Re: [vcmi/f40] Can be built with ffmpeg-free-devel as well
Hello! On Mon, Jul 8, 2024 at 10:16 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > Hello, Peter. > I can see that you've resumed your open source contributions. Great! > > On Monday, 08 July 2024 at 04:44, runlevel5 wrote: > > commit a29398a4ed39d21d0677097fedefdb63d76afe64 > > Author: Peter Lemenkov > > Date: Thu Jul 4 21:07:06 2024 +0200 > > > > Can be built with ffmpeg-free-devel as well > > Does that mean it can be moved to Fedora? I can't see any non-Fedora > dependencies in the spec anymore. Yes it can be built with packages only from Fedora so it can be moved to Fedora. I am not sure about current Fedora Games policies related to engines with non-free data. I remember back then we had some kind of a data downloader script - is it still around? -- With best regards, Peter Lemenkov. ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
Re: Koji, Bodhi and other sweets
Hello All! 2013/11/11 Miro Hrončok : > Hi, > I've joined RPMFusion recently and current infrastructurre bothers me. > > What blocks us from using Koji, Bodhi, git? Is it man power, hardware, > money, licnese? How can I help with migrating to Koji and Bodhi and keep the > infrastrucutre the same as Fedora has? We're interested in updating RPMFusion infra as well. Its current state simply keeps volunteers away from participating. We should come up with a something more modern. I propose to reuse existing services - for example GitHub for repositories. -- With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
Re: BuildSys restored re-submit/verify your build
2013/10/2 Hans de Goede : > Hi, >> ~1 month downtime is in no way can be called as "awesome". > > Yes we seem to have a problem where we don't have enough people > doing infra work, agreed. Still I for one am very grateful for Well, in order to attract more people we should replace infrastructure with more modern and reliable one. This also could help an existing maintainers by simplifying their workflow greatly. -- With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
Re: BuildSys restored re-submit/verify your build
2013/10/2 Hans de Goede : > Hi, > > > On 10/02/2013 10:54 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> >> Since the buildsys is now functional again > > > Awesome, many thanks for all your work on rpmfusion, and for getting > the buildsys back up again! ~1 month downtime is in no way can be called as "awesome". -- With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
Re: Self Introduction
Hello All! 2013/5/12 : > Review Request : Please review my "Mplayer2" package bug : > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2775 . Regarding mplayer2 - I wonder if it's better to switch to mpv instead which is a fork of mplayer2. What do you think? * http://mpv.io/ * https://github.com/mpv-player/mpv/blob/master/DOCS/man/en/changes.rst * https://github.com/mpv-player/mpv -- With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
Re: ffmpeg: here we go again
2013/1/8 Nicolas Chauvet : > 2013/1/7 Julian Sikorski >> >> Hi list, >> >> ffmpeg-1.1 was released today. Out of 32 deps we are carrying, only 2 >> failed to rebuild (bino and motion). Given how early in F-19 cycle we >> are, I'm inclined to push it sooner than later. Keep in mind that >> dvdstyler and kmediafactory can only be rebuilt in the 2nd round. >> I'll commit the changes and submit a build a few days later. > > > Is there any ABI changes ? Where ? Lots of API/ABI changes. * http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/ffmpeg.html -- With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
Re: RPM Fusion Infrastructure changes
2011/2/6 Matthias Saou : > * Rent a dedicated server. This will require the project to take > donations in order to live : Getting hardware "lent" from here or > there is really nice, and will still be fine for satellite services > like mirrors and builders, but for the central vital infrastructure > (dns, mail, buildsys, bugzilla), I think this is best in order to > be independent from individuals. I've actually already ordered a > server at OVH Spain which will cost 60€/month (I've pre-paied install > + 3 months), which I think is more than reasonable. I think we could offer you quite decent hardware for these tasks (we're using it in rebuilding RFRemix). I'll ping our hardware team. At least it could serve as a backup facility. It is located in Russia, so beware of drunken bears. -- With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
Re: libbluray / libaacs / libbdplus
2010/7/9 Xavier Bachelot : > Hi, > > libbluray is a library to access Blu-Ray disks for video playback. It is > licensed under the LGPL and as such should be fine for Fedora. > > http://www.videolan.org/developers/libbluray.html > > However, this will only work with blurays not protected with either AACS > or BD+. Hopefully, none of them are really required for daily use, because almost *all* HD-Video rips, available via torrent-trackers are already w/o encryption. So you need these libraries only if you're stupid enough to buy original licensed Blu-Ray disks. The same applies for DVDs. Keeping in mind that if you will buy original disk, then you will directly sponsor MPAA trials against file-sharers, I believe that this is socially unacceptable behavior we mustn't encourage (people should download unencrypted images instead). So my opinion is that we should allow libbluray and reject the rest. -- With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
Re: vuze/azureus
Hello All! 2009/9/9 Valent Turkovic : > Hi, there is Vuze/Azureus 4.2 out and in RPMFusion repos I only see 4.0 > Is there a planed update soon to 4.2 version? Wrong maillist, definitely. Azureus available in Fedora. -- With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
Anonymous CVS checkout
Hello All! Is there a way to make anonymous checkout of rpmfusion tree(s)? -- With best regards!
Re: libdvdcss,again
Hello! 2008/12/13, Andrea Musuruane : > Aren't you trolling a bit too much? > It seemes that the only thing you care about is libdvdcss. Not only. I care about my freedom a little. Do you? > I haven't seen any other post of yours about something That means that other things are OK for me. > else. Want to help? Package something :) I' afraid that if some official in some country will claim, that application "foobar" (and all its components) is illegal, then RPMFusion heads will drop it asap. I mean I cannot trust (and work with) people, living in totalitarian countries, because their governments can easily pressurized on them (I know it, because I'm one of the people in the opposition in Russia :). -- With best regards!
Re: libdvdcss,again
Hello! 2008/12/13, Andrea Musuruane : > BTW, I've always been a fan of who-does-much-of-the-work is more equal > than the others and who-has-the-legal-risk has the right to choose. So all we need is to change rpmfusion heads to those who live in more freedom countries, right? There is a possibility to create and maintain infrastructure in Russia, for example. Probably guys from the indian Fedora community can do this too. I also don't hear any news about DMCA repressions in Poland. If someone thinks that he may be under legal attack, maybe he should to leave the administration (not the contribution and development) of rpmfusion. > > So, finally, what benefits rpmfusion provides over Livna? I see only > > disadvantages (cannot include software, which someone claims illegal > > in some particular country). > Hmm let me think... > RPM Fusion is a community, it has much more developers than Livna, it > has merged two other repositories, it has an open infrastructure, it > has much more packages than Livna. That's not a benefits (developers may easily switch back to work with Livna, other repo may be merged with Livna as well, and so on). BTW "more open infrastructure" means using cvs instead of svn? :) > -- With best regards!
Re: libdvdcss,again
Hello All! 2008/12/13, Thorsten Leemhuis : > > > The question is - who decided it. I wish to know whether rpmfusion is > > > a community-driven project or not. > > Please read these: > > http://rpmfusion.org/SteeringCommittee > http://lists.fedoraunity.org/pipermail/repo-merge-discussion/2007-April/96.html Understood - rpmfusion is not a community-project (important decisions were made w/o asking community directly). So, finally, what benefits rpmfusion provides over Livna? I see only disadvantages (cannot include software, which someone claims illegal in some particular country). -- With best regards!
Re: libdvdcss,again
2008/12/13, Conrad Meyer : > The current state of things is that Livna still lives (and ships *only* > libdvdcss), and that way RPMFusion can avoid shipping libdvdcss and get > advertised in countries where libdvdcss is illegal. The question is - who decided it. I wish to know whether rpmfusion is a community-driven project or not. -- With best regards!
Re: libdvdcss,again
Hello All. 2008/12/13, Gianluca Sforna : > > The question is, who agreed not to ship libdvdcss (completely legal in > > wast majority of countries) and when? > I'm not here since a long time, but I already saw few threads about > this, so I guess archives could answer your Q. I searched a bit, but cannot fuiind any traces of *agreement*. Actually, there is the only relevant thread I found: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.rpmfusion.devel/2264 -- With best regards!
libdvdcss,again
Hello All! > Request: libdvdcss > Why not in RPM Fusion: The short story is: *It was agreed* on not to ship it > due to > various reasons around the fact that libdvdcss is a bit more complicated (or > dangerous) than all the other software RPM Fusion offeres have. The question is, who agreed not to ship libdvdcss (completely legal in wast majority of countries) and when? -- With best regards!
Re: Hopefully a new member of the team
Hello Dejan! 2008/11/18 Dejan Lekic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I am willing to maintain Portable.NET (or so-called the "dotGNU" project) > packages. Portable.NET is an open-source, (L)GPL, implementation of the .NET > 2.0 . I use my dotGNU RPMs quiet often and so far I haven't seen any problem > with them. I maintain contact with other users of my RPMs via dotGNU's > official IRC channel ( irc://irc.freenet.org/dotGNU ) and nobody complained > so far. > > I have some more RPMs that would be very interesting to be in rpmfusion, > but, since I am new here, I thought it would be the best to begin with > something. :) Why you decided to push rpms into RPMFusion instead of Fedora/EPEL? -- With best regards!
Re: the libdvdcss issue
Hello! 2008/11/18 Andreas Thienemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Tue, 18 Nov 2008, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > >> Sure, the latter is a bit more complicated, but imho it's the right >> thing to do, especially as the user might do something that is illegal >> in his country. > > I do not consider it our job to prevent people doing illegal acts. +1 -- With best regards!
Re: the libdvdcss issue
Hello! 2008/11/18 Richard Körber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Just ignore that issue. We should satisfy the majority's needs, and >> the majority of Fedora users (obviously) needs DVD playback (as well >> as other patents/crypto stuff). If that guy(s) stops contributing - >> that's not a problem at all. We easily find someone who will >> contribute instead. > > In a lot of countries it would not be allowed to link to RPMfusion > (or probably even mention its name) if RPMfusion offers software to > circumvent copy protection. Not an issue. People should complain to their governments. There are tons of prohibitions all around the world - we have no moral rights to obey all these laws (therefore supporting different kinds of censorship). > The bottom line is: RPMfusion will not just lose some contributors, but > will lose a lot of free advertisement and public attention. What countries have laws which prohibits mentioning addresses of web-servers? Just curious. Even ThePirateBay can be named in wast majority of countries. > For me it means that if RPMfusion is offering software that is illegal in > Germany, I will stop blogging about it in fedorablog.de and remove the > package lists from repowatch.fedorablog.de. You can blame me for being a > sissy, but I see no other option for me. What about news about ThePirateBay in German newspapers? Also, I'm just curious. In any case - feel free to stop advertising RPMFusion if it potentially could hurt you. However I still see no reasons to obey your country's laws. If we'll decide to remove all restricted (in some countries) software from RPMFusion when I see no reason why to abandon Livna in favor of less-functional castrated repository? BTW I probably can find you good hosting in Russia, where you can hide your identity from your country's RIAA/MPAA. Looks like despite of all moves of our Russian government against our opposition, we still live on more free country than you, in Europe (at least we allowed to free talk). > To the people who are responsible for RPMfusion: Please make up your mind, > and then make an official and irrevocable (!) commitment pro or contra > libdvdcss. Agree. People in free countries need to know whether they need to create (and work on) their local repositories or we may rely on RPMFusion. I personally afraid that after removing libdvdcss, there will be another one restricted in some particular country library or utility, and another one, and another one... -- With best regards!
Re: the libdvdcss issue
Hello All! 2008/11/18 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > IIRC someone said earlier that some people wouldn't contribute to RPMFusion > if it was in any way associated with distribution of libdvdcss, but never > mentioned any names or what these contributors would bring to RPMFusion. Just ignore that issue. We should satisfy the majority's needs, and the majority of Fedora users (obviously) needs DVD playback (as well as other patents/crypto stuff). If that guy(s) stops contributing - that's not a problem at all. We easily find someone who will contribute instead. That unnamed guy(s) should complain to his(their) government rather than trying to complicate our lives. > Frankly I'm a bit tired of this game, but I'm willing to do whatever > I can to provide users with complete DVD playback capability. > So what CAN I do? > > Regards, > R. > > -- > Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann > RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org | MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu > "Faith manages." >-- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations" > -- With best regards!
