Re: apt and smart support for RPM Fusion and Livna
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote: On Wed, 2008-12-24 at 23:29 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: Has a bug report been filed? Shouldn't be in blocked from the mirrors till this problem is fixed? Bug was filed, and fixed in Rawhide. Now someone just has to backport it to F10. I should add that the delay was not in filing the bug, but in fixing it. It's really hard to fix apt-rpm bugs and Panu is really busy (maintaining RPM itself and with something called Real Life ;-) ). Kevin Kofler
Re: apt and smart support for RPM Fusion and Livna
I'm sending this again, as it didn't seem to appear on the list, and it would be nice to have apt support for accessing the rpmfusion repo's. Nigel. On Wednesday 24 December 2008 19:45, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote: On Wed, 2008-12-24 at 23:29 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: Kevin Kofler wrote: Conrad Meyer wrote: apt-rpm doesn't work in current Fedora anyways. To be more precise, command-line apt-rpm is completely broken in F10 and higher, Synaptic already in F9. So if somebody cares strongly about apt, they'll have to fix apt first! Kevin Kofler Has a bug report been filed? Shouldn't be in blocked from the mirrors till this problem is fixed? Bug was filed, and fixed in Rawhide. Now someone just has to backport it to F10 I'd go for backporting it to F8, and F9 as well. Apt was working just fine on both the Livna, and Freshrpms repos, until the transition to Rpmfusion, when everything hit the fan. Nigel.
Re: apt and smart support for RPM Fusion and Livna
Kevin Kofler wrote: Conrad Meyer wrote: apt-rpm doesn't work in current Fedora anyways. To be more precise, command-line apt-rpm is completely broken in F10 and higher, Synaptic already in F9. So if somebody cares strongly about apt, they'll have to fix apt first! Kevin Kofler Has a bug report been filed? Shouldn't be in blocked from the mirrors till this problem is fixed? Rahul
apt and smart support for RPM Fusion and Livna
Hi! Just FYI, seems some people would like to have apt and smart support for RPM Fusion and Livna; see this mail (and the replies to it): https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2008-December/msg02807.html Smart support for RPM Fusion is in the works https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13 Support for apt isn't afaics. Does anybody want to work on this? BTW, I guess the livna developers will also be gladly accept patches that enhance the current livna-release rpm from http://rpm.livna.org/ to support support apt or smart (SRPM can be found here: http://rpm.livna.org/repo/8/SRPMS/livna-release-1-1.src.rpm); the old release rpms did support smart and apt iirc, but I they ignored the directory ownership problem. Cu knurd
Re: apt and smart support for RPM Fusion and Livna
On Wednesday 17 December 2008 01:43:40 am Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: Hi! Just FYI, seems some people would like to have apt and smart support for RPM Fusion and Livna; see this mail (and the replies to it): https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2008-December/msg02807.html Smart support for RPM Fusion is in the works https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13 Support for apt isn't afaics. Does anybody want to work on this? BTW, I guess the livna developers will also be gladly accept patches that enhance the current livna-release rpm from http://rpm.livna.org/ to support support apt or smart (SRPM can be found here: http://rpm.livna.org/repo/8/SRPMS/livna-release-1-1.src.rpm); the old release rpms did support smart and apt iirc, but I they ignored the directory ownership problem. Cu knurd apt-rpm doesn't work in current Fedora anyways. -- Conrad Meyer kon...@tylerc.org
