[Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855 Sérgio Bastochanged: What|Removed |Added namespace||free Resolution|WONTFIX |DUPLICATE --- Comment #33 from Sérgio Basto --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 3694 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855 Nicolas Chauvetchanged: What|Removed |Added Blocks|2 | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2 [Bug 2] Tracker: New packages awaiting review -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855 Richard hobbes1...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Comment #32 from Richard hobbes1...@gmail.com 2015-01-14 23:09:30 CET --- Closing due to inactivity, please reopen if you're interested in pursuing this review request. Amending my standard note above as I'm doing some bugzilla housekeeping. I would really like to see this in RPM Fusion. While is is preferable to be sponsored in Fedora first it's not a requirement, but if you have time, please consider submitting a package there and if you need help picking a package start here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_maintainers_wishlist?rd=PackageMaintainers/WishList -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855 --- Comment #31 from Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com 2013-07-11 00:26:42 CEST --- Hi, (In reply to comment #30) patch applied, new src rpm uploaded. now begins the hard part :) Issues: === - update-desktop-database is invoked when required Note: desktop file(s) in flowblade See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache - Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install if there is such a file. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop I had to do the same with smb4k and if I have time right now, I had do it for you . see http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/smb4k.git/tree/smb4k.spec#n42 begins in line 42 to 76 you need use desktop-file-install and update-desktop-database -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855 --- Comment #28 from Klaatu kla...@straightedgelinux.com 2013-07-08 20:07:49 CEST --- Thanks for the help. I tried the dev version of fedora-review, fixed the %post and %postun command as recommended in the output of (try-)fedora-review and I get no further errors. rpmlint still throws an error about a non-executable file; this seems to be more of a setup.py issue than mine, but I added a find/chmod to fix it. Strictly speaking, I'm not even sure it's necessary, since I've never seen an issue with it when using Flowblade. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855 --- Comment #29 from Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com 2013-07-08 20:24:42 CEST --- Created attachment 1126 -- https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/attachment.cgi?id=1126 package versioning Hi, I suggest that you version yours change , like my patch does ,is much more readable. other suggestion is build src.rpm with rpmbuild, to .spec not have differences of .spec in src.rpm like this rpmbuild -bs flowblade.spec --define _sourcedir ../srpm-unpacked/ --define _srcrpmdir . you may define where is the SOURCES dir and where is wrote src.rpm . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855 --- Comment #30 from Klaatu kla...@straightedgelinux.com 2013-07-09 00:37:24 CEST --- (In reply to comment #29) Created attachment 1126 [details] package versioning Hi, I suggest that you version yours change , like my patch does ,is much more readable. other suggestion is build src.rpm with rpmbuild, to .spec not have differences of .spec in src.rpm like this rpmbuild -bs flowblade.spec --define _sourcedir ../srpm-unpacked/ --define _srcrpmdir . you may define where is the SOURCES dir and where is wrote src.rpm . patch applied, new src rpm uploaded. spec: http://fedorapeople.org/~klaatu/flowblade/flowblade.spec source rpm: http://fedorapeople.org/~klaatu/flowblade/flowblade-0.8.0-4.fc18.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855 --- Comment #27 from Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com 2013-07-07 18:43:26 CEST --- Yup, that's why. Try e. g., fedora-review --other-bz https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/ -b 2855 -m fedora-rawhide-i386-rpmfusion_nonfree or use the example on https://fedorahosted.org/FedoraReview/wiki/UsageScenarios fedora-review's devel version has this message, I don't think the released version handles it: - update-desktop-database is invoked as required Note: desktop file(s) with MimeType entry in flowblade See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#desktop- database -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855 --- Comment #25 from Klaatu kla...@straightedgelinux.com 2013-07-07 04:38:14 CEST --- (In reply to comment #24) No, I think it's just confused because of the way you have your spec laid out... %global nameflowblade %global release1%{?dist} %global version0.8.0 Get rid of this, just use the tags directly, i.e.: Name:flowblade Version:0.8.0 Release:1%{?dist} Also: %install rm -fr $RPM_BUILD_ROOT kill the rm -fr $RPM_BUILD_ROOT... Got rid of the %global declarations, got rid of the rm -fr $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. fedora-review still fails in two places; update mime is not run, and rpmlint is not run on all packages. I think the install itself is failing; I see errors about it requiring mlt, ffmpeg, and some others, and I tried changing those to BuidRequires in spite of being pretty sure they aren't required to build a python application, and it made no difference. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855 --- Comment #17 from Klaatu kla...@straightedgelinux.com 2013-07-05 17:36:50 CEST --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~klaatu/flowblade/flowblade.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~klaatu/flowblade/flowblade-0.8.0-1.src.rpm removed %dist, s/%define/%global/g, installed python2-devel...trying fedora-review again.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855 --- Comment #18 from Klaatu kla...@straightedgelinux.com 2013-07-05 17:55:40 CEST --- Still getting an error in mock logs regarding /usr/bin/python: no such file or directory I've installed python2-devel and have added myself to mock group. the relevant error seems to be this: + python setup.py build --build-base=/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/flowblade-0.8.0-1.i386 /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.jk9gxU: line 35: python: command not found I've tried using both the macro %{python} and just plain 'python' in the spec file. What am I missing? how can I ensure that /usr/bin/python gets included into my chroot environment? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||p...@city-fan.org --- Comment #19 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org 2013-07-05 18:28:47 CEST --- (In reply to comment #18) Still getting an error in mock logs regarding /usr/bin/python: no such file or directory I've installed python2-devel and have added myself to mock group. the relevant error seems to be this: + python setup.py build --build-base=/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/flowblade-0.8.0-1.i386 /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.jk9gxU: line 35: python: command not found I've tried using both the macro %{python} and just plain 'python' in the spec file. What am I missing? how can I ensure that /usr/bin/python gets included into my chroot environment? You add to your spec: BuildRequires: python2-devel as indicated in Comment #15. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855 --- Comment #20 from Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com 2013-07-05 22:48:41 CEST --- (In reply to comment #19) (In reply to comment #18) Still getting an error in mock logs regarding /usr/bin/python: no such file or directory I've installed python2-devel and have added myself to mock group. the relevant error seems to be this: + python setup.py build --build-base=/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/flowblade-0.8.0-1.i386 /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.jk9gxU: line 35: python: command not found I've tried using both the macro %{python} and just plain 'python' in the spec file. What am I missing? how can I ensure that /usr/bin/python gets included into my chroot environment? You add to your spec: BuildRequires: python2-devel as indicated in Comment #15. one guess , you know that you need a lots of internet, every mock build downloads all packages from internet . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855 --- Comment #21 from Richard hobbes1...@gmail.com 2013-07-05 23:00:32 CEST --- I think he got a little confused. When you use mock, what you have installed on your system (other than the mock requirements) are irrelevant. Mock builds your package in a clean chroot[1] and only installs some defaults and whatever you specify in BuildRequires: so the fact you have python2-devel installed on your system doesn't matter, it must be in the BuildRequires:. [1] http://lwn.net/Articles/252794/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855 --- Comment #22 from Klaatu kla...@straightedgelinux.com 2013-07-06 01:45:14 CEST --- (In reply to comment #21) I think he got a little confused. When you use mock, what you have installed on your system (other than the mock requirements) are irrelevant. Mock builds your package in a clean chroot[1] and only installs some defaults and whatever you specify in BuildRequires: so the fact you have python2-devel installed on your system doesn't matter, it must be in the BuildRequires:. [1] http://lwn.net/Articles/252794/ BuildRequires. that explains it. thanks. Fixed everything. Now clearing failures from fedora-review review.txt.. Apparenltly %dist is required; adding it back in, updating urls one more time: Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~klaatu/flowblade/flowblade.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~klaatu/flowblade/flowblade-0.8.0-1.fc18.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855 --- Comment #23 from Klaatu kla...@straightedgelinux.com 2013-07-06 02:37:40 CEST --- fedora-review failures: SHOULD: [!]: Dist tag is present. ##I have %dist included in the same way rpmdev-newspec does. Am I supposed to include it elsewhere as well? [!]: update-mime-database is invoked as required Note: mimeinfo files in: flowblade ## I have it running in %post. Is this incorrect? or perhaps it's related to the following and final error: EXTRA: [!]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: Mock build failed ## there are no errors in build.log or results/build.log. Where do I look for an explanation of this one? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855 --- Comment #24 from Richard hobbes1...@gmail.com 2013-07-06 02:45:02 CEST --- No, I think it's just confused because of the way you have your spec laid out... %global nameflowblade %global release1%{?dist} %global version0.8.0 Get rid of this, just use the tags directly, i.e.: Name:flowblade Version:0.8.0 Release:1%{?dist} Also: %install rm -fr $RPM_BUILD_ROOT kill the rm -fr $RPM_BUILD_ROOT... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855 --- Comment #16 from Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com 2013-07-04 15:17:06 CEST --- (In reply to comment #14) Fixed changelog order. Tried to run fedora-review but it failed; complains about me not running rawhide (true) and claims there is no /usr/bin/python (false) so I'm assuming I have mock or something configured incorrectly. This is the first I'd heard of fedora-review, so I am probably using it wrong. try see if this doc helps: http://www.serjux.com/alps/how_to_use_mock.txt Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review --other-bz https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org -b 2855 pre-review: = SHOULD items = Generic: [!]: Buildroot is not present Note: Invalid buildroot found: %{_topdir}/%{name}-buildroot [!]: Dist tag is present. [!]: update-mime-database is invoked as required Note: mimeinfo files in: flowblade [!]: Spec use %global instead of %define. Note: %define name flowblade %define release 1%{?dist} %define version 0.8.0 seems be related with: [!]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Note: Spec file as given by url is not the same as in SRPM (see attached diff). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855 --- Comment #5 from Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com 2013-07-03 14:20:19 CEST --- Hi, looks good thanks, you may also clean : rm -fr $RPM_BUILD_ROOT I can do a little review but I'm too busy to have this task . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855 --- Comment #6 from Klaatu kla...@straightedgelinux.com 2013-07-03 14:57:07 CEST --- (In reply to comment #5) Hi, looks good thanks, you may also clean : rm -fr $RPM_BUILD_ROOT I can do a little review but I'm too busy to have this task . Sergio, in your previous comment (comment #3) I think you told me to take the rm -fr $RPM_BUILD_ROOT out, Did I misunderstand? For now I'm adding it back in because it feels right to be tidy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855 --- Comment #7 from Richard hobbes1...@gmail.com 2013-07-03 15:08:13 CEST --- (In reply to comment #6) (In reply to comment #5) Hi, looks good thanks, you may also clean : rm -fr $RPM_BUILD_ROOT I can do a little review but I'm too busy to have this task . Sergio, in your previous comment (comment #3) I think you told me to take the rm -fr $RPM_BUILD_ROOT out, Did I misunderstand? For now I'm adding it back in because it feels right to be tidy. You can remove it as it's done automatically. It hasn't been needed since Fedora 14. There's some corner cases when you have multiple sources, but that's not the case here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855 --- Comment #8 from Klaatu kla...@straightedgelinux.com 2013-07-03 15:11:30 CEST --- (In reply to comment #7) (In reply to comment #6) (In reply to comment #5) Hi, looks good thanks, you may also clean : rm -fr $RPM_BUILD_ROOT I can do a little review but I'm too busy to have this task . Sergio, in your previous comment (comment #3) I think you told me to take the rm -fr $RPM_BUILD_ROOT out, Did I misunderstand? For now I'm adding it back in because it feels right to be tidy. You can remove it as it's done automatically. It hasn't been needed since Fedora 14. There's some corner cases when you have multiple sources, but that's not the case here. Re-removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855 --- Comment #9 from Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com 2013-07-03 15:54:54 CEST --- (In reply to comment #8) (In reply to comment #7) (In reply to comment #6) (In reply to comment #5) Hi, looks good thanks, you may also clean : rm -fr $RPM_BUILD_ROOT I can do a little review but I'm too busy to have this task . Sergio, in your previous comment (comment #3) I think you told me to take the rm -fr $RPM_BUILD_ROOT out, Did I misunderstand? For now I'm adding it back in because it feels right to be tidy. You can remove it as it's done automatically. It hasn't been needed since Fedora 14. There's some corner cases when you have multiple sources, but that's not the case here. Re-removed. thanks, I though that you had miss that at first time ... but the reason that I ask you to do so, is when we use mock with --no-clean or --no-clean-after etc , for debug proposes, sometimes this cleans may change the mock behavior and may make us lose more time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855 --- Comment #10 from Klaatu kla...@straightedgelinux.com 2013-07-03 16:00:55 CEST --- (In reply to comment #9) (In reply to comment #8) (In reply to comment #7) (In reply to comment #6) (In reply to comment #5) Hi, looks good thanks, you may also clean : rm -fr $RPM_BUILD_ROOT I can do a little review but I'm too busy to have this task . Sergio, in your previous comment (comment #3) I think you told me to take the rm -fr $RPM_BUILD_ROOT out, Did I misunderstand? For now I'm adding it back in because it feels right to be tidy. You can remove it as it's done automatically. It hasn't been needed since Fedora 14. There's some corner cases when you have multiple sources, but that's not the case here. Re-removed. thanks, I though that you had miss that at first time ... but the reason that I ask you to do so, is when we use mock with --no-clean or --no-clean-after etc , for debug proposes, sometimes this cleans may change the mock behavior and may make us lose more time. Understood, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855 --- Comment #11 from Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com 2013-07-03 21:40:16 CEST --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~klaatu/flowblade/flowblade.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~klaatu/flowblade/flowblade-0.8.0-1.src.rpm let see if fedora-review -u https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855; works ! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855 --- Comment #12 from Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com 2013-07-03 21:44:09 CEST --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~klaatu/flowblade/flowblade.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~klaatu/flowblade/flowblade-0.8.0-1.fc18.src.rpm fixed srpm URL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855 --- Comment #13 from Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com 2013-07-03 21:49:31 CEST --- fedora-review -uhttps://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855 or fedora-review --other-bz https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org -b 2855 (...) error: %changelog not in descending chronological order and breaks fedora-review :) ERROR: Exception down the road...(logs in /home/sergio/.cache/fedora-review.log) which is a bug in fedora-review , but we can't processed without fix changelog dates . Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855 --- Comment #14 from Klaatu kla...@straightedgelinux.com 2013-07-04 04:31:19 CEST --- (In reply to comment #13) fedora-review -uhttps://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855 or fedora-review --other-bz https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org -b 2855 (...) error: %changelog not in descending chronological order and breaks fedora-review :) ERROR: Exception down the road...(logs in /home/sergio/.cache/fedora-review.log) which is a bug in fedora-review , but we can't processed without fix changelog dates . Thanks Fixed changelog order. Tried to run fedora-review but it failed; complains about me not running rawhide (true) and claims there is no /usr/bin/python (false) so I'm assuming I have mock or something configured incorrectly. This is the first I'd heard of fedora-review, so I am probably using it wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855 Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||leamas.a...@gmail.com --- Comment #15 from Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com 2013-07-04 06:49:53 CEST --- Just some drive-by comments: I'd guess that you are indeed missing /usr/bin/python in the mock chroot, you're missing the mandatory python BuiltRequires, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#BuildRequires BTW: fedora-review does nothing wrong here (or when crashing on bad changelog order). Basically, fedora-review expects the package to build in mock and cannot really do much about if it doesn't. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855 Klaatu kla...@straightedgelinux.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||2, 30 --- Comment #2 from Klaatu kla...@straightedgelinux.com 2013-07-02 21:00:59 CEST --- Full URLs to the spec file and source rpm of the package. spec: http://fedorapeople.org/~klaatu/flowblade/flowblade.spec source rpm: http://fedorapeople.org/~klaatu/flowblade/flowblade-0.8.0-1.src.rpm %description Flowblade is a fast and efficient video editor written in Python and based on the MLT and ffmpeg engines. Ineligible for Fedora due to ffmpeg dependency This is my first RPM Fusion Package. I am seeking a sponsor, as I am not a Fedora Packager. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855 Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ser...@serjux.com --- Comment #3 from Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com 2013-07-02 21:48:09 CEST --- please remove all this : %define _topdir /tmp/rpmbuild %define buildroot %{_topdir}/%{name}-%{version}-root BuildRoot: %{_topdir}/%{name}-buildroot Prefix: /usr %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT are redundant or worst #% this will not comment, just you need remove % where is ? URL: and Source0: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855 --- Comment #4 from Klaatu kla...@straightedgelinux.com 2013-07-03 04:50:56 CEST --- Updated spec file to roll in Sergio's suggestions. URL to corrected spec file is the same as before: http://fedorapeople.org/~klaatu/flowblade/flowblade.spec URL for src RPM: http://fedorapeople.org/~klaatu/flowblade/flowblade-0.8.0-1.fc18.src.rpm rpmlint issues no errors, these warnings: flowblade.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ffmpeg - imperf ## ignoring since 'ffmpeg' in description is properly spelled flowblade.src: W: invalid-url Source0: https://flowblade.googlecode.com/files/flowblade-0.8.0.tar.gz HTTP Error 404: Not Found ## ignoring because a manual wget of that url works as expected. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.