Re: Broken deps - RPM Fusion free Fedora development - 2008-12-15
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 07:42:18 +0100, Thorsten wrote: libfaac.so.0 Got it, faac did not get picked to be multilib :) +1 points. :) Mission objective now is to find out the culprit: faac on multilib blacklist? Nope. Misconfigured pushscripts? (== couldn't load the i386 repo metadata directly after pushing to it and while resolving for x86_64?) Don't think so, as http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/development//x86_64/os/freetype-freeworld-2.3.7-2.fc11.i386.rpm (pushed on 2008-Dec-10) got properly multilibed. I'll take a closer look at the output during the next push and report back. faac was multilibed properly now; not sure why it didn't happen during the last push. That confirms my speculations made in yesterday's reply, that the pushscript accesses repos in /srv/local_repo/... not /srv/rpmbuild/...
Re: Broken deps - RPM Fusion free Fedora development - 2008-12-15
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:59:19 +0100, Karel wrote: but the breakage isn't reported for Rawhide but for version 10 You're mistaken. Notice the repository ids as well as the message subject.
Re: Broken deps - RPM Fusion free Fedora development - 2008-12-15
but the breakage isn't reported for Rawhide but for version 10 You're mistaken. Notice the repository ids as well as the message subject. argh, this drives me mad if I do make mockbuild in the devel directory I get qmmp-plugins- freeworld-0.2.3-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm within the email, there is qmmp-plugins-freeworld-0.2.2-1.fc10.* which is in F-10 and the subject is ... development okay, I promise to try to sleep during nights and be awake during daytime, really sorry for the noise K.
Re: Broken deps - RPM Fusion free Fedora development - 2008-12-15
OMG, who stole my package? qmmp-plugins-freeworld-0.2.2-1.fc10.i386 requires qmmp = 0:0.2.2 [r...@dhcp-lab-227 mock]# yum list qmmp Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit Installed Packages qmmp.x86_64 0.2.2-1.fc10 installed Available Packages qmmp.i386 0.2.2-1.fc10 fedora ... but looking at the fedora repo mirror, http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/10/Fedora/i386/os/Packages/ I see no qmmp package how is that possible? K.
Re: Broken deps - RPM Fusion free Fedora development - 2008-12-15
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 12:21:04 +0100, Karel wrote: OMG, who stole my package? qmmp-plugins-freeworld-0.2.2-1.fc10.i386 requires qmmp = 0:0.2.2 [r...@dhcp-lab-227 mock]# yum list qmmp Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit Installed Packages qmmp.x86_64 0.2.2-1.fc10 installed Available Packages qmmp.i386 0.2.2-1.fc10 fedora ... but looking at the fedora repo mirror, http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/10/Fedora/i386/os/Packages/ I see no qmmp package how is that possible? Look again, it's there. In Rawhide, however, you upgraded qmmp to 0.2.3, which breaks the strict dependency in qmmp-plugins-freeworld.
Re: Broken deps - RPM Fusion free Fedora development - 2008-12-15
qmmp-plugins-freeworld-0.2.2-1.fc10.i386 requires qmmp = 0:0.2.2 [r...@dhcp-lab-227 mock]# yum list qmmp Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit Installed Packages qmmp.x86_64 0.2.2-1.fc10 installed Available Packages qmmp.i386 0.2.2-1.fc10 fedora ... but looking at the fedora repo mirror, http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases /10/Fedora/i386/os/Packages/ I see no qmmp package how is that possible? Look again, it's there. Well, yes, if you do s/Fedora/Everything/ first ah, I see ... I was confused by my yum config - thanks for pointing this out but the question is, why it is reported as broken dependency then? In Rawhide, however, you upgraded qmmp to 0.2.3, which breaks the strict dependency in qmmp-plugins-freeworld. Karel build a 0.2.3 update for RPM Fusion; but the build is not yet pushed yet, as qmmp-plugins-freeworld was build against a new ffmpeg, which is not pushed because xine-lib-freeworld and some other important packages are not yet rebuild against it :-/ correct ... and the strict package version dependency is there because the libraries are missing version, so that I have to ensure consistency this way but the breakage isn't reported for Rawhide but for version 10 which includes qmmp-0.2.2-1.fc10 satisfying the dependency of qmmp-plugins-freeworld-0.2.2-1.fc10 ... K.
Re: Broken deps - RPM Fusion free Fedora development - 2008-12-15
On 15.12.2008 23:36, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:08:17 +0100, Julian wrote: Broken packages in rpmfusion-free-development-x86_64: ffmpeg-libs-0.4.9-0.52.20080908.fc10.i386 requires libfaac.so.0 gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.9-1.fc10.i386 requires libfaac.so.0 libquicktime-1.0.3-4.fc10.i386 requires libfaac.so.0 mencoder-1.0-0.103.20080903svn.fc10.i386 requires libfaac.so.0 Got it, faac did not get picked to be multilib :) +1 points. :) Mission objective now is to find out the culprit: faac on multilib blacklist? Nope. Misconfigured pushscripts? (== couldn't load the i386 repo metadata directly after pushing to it and while resolving for x86_64?) Don't think so, as http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/development//x86_64/os/freetype-freeworld-2.3.7-2.fc11.i386.rpm (pushed on 2008-Dec-10) got properly multilibed. I'll take a closer look at the output during the next push and report back. CU knurd
Re: Broken deps - RPM Fusion free Fedora development - 2008-12-15
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 19:47:09 +0100, Thorsten wrote: On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:08:17 +0100, Julian wrote: Broken packages in rpmfusion-free-development-x86_64: ffmpeg-libs-0.4.9-0.52.20080908.fc10.i386 requires libfaac.so.0 gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.9-1.fc10.i386 requires libfaac.so.0 libquicktime-1.0.3-4.fc10.i386 requires libfaac.so.0 mencoder-1.0-0.103.20080903svn.fc10.i386 requires libfaac.so.0 Got it, faac did not get picked to be multilib :) +1 points. :) Mission objective now is to find out the culprit: faac on multilib blacklist? Nope. Misconfigured pushscripts? (== couldn't load the i386 repo metadata directly after pushing to it and while resolving for x86_64?) Don't think so, as http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/development//x86_64/os/freetype-freeworld-2.3.7-2.fc11.i386.rpm (pushed on 2008-Dec-10) got properly multilibed. I'll take a closer look at the output during the next push and report back. 'rpmfusion_free-development' : 'file:///srv/local_repo/free/fedora/%s/%s/os/', Is this a symlink or a bind mount of /srv/rpmbuild? If not, it needs to be changed to point directly at the repository below /srv/rpmbuild. Similarly for the other repos.
Re: Broken deps - RPM Fusion free Fedora development - 2008-12-15
On 16.12.2008 19:47, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: On 15.12.2008 23:36, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:08:17 +0100, Julian wrote: Broken packages in rpmfusion-free-development-x86_64: ffmpeg-libs-0.4.9-0.52.20080908.fc10.i386 requires libfaac.so.0 gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.9-1.fc10.i386 requires libfaac.so.0 libquicktime-1.0.3-4.fc10.i386 requires libfaac.so.0 mencoder-1.0-0.103.20080903svn.fc10.i386 requires libfaac.so.0 Got it, faac did not get picked to be multilib :) +1 points. :) Mission objective now is to find out the culprit: faac on multilib blacklist? Nope. Misconfigured pushscripts? (== couldn't load the i386 repo metadata directly after pushing to it and while resolving for x86_64?) Don't think so, as http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/development//x86_64/os/freetype-freeworld-2.3.7-2.fc11.i386.rpm (pushed on 2008-Dec-10) got properly multilibed. I'll take a closer look at the output during the next push and report back. faac was multilibed properly now; not sure why it didn't happen during the last push. CU knurd
Re: Broken deps - RPM Fusion free Fedora development - 2008-12-15
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski pisze: On Monday, 15 December 2008 at 21:21, Julian Sikorski wrote: Michael Schwendt pisze: [...] == Broken packages in rpmfusion-free-development-x86_64: ffmpeg-libs-0.4.9-0.52.20080908.fc10.i386 requires libfaac.so.0 gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.9-1.fc10.i386 requires libfaac.so.0 libquicktime-1.0.3-4.fc10.i386 requires libfaac.so.0 mencoder-1.0-0.103.20080903svn.fc10.i386 requires libfaac.so.0 [...] I am somewhat responsible for faac, I suggested to update it but did not notice the abi bump. Sorry. Please let me know if I can help to bring this back to shape. Well, you could check if there haven't been any API changes, IOW if the affected packages build against the new faac. I would prefer it if this build were removed because we're in the middle of rebuilding most of our multimedia stack against the new x264 and ffmpeg and I don't want any unnecessary release bumps and rebuilds. Regards, R. Hmm, I just installed the faac-1.26 on my Fedora 10, and it seems the soname is the same: $ rpm -q --provides faac libfaac.so.0()(64bit) faac = 1.26-1.fc11 faac(x86-64) = 1.26-1.fc11 $ readelf -a /usr/lib64/libfaac.so.0.0.0 |grep SONAME 0x000e (SONAME) Library soname: [libfaac.so.0]
Re: Broken deps - RPM Fusion free Fedora development - 2008-12-15
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 21:57:47 +0100, Julian wrote: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski pisze: On Monday, 15 December 2008 at 21:21, Julian Sikorski wrote: Michael Schwendt pisze: [...] == Broken packages in rpmfusion-free-development-x86_64: ffmpeg-libs-0.4.9-0.52.20080908.fc10.i386 requires libfaac.so.0 gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.9-1.fc10.i386 requires libfaac.so.0 libquicktime-1.0.3-4.fc10.i386 requires libfaac.so.0 mencoder-1.0-0.103.20080903svn.fc10.i386 requires libfaac.so.0 [...] I am somewhat responsible for faac, I suggested to update it but did not notice the abi bump. Sorry. Please let me know if I can help to bring this back to shape. Well, you could check if there haven't been any API changes, IOW if the affected packages build against the new faac. I would prefer it if this build were removed because we're in the middle of rebuilding most of our multimedia stack against the new x264 and ffmpeg and I don't want any unnecessary release bumps and rebuilds. Regards, R. Hmm, I just installed the faac-1.26 on my Fedora 10, and it seems the soname is the same: $ rpm -q --provides faac libfaac.so.0()(64bit) faac = 1.26-1.fc11 faac(x86-64) = 1.26-1.fc11 $ readelf -a /usr/lib64/libfaac.so.0.0.0 |grep SONAME 0x000e (SONAME) Library soname: [libfaac.so.0] And what are you trying to prove? * Notice the repository id. * Notice the package %arch. * Draw your conclusion. * Confirm by listing the repo directory.
Re: Broken deps - RPM Fusion free Fedora development - 2008-12-15
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:08:17 +0100, Julian wrote: Broken packages in rpmfusion-free-development-x86_64: ffmpeg-libs-0.4.9-0.52.20080908.fc10.i386 requires libfaac.so.0 gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.9-1.fc10.i386 requires libfaac.so.0 libquicktime-1.0.3-4.fc10.i386 requires libfaac.so.0 mencoder-1.0-0.103.20080903svn.fc10.i386 requires libfaac.so.0 Got it, faac did not get picked to be multilib :) +1 points. :) Mission objective now is to find out the culprit: faac on multilib blacklist? Misconfigured pushscripts? (== couldn't load the i386 repo metadata directly after pushing to it and while resolving for x86_64?)
