Re: vcdimager CDs (VCD, sVCD or CVD)
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 7:43 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Dom, 2016-07-10 at 16:36 +0200, Andrea Musuruane wrote: > > If you are interested, I have a review request for devedeng: > > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4013 > > > > devede is no longer maintained upstream. > > yes , I found it 2 or 3 days ago , now that seems we will have > RPMfusion rawhide ! , we can put devedeng there . > But shouldn't devedeng replace devede ? , i.e., or rename package or > even just update devede package with new code (devedeng), or do you > want the 2 packages, devede and devedeng, at same time ? > Upstream has two different source code repositories: one for devede and one for devedeng. Therefore I choose to made a new package for devedeng (which is quite different from the package for devede). Moreover I followed Fedora Guidelines regarding replacing an existing package: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Renaming.2FReplacing_Existing_Packages When devedeng is in the RPM fusion repository, we will be able to retire devede. Bye, Andrea
Re: vcdimager CDs (VCD, sVCD or CVD)
On Dom, 2016-07-10 at 16:36 +0200, Andrea Musuruane wrote: > On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 2:18 AM, Sérgio Basto > wrote: > > Hi, this package was retired on RPMFusion F24 , but I don't know if > > it > > was a good idea. Because : > > > > 1 - it builds without problem > > 2 - devede stops to work , doesn't start until we install > > vcdimager, > > even comment check vcdimager command still offer to make VCD, sVCD > > or > > CVD > If you are interested, I have a review request for devedeng: > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4013 > > devede is no longer maintained upstream. yes , I found it 2 or 3 days ago , now that seems we will have RPMfusion rawhide ! , we can put devedeng there . But shouldn't devedeng replace devede ? , i.e., or rename package or even just update devede package with new code (devedeng), or do you want the 2 packages, devede and devedeng, at same time ? > BR, > > Andrea > > PS devedeng still requires vcdimager. > > -- Sérgio M. B.
Re: vcdimager CDs (VCD, sVCD or CVD)
On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 2:18 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > Hi, this package was retired on RPMFusion F24 , but I don't know if it > was a good idea. Because : > > 1 - it builds without problem > 2 - devede stops to work , doesn't start until we install vcdimager, > even comment check vcdimager command still offer to make VCD, sVCD or > CVD > If you are interested, I have a review request for devedeng: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4013 devede is no longer maintained upstream. BR, Andrea PS devedeng still requires vcdimager.
Re: vcdimager CDs (VCD, sVCD or CVD)
On Ter, 2016-07-05 at 21:45 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 7:18 PM, Sérgio Basto > wrote: > > Hi, this package was retired on RPMFusion F24 , but I don't know if > > it > > was a good idea. Because : > > > > 1 - it builds without problem > > 2 - devede stops to work , doesn't start until we install > > vcdimager, > > even comment check vcdimager command still offer to make VCD, sVCD > > or > > CVD > > 3 - Also xine will lose ability to read vcds ) I have to check this > > item better. > > > > In resume seems that give us less work unretire it and maintain it > > than > > retire it, I my mind we just need retire it when begin to be one > > FTBFS > > ... > > > > what is your vote ? > > > > A- keep it retired > > B- Unretire it > I'm all for unretiring it but who will be the maintainer? I can't > really take on any more packages right now. I can barely keep up with > what I have. Thanks for the support, I will unretiring and maintain it. > Thanks, > Richard Best regards, -- Sérgio M. B.
Re: vcdimager CDs (VCD, sVCD or CVD)
2016-07-06 2:18 GMT+02:00 Sérgio Basto : > Hi, this package was retired on RPMFusion F24 , but I don't know if it > was a good idea. Because : > > 1 - it builds without problem > 2 - devede stops to work , doesn't start until we install vcdimager, > even comment check vcdimager command still offer to make VCD, sVCD or > CVD > 3 - Also xine will lose ability to read vcds ) I have to check this > item better. > > In resume seems that give us less work unretire it and maintain it than > retire it, I my mind we just need retire it when begin to be one FTBFS > ... > > what is your vote ? > > A- keep it retired > B- Unretire it If you want to maintain vcdimager, a vote is not relevant.
Re: vcdimager CDs (VCD, sVCD or CVD)
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 7:18 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > Hi, this package was retired on RPMFusion F24 , but I don't know if it > was a good idea. Because : > > 1 - it builds without problem > 2 - devede stops to work , doesn't start until we install vcdimager, > even comment check vcdimager command still offer to make VCD, sVCD or > CVD > 3 - Also xine will lose ability to read vcds ) I have to check this > item better. > > In resume seems that give us less work unretire it and maintain it than > retire it, I my mind we just need retire it when begin to be one FTBFS > ... > > what is your vote ? > > A- keep it retired > B- Unretire it I'm all for unretiring it but who will be the maintainer? I can't really take on any more packages right now. I can barely keep up with what I have. Thanks, Richard
vcdimager CDs (VCD, sVCD or CVD)
Hi, this package was retired on RPMFusion F24 , but I don't know if it was a good idea. Because : 1 - it builds without problem 2 - devede stops to work , doesn't start until we install vcdimager, even comment check vcdimager command still offer to make VCD, sVCD or CVD 3 - Also xine will lose ability to read vcds ) I have to check this item better. In resume seems that give us less work unretire it and maintain it than retire it, I my mind we just need retire it when begin to be one FTBFS ... what is your vote ? A- keep it retired B- Unretire it Thanks, -- Sérgio M. B.
