Re: Anything missing for RPM Fusion readiness for f29 ?
On Thu, 2018-10-04 at 19:42 -0400, FeRD wrote: > On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 7:37 PM Sérgio Basto > wrote: > > Yes we were in the middle of a mass rebuild of packages with the > > new > > > > x264 (0.155) and and x265 (2.8), after rebuilt ffmpeg the problem > > was > > > > fixed. And after that I resubmit audacity-freeworld. > > > > Should I plan to rebuild libopenshot, or have you guys got that > covered? No, only packages that depends on x264-libs and x265-libs, libopenshot just depend on ffmpeg . We have an wiki page to help us (I can update it today or tomorrow), for example the list for x265 [1] , today we had x264 and x265 soname bump (on rawhide) , 2 in 1 like shampoos :) [1] https://rpmfusion.org/ImportantDependencyLists#only_x265_so_bump Best regards, -- Sérgio M. B. ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
Re: Anything missing for RPM Fusion readiness for f29 ?
On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 7:37 PM Sérgio Basto wrote: > > Yes we were in the middle of a mass rebuild of packages with the new > x264 (0.155) and and x265 (2.8), after rebuilt ffmpeg the problem was > fixed. And after that I resubmit audacity-freeworld. > > Should I plan to rebuild libopenshot, or have you guys got that covered? ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
Re: Anything missing for RPM Fusion readiness for f29 ?
On Fri, 2018-10-05 at 08:14 +1000, David Timms wrote:
> On 05/10/18 07:20, David Timms wrote:
> > On 04/10/18 14:37, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2018-10-03 at 12:47 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> >
> > ..
> > > > Anyone has still task planned for RPM Fusion f29 GA ?
> > >
> > > x264 soname bump
> >
> > I wanted to Audacity 2.3.0 built and ready for the release, since
> > their
> > release was done last month.
> >
> > I had build failure on armv7hl, when trying to install ffmpeg-
> > devel:
> >
> > root.log:
> > DEBUG util.py:522: Executing command: ['/usr/bin/dnf',
> > 'builddep',
> > '--installroot', '/var/lib/mock/f30-free-build-51845-40910/root/',
> > '/var/lib/mock/f30-free-build-51845-
> > 40910/root//builddir/build/SRPMS/audacity-freeworld-2.3.0-
> > 1.fc30.src.rpm']
> > with env {'TERM': 'vt100', 'SHELL': '/bin/bash', 'HOME':
> > '/builddir',
> > 'HOSTNAME': 'mock', 'PATH': '/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin',
> > 'PROMPT_COMMAND': 'printf "\\033]0;\\007"', 'PS1':
> > ' \\s-\\v\\$ ', 'LANG': 'en_US.UTF-8', 'http_proxy':
> > 'http://proxy:3128', 'LC_MESSAGES': 'C', 'LD_PRELOAD':
> > '/tmp/tmp.mock.tx49hobf/$LIB/nosync.so'} and shell False
> > DEBUG util.py:439: Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:03 ago on
> > Thu
> > 04 Oct 2018 01:27:05 PM UTC.
> > DEBUG util.py:439: Package zip-3.0-23.fc29.armv7hl is already
> > installed, skipping.
> > DEBUG util.py:439: Error:
> > DEBUG util.py:439: Problem: package ffmpeg-devel-4.0.2-
> > 6.fc30.armv7hl
> > requires libavutil.so.56, but none of the providers can be
> > installed
> > DEBUG util.py:439:- conflicting requests
> > DEBUG util.py:439:- nothing provides libx264.so.152 needed by
> > ffmpeg-libs-4.0.2-6.fc30.armv7hl
> >
> > Local rpmbuild (f27) and mock for 27,28,29 all succeeded.
> >
> > Do I need to give the repo a few days to catch up to the x264
> > change ?
> > Or maybe use ffmpeg-compat- instead ?
>
> I made a resubmit, but looks like Sergio had already started a build
> -
Yes we were in the middle of a mass rebuild of packages with the new
x264 (0.155) and and x265 (2.8), after rebuilt ffmpeg the problem was
fixed. And after that I resubmit audacity-freeworld.
Thanks !
> which has succeeded in f30. I'm going to make same changes for f29
> now.
>
> Dave.
> ___
> rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfu
> sion.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmf
> usion.org
--
Sérgio M. B.
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
Re: Anything missing for RPM Fusion readiness for f29 ?
On 05/10/18 07:20, David Timms wrote:
On 04/10/18 14:37, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Wed, 2018-10-03 at 12:47 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
..
Anyone has still task planned for RPM Fusion f29 GA ?
x264 soname bump
I wanted to Audacity 2.3.0 built and ready for the release, since their
release was done last month.
I had build failure on armv7hl, when trying to install ffmpeg-devel:
root.log:
DEBUG util.py:522: Executing command: ['/usr/bin/dnf', 'builddep',
'--installroot', '/var/lib/mock/f30-free-build-51845-40910/root/',
'/var/lib/mock/f30-free-build-51845-40910/root//builddir/build/SRPMS/audacity-freeworld-2.3.0-1.fc30.src.rpm']
with env {'TERM': 'vt100', 'SHELL': '/bin/bash', 'HOME': '/builddir',
'HOSTNAME': 'mock', 'PATH': '/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin',
'PROMPT_COMMAND': 'printf "\\033]0;\\007"', 'PS1':
' \\s-\\v\\$ ', 'LANG': 'en_US.UTF-8', 'http_proxy':
'http://proxy:3128', 'LC_MESSAGES': 'C', 'LD_PRELOAD':
'/tmp/tmp.mock.tx49hobf/$LIB/nosync.so'} and shell False
DEBUG util.py:439: Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:03 ago on Thu
04 Oct 2018 01:27:05 PM UTC.
DEBUG util.py:439: Package zip-3.0-23.fc29.armv7hl is already
installed, skipping.
DEBUG util.py:439: Error:
DEBUG util.py:439: Problem: package ffmpeg-devel-4.0.2-6.fc30.armv7hl
requires libavutil.so.56, but none of the providers can be installed
DEBUG util.py:439: - conflicting requests
DEBUG util.py:439: - nothing provides libx264.so.152 needed by
ffmpeg-libs-4.0.2-6.fc30.armv7hl
Local rpmbuild (f27) and mock for 27,28,29 all succeeded.
Do I need to give the repo a few days to catch up to the x264 change ?
Or maybe use ffmpeg-compat- instead ?
I made a resubmit, but looks like Sergio had already started a build -
which has succeeded in f30. I'm going to make same changes for f29 now.
Dave.
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
Re: Anything missing for RPM Fusion readiness for f29 ?
On 04/10/18 14:37, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Wed, 2018-10-03 at 12:47 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
..
Anyone has still task planned for RPM Fusion f29 GA ?
x264 soname bump
I wanted to Audacity 2.3.0 built and ready for the release, since their
release was done last month.
I had build failure on armv7hl, when trying to install ffmpeg-devel:
root.log:
DEBUG util.py:522: Executing command: ['/usr/bin/dnf', 'builddep',
'--installroot', '/var/lib/mock/f30-free-build-51845-40910/root/',
'/var/lib/mock/f30-free-build-51845-40910/root//builddir/build/SRPMS/audacity-freeworld-2.3.0-1.fc30.src.rpm']
with env {'TERM': 'vt100', 'SHELL': '/bin/bash', 'HOME': '/builddir',
'HOSTNAME': 'mock', 'PATH': '/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin',
'PROMPT_COMMAND': 'printf "\\033]0;\\007"', 'PS1':
' \\s-\\v\\$ ', 'LANG': 'en_US.UTF-8', 'http_proxy':
'http://proxy:3128', 'LC_MESSAGES': 'C', 'LD_PRELOAD':
'/tmp/tmp.mock.tx49hobf/$LIB/nosync.so'} and shell False
DEBUG util.py:439: Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:03 ago on Thu
04 Oct 2018 01:27:05 PM UTC.
DEBUG util.py:439: Package zip-3.0-23.fc29.armv7hl is already
installed, skipping.
DEBUG util.py:439: Error:
DEBUG util.py:439: Problem: package ffmpeg-devel-4.0.2-6.fc30.armv7hl
requires libavutil.so.56, but none of the providers can be installed
DEBUG util.py:439:- conflicting requests
DEBUG util.py:439:- nothing provides libx264.so.152 needed by
ffmpeg-libs-4.0.2-6.fc30.armv7hl
DEBUG util.py:577: Child return code was: 1
DEBUG util.py:188: kill orphans
Local rpmbuild (f27) and mock for 27,28,29 all succeeded.
Do I need to give the repo a few days to catch up to the x264 change ?
Or maybe use ffmpeg-compat- instead ?
Dave.
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
Re: Anything missing for RPM Fusion readiness for f29 ?
On Thu, 2018-10-04 at 16:02 +, Andrew Bauer wrote: > Should I assume that the upcoming f29 GA is behind why recent builds > this week have not been pushed to testing? The main reason I think was ENOTIME , anyway GA is just on 30: 2018-10-09 Final Freeze (*)2018-10-10 Update of the AppStream data2018-10-23Fedora 29 Final Release (GA) (Preferred target)2018-10-30Fedora 29 Final Release (GA) (Target #1) > > > > > > From: Sérgio Basto > > Sent: Wednesday, October 3, 2018 11:37 PM > > To: RPM Fusion developers discussion list > > Subject: Re: Anything missing for RPM Fusion readiness for f29 ? > > > > > On Wed, 2018-10-03 at 12:47 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Anyone has still task planned for RPM Fusion f29 GA ? > > > As per the Fedora schedule the Final freeze should be next Tuesday > > > the 9th. > > > > > > On my side, I still expect to land an updated libplacebo for vlc > > > There is also a kodi update to beta3 that should lands armhfp > > > support. > > > There is a need to review the rpmfusion obsoletes package. > > > > x264 soname bump > > > > > Thx in advances. > > > > > > -- > > > - > > > > > > Nicolas (kwizart) > > > ___ > > > rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-develop...@lists.rpm > fu > > > sion.org > > > To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rp > mf > > > usion.org > > ___ > rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfu > sion.org > To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmf > usion.org -- Sérgio M. B. ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
Re: Anything missing for RPM Fusion readiness for f29 ?
Should I assume that the upcoming f29 GA is behind why recent builds this week have not been pushed to testing? From: Sérgio Basto Sent: Wednesday, October 3, 2018 11:37 PM To: RPM Fusion developers discussion list Subject: Re: Anything missing for RPM Fusion readiness for f29 ? On Wed, 2018-10-03 at 12:47 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > Hi, > > Anyone has still task planned for RPM Fusion f29 GA ? > As per the Fedora schedule the Final freeze should be next Tuesday > the 9th. > > On my side, I still expect to land an updated libplacebo for vlc > There is also a kodi update to beta3 that should lands armhfp > support. > There is a need to review the rpmfusion obsoletes package. x264 soname bump > Thx in advances. > > -- > - > > Nicolas (kwizart) > ___ > rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfu > sion.org > To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmf > usion.org -- Sérgio M. B. ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
Re: Anything missing for RPM Fusion readiness for f29 ?
On Wed, 2018-10-03 at 12:47 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > Hi, > > Anyone has still task planned for RPM Fusion f29 GA ? > As per the Fedora schedule the Final freeze should be next Tuesday > the 9th. > > On my side, I still expect to land an updated libplacebo for vlc > There is also a kodi update to beta3 that should lands armhfp > support. > There is a need to review the rpmfusion obsoletes package. x264 soname bump > Thx in advances. > > -- > - > > Nicolas (kwizart) > ___ > rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfu > sion.org > To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmf > usion.org -- Sérgio M. B. ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
Re: Anything missing for RPM Fusion readiness for f29 ?
On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 4:13 PM Leigh Scott wrote: > Nvidia is nonfree so use > > > koji-rpmfusion tag-build f29-nonfree-override > xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-390xx-390.87-1.fc29 > Duh... Too much cut-n-paste. Thanks, Richard ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
Re: Anything missing for RPM Fusion readiness for f29 ?
Nvidia is nonfree so use koji-rpmfusion tag-build f29-nonfree-override xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-390xx-390.87-1.fc29 ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
Re: Anything missing for RPM Fusion readiness for f29 ?
Le mer. 3 oct. 2018 à 22:21, Richard Shaw a écrit : [...] > I tried but it didn't work... > > $ koji-rpmfusion tag-build f29-free-override > xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-390xx-390.87-1.fc29 > 2018-10-03 15:16:27,878 [ERROR] koji: TagError: Package > xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-390xx not in list for f29-free-override You need to use nonfree -- - Nicolas (kwizart) ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
Re: Anything missing for RPM Fusion readiness for f29 ?
On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 10:12 AM Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > On mercredi 3 octobre 2018 14:55:22 CEST Richard Shaw wrote: > > I'd like to get the nvidia 390.87 drivers available but Robert has not > > responded to my request to finish the review... > > Oops, I didn't catch your message, I'm on it right now. > Thanks for following up! Now, do I need to submit buildroot overrides[1] for the xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-390xx builds so I can build nvidia-390xx-kmod? I tried but it didn't work... $ koji-rpmfusion tag-build f29-free-override xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-390xx-390.87-1.fc29 2018-10-03 15:16:27,878 [ERROR] koji: TagError: Package xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-390xx not in list for f29-free-override Thanks, Richard [1] https://rpmfusion.org/Contributors#Requesting_a_buildroot_override ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
Re: Anything missing for RPM Fusion readiness for f29 ?
On mercredi 3 octobre 2018 14:55:22 CEST Richard Shaw wrote: > I'd like to get the nvidia 390.87 drivers available but Robert has not > responded to my request to finish the review... > > Thanks, > Richard Oops, I didn't catch your message, I'm on it right now. ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
Re: Anything missing for RPM Fusion readiness for f29 ?
I'd like to get the nvidia 390.87 drivers available but Robert has not responded to my request to finish the review... Thanks, Richard ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
Re: Anything missing for RPM Fusion readiness for f29 ?
On 10/3/18 12:47 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: Hi, Anyone has still task planned for RPM Fusion f29 GA ? As per the Fedora schedule the Final freeze should be next Tuesday the 9th. On my side, I still expect to land an updated libplacebo for vlc There is also a kodi update to beta3 that should lands armhfp support. There is a need to review the rpmfusion obsoletes package. Thx in advances. I updated to F29 with dnf system-upgrade last weekend and had to fetch vlc from -testing. I just checked and vlc is now in rpmfusion-free, so all is fine. Nothing else to report so far. Thanks everyone for the hard work ! Regards, Xavier ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
Anything missing for RPM Fusion readiness for f29 ?
Hi, Anyone has still task planned for RPM Fusion f29 GA ? As per the Fedora schedule the Final freeze should be next Tuesday the 9th. On my side, I still expect to land an updated libplacebo for vlc There is also a kodi update to beta3 that should lands armhfp support. There is a need to review the rpmfusion obsoletes package. Thx in advances. -- - Nicolas (kwizart) ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
