[Bug 48] Review Request: freej - a vision mixer for video DJs on Linux

2011-09-29 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48


Richard  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|2   |
 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||WONTFIX




--- Comment #11 from Richard   2011-09-29 20:31:43 ---
There's been no activity on this review request for >1 year. Please reopen if
you are still interested in pursuing it.

Remember to re-add the review tracker bug (#2) if you decide to reopen it.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.


[Bug 48] Review Request: freej - a vision mixer for video DJs on Linux

2011-09-29 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48


Richard  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||hobbes1...@gmail.com




--- Comment #10 from Richard   2011-09-29 19:38:03 ---
I'm thinking this review request can be closed. What's the correct resolution?
WONTFIX?

Richard


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.


[Bug 48] Review Request: freej - a vision mixer for video DJs on Linux

2009-11-29 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48





--- Comment #9 from Orcan Ogetbil   2009-11-29 23:25:26 
---
Ping? What is the current situation on this package?


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.


[Bug 48] Review Request: freej - a vision mixer for video DJs on Linux

2009-04-14 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48


NicolasChauvet  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||kwiz...@gmail.com




--- Comment #8 from NicolasChauvet   2009-04-14 11:50:34 ---
freir0-plugins is now available in fedora.

According to our packaging standard, there is a need to search for 64bit dso in
/usr/lib64. But the freir0 api doesn't obbey to this rule.
This probably need to be tweaked in the related application... 
(I can have a look if needed).

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1296849


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.


[Bug 48] Review Request: freej - a vision mixer for video DJs on Linux

2009-04-08 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48





--- Comment #7 from Orcan Ogetbil   2009-04-09 05:57:44 
---
* Additionally, these files
   /usr/lib64/libfreej.so.0
   /usr/lib64/libfreej.so.0.0.0
belong to the main package, not to the devel subpackage.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.


[Bug 48] Review Request: freej - a vision mixer for video DJs on Linux

2009-04-08 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48





--- Comment #6 from Orcan Ogetbil   2009-04-09 05:51:11 
---
This package definitely needs some work. Here are some blockers:

* Please remove the precompiled binary(ies) in %prep, e.g. 
xcode/English.lproj/MainMenu.nib/designable.nib

* These files have "usr/lib/" and/or "usr/local/" hardcoded. Please fix these
via sed or patch:
src/context.cpp
src/plugger.cpp
xcode/config.h

* Package does not build against gcc4.4:
   DEBUG:  g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I.. -I../src/include -I../lib
-I../lib/ccvt -I../lib/shout -I../lib/lo -I../lib/sdl_image -I../lib/sdl_gfx
-I../lib/sdl_ttf -I../lib/flash -I../lib/goom -I../lib/cwiid
-I/usr/include/slang -I/usr/include/SDL -D_GNU_SOURCE=1 -D_REENTRANT
-I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/unicap -I/usr/include/ffmpeg
-I/usr/include/ffmpeg/libavcodec -I/usr/include/ffmpeg/libavformat
-I/usr/include/ffmpeg/libswscale -I../lib/javascript -I../lib/javascript/obj
-freg-struct-return -DPREFIX=\"/usr\" -DDATADIR=\"/usr/share\" -pipe
-D_REENTRANT -freg-struct-return -fPIC -O2 -mfpmath=sse -mtune=nocona -O2 -MT
frei0r.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/frei0r.Tpo -c frei0r.cpp  -fPIC -DPIC -o
.libs/frei0r.o  
   DEBUG: frei0r.cpp: In member function 'int Freior::open(char*)': 
   DEBUG: frei0r.cpp:102: error: 'snprintf' was not declared in this scope  
   DEBUG: frei0r.cpp: In member function 'void Freior::print_info()':   
   DEBUG: frei0r.cpp:122: error: 'snprintf' was not declared in this scope

Please patch this up and try to build your packages in mock/rawhide beforehand
to see if they compile.

* rpmlint says:
   freej.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 22, tab: line 5)
which can be fixed easily

* You need to remove .la files from the final binary RPM.

* These need not be specified explicitly:
   Requires:   SDL SDL_ttf freetype slang
   Requires:   fftw jack-audio-connection-kit
   Requires:   unicap
these dependencies will be added automatically by rpmbuild.

* There are many libraries in the lib/ directory which are already present in
Fedora. You need to patch freej to use system libraries instead of those in the
lib/ directory. Even those that are not in Fedora should be packaged separately
and be submitted to Fedora.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.


[Bug 48] Review Request: freej - a vision mixer for video DJs on Linux

2009-04-06 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48





--- Comment #5 from Yaakov Nemoy   2009-04-07 
02:41:51 ---
Got an update. The freej guys redid their entire autotools setup. They are also
gearing up for a new release, so this is based on a git checkout for the time
being.

SRPM:
http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/freej-0.10-12.20090406git.6ab131da4f54.fc10.src.rpm
SPEC: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/freej.spec


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.


[Bug 48] Review Request: freej - a vision mixer for video DJs on Linux

2008-12-28 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48


Orcan Ogetbil  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||oget.fed...@gmail.com




--- Comment #4 from Orcan Ogetbil   2008-12-28 09:03:55 
---
Ping? Any updates?


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.


[Bug 48] Review Request: freej - a vision mixer for video DJs on Linux

2008-09-22 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48





--- Comment #3 from Kevin Kofler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  2008-09-23 02:36:31 ---
> FreeJ has a built in javascript interpreter.  rpmlint is not intelligent
> enough to realize this.

No, it's trying to tell you that the #! line is wrong. It should say
/usr/bin/freej, not /usr/local/bin/freej, or you should remove the #! line
entirely, which will also get you rid of the "non-executable script" warning.
The #! line is only used when you execute the script directly on the command
line, it makes no sense to have a #! line in a script which doesn't have the +x
flag set, nor does it make sense to have one pointing to a nonexistent path. If
it makes no sense to run the script from the command line, just remove the #!
line, if it _does_ make sense to do that, fix the #! line and set the +x flag.

> The rest is a silly warning.

No, none of the messages are "silly warnings". I already explained how to fix
the .js-related ones above. For the others:

> freej.i386: W: executable-stack /usr/bin/freej

This means that the executable will cause problems with SELinux and is also a
security problem. It is probably due to assembly source files (.s or .S files)
without a GNU-stack note. See:
http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/qimageblitz/devel/qimageblitz-0.0.4-noexecstack.patch?revision=1.1&view=markup
for how to fix such assembly files.

It may also be due to abuse of nested functions in C code, but that's less
likely.

> freej.spec:97: W: macro-in-%changelog __make

You must escape any percent signs in the changelog, e.g. use %%__make instead
of just %_make. Otherwise, the macro will be expanded into the changelog, which
is almost certainly not what you want.

Please fix the issues reported by rpmlint, they're all valid issues and the
package should not be approved without those issues fixed.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.


[Bug 48] Review Request: freej - a vision mixer for video DJs on Linux

2008-09-22 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48





--- Comment #2 from Yaakov Nemoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  2008-09-23 02:31:59 ---
the nonfree in the URL is to discriminate packages that can go in fedora and
packages that can't.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.


[Bug 48] Review Request: freej - a vision mixer for video DJs on Linux

2008-09-22 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48





--- Comment #1 from Kevin Kofler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  2008-09-23 02:25:02 ---
Note that despite the "nonfree" in the URL, this should go to RPM Fusion's free
section. It's not non-Free, just patent-encumbered.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.


[Bug 48] Review Request: freej - a vision mixer for video DJs on Linux

2008-09-22 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48


Yaakov Nemoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||2




-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.