[Bug 13] Review request: rpmfusion-package-config-smart - RPM Fusion configuration files for the Smart package manager
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13 NicolasChauvet kwiz...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|33 | -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 13] Review request: rpmfusion-package-config-smart - RPM Fusion configuration files for the Smart package manager
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13 Chen Lei supercy...@163.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||supercy...@163.com --- Comment #23 from Chen Lei supercy...@163.com 2010-05-29 13:56:17 --- (In reply to comment #21) (In reply to comment #20) This seems to have been fixed already, releasing cvs request Something is wrong, I still can't commit :/ It seems the ACL list is fine. See http://cvs.rpmfusion.org/viewvc/owners/owners.list?revision=1.125root=nonfreeview=markup -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 13] Review request: rpmfusion-package-config-smart - RPM Fusion configuration files for the Smart package manager
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13 --- Comment #24 from Stewart Adam s.a...@diffingo.com 2010-05-29 20:53:20 --- (In reply to comment #23) It seems the ACL list is fine. See http://cvs.rpmfusion.org/viewvc/owners/owners.list?revision=1.125root=nonfreeview=markup rpmfusion-free-package-config-smart isn't in that list at all. But I believe that owners.list is different from the ACL permissions. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 13] Review request: rpmfusion-package-config-smart - RPM Fusion configuration files for the Smart package manager
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13 --- Comment #22 from Kam Leo a1tmb...@netscape.net 2010-05-26 20:30:27 --- If you can not commit updated configuration builds please do not push the old F11 package to newer versions of Fedora. It is not nice for users to have to sort out conflicts with old rpmfusion 11 repo builds. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 13] Review request: rpmfusion-package-config-smart - RPM Fusion configuration files for the Smart package manager
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13 NicolasChauvet kwiz...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kwiz...@gmail.com Blocks|33 | --- Comment #20 from NicolasChauvet kwiz...@gmail.com 2010-04-27 21:46:36 --- This seems to have been fixed already, releasing cvs request -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 13] Review request: rpmfusion-package-config-smart - RPM Fusion configuration files for the Smart package manager
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13 Stewart Adam s.a...@diffingo.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||33 --- Comment #19 from Stewart Adam s.a...@diffingo.com 2009-12-23 16:34:09 --- Package Change Request == Package Name: rpmfusion-nonfree-package-config-smart Updated RPMFusion Owners: firewing I'm not on the ACL so I can't update it for F12... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 13] Review request: rpmfusion-package-config-smart - RPM Fusion configuration files for the Smart package manager
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13 Stewart Adam s.a...@diffingo.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|4 | Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 13] Review request: rpmfusion-package-config-smart - RPM Fusion configuration files for the Smart package manager
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13 Xavier Lamien lxt...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lxt...@gmail.com Blocks|33 | --- Comment #18 from Xavier Lamien lxt...@gmail.com 2008-12-20 12:56:46 --- branched. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 13] Review request: rpmfusion-package-config-smart - RPM Fusion configuration files for the Smart package manager
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13 --- Comment #16 from David Timms dti...@iinet.net.au 2008-12-20 01:08:28 --- (In reply to comment #15) (In reply to comment #14) Built both the nonfree and free packages using rpmbuild -bb on fully updated Fedora 8 VMware client. No problems with either the build nor the install. Using smart-1.1-56.fc8. No problem with uninstall either. Thanks for the feedback Kam. I also performed build, install of free, checked written channel files (all URLs good on F9), used smart gui, installed something, removed it. Removed the free config. Then I built and install free (which required non-free, which I added), checked written channel files, used smart gui to install and remove a package. Then removed rf-free-p-c-s, and confirms that this required the dependent removal of rf-nonfree-p-c-s. So without further ado: - The updated packages (free - free and nonfree - nonfree) have been re-approved. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 13] Review request: rpmfusion-package-config-smart - RPM Fusion configuration files for the Smart package manager
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13 Stewart Adam s.a...@diffingo.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|3 |4, 33 --- Comment #17 from Stewart Adam s.a...@diffingo.com 2008-12-20 04:04:27 --- Package CVS request == Package Name: rpmfusion-free-package-config-smart Short Description: RPM Fusion (free) configuration files for the Smart package manager Owners: firewing1 Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- License tag: free Package CVS request == Package Name: rpmfusion-nonfree-package-config-smart Short Description: RPM Fusion (nonfree) configuration files for the Smart package manager Owners: firewing1 Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- License tag: nonfree -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 13] Review request: rpmfusion-package-config-smart - RPM Fusion configuration files for the Smart package manager
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13 Kam Leo a1tmb...@netscape.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||a1tmb...@netscape.net --- Comment #14 from Kam Leo a1tmb...@netscape.net 2008-12-18 23:29:47 --- (In reply to comment #13) (In reply to comment #12) Okay, I've added (nonfree) or (free) to the summary and fixed the %descriptions: SRPM: http://downloads.diffingo.com/rpmfusion/rpmfusion-free-package-config-smart-10-2.src.rpm I'm hoping to get some feedback from a regular smart user, if not I'll get a chance to fully test the split packages soonish. Built both the nonfree and free packages using rpmbuild -bb on fully updated Fedora 8 VMware client. No problems with either the build nor the install. Using smart-1.1-56.fc8. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 13] Review request: rpmfusion-package-config-smart - RPM Fusion configuration files for the Smart package manager
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13 --- Comment #15 from Kam Leo a1tmb...@netscape.net 2008-12-19 00:33:38 --- (In reply to comment #14) (In reply to comment #13) (In reply to comment #12) Okay, I've added (nonfree) or (free) to the summary and fixed the %descriptions: SRPM: http://downloads.diffingo.com/rpmfusion/rpmfusion-free-package-config-smart-10-2.src.rpm I'm hoping to get some feedback from a regular smart user, if not I'll get a chance to fully test the split packages soonish. Built both the nonfree and free packages using rpmbuild -bb on fully updated Fedora 8 VMware client. No problems with either the build nor the install. Using smart-1.1-56.fc8. No problem with uninstall either. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 13] Review request: rpmfusion-package-config-smart - RPM Fusion configuration files for the Smart package manager
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13 --- Comment #13 from David Timms dti...@iinet.net.au 2008-12-17 13:45:58 --- (In reply to comment #12) Okay, I've added (nonfree) or (free) to the summary and fixed the %descriptions: SRPM: http://downloads.diffingo.com/rpmfusion/rpmfusion-free-package-config-smart-10-2.src.rpm I'm hoping to get some feedback from a regular smart user, if not I'll get a chance to fully test the split packages soonish. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 13] Review request: rpmfusion-package-config-smart - RPM Fusion configuration files for the Smart package manager
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13 --- Comment #10 from Stewart Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 03:36:26 --- Here they are: * free SPEC: http://downloads.diffingo.com/rpmfusion/rpmfusion-free-package-config-smart.spec SRPM: http://downloads.diffingo.com/rpmfusion/rpmfusion-free-package-config-smart-10-1.src.rpm * nonfree SPEC: http://downloads.diffingo.com/rpmfusion/rpmfusion-nonfree-package-config-smart.spec SRPM: http://downloads.diffingo.com/rpmfusion/rpmfusion-nonfree-package-config-smart-10-1.src.rpm I don't think there's a way to have them generated from same RPM, and while disabling the nonfree repos initially would work, I think it would be annoying for the end-users since it makes more sense to have to configure smart in the same way they configured Yum. Also, a good point was raised on the list[1] a while back... If there's any chance at having Fedora linking to the free repo on their sites, we absolutely need to keep nonfree and free as far away from each other as possible. [1] http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/2007-October/53.html -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 13] Review request: rpmfusion-package-config-smart - RPM Fusion configuration files for the Smart package manager
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13 --- Comment #7 from David Timms [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-04 10:51:50 --- (In reply to comment #6) SRPM: http://downloads.diffingo.com/rpmfusion/rpmfusion-package-config-smart-9-3.src.rpm I fixed the two typos and this SRPM will build dynamically for any Fedora X final release. I'd rather keep EL and rawhide on different sources (I'll just change the path in the case of EL and toggle the disabled= in the case of rawhide) just because going crazy on the regex is bound to go wrong at some point or some where ( example is the nonnonfree ;) ). Builds and makes usable files on F9-i386. smart-gui finds content in the channels, and I'm able to install rpmfusion items OK. = A coupla more consistency changes [add trailing slash] (before import): = [rpmfusion-free-rawhide-debuginfo] baseurl=http://download1.rpmfusion.org/nonfree/fedora/development/$basearch/debug = [rpmfusion-nonfree-rawhide-debuginfo] baseurl=http://download1.rpmfusion.org/nonfree/fedora/development/$basearch/debug = Side issue: Is there any special protection that we could provide to ensure that this package can't get built to include activating some random (dodgy) repository ? ( Like removing cvs access after import and successful build.) ( do we have groups of people who can update, and build cvs packages - like fedora, or strictly only the owner as requested in CVS request ? ) = David Timms has approved the package rpmfusion-package-config-smart. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 13] Review request: rpmfusion-package-config-smart - RPM Fusion configuration files for the Smart package manager
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13
--- Comment #5 from David Timms [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-03 13:06:35 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
I've updated the paths and split up the .channel files to match the way we
split up the .repo files:
SRPM:
http://downloads.diffingo.com/rpmfusion/rpmfusion-package-config-smart-9-2.src.rpm
bugz in the .channel files:
---
rpmfusion-free-rawhide.channel:
l3: delete trailing disabled=yes
rpmfusion-nonfree-rawhide.channel:
l3,l9,l15: nonnonfree - nonfree
With the existing sed command:
sed -i 's/\$ARCH/%{_target_cpu}/'
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/smart/channels/$(basename $channel) ,
just want to clarify that when the builder builds this, the mod is done to the
.channel files that make it into the arch specific.rpm. And then the %files
part of the spec does it's %config(noreplace) decision on whether to use the
name or append rpmnew as the user installs the package ? {my initial thought
was that the sed would attempt to work on the filenames that are on users disk,
unexpectedly potentially modifying them if the match text was found in config
files already on disk}.
Also, with this arrangement, there will need to be equivalent .channel files
for F10 and F8, as well as EL-X 's that rf will support. Is there a way to
specify the release, like yum configs, and not have to have separate channel
files for each release ? Or maybe with sed's like you have done for arch ?
I also remember thl tossing up whether it would be worth it to place the smart
configs into the main rpmfusion-*free-release packages. The biggest
disadvantage that I can see is that to properly own the .../channel directory,
the package would need to require smart. This would then cause all users to
install smart, whether or not they want to smart as the package manager. What
do you think ?
(In reply to comment #4)
AFAIK smart doesn't support mirrorlists in the config file or multiple
baseurls, so we're stuck with the main mirror.
I've updated the paths and split up the .channel files to match the way we
split up the .repo files:
SPEC:
http://downloads.diffingo.com/rpmfusion/rpmfusion-package-config-smart.spec
SRPM:
http://downloads.diffingo.com/rpmfusion/rpmfusion-package-config-smart-9-2.src.rpm
$ rpmlint
/home/davidt/rpmbuild/SRPMS/rpmfusion-package-config-smart-9-2.src.rpm
/home/davidt/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/rpmfusion-package-config-smart-9-2.i386.rpm
rpmfusion-package-config-smart.i386: E: no-binary
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings.
- as before, that's OK since it's not a real binary package.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 13] Review request: rpmfusion-package-config-smart - RPM Fusion configuration files for the Smart package manager
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13 --- Comment #6 from Stewart Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-03 16:29:08 --- SPEC: http://downloads.diffingo.com/rpmfusion/rpmfusion-package-config-smart.spec SRPM: http://downloads.diffingo.com/rpmfusion/rpmfusion-package-config-smart-9-3.src.rpm I fixed the two typos and this SRPM will build dynamically for any Fedora X final release. I'd rather keep EL and rawhide on different sources (I'll just change the path in the case of EL and toggle the disabled= in the case of rawhide) just because going crazy on the regex is bound to go wrong at some point or some where ( example is the nonnonfree ;) ). Regarding including the .channel files in rpmfusion-release, while I agree that would be easier for the users, that means we wither own /etc/smart/channels or pull in smart... I don't really like either of those options. Fedora packages their smart configs in a separate package, so I think we should follow that and do the same. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 13] Review request: rpmfusion-package-config-smart - RPM Fusion configuration files for the Smart package manager
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13 --- Comment #4 from Stewart Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-27 16:16:32 --- AFAIK smart doesn't support mirrorlists in the config file or multiple baseurls, so we're stuck with the main mirror. I've updated the paths and split up the .channel files to match the way we split up the .repo files: SPEC: http://downloads.diffingo.com/rpmfusion/rpmfusion-package-config-smart.spec SRPM: http://downloads.diffingo.com/rpmfusion/rpmfusion-package-config-smart-9-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 13] Review request: rpmfusion-package-config-smart - RPM Fusion configuration files for the Smart package manager
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13
--- Comment #3 from David Timms [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-21 14:24:12 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
rpmfusion-package-config-smart.i386: E: no-binary
I fixed no-documentation. but no-binary is OK since we don't want one in the
first place.
OK.
2: should this package be noarch, since it has no executable ?
Smart doesn't handle multiarch very well, so it's best to keep this
arch-dependant so that users can install the i386 and x86_64 versions if they
wish to do so.
OK.
[??] buildroot differs slightly from third most preferred location.
Fixed
Correct. Now identical to form 2.
[??] Provides: smart-config-rpmfusion. Is this a previous package that you
are trying to supersee ? Or why is this done ?
If there is a smart config package for any of the three parent repos,
then
perhaps this should provide smart-config-[oldrepo], so that the old
smart
config is removed ?
I just copied this off of fedora-package-config-smart, it's a metaprovides for
other packages to use.
OK. makes sense.
[!] Release is sane, but needs the %{?dist}
Because this is the repo release file, it's best to avoid %{?dist}.
Agreed.
[??] The config presented in the smart config files refers to URLs that
don't
exist. I assume these will get updated as rpmfusion nears public
release
Yeah, we'll have to tweak those later ;)
It's time
I think we have final locations now.
Also:
[rpmfusion-free-updates-testing]: add disabled=yes as default ?
[rpmfusion-non-free-updates-testing]: add disabled=yes as default ?
Until we can put these in CVS, I have the individual sources here as well:
http://downloads.diffingo.com/rpmfusion/rpmfusion-package-config-smart-9/
Can smart handle mirrorlist's like yum ?
A quick look suggests not, which might limit smart download speed due to
hassling specific servers rather than in country rpmfusion mirrors etc.
If that is the case, perhaps it would be good to at least include multiple
baseurl entries from the repos mirror. Not that we want to re-issue the
-config-smart each time mirror are added/removed from the list. Would it be
possible for the postinstall to retrieve the mirrorlist and insert it as the
list of baseurl= ?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 13] Review request: rpmfusion-package-config-smart - RPM Fusion configuration files for the Smart package manager
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13 Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rpmfusion-package- ||[EMAIL PROTECTED], ||[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug.
