmfusion.net
Task Type: buildArch (e-uae-0.8.29-0.19.wip4.fc26.src.rpm, i686)
logs:
  http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/getfile?taskID=92256=build.log
  http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/getfile?taskID=92256=hw_info.log
  http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/getfile?taskID=92256=mock_output.log
  http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/getfile?taskID=92256=root.log
  http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/getfile?taskID=92256=state.log
rpms:
 http://koji.rpmfusion.org/kojifiles/packages/e-uae/0.8.
29/0.19.wip4.fc26/i686/e-uae-0.8.29-0.19.wip4.fc26.i686.rpm
 http://koji.rpmfusion.org/kojifiles/packages/e-uae/0.8.
29/0.19.wip4.fc26/i686/e-uae-debuginfo-0.8.29-0.19.wip4.fc26.i686.rpm

Task 92257 on arm-builder02.scaleway.rpmfusion.net
Task Type: buildArch (e-uae-0.8.29-0.19.wip4.fc26.src.rpm, armv7hl)
logs:
  http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/getfile?taskID=92257=build.log
  http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/getfile?taskID=92257=hw_info.log
  http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/getfile?taskID=92257=mock_output.log
  http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/getfile?taskID=92257=root.log
  http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/getfile?taskID=92257=state.log
rpms:
 http://koji.rpmfusion.org/kojifiles/packages/e-uae/0.8.
29/0.19.wip4.fc26/armv7hl/e-uae-0.8.29-0.19.wip4.fc26.armv7hl.rpm
 http://koji.rpmfusion.org/kojifiles/packages/e-uae/0.8.
29/0.19.wip4.fc26/armv7hl/e-uae-debuginfo-0.8.29-0.19.wip4.fc26.armv7hl.rpm

Task 92238 on buildvm-02.online.rpmfusion.net
Task Type: buildSRPMFromSCM (/nonfree/e-uae:89f7938146ca3595f9d53ca00ec832
9b470f3f7f)
logs:
  http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/getfile?taskID=92238=build.log
  http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/getfile?taskID=92238=checkout.log
  http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/getfile?taskID=92238=hw_info.log
  http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/getfile?taskID=92238=mock_output.log
  http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/getfile?taskID=92238=root.log
  http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/getfile?taskID=92238=state.log

Task 92343 on buildvm-01.online.rpmfusion.net
Task Type: tagBuild (noarch)

Task 92252 on buildvm-02.online.rpmfusion.net
Task Type: buildArch (e-uae-0.8.29-0.19.wip4.fc26.src.rpm, x86_64)
logs:
  http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/getfile?taskID=92252=build.log
  http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/getfile?taskID=92252=hw_info.log
  http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/getfile?taskID=92252=mock_output.log
  http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/getfile?taskID=92252=root.log
  http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/getfile?taskID=92252=state.log
rpms:
 http://koji.rpmfusion.org/kojifiles/packages/e-uae/0.8.
29/0.19.wip4.fc26/x86_64/e-uae-0.8.29-0.19.wip4.fc26.x86_64.rpm
 http://koji.rpmfusion.org/kojifiles/packages/e-uae/0.8.
29/0.19.wip4.fc26/x86_64/e-uae-debuginfo-0.8.29-0.19.wip4.fc26.x86_64.rpm

Task 92253 on buildppcle-01.osuosl.rpmfusion.net
Task Type: buildArch (e-uae-0.8.29-0.19.wip4.fc26.src.rpm, ppc64le)
logs:
  http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/getfile?taskID=92253=build.log
  http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/getfile?taskID=92253=hw_info.log
  http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/getfile?taskID=92253=mock_output.log
  http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/getfile?taskID=92253=root.log
  http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/getfile?taskID=92253=state.log
rpms:
 http://koji.rpmfusion.org/kojifiles/packages/e-uae/0.8.
29/0.19.wip4.fc26/ppc64le/e-uae-0.8.29-0.19.wip4.fc26.ppc64le.rpm
 http://koji.rpmfusion.org/kojifiles/packages/e-uae/0.8.
29/0.19.wip4.fc26/ppc64le/e-uae-debuginfo-0.8.29-0.19.wip4.fc26.ppc64le.rpm

Task 92254 on aarch64-01.linaro

Re: Comps for F25 (was Re: comps for free/nonfree repos in rpmfusion)

[Andrea Musuruane]

On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Nicolas Chauvet  wrote:
>>> gens (i686 only in F24, is this now gone?)
>>
>> No, it should be there.
> I think I've got issue with gens multilibs, I've fixed gens-gs, so now
> it's correctly copied into the x86_64 even with doc, but I don't
> remember what is the particular issue with gens.
> @Andrea
> Given the GA repos are frozen. Can you rebuild gens if needed ?

I can but probably not before next weekend.

Bye,

Andrea

Re: Comps for F25 (was Re: comps for free/nonfree repos in rpmfusion)

[Andrea Musuruane]

On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 12:43 PM, Jonathan Dieter  wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-11-10 at 19:13 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
>> Here is a quick TODO list anyone can take:
>> - clean packages not in rpmfusion anymore (moved to fedora, orphaned)
>
> Ok, looking at the jump from F24 to F25, there are a few packages that
> were in comps that are now missing, and I'd like to verify that this is
> expected:
[..]
> Non-free:
> gens (i686 only in F24, is this now gone?)

No, it should be there.

Bye,

Andrea

Re: comps for free/nonfree repos in rpmfusion

[Andrea Musuruane]

Hi,

On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 6:44 AM, Jonathan Dieter  wrote:

> And I did test this yesterday, and it worked as expected.  On a clean
> Workstation install with RPM Fusion Free enabled, I got rpmfusion-free-
> release, gstreamer1-libav, gstreamer1-plugins-bad-freeworld and
> gstreamer1-plugins-ugly.
>
> At this point, there seems to be no way to choose optional packages,
> either in the installer (as designed) or in GNOME software (no appdata,
> as Nicolas pointed out earlier).
>
> If there are no suggestions as to what else should be added, I'll try
> to get a patch out with updated comps for 24, 25 and 26 for both Free
> and Nonfree within the next few days.

I see the following issues:

devede has been retired. Now there is devedeng instead.

plus4emu is nonfree but it's included in the free list.

zboy, fceux are missing.

Bye,

Andrea

Re: mpg123 is in Fedora 25+ now, should be dropped from rpmfusion

[Andrea Musuruane]

Hi Hans,
 you have to retire it (not to orphan it).

This procedure is up to date AFAIK:
http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors#Retiring_a_package

Bye,

Andrea


On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 9:18 AM, Hans de Goede  wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> $subject says it all, not sure what the orphan process
> for rpmfusion is, hence this direct mail.
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans

Koji: can't build packages

[Andrea Musuruane]

Hi!
   it seems there are problems downloading packages in the buildroot for koji:
http://koji.rpmfusion.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/9595/39595/root.log

Can someone have a look?

Thanks,

Andrea

Re: libdvdcss in RPM Fusion ?

[Andrea Musuruane]

On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 9:10 PM, Nicolas Chauvet  wrote:

> > As a package maintainer and end-user, I think it'd be valuable to have
> > libdvdcss in RPM Fusion.
> >
> > If there is some concern about mirroring, though, perhaps we could
> create a
> > *third* repository for this sort of even more dubious package? Which I
> guess
> > at the moment would just be libdvdcss and anything that depends on it.
> Then
> > mirrors that don't / can't ship it simply don't mirror this additional
> repo.
>
> That reminds me how openh264 is dealt with in fedora.
> Can anyone sum-up the existing methods used by various distro about this
> issue ?
>

I did a little research.

libdvdcss is Mageia Tainted repository, an official Mageia repository that
hosts packages that they may infringe on patents and copyright laws in some
countries. E.g. most multimedia codecs are shipped in this repository.

It is included in Arch Linux, in the extra repository (i.e. non core
packages).

libdvdcss is not included in Debian, Ubuntu and SUSE.

Debian users must use Debian Multimedia repository - which is not part of
the Debian project but it is maintained by Debian developers or maintainers
and therefore it seems similar to RPM Fusion.
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-multimedia/libdvdcss.git/tree/debian

Debian multimedia also provides libdvd-pkg. `dpkg-reconfigure libdvd-pkg`
may be used to build and install  libdvdcss* package(s).
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-multimedia/libdvdcss-pkg.git/tree/debian

This package is also provided in Ubuntu 15.10+ and it must how their users
must install libdvdcss:
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/RestrictedFormats/PlayingDVDs

Debian/Ubuntu uses can also use a VideoLAN repository to install libdvdcss:
http://www.videolan.org/developers/libdvdcss.html

VideoLAN also hosts a repository for SuSE users which includes libdvdcss.

Libdvdcss is already packaged for Fedora in Remi's RPM repository and in
United RPMS.
http://rpms.famillecollet.com/fedora/24/remi/i386/repoview/libdvdcss.html
http://unitedrpms.sourceforge.net/x86_64/repoview/libdvdcss.html

Summarizing, these are the methods we can implement:

   1. ship libdvdcss in the free repository
   2. ship libdvdcss in a newly created repository
   3. ship a package that can build and install libdvdcss in the free
   repository
   4. don't ship libdvdcss and refer to another (non RPM Fusion maintained)
   repository

Maybe we should ask various RPM Fusion mirror maintainers what they think
about and what is their preferred method to ship libdvdcss.

Bye,

Andrea

Re: review all packages published, retired and added since F16

[Andrea Musuruane]

On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 6:37 AM, Sérgio Basto  wrote:

> After yesterday verify , if versions are correct in all branches.
> Today I after new builds of jwrdegoede , I started to check the
> packages that was removed and add to repos, I checked since F16 to F26
> (rawhide), and now I found some issues , see file in attach, we got
> some strange results, basically forgotten packages ...
>
> The top of strange, is:
>
> [..] 
>
> - dega-sdl is not published since f22, but built on koji
> http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=315
>
>

I discovered this particular issue on on Aug 12th and I sent a mail to this
list.

Bye,

Andrea

Re: Add to wiki page of bugzilla

[Andrea Musuruane]

On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 7:15 PM, Sérgio Basto  wrote:

> Xavier ,
>
> Can you add to wiki page bugzilla ( http://rpmfusion.org/ReportingBugs
> ) ?
>
> In page age http://rpmfusion.org/ReportingBugs we should read :
>
> You should install CACert root certificate to successfully validate
> bugzilla's certificate.
>

Can we have a certificate by Let's Encrypt for Bugzilla? This would solve
this issue.

BR,

Andrea

Re: resubmit some packages on rawhide

[Andrea Musuruane]

On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Andrea Musuruane <musur...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
> Desmume doesn't build because agg was removed from fedora 25. This br can
> be dropped loosing some feature.
>
> But it's not enough. It also doesn't build with gcc 6. This is less
> trivial to fix. If some proven packagers want to help I will appreciate.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Andrea
>
>
Thank you Leigh for the GCC 6 patch.

Bye,

Andrea

Re: 7 leftovers

[Andrea Musuruane]

I see too late that we didn't yet branch for f25 :(

Bye,

Andrea


On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 1:13 PM, Sérgio Basto <ser...@serjux.com> wrote:

> On Qui, 2016-08-04 at 13:06 +0200, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 10:01 PM, Sérgio Basto <ser...@serjux.com>
> > wrote:
> > > On Qua, 2016-08-03 at 20:45 +0200, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 7:48 PM, Sérgio Basto <ser...@serjux.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > but others still empty:
> > > > > https://github.com/rpmfusion/game-data-packager
> > > > > https://github.com/rpmfusion/devedeng
> > > > >
> > > > I still have to import devedeng. That's why it's empty (in RPM
> > > Fusion
> > > > too).
> > >
> > > Not quiet, in github we should have an mirror of cgit and https://p
> > > kgs.
> > > rpmfusion.org/cgit/free/devedeng.git/ have the init setup, which
> > > github
> > > don't.
> > > But now if it is fixed, on first commit, should update the all
> > > module
> > > in github mirror (all the branches and commits), is what we expect
> > > if
> > > this leftover is fixed.
> > > What I can say more ? For one creation of new packages on
> > > RPMFusion, we
> > > have a few tasks to do, one is creation of modules on github,
> > > before
> > > create a repo in cgit and after we just need add one rule in cgit
> > > for
> > > mirror the commits to github.
> > > So with new a commit we can test it :). Since this is production, I
> > > prefer try with "real" commits. So Andrea be my guess :).
> > I can't find an F25 branch for devedeng. Can you please create it?
>
> Please no, branch for f25 will be done soon , thanks .
>
> P.S: it works !
>
> Cheers.
>
> > Bye,
> >
> > Andrea
> >
> --
> Sérgio M. B.
>

Re: 7 leftovers

[Andrea Musuruane]

On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 10:01 PM, Sérgio Basto <ser...@serjux.com> wrote:

> On Qua, 2016-08-03 at 20:45 +0200, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 7:48 PM, Sérgio Basto <ser...@serjux.com>
> > wrote:
> > > but others still empty:
> > > https://github.com/rpmfusion/game-data-packager
> > > https://github.com/rpmfusion/devedeng
> > >
> > I still have to import devedeng. That's why it's empty (in RPM Fusion
> > too).
>
> Not quiet, in github we should have an mirror of cgit and https://pkgs.
> rpmfusion.org/cgit/free/devedeng.git/ have the init setup, which github
> don't.
> But now if it is fixed, on first commit, should update the all module
> in github mirror (all the branches and commits), is what we expect if
> this leftover is fixed.
> What I can say more ? For one creation of new packages on RPMFusion, we
> have a few tasks to do, one is creation of modules on github, before
> create a repo in cgit and after we just need add one rule in cgit for
> mirror the commits to github.
> So with new a commit we can test it :). Since this is production, I
> prefer try with "real" commits. So Andrea be my guess :).
>

I can't find an F25 branch for devedeng. Can you please create it?

Bye,

Andrea

Re: 7 leftovers

[Andrea Musuruane]

On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 7:48 PM, Sérgio Basto  wrote:

> but others still empty:
> https://github.com/rpmfusion/game-data-packager
> https://github.com/rpmfusion/devedeng
>
>
I still have to import devedeng. That's why it's empty (in RPM Fusion too).

Bye,

Andrea

Re: resubmit some packages on rawhide

[Andrea Musuruane]

Hi,
Desmume doesn't build because agg was removed from fedora 25. This br can
be dropped loosing some feature.

But it's not enough. It also doesn't build with gcc 6. This is less trivial
to fix. If some proven packagers want to help I will appreciate.

Thanks.

Andrea

Il 22/lug/2016 00:23, "Sérgio Basto"  ha scritto:

> Hello,
> I thought writing before do , since we have rawhide with less broken
> deps (more operational) . I intend resubmit: freeguide-0.11-
> 4.fc25, desmume-0.9.11-1.fc25, kwave-0.8.99-7.fc25 and terminatorX-
> 4.0.0-1.fc25 .
> I checked all these builds and the result was "(...)mock exited with
> status 30; see root.log" , if says "see root.log" means that doesn't
> even start to build.
>
> Thanks and best regards,
> --
> Sérgio M. B.
>

Re: About chromium packaging

[Andrea Musuruane]

On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Nicolas Chauvet  wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I've just saw that chromium was banned to RPM Fusion whislist
> http://rpmfusion.org/Wishlist
>
> I haven't see any message from the developers mailing list where this
> has been discussed.
> To be, the only valid reason why a software can be banned from the
> repo is that it cannot be redistributed.
>

Well, we don't also accept software that can go to Fedora proper. And if
I'm not mistaken Chromium can go directly to Fedora. There even a review
request open:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322

Bye,

Andrea

Re: [xcpc] Built against libXaw because lesstif has been retired for F24

[Andrea Musuruane]

On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 12:16 PM, Ralf Corsepius <rc040...@freenet.de>
wrote:

> On 07/19/2016 09:26 AM, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 1:04 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
>> <domi...@greysector.net <mailto:domi...@greysector.net>> wrote:
>>
>> On Sunday, 17 July 2016 at 17:01, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
>> > commit a0cdaee43b67a890b569ca6043f73183f9474134
>> > Author: Andrea Musuruane <musur...@gmail.com
>> <mailto:musur...@gmail.com>>
>> > Date:   Sun Jul 17 17:01:36 2016 +0200
>> >
>> > Built against libXaw because lesstif has been retired for F24
>>
>> You could've switched to openmotif instead, but of course it's your
>> call.
>>
>>
>> No, I couldn't. Opermotif only supports motif2 API while xcpc requires
>> motif1 API :(
>>
>
> You seem to be confused.
>
> F24 ships with Motif (not OpenMotif - OpenMotif is obsolete).
>

Fedora ships Motif 2.3.4 (even if 2.3.6 is already available upstream).

Motif 2.3.4 is an updated version of Open Motif 2.3 and is a major bug fix
release:
http://motif.ics.com/motif

About motif1 API, this is what I read on Fedora ML when they were about to
retire lesstif:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2015-October/215521.html


> That said, building xcpc against Motif appears to work perfectly.


Happy to hear that. I will try to provide a new build soon.

BR,

Andrea

Re: [xcpc] Built against libXaw because lesstif has been retired for F24

[Andrea Musuruane]

On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 1:04 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <
domi...@greysector.net> wrote:

> On Sunday, 17 July 2016 at 17:01, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
> > commit a0cdaee43b67a890b569ca6043f73183f9474134
> > Author: Andrea Musuruane <musur...@gmail.com>
> > Date:   Sun Jul 17 17:01:36 2016 +0200
> >
> > Built against libXaw because lesstif has been retired for F24
>
> You could've switched to openmotif instead, but of course it's your call.
>

No, I couldn't. Opermotif only supports motif2 API while xcpc requires
motif1 API :(

BR,

Andrea

Re: Contributors page on wiki

[Andrea Musuruane]

On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Xavier Lamien 
wrote:

> The wiki has been mostly cleaned up.
>
> However, if you guys can do a double check see if everything is back to
> normal, that would be really helpful.
> In the mean time, account creation has been disabled while validating the
> cleanliness.
> Also, I updated the badContent regex list and TextCha to prevent amap such
> a spam.
>

Thank you.

I also deleted some more pages and restored some others.

BR,

Andrea

Re: Contributors page on wiki

[Andrea Musuruane]

We have lost the Contributors page again due to spammers.

Moreover, as Paul already noted, the wiki is now full of spam:
http://rpmfusion.org/LastFewChanges

Bye,

Andrea

Re: Contributors page on wiki

[Andrea Musuruane]

On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Andrea Musuruane <musur...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Paul Howarth <p...@city-fan.org> wrote:
>
>> On 14/07/16 09:49, Paul Howarth wrote:
>>
>>> On 14/07/16 08:24, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:19 PM, Sérgio Basto <ser...@serjux.com
>>>> <mailto:ser...@serjux.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Anyway what happened ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I have no idea. I wanted to check something and the page was missing.
>>>>
>>>
>> Spammer renamed it. As Andrea has re-created it, I renamed the old
>> version back to:
>>
>> http://rpmfusion.org/OldContributorsPage
>
>
They started to spam bugzilla too:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4124

We are under siege :(

Bye,

Andrea

Re: Contributors page on wiki

[Andrea Musuruane]

On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Paul Howarth <p...@city-fan.org> wrote:

> On 14/07/16 09:49, Paul Howarth wrote:
>
>> On 14/07/16 08:24, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:19 PM, Sérgio Basto <ser...@serjux.com
>>> <mailto:ser...@serjux.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Anyway what happened ?
>>>
>>>
>>> I have no idea. I wanted to check something and the page was missing.
>>>
>>
> Spammer renamed it. As Andrea has re-created it, I renamed the old version
> back to:
>
> http://rpmfusion.org/OldContributorsPage


I guess you can delete the one I recreated and but back the older. It is
better formatted than mine :(

BR,

Andrea

Re: Contributors page on wiki

[Andrea Musuruane]

On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:19 PM, Sérgio Basto  wrote:

> Anyway what happened ?
>

I have no idea. I wanted to check something and the page was missing.

Maybe spammers at work. Now the page is full of spam :( I'll try to restore
it later.

Bye,

Andrea

Re: vcdimager CDs (VCD, sVCD or CVD)

[Andrea Musuruane]

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 7:43 PM, Sérgio Basto <ser...@serjux.com> wrote:

> On Dom, 2016-07-10 at 16:36 +0200, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
> > If you are interested, I have a review request for devedeng:
> > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4013
> >
> > devede is no longer maintained upstream.
>
> yes , I found it 2 or 3 days ago , now that seems we will have
> RPMfusion rawhide ! , we can put devedeng there .
> But shouldn't devedeng replace devede ? , i.e., or rename package or
> even just update devede package with new code (devedeng), or do you
> want the 2 packages, devede and devedeng, at same time ?
>

Upstream has two different source code repositories: one for devede and one
for devedeng. Therefore I choose to made a new package for devedeng (which
is quite different from the package for devede).

Moreover I followed Fedora Guidelines regarding replacing an existing
package:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Renaming.2FReplacing_Existing_Packages

When devedeng is in the RPM fusion repository, we will be able to retire
devede.

Bye,

Andrea

Re: vcdimager CDs (VCD, sVCD or CVD)

[Andrea Musuruane]

On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 2:18 AM, Sérgio Basto  wrote:

> Hi, this package was retired on RPMFusion F24 , but I don't know if it
> was a good idea.  Because :
>
> 1 - it builds without problem
> 2 - devede stops to work , doesn't start until we install vcdimager,
> even comment check vcdimager command still offer to make VCD, sVCD or
> CVD
>

If you are interested, I have a review request for devedeng:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4013

devede is no longer maintained upstream.

BR,

Andrea

PS devedeng still requires vcdimager.

Re: Various pkgs missing from f24 repos

[Andrea Musuruane]

On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 8:16 PM, Hans de Goede 
wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> First of all many thanks to all who have been involved in getting the f24
> repos in place. They look great and all the important pkgs are there.
>
> I accidentally found out that some not so important pkgs are missing
> though when running dnf repoquery --extras on my main workstation
> which has way too much stuff installed :)
>

I notice that the following packages are missing too:
Nestopia
dega-sdl
meka

What's the best way to add them? Should I rebuild them? (BTW, I have
problems with building - see other mail).

Bye,

Andrea

Re: RPM Fusion new infra

[Andrea Musuruane]

Now it seems builders have problems:
[andrea@panoramix zboy]$ rfpkg build
Building zboy-0.60-2.fc25 for rawhide-free
Created task: 7991
Task info: http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7991
Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)...
7991 build (rawhide-free,
/free/zboy:df3a2631ef5d9937684988694b9d250e6ad2ff2b): free
7991 build (rawhide-free,
/free/zboy:df3a2631ef5d9937684988694b9d250e6ad2ff2b): free -> open (
arm-builder03.scaleway.rpmfusion.net)
  7992 buildSRPMFromSCM
(/free/zboy:df3a2631ef5d9937684988694b9d250e6ad2ff2b): free
  7992 buildSRPMFromSCM
(/free/zboy:df3a2631ef5d9937684988694b9d250e6ad2ff2b): free -> open (
arm-builder02.scaleway.rpmfusion.net)
  7992 buildSRPMFromSCM
(/free/zboy:df3a2631ef5d9937684988694b9d250e6ad2ff2b): open (
arm-builder02.scaleway.rpmfusion.net) -> FAILED: BuildrootError: could not
init mock buildroot, mock exited with status 30; see root.log for more
information
  0 free  1 open  0 done  1 failed
7991 build (rawhide-free,
/free/zboy:df3a2631ef5d9937684988694b9d250e6ad2ff2b): open (
arm-builder03.scaleway.rpmfusion.net) -> FAILED: BuildrootError: could not
init mock buildroot, mock exited with status 30; see root.log for more
information
  0 free  0 open  0 done  2 failed

7991 build (rawhide-free,
/free/zboy:df3a2631ef5d9937684988694b9d250e6ad2ff2b) failed

Bye,

Andrea

Re: RPM Fusion new infra

[Andrea Musuruane]

On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Richard Shaw  wrote:

> You need the newer version of the package:
>
>
> https://koji.rpmfusion.org/kojifiles/packages/rpmfusion-packager/0.5.0/1.fc23/noarch/rpmfusion-packager-0.5.0-1.fc23.noarch.rpm
>
> since it's noarch it doesn't really matter which dist you download.
>

Thank you. I updated the wiki to specify this.

Bye,

Andrea

Re: RPM Fusion new infra

[Andrea Musuruane]

Another problem, this time when I try to build the package:

[andrea@panoramix zboy]$ rfpkg build
Could not execute build: No server defined in: /etc/koji/rpmfusion-config,
/home/andrea/.koji/config

Some other notes that may be helpful:

[andrea@panoramix zboy]$ less /etc/koji/rpmfusion-config
/etc/koji/rpmfusion-config: File o directory non esistente
[andrea@panoramix zboy]$ rpm -q rfpkg
rfpkg-1.23.4-1.fc23.noarch
[andrea@panoramix zboy]$ rpm -q rpmfusion-packager
rpmfusion-packager-0.4-2.fc22.noarch

Bye,

Andrea


On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Andrea Musuruane <musur...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Hans de Goede <j.w.r.dego...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 07/10/2016 01:47 PM, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> I'm trying to import zboy.
>>>
>>> I followed this guide:
>>> http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors#Import_your_package
>>>
>>> But I get:
>>> [andrea@panoramix zboy]$ rfpkg import
>>> /home/andrea/rpmbuild/SRPMS/zboy-0.60-2.fc23.src.rpm
>>> Could not execute import_srpm: (35, 'Peer reports failure of signature
>>> verification or key exchange.')
>>>
>>> Can somebody please help?
>>>
>>
>> rfpkg import also does a rfpkg new-sources with the source tarbal in the
>> srpm, that is likely
>> were the error is coming from.
>>
>
> Gotcha :)
>
> You likely need to run rpmfusion-packager-setup first, and/or maybe
>> manually download
>> a client-side certificate from: https://fas.rpmfusion.org/accounts/
>> (not sure if
>> rpmfusion-packager-setup does this automatically like the fedora version
>> does).
>>
>
> No, it does not download a new client-side certificate.
>
>
>
>> If you manually download the client side certificate make sure to save it
>> as
>> ~/.rpmfusion.cert
>>
>
> It worked.
>
> If you get this to work, please update the wiki if necessary.
>>
>
> Done.
>
> Thanks Hans!
>
> Andrea
>
>

Re: RPM Fusion new infra

[Andrea Musuruane]

On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Hans de Goede <j.w.r.dego...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On 07/10/2016 01:47 PM, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I'm trying to import zboy.
>>
>> I followed this guide:
>> http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors#Import_your_package
>>
>> But I get:
>> [andrea@panoramix zboy]$ rfpkg import
>> /home/andrea/rpmbuild/SRPMS/zboy-0.60-2.fc23.src.rpm
>> Could not execute import_srpm: (35, 'Peer reports failure of signature
>> verification or key exchange.')
>>
>> Can somebody please help?
>>
>
> rfpkg import also does a rfpkg new-sources with the source tarbal in the
> srpm, that is likely
> were the error is coming from.
>

Gotcha :)

You likely need to run rpmfusion-packager-setup first, and/or maybe
> manually download
> a client-side certificate from: https://fas.rpmfusion.org/accounts/  (not
> sure if
> rpmfusion-packager-setup does this automatically like the fedora version
> does).
>

No, it does not download a new client-side certificate.



> If you manually download the client side certificate make sure to save it
> as
> ~/.rpmfusion.cert
>

It worked.

If you get this to work, please update the wiki if necessary.
>

Done.

Thanks Hans!

Andrea

Re: Where to push f23 rpmfusion pkg updates ?

[Andrea Musuruane]

On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 6:14 PM, Nicolas Chauvet  wrote:

> Please with github pull request based on pkgs.rpmfusion.org git content
> The previous git "preview" repository is made Read Only.
>
> I will try to proceed tomorrow.
>

Can you please also update Nestopia?
https://github.com/rpmfusion/Nestopia/pulls

Thanks!

Andrea

Github pull request

[Andrea Musuruane]

Hi,
 I've made a pull request for Nestopia following:
http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors_github

Can this be merged and Nestopia built?

Thanks.

Andrea

RPMs still in testing

[Andrea Musuruane]

Hi,
frogatto and yapeSDL are still in rpmfusion-nonfree-updates-testing.

Can someone please push them to updates?

Thanks!

Andrea

Problems building for F19

[Andrea Musuruane]

Hi!
I have problems building for F19:
http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-19-rpmfusion_free/22480-desmume-0.9.11-1.fc19/x86_64/

Can somebody have a look?

Thanks!

Andrea

Re: Problems building for F19

[Andrea Musuruane]

Ops. you're right!

BR,

Andrea


On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com
wrote:

 Fedora 19 has been retired in January:

 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/End_of_life

 Regards,
 --Simone


 On 15 May 2015 at 10:56, Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi!
 I have problems building for F19:

 http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-19-rpmfusion_free/22480-desmume-0.9.11-1.fc19/x86_64/

 Can somebody have a look?

 Thanks!

 Andrea




 --
 You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight
 of the shore (R. W. Emerson).

 http://xkcd.com/229/
 http://negativo17.org/

Re: mass rebuild plan

[Andrea Musuruane]

On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 8:12 PM, Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:

  src/debug.cpp: In function 'void output_debug_message(const char*, ...)':
  src/debug.cpp:31:21: error: format not a string literal and no format
  arguments [-Werror=format-security]
fprintf(fp, text);
^

 is easy :
 -  printf(fp, text);
 +  printf(fp, %s, text);


Sorry for the noise, guys. I think I have misinterpreted a warning for an
error :-/ It was almost trivial to fix.

I'll commit a new version soon.

Bye,

Andrea

Re: mass rebuild plan

[Andrea Musuruane]

On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 3:16 AM, Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:

 Hi,
 Have been submitted all packages from group 2 (packages that haven't
 fc21 ) [1] e [2] , now I'm going check group 3 [3] e [4] ...

 So far we got this FTBFS (please try to fix the issues) :

 http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_nonfree/21044-e-uae-0.8.29-0.18.wip4.fc21/x86_64/build.log


Fixed.



 http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_nonfree/21060-meka-0.80-0.6.20130725svn.fc21/x86_64/build.log


Working on this.



 http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_nonfree/21069-roadfighter-1.0.1269-7.fc21/i686/build.log


I have no idea how to fix this issue. I need help. Thanks.

Bye,

Andrea

Re: ffmpeg-2.2 released

[Andrea Musuruane]

On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Julian Sikorski beleg...@gmail.com wrote:

 I have submitted the build, the following packages need to be rebuilt:

 minidlna


Rebuilt.

Regards,

Andrea.

Desmume on i686

[Andrea Musuruane]

Hi,
a user submitted the following bug report:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3186

I'm unable to reproduce this issue in F20/x86-64 (and previously on
F19/x86-64). Can someone still using i686 give a try?

BTW, this issue seems to have been reported upstream and they are unwilling
to find the bug, blaming gcc 4.8.

Thanks,

Andrea.

Re: Packaging 3-rd party repositories in rpmfusion

[Andrea Musuruane]

On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com wrote:

 Formally, this is about review request 3152 for dropbox-repo [1]. From
 a more practical POV, it's about users being able to install software
 like dropbox more or less out of the box, an area where I think we
 really need to improve (as can be seen in all those Fedora XX post
 installation guide out there).

 My basic understanding is that current Fedora guidelines needs a
 interpretation in the rpmfusion context. Those brand new GL for 3-rd
 party repos are in [2] (discussions in [3]). For now, I think they can
 be abridged to:
 - Non-free repos can not be part of Fedora yum configuration.
 - In some cases free repos can be part of the configuration after
 FESCO/Fedora legal approval.

 Now, IMHO this doesn't really make much sense for rpmfusion for three
 reasons:
 - rpmfusion does not ban non-free software, it's one of the very
 reasons it exists.


RPM Fusion doesn't ban non-free software, but it does not allow non
redistributable software. It is not a place to ship everything regardless
of its license.


 - FESCO/Fedora legal cannot approve anything in rpmfusion.


At the start of RPM Fusion we had a sort of steering committee which
handled such decisions (IIRC Hans, Matthias and Thorsten). Each of them
represented one of the repositories merged in RPM Fusion (Dribble,
Freshrpms, and Livna).

It could be good to have such a committee back.


 - We already have a list of endorsed 3-rd party repos [4].


That list is not endorsed in any way by RPM Fusion. It is just a list of
third party repositories made for user convenience, some of which are known
to work well (i.e. without conflicts) with RPM Fusion.


 To handle this, my simple proposal is that we handles packaged yum
 repositories like this:
 - It's ok to package yum repositories listed in [4].
 - If anyone wants to change the list in [4] this should be announced
 here on rpmfusion-devel, and not done until we agree on it (similar to
 how we handle bundling exceptions).

 Thoughts. out there?


As RPM Fusion follows Fedora guidelines and at present Fedora forbids to
ship third party repositories, we should do the same.

Regards,

Andrea.

Re: New Nestopia upstream

[Andrea Musuruane]

Hi!

On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 
domi...@greysector.net wrote:

 Switching upstream from dead to active seems to be a no-brainer to me,
 especially if other distributions have done so already.

 Anyway, I think this kind of decision is up to the maintainer, but of
 course it's nice of you to ask.


I've just committed and built Nestopia v1.45 for F-19 and devel.

Feedback welcome :)

Bye,

Andrea.

New Nestopia upstream

[Andrea Musuruane]

Hi all,
nestopia upstream seems dead:
http://nestopia.sourceforge.net/

and the linux port too:
http://rbelmont.mameworld.info/?page_id=200

I just found out a new upstream/fork that also includes the linux port:
http://0ldsk00l.ca/nestopia.html

Debian, archlinux and OpenBSD now use this version instead of the original one.

If it is OK with you, I'm going to use this new upsteam to update the
RPM Fusion package.

Please let me know.

Bye,

Andrea.

Meka still in updates-testing

[Andrea Musuruane]

Can someone move it to updates?

Thanks!

Andrea.

Re: minidlna

[Andrea Musuruane]

Hi,
I'm the minidlna maintainer. I already have a spec file for v1.1.0 but
there are problems with log files. I haven't yet the time to analyse it.
I'm sorry but an updated package will be made when this thing will be
sorted out.

Bye,

Andrea.



On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 5:56 PM, poma pomidorabelis...@gmail.com wrote:


 Pronto,
 attached is a spec file for a latest minidlna.

 1. Licence additione
 The SOURCE3 i.e. 'LICENCE' originates from the 'minidlna-1.0.26/LICENCE'.

 2. Systemd unite file change
 minidlna-1.0.26 - 'minidlna.service'
 ExecStart=/usr/sbin/minidlna …
 change in
 minidlna-1.1.0 - 'minidlna.service'
 ExecStart=/usr/sbin/minidlnad …

 3. Manulas a switch
 Manuals are an integral part of the 1.1.0 source.


 poma

Orphaning Edgar

[Andrea Musuruane]

Hi all,
The Legend of Edgar has been moved to Fedora because it now contains
sounds licensed under a good Fedora license.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816565

Therefore I'll retire the package from RPM Fusion.

Bye,

Andrea.

Gambatte version number

[Andrea Musuruane]

Hi,
Gambatte has changed its version scheme. Now it is based on the git
incremental commit number (nb: not the sha number). The latest stable
release is r537.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/gambatte/

I asked upstream if he could revert and start again using a saner version
format (eg.5.0.0) but he is unwilling to do so. He might drop the r in
r537 though.

So, I ask you what version should the RPM have? 537 seems a bit odd for me.

Bye,

Andrea.

CFLAGS.... again

[Andrea Musuruane]

Hi,
while performing the review of pcsx2 I noticed that upstream customize
heavily CFLAGS.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2455#c55

Although RPM_OPT_FLAGS are passed to the compiler, a great number of
optimization flags (e.g. -fx) are also used. A few are in contrast with
optimizations turned on by -O2.

The Fedora guidelines say:
Overriding these flags for performance optimizations (for instance, -O3
instead of -O2) is generally discouraged. If you can present benchmarks
that show a significant speedup for this particular code, this could be
revisited on a case-by-case basis. Adding to and overriding or filtering
parts of these flags is permitted if there's a good reason to do so; the
rationale for doing so must be documented in the specfile. 

Upstream says:
PCSX2 is not an ordinary sofware. Most of the code executed are
self-generated by PCSX2 itself (aka dynamic recompiler/virtual machine).
That mean 1/ gcc flags have no much impact on speed 2/ some gcc flags (used
to) crash PCSX2  It would need a careful test to check which flags can be
enabled/disabled. Too much work for myself, but you're welcome ;). Note:
strict aliasing is surely still broken.

So, what to do? Asking the submitter to check is each flags work is a
daunting task and probably not his job. Removing upstream flags might broke
the emulator. Using upstream flags is against the guidelines. I'd go for
the latter - but I'd like to check if other RPM Fusion packagers agree.

Regards,

Andrea.

Re: mass rebuild for x264/ffmpeg/mplayer on F19

[Andrea Musuruane]

On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 1:43 AM, Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:

 [...]
 9 - build what requires ffmpeg.
 repoquery --releasever=19 --whatrequires ffmpeg\*1.1\* --source
 --alldeps | grep -vP x264|ffmpeg-1.1|gpac|^mplayer|vlc|mythtv|
 libquicktime|mjpegtools | sort -u

 [...]

 list 9 -
 acoustid-fingerprinter-0.6-2.fc19.src.rpm
 alsa-plugins-freeworld-1.0.26-3.fc19.src.rpm
 audacious-plugins-freeworld-3.3.4-1.fc19.src.rpm
 bino-1.4.1-2.fc19.src.rpm
 bombono-dvd-1.2.2-1.fc19.src.rpm
 chromaprint-tools-0.7-4.fc19.src.rpm
 cmus-2.5.0-1.fc19.src.rpm
 devede-3.23.0-1.fc19.src.rpm
 dvbcut-0.6.1-10.svn179.fc19.src.rpm
 dvd95-1.6p0-5.fc19.src.rpm
 dvd-slideshow-0.8.0-6.fc19.src.rpm
 dvdstyler-2.4.3-1.fc19.src.rpm
 ffmpeg2theora-0.29-3.fc19.src.rpm
 ffmpegthumbnailer-2.0.8-3.fc19.src.rpm
 ffmpegthumbs-4.10.1-1.fc19.src.rpm
 get_iplayer-2.80-6.fc19.src.rpm
 guvcview-1.6.1-3.fc19.src.rpm
 imagination-3.0-9.fc19.src.rpm
 k3b-extras-freeworld-2.0.2-10.fc19.src.rpm
 kdenlive-0.9.6-1.fc19.src.rpm
 kmediafactory-0.8.1-7.fc19.src.rpm
 lightspark-0.7.2-1.fc19.src.rpm
 minidlna-1.0.26-1.fc19.src.rpm
 miro-5.0.4-3.fc19.src.rpm
 mjpegtools-2.0.0-6.fc19.src.rpm
 mlt-0.8.8-3.fc19.src.rpm
 mpd-0.17.3-2.fc19.src.rpm
 picard-freeworld-1.1-2.fc19.src.rpm
 qmmp-plugins-freeworld-0.7.0-1.fc19.src.rpm
 vdrsync-0.1.3-16.PRE1.050322.fc19.src.rpm
 wxsvg-1.1.15-1.fc19.src.rpm
 xbmc-12.2-1.fc19.src.rpm
 xine-lib-extras-freeworld-1.1.21-5.fc19.src.rpm
 xmms2-freeworld-0.8-7.fc19.src.rpm


These queries seems wrong to me because you are extracting both BR and
Requires. For example devede does not BR ffmpeg, it just requires it at
runtime. Rebuilding it is unneeded.

Regards,

Andrea.

Re: 2 packages that can be removed from F-19

[Andrea Musuruane]

Hi,

On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 2:08 AM, Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:

 Hi,
 this 2 packages that can be removed from F-19

 [..]

 Package gfceu-0.6.0-7.fc19.noarch is obsoleted by
 fceux-2.2.1-1.fc19.x86_64 which is already installed
 http://cvs.rpmfusion.org/viewvc/rpms/gfceu/devel/?root=free
 don't have dead.package


I just committed the dead.package to CVS. I forgot to do it many moons ago.
Thanks for noticing.

Bye,

Andrea.

FCEUX 2.2.1

[Andrea Musuruane]

Hi all,
I've just updated FCEUX to v2.2.1. It should appear soon in
rpmfusion-free-updates-testing. This is the first release that has LUA
scripting enabled thanks to a patch I found in Debian land. It also ships
for the first time fceux-net-server as a subpackage, allowing game
multiplaying.

Feedback welcome :)

Bye,

Andrea.

Re: Mass rebuilt for F-19 on RPM Fusion - next week

[Andrea Musuruane]

On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.comwrote:

 On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:

  better late then never , the fails are:
 16390   zsnes   zsnes-1_51-13_fc19


 I found this patch made by Debian to fix this issue:

 http://patch-tracker.debian.org/patch/series/view/zsnes/1.510+bz2-5/0012-Fix-build-with-gcc-4.7.patch

 I'll apply it soon.


I tried to fix this issue but I hit another. Now when I build with mock I
get the following error:

[...]
g++ -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions
-fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4  -m32 -march=i686 -mtune=atom
-fasynchronous-unwind-tables -I. -D__UNIXSDL__  -I/usr/include/SDL
-D_GNU_SOURCE=1 -D_REENTRANT  -D__LIBAO__ -D__OPENGL__ -march=i386
-D__RELEASE__ -fno-rtti -o tools/depbuild tools/depbuild.cpp
tools/fileutil.o tools/strutil.o
tools/depbuild.cpp: In function 'int main(int, const char* const*)':
tools/depbuild.cpp:214:30: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned
integer expressions [-Wsign-compare]
tools/depbuild.cpp: In function 'void dependency_calculate_asm(const
char*)':
tools/depbuild.cpp:135:26: warning: ignoring return value of 'int
system(const char*)', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
[-Wunused-result]
/tmp/ccTlkeDY.o: In function `__exchange_and_add':
/usr/lib/gcc/i686-redhat-linux/4.7.2/../../../../include/c++/4.7.2/ext/atomicity.h:48:
undefined reference to `__atomic_fetch_add_4'
tools/strutil.o: In function `__exchange_and_add':
/usr/lib/gcc/i686-redhat-linux/4.7.2/../../../../include/c++/4.7.2/ext/atomicity.h:48:
undefined reference to `__atomic_fetch_add_4'
/usr/lib/gcc/i686-redhat-linux/4.7.2/../../../../include/c++/4.7.2/ext/atomicity.h:48:
undefined reference to `__atomic_fetch_add_4'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [tools/depbuild] Error 1
errore: Stato d'uscita errato da /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.m63Y3l (%build)
Errori di compilazione RPM:
Stato d'uscita errato da /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.m63Y3l (%build)
Child return code was: 1
EXCEPTION: Command failed. See logs for output.
 # ['bash', '--login', '-c', 'rpmbuild -bb --target i686 --nodeps
builddir/build/SPECS/zsnes.spec']
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/mockbuild/trace_decorator.py,
line 70, in trace
result = func(*args, **kw)
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/mockbuild/util.py, line 359, in do
raise mockbuild.exception.Error, (Command failed. See logs for
output.\n # %s % (command,), child.returncode)
Error: Command failed. See logs for output.
 # ['bash', '--login', '-c', 'rpmbuild -bb --target i686 --nodeps
builddir/build/SPECS/zsnes.spec']
LEAVE do -- EXCEPTION RAISED

I can't understand the cause.

The SRPM is here:
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/12575912/zsnes-1.51-14.fc17.src.rpm

Does someone has a spare cycle?

Thanks!

Andrea.

Re: Mass rebuilt for F-19 on RPM Fusion - next week

[Andrea Musuruane]

On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:

 better late then never , the fails are:
 16390   zsnes   zsnes-1_51-13_fc19


I found this patch made by Debian to fix this issue:
http://patch-tracker.debian.org/patch/series/view/zsnes/1.510+bz2-5/0012-Fix-build-with-gcc-4.7.patch

I'll apply it soon.

Bye,

Andrea.

Re: Bug Review 2532 - Package CVS request: not yet approved, please help

[Andrea Musuruane]

Hi Martin,
this is a manual operation. You are not alone in waiting for your
request. You just need to be patient :-)

Bye,

Andrea.


On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Martin Gansser linux4mar...@web.de wrote:

 Hi,

 The Package CVS request for
 https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2532[https://3c.web.de/mail/client/dereferrer?redirectUrl=https%3A%2F%2Fbugzilla.rpmfusion.org%2Fshow_bug.cgi%3Fid%3D2532selection=tfol11b1fac6f28b288e]is
  not yet approved.
 Is there any reason ?

 Thanks
 Martin

Re: ffmpeg 1.0

[Andrea Musuruane]

On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Julian Sikorski beleg...@gmail.com wrote:
 Out of those, kmediafactory, minidlna and motion fail due to glibc, vlc
 due to kernel, and kdemultimedia-extras-freeworld should be retired [1].
 So it seems we have only 3 genuine ffmpeg-related failures. Looks good
 to me :)

The minidlna issue has been already reported upstream and it is
related to ffmpeg 1.0:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=3577137group_id=243163atid=1121516

Archlinux has a made a rather ugly but effective workaround:
https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/community.git/commit/trunk/PKGBUILD?h=packages/minidlnaid=28a9dbed703e5242d8419567171ba61e52fe4fa4

I didn't like it very much. After googling a bit more, I found out the
following patch:
http://inmmc.org/ftp/soft/minidlna.diff

I will commit an updated version of minidlna based on it soon.

Bye,

Andrea.

Re: MOC's packages review requests

[Andrea Musuruane]

On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.comwrote:

 How long should I wait to unlock bug #30 ? :)


This may help you:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group

Bye,

Andrea.

Re: MOC's packages review requests

[Andrea Musuruane]

On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.comwrote:

 Raymond Lu doesn't reply me by mail (I sent a mail to ray...@yahoo.com).
 Please let me know what you want to do regarding
 https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=789 or else I give up for
 now.


Update the ticket asking him there if he is still interested. If he doesn't
reply in a week or two, open a new one submitting your package and close
#789 as a duplicate of the one you will open.

Bye,

Andrea.

Re: MOC's packages review requests

[Andrea Musuruane]

On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi Nicolas.

 MOC is still in development, see SVN repositories
 (http://moc.daper.net/download).
 My RPMs: http://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/moc/

 The next beta will be released soon.

There is already a pending (and stalled?) review request for MOC in RPM Fusion:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=789

Bye,

Andrea.

Re: MOC's packages review requests

[Andrea Musuruane]

On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com wrote:
 No problem. I can complete the Bug789 or open another one.

The rule is FIFO. So the original request have the precedence. Kindly
ask the submitter in #789 if he is still interested. If he is no
longer interested, we can close that request and you can open a new
one.

Since you are not sponsored yet you cannot review #789 if the original
submitter is still interested.

The review seems stalled to me.
 About libRCC/libRCD ?

You must open a review request for each new package you want to submit.

Regards,

Andrea.

Re: The program I wish to package uses SSE and SSE2: can it be included in rpmfusion?

[Andrea Musuruane]

Hi,

On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Nicolas Chauvet kwiz...@gmail.com wrote:

 2012/9/3 Giles gbirch...@blueyonder.co.uk:
  Hi,
 
  I'm trying to make a package pcsx2, a playstation2 emulator, for Fedora
 to
  be included on the rpmfusion repository. (Bug 2455 - Review request:
 pcsx2 -
  A Sony Playstation2 emulator).
  I have run into problems as I have removed the SSE and SSE2 cflags and
 now
  the package does not build. I am being given some advice by another
  packager, who thinks this may disqualify the package from rpmfusion. Is
  there any way to include a package with such dependencies in the
 repository?

 I'm the one who suggested Giles to write here.


 I don't know any guideline that would prevent this ?
 But someone could point it to me.


Not all i686 arch supported by Fedora have SSE or SSE2 capabilities. AFAIK
some of the %{optflags} were selected to match these architectures. Hence
someone could install a package that won't work on his PC if you enable SSE
and SSE2 flags.


 Using runtime detection would be expected in nowadays code, but if the
 default implementation is sse/sse2 this couldn't be expected by
 default on i686, whereas this is always present on x86_64 (and maybe
 ia64 if relevant).


ATM the package in question won't even build without SSE and SSE2 flags and
it can't be compiled on x86_64.


 I don't see any point to use ExclusiveArch: x86_64 that would prevent
 some i686 users because of that.


Since it cannot be compiled on x86_64, the packages is  ExclusiveArch: i686


 Also I would compare with 3D card, you will likely hit a hardware
 limitation somewhere if you load a huge 3D CAD model on an Intel IGP
 with an Atom CPU, this will crash early somewhere.
 So in your case, if you disable sse2, you may lower the level of such
 hardware limitation, because then sse2 capable CPU may not be able to
 run the software appropriately with sse1 only CPU already too short
 for this emulation anyway.

 So I would prefer to have a simple check on i686 for sse2 capability
 as an entry point instead of disabling sse2 and have sse2 capable CPU
 to behave like sse1 only one and not been able to run the software
 whereas they should have.


I agree. A check with upstream can be enlightening :-)

Bye,

Andrea.

Re: FFmpeg 0.11.1 pushed to Rawhide - Known ABI break

[Andrea Musuruane]

On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 8:45 PM, Nicolas Chauvet kwiz...@gmail.com wrote:
 As said in a previous post, I will push the ffmpeg update in rawhide
 in few minutes despite some packages are still failing to catch the
 new ABI.
 The reason is that some packages are already blocked by a dependency
 break (such as libudev).
[...]
 Here is a list of packages known to have ABI break with ffmpeg:
[...]
 minidlna

Fixed. I just updated Minidlna to v1.0.25.

Bye,

Andrea.

Re: roms for bsnes

[Andrea Musuruane]

On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Julian Sikorski beleg...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi,

 updating bsnes to the latest version requires shipping a few firmware
 files [1]. Upstream deems them legal to distribute based on a printer
 ink firmware precedent, and it seems that debian distributes them as
 well. Not shipping them will provide a package which does not work.

IANAL but I don't think we should ship these firmware files given than
Nintendo is not very emulator friendly.

Moreover, the inclusion in Debian seems a mistake to me, because they
do not list these files in the copyright file:
http://packages.debian.org/sid/bsnes

Regards,

Andrea.

Re: [RPM Fusion] Current FTBFS in F-17 - take 3

[Andrea Musuruane]

On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 8:18 AM, Nicolas Chauvet kwiz...@gmail.com wrote:
 paintdotnet

I think it should be orphaned. Paintdotnet source code hasn't been
available for years (circa 2009). Moreover, pinta is already in
Fedora.

Bye,

Andrea.

Re: [RPM Fusion] Current FTBFS in F-17

[Andrea Musuruane]

On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Nicolas Chauvet kwiz...@gmail.com wrote:
 meka

 I'll work soon on meka. But instead of patching an old version, I'll
 work on the latest SVN that has a number of new interesting features
 (e.g. sound under Linux).
 Good, thx

I updated meka to an upstream preview of v0.80 for f16, f17 and devel.
Because nasm is no longer required, we have builds for x86_86 too.

Bye,

Andrea.

Re: [RPM Fusion] Current FTBFS in F-17

[Andrea Musuruane]

On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 8:23 PM, Nicolas Chauvet kwiz...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hello,

 FYI.

 Here is  the current list of packages that Fail To Build From Sources
 from the RPM Fusion 17 tree.
 This is based on the dist tag from the development/17 repo.

 Some of them might be trivial like a version bump. It means the
 package more likely is in search for a new maintainer.
 Please search for existing bugs if you want to volunteer to maintain a
 package and block #33.

 fceultra

It has already been fixed and rebuilt (fceultra-0.98.13-0.9.pre). Why
do you report a problem?

 meka

I'll work soon on meka. But instead of patching an old version, I'll
work on the latest SVN that has a number of new interesting features
(e.g. sound under Linux).

Bye,

Andrea.

CVS broken?

[Andrea Musuruane]

Hi all,
   I can't build desmume for F16 and F15. It seems that some kind of
corruption has gone in this branches:
http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/build-status/job.psp?uid=12826
http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/build-status/job.psp?uid=12827

How to solve this?

Regards,

Andrea.

Re: CVS broken?

[Andrea Musuruane]

On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 6:28 PM, Nicolas Chauvet kwiz...@gmail.com wrote:
 That's because you don't have the patch in F-16
 /desmume/F-16/desmume-0.9.7-gcc47.patch: No such file or directory

Thank you. I should read better error logs

Maybe you can also help with this one too:
http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_nonfree/12828-plus4emu-1.2.9.2-5.fc18/

It seems to be this issue:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2263

Any way to solve it?

Bye,

Andrea.

Re: New rpmfusion packager for Homer SIP phone

[Andrea Musuruane]

On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:31 PM, Mario Santagiuliana
fed...@marionline.it wrote:
 Hi to all,
 I am Mario Santagiuliana, I am asking to join rpmfusion developer to become
 maintainer of Homer SIP phone for Fedora.
 I am just a Fedora Packager Maintainer. If you want to know more thing
 about me you could check my fedora wiki page:
 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Marionline

 I open a review request here:
 https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2237

 So I add my bug to bug #2 and I need a sponsor for rpmfusion, I add my bug
 to bug #30.

Since you already are a Fedora sponsored packager you don't need to be
sponsored in RPM Fusion too. Therefore remove yourself from the
tracker bug #30.

Bye.

Andrea.

Re: New rpmfusion packager for Homer SIP phone

[Andrea Musuruane]

On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 7:28 PM, Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com wrote:
 Since you already are a Fedora sponsored packager you don't need to be
 sponsored in RPM Fusion too. Therefore remove yourself from the
 tracker bug #30.

BTW, asking for a review swap can be a way to speed up the review
process in RPM Fusion :)

Bye,

Andrea.

Re: To All Package maintainer ! - no F-17 builds at the moment.

[Andrea Musuruane]

On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 11:16 PM, Nicolas Chauvet kwiz...@gmail.com wrote:
 So, do not build for F-17, but devel is OK ?
 devel is OK to build and need to be equal or higher of F-17
 (and ffmpeg dependency is fixed)

Are you sure? Last evening I still got dependency errors in devel:
http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/12005-minidlna-1.0.24-1.fc18/

Bye,

Andrea.

Review swap

[Andrea Musuruane]

Hi all,
   I still have two pending reviews:

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1798
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1816

I'm willing to swap reviews here or in Fedora.

Regards,

Andrea.

Re: No space left on device

[Andrea Musuruane]

On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
 You should probably fill out an infrastructure ticket for this
 problem. I hope it get's some attention but don't get your hopes up. I
 still can't build EL6 packages and I submitted mine on December 14th.

Done:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2110

Bye,

Andrea.

Re: No space left on device

[Andrea Musuruane]

On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 8:54 PM, Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi,
    it seems that the build system hasn't enough space left:
 http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/build-status/job.psp?uid=11160

 Frogatto source tarball is  250Mb and if this error is not solved, I
 cannot build it.

Ping. I'm still hitting this issue.

Bye,

Andrea.