Re: mpg123 is in Fedora 25+ now, should be dropped from rpmfusion
On Dom, 2016-11-13 at 09:18 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi Nicolas, > > $subject says it all, not sure what the orphan process > for rpmfusion is, hence this direct mail. I'm thinking in give up on Fedora , haven't you notice that F25 is closed for GA ? -- Sérgio M. B.
Re: mpg123 is in Fedora 25+ now, should be dropped from rpmfusion
2016-11-13 12:00 GMT+01:00 Hans de Goede : > Hi, > > On 13-11-16 11:33, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: >> >> 2016-11-13 10:54 GMT+01:00 Hans de Goede : >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> On 13-11-16 09:53, Andrea Musuruane wrote: Hi Hans, you have to retire it (not to orphan it). This procedure is up to date AFAIK: http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors#Retiring_a_package Bye, Andrea >>> >>> >>> >>> Thank you, I've added dead.package files to git and created: >>> >>> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4335 >> >> I think you should be able to use pkgdb to retire the package. >> Now I still wonder if we still need mpg123 in 25 GA repo. I think so, >> so it won't break users that might install with kickstart and only GA >> repos for both projects. > > > I went here (and logged in): > > https://admin.rpmfusion.org/pkgdb/package/free/mpg123/ > > I can orphan it there, but I don't think I can retire it > there. Just a tought, it could need to be provided in epel (until RHEL directly) also. So we wouldn't have to keep older branches. Unfortunately the import didn't kept our history, so it's won't be easy to sync branches. Anyway, in the mpg123 case, using the latest seems better. -- - Nicolas (kwizart)
Re: mpg123 is in Fedora 25+ now, should be dropped from rpmfusion
Hi, On 13-11-16 11:33, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: 2016-11-13 10:54 GMT+01:00 Hans de Goede : Hi, On 13-11-16 09:53, Andrea Musuruane wrote: Hi Hans, you have to retire it (not to orphan it). This procedure is up to date AFAIK: http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors#Retiring_a_package Bye, Andrea Thank you, I've added dead.package files to git and created: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4335 I think you should be able to use pkgdb to retire the package. Now I still wonder if we still need mpg123 in 25 GA repo. I think so, so it won't break users that might install with kickstart and only GA repos for both projects. I went here (and logged in): https://admin.rpmfusion.org/pkgdb/package/free/mpg123/ I can orphan it there, but I don't think I can retire it there. Regards, Hans
Re: mpg123 is in Fedora 25+ now, should be dropped from rpmfusion
2016-11-13 10:54 GMT+01:00 Hans de Goede : > Hi, > > On 13-11-16 09:53, Andrea Musuruane wrote: >> >> Hi Hans, >> you have to retire it (not to orphan it). >> >> This procedure is up to date AFAIK: >> http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors#Retiring_a_package >> >> Bye, >> >> Andrea > > > Thank you, I've added dead.package files to git and created: > > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4335 I think you should be able to use pkgdb to retire the package. Now I still wonder if we still need mpg123 in 25 GA repo. I think so, so it won't break users that might install with kickstart and only GA repos for both projects. Thx -- - Nicolas (kwizart)
Re: mpg123 is in Fedora 25+ now, should be dropped from rpmfusion
Hi, On 13-11-16 09:53, Andrea Musuruane wrote: Hi Hans, you have to retire it (not to orphan it). This procedure is up to date AFAIK: http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors#Retiring_a_package Bye, Andrea Thank you, I've added dead.package files to git and created: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4335 Regards, Hans
Re: mpg123 is in Fedora 25+ now, should be dropped from rpmfusion
Hi Hans, you have to retire it (not to orphan it). This procedure is up to date AFAIK: http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors#Retiring_a_package Bye, Andrea On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 9:18 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi Nicolas, > > $subject says it all, not sure what the orphan process > for rpmfusion is, hence this direct mail. > > Regards, > > Hans
mpg123 is in Fedora 25+ now, should be dropped from rpmfusion
Hi Nicolas, $subject says it all, not sure what the orphan process for rpmfusion is, hence this direct mail. Regards, Hans