[Bug 1165] Review request: cc65 - Crosscompiler/Crossassembler for 6502 systems

[RPM Fusion Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1165

Nicolas Chauvet  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|2   |


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2
[Bug 2] Tracker: New packages awaiting review
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

[Bug 1165] Review request: cc65 - Crosscompiler/Crossassembler for 6502 systems

[RPM Fusion Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1165

Richard hobbes1...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 CC||hobbes1...@gmail.com
 Resolution||WONTFIX

--- Comment #4 from Richard hobbes1...@gmail.com 2015-01-14 22:50:26 CET ---
Closing due to inactivity, please reopen if you're interested in pursuing this
review request.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 1165] Review request: cc65 - Crosscompiler/Crossassembler for 6502 systems

[RPM Fusion Bugzilla]

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1165





--- Comment #1 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz  2010-04-17 16:26:23 ---
I already did some work to package cc65 in a Fedora complaint way, please see
http://fedora.danny.cz/


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 1165] Review request: cc65 - Crosscompiler/Crossassembler for 6502 systems

[RPM Fusion Bugzilla]

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1165


Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||d...@danny.cz




--- Comment #3 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz  2010-04-17 17:23:36 ---
first do s/complaint/compliant/ :-)

I'm not actively working on it, I did the 2.12.0 a year ago and if I remember
correctly the update to 2.13.0 would need also to port the makefile patch.

The license - almost all files are licensed under zlib with only 2 files having
the original license that's considered non-free by Fedora (and thus it can't go
directly to Fedora). I think the details could be found either in
bugzilla.redhat.com or in the archives of fedora-legal mailing list. But the
Fedora packaging guidelines
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines) apply also to packages in
RPM Fusion.

The date of http://fedora.danny.cz/cc65-2.13.0.spec is the date of upload, I
last touched it half a year ago. It's meant primarily as an inspiration, but in
my opinion it could be acceptable for RPM Fusion.

The problems I see in the upstream spec file are
- the name/version %defines are redundant
- explicit usage of %attr
- using absolute paths instead of macros
- the target headers/libs should (IMHO) go into %{_datadir} (instead of
%{_libdir}) because the content is not arch dependent from the host's view
- the binaries are stripped and the -debuginfo subpackage is then useless


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.