[Bug 1806] Review request: opera - A fast and secure web browser and Internet suite

[RPM Fusion Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1806

Nicolas Chauvet  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Blocks|3   |
 Resolution|--- |EXPIRED

--- Comment #20 from Nicolas Chauvet  ---
Review expired. Please re-open if you feel like it's still relevant.


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3
[Bug 3] Tracker: Packages under review.
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

[Bug 1806] Review request: opera - A fast and secure web browser and Internet suite

[RPM Fusion Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1806

Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|2   |3

--- Comment #19 from Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com 2012-08-19 15:57:25 
CEST ---
Blocking RF_REVIEW because Nicolas is assigned the review to himself.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1806] Review request: opera - A fast and secure web browser and Internet suite

[RPM Fusion Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1806

--- Comment #18 from Russell Golden niveusl...@niveusluna.org 2012-07-27 
16:45:50 CEST ---
There are separate repositories for each branch of Fedora and each branch of
EL. There have to be, because of differing library versions between branches.

Sometimes this separation causes problems, because some maintainers aren't
interested in supporting EL. For example, for a long time, gstreamer plugins
weren't in the EL6 branch because the maintainer for the fedora branches wasn't
interested in EL6 support. That is currently being worked on. So far, there's
only gstreamer-ffmpeg, but I'm hoping someone else will pick up the rest. ^_^

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1806] Review request: opera - A fast and secure web browser and Internet suite

[RPM Fusion Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1806

--- Comment #15 from Patryk Obara patryk.ob...@gmail.com 2012-07-23 13:22:48 
CEST ---
Spec URL:
http://dreamertan.fedorapeople.org/srpm/opera/12.00-2.fc17/opera.spec

SRPM URL:
http://dreamertan.fedorapeople.org/srpm/opera/12.00-2.fc17/opera-12.00-2.fc17.src.rpm

Turns out as of rpm 4.9.1.3 internal dependency generator works properly for
both architectures, so special dependency generator/requirements filter is no
longer required - I removed it completely :) Internal generator now offers lean
and clean dependencies, just as intended :)

This spec bumps up version to 12.00 final (I will bump up to 12.01 as soon as
they will appear on ftp; atm only opera-next builds are available).

Urls use now %{version}, so it's easier to upgrade spec in future; spectool can
be used to download sources as usual.

@Nicolas
as of environment detection, currently opera is able to detect xfce, kde4,
gnome 2, gnome 3 and unity and picks lib accordingly. Using gnome 3 in fallback
mode might trigger gtk2 (I am not sure).

You can check env detected and toolkit used by opera by running:
$ opera --full-version
Opera 12.00 Build 1467 for Linux x86_64.
OS: Linux 3.4.4-5.fc17.x86_64
Architecture: x86_64
Compositor active: Yes
Toolkit: Gtk 3.4.4 using Adwaita
Desktop environment: Gnome 3
Window manager: Mutter
Screens:
0: 1440x900 depth 24,32 (default)

You can also disable auto detection, visit
opera:config#FileSelector|DialogToolkit
0 = auto detection
1 = (falls back to kde4 for compatibility reasons)
2 = gtk2
3 = kde4
4 = x11 (also used as fallback if anything else fails)
5 = gtk3 (undocumented in help atm)

@Russell Golden
I believe rpmfusion has single repo for both Fedora and EL6? My packages should
work just fine with EL6.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1806] Review request: opera - A fast and secure web browser and Internet suite

[RPM Fusion Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1806

--- Comment #16 from Nicolas Chauvet kwiz...@gmail.com 2012-07-23 14:03:57 
CEST ---
I don't remember what previously was the dependency issue, but something weird
seem still present:

-- Traitement de la dépendance : libX11.so.6 pour le paquet :
opera-12.00-2.fc16.x86_64
Whereas it should have be libX11.so.6()(64bit).

That's probably because a 32bit binary remains bundled within the package.
I guess this is related to:
/usr/lib64/opera/pluginwrapper/operapluginwrapper-ia32-linux



For Fedora EL in RPM Fusion. There are dedicated branches for each version of
Fedora or EL. So you will need to update each branches and take into account
the different version of RPM that will be used to build opera on each version.
(mostly related to the dependency filtering scheme specially, see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:AutoProvidesAndRequiresFiltering )


One note about setting the RPM Vendor field. Fedora usually doesn't do that. A
Vendor field is usually set on the buildsys level and not on a package level. 
But that's also because this fied is to be understood as Distributor of the
package over been the Editor of the Software.
URL, Summary and description are fields dedicated to the Software Editor
instead.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1806] Review request: opera - A fast and secure web browser and Internet suite

[RPM Fusion Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1806

--- Comment #17 from Patryk Obara patryk.ob...@gmail.com 2012-07-23 15:33:03 
CEST ---
Spec URL:
http://dreamertan.fedorapeople.org/srpm/opera/12.00-3.fc17/opera.spec
SRPM URL:
http://dreamertan.fedorapeople.org/srpm/opera/12.00-3.fc17/opera-12.00-3.fc17.src.rpm

I forgot, that older versions of fedora probably do have older rpm;
reintroduced filtering - this should fix missing dependency issue. If user will
want to use 32-bit plugin, then those dependencies will be pulled by plugin
package.

Vendor field removed.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1806] Review request: opera - A fast and secure web browser and Internet suite

[RPM Fusion Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1806

--- Comment #14 from Nicolas Chauvet kwiz...@gmail.com 2012-07-20 18:09:47 
CEST ---
@Patrick 
BTW, Can you please upload at least your latest spec file ?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.