[rrd-users] Re: Help about creating graphs

2003-07-14 Thread Alex van den Bogaerdt
On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 05:16:02PM -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 And I did this to make gif files:
  /usr/local/rrdtool-1.0.42/bin/rrdtool graph test.gif --start 0 \
  DEF:in_bytes=/var/local/flows/graphs/total.rrd:in_bytes:AVERAGE \
  LINE2:in_bytes#FF000:in_bytes

Go back to the manual page for rrdtool graph and focus on the time
value given to --start.

Alex
-- 
Received on my linux server: Increase the speed of your PC in minutes! Stop
windows from crashing, improve internet security and optimize your computers
performance with just a few easy mouse clicks!

--
Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Helpmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-users
WebAdminhttp://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi


[rrd-users] strange numbers

2003-07-14 Thread Greg MacLellan
I'm getting some weird outputs on a counter graph I have, and I'm just 
trying to understand why. I'm actually using Cacti as a front-end, but I 
believe the problem is either with rrdtool, or 
confusion/misconfiguration on my part (which is likely).

This is a quick log of the update commands, showing the actual counter 
value:

07/14/2003 11:42 AM - CMD: /var/mwt/rrdtool/bin/rrdtool update 
/var/mwt/htdocs/cacti/rra/in1cnt_9.rrd --template in1cnt N:532
07/14/2003 11:43 AM - CMD: /var/mwt/rrdtool/bin/rrdtool update 
/var/mwt/htdocs/cacti/rra/in1cnt_9.rrd --template in1cnt N:541
07/14/2003 11:44 AM - CMD: /var/mwt/rrdtool/bin/rrdtool update 
/var/mwt/htdocs/cacti/rra/in1cnt_9.rrd --template in1cnt N:550
07/14/2003 11:45 AM - CMD: /var/mwt/rrdtool/bin/rrdtool update 
/var/mwt/htdocs/cacti/rra/in1cnt_9.rrd --template in1cnt N:559
07/14/2003 11:46 AM - CMD: /var/mwt/rrdtool/bin/rrdtool update 
/var/mwt/htdocs/cacti/rra/in1cnt_9.rrd --template in1cnt N:569
07/14/2003 11:47 AM - CMD: /var/mwt/rrdtool/bin/rrdtool update 
/var/mwt/htdocs/cacti/rra/in1cnt_9.rrd --template in1cnt N:578
07/14/2003 11:48 AM - CMD: /var/mwt/rrdtool/bin/rrdtool update 
/var/mwt/htdocs/cacti/rra/in1cnt_9.rrd --template in1cnt N:586
07/14/2003 11:49 AM - CMD: /var/mwt/rrdtool/bin/rrdtool update 
/var/mwt/htdocs/cacti/rra/in1cnt_9.rrd --template in1cnt N:594
07/14/2003 11:50 AM - CMD: /var/mwt/rrdtool/bin/rrdtool update 
/var/mwt/htdocs/cacti/rra/in1cnt_9.rrd --template in1cnt N:604
07/14/2003 11:51 AM - CMD: /var/mwt/rrdtool/bin/rrdtool update 
/var/mwt/htdocs/cacti/rra/in1cnt_9.rrd --template in1cnt N:613
07/14/2003 11:52 AM - CMD: /var/mwt/rrdtool/bin/rrdtool update 
/var/mwt/htdocs/cacti/rra/in1cnt_9.rrd --template in1cnt N:620


rrdtool fetch AVERAGE output:

1058197320: 1.83e-01
1058197380: 1.505556e-01
1058197440: 1.50e-01
1058197500: 1.50e-01
1058197560: 1.663889e-01
1058197620: 1.502778e-01
1058197680: 1.336111e-01
1058197740: 1.33e-01
1058197800: 1.66e-01
1058197860: 1.4785974499e-01

MAX and MIN both have the same output (why is that?)

I'm sampling data (and updating rrdtool) once a minute, and the step 
value for this datasource is 60 seconds:


/var/mwt/rrdtool/bin/rrdtool create \
/var/mwt/htdocs/cacti/rra/in1cnt_9.rrd \
--step 60  \
DS:in1cnt:COUNTER:120:0:1000 \
RRA:AVERAGE:0.5:1:1440 \
RRA:AVERAGE:0.5:10:2016 \
RRA:AVERAGE:0.5:60:1440 \
RRA:MIN:0.5:1:1440 \
RRA:MIN:0.5:10:2016 \
RRA:MIN:0.5:60:1440 \
RRA:MAX:0.5:1:1440 \
RRA:MAX:0.5:10:2016 \
RRA:MAX:0.5:60:1440 \


I would think that I should be seeing 9,9,9,10,etc. on the graph, 
instead of .18 .15 etc that's actually showing up. Do I have something 
messed up here? Do I just not understand how it works? Or is there 
actually a problem here?

Thanks

ttyl, greg

--
Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Helpmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-users
WebAdminhttp://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi


[rrd-users] strange numbers w/ counter

2003-07-14 Thread Greg MacLellan
I'm getting some weird outputs on a counter graph I have, and I'm just 
trying to understand why. I'm actually using Cacti as a front-end, but I 
believe the problem is either with rrdtool, or 
confusion/misconfiguration on my part (which is likely).

This is a quick log of the update commands, showing the actual counter 
value:

07/14/2003 11:42 AM - CMD: /var/mwt/rrdtool/bin/rrdtool update 
/var/mwt/htdocs/cacti/rra/in1cnt_9.rrd --template in1cnt N:532
07/14/2003 11:43 AM - CMD: /var/mwt/rrdtool/bin/rrdtool update 
/var/mwt/htdocs/cacti/rra/in1cnt_9.rrd --template in1cnt N:541
07/14/2003 11:44 AM - CMD: /var/mwt/rrdtool/bin/rrdtool update 
/var/mwt/htdocs/cacti/rra/in1cnt_9.rrd --template in1cnt N:550
07/14/2003 11:45 AM - CMD: /var/mwt/rrdtool/bin/rrdtool update 
/var/mwt/htdocs/cacti/rra/in1cnt_9.rrd --template in1cnt N:559
07/14/2003 11:46 AM - CMD: /var/mwt/rrdtool/bin/rrdtool update 
/var/mwt/htdocs/cacti/rra/in1cnt_9.rrd --template in1cnt N:569
07/14/2003 11:47 AM - CMD: /var/mwt/rrdtool/bin/rrdtool update 
/var/mwt/htdocs/cacti/rra/in1cnt_9.rrd --template in1cnt N:578
07/14/2003 11:48 AM - CMD: /var/mwt/rrdtool/bin/rrdtool update 
/var/mwt/htdocs/cacti/rra/in1cnt_9.rrd --template in1cnt N:586
07/14/2003 11:49 AM - CMD: /var/mwt/rrdtool/bin/rrdtool update 
/var/mwt/htdocs/cacti/rra/in1cnt_9.rrd --template in1cnt N:594
07/14/2003 11:50 AM - CMD: /var/mwt/rrdtool/bin/rrdtool update 
/var/mwt/htdocs/cacti/rra/in1cnt_9.rrd --template in1cnt N:604
07/14/2003 11:51 AM - CMD: /var/mwt/rrdtool/bin/rrdtool update 
/var/mwt/htdocs/cacti/rra/in1cnt_9.rrd --template in1cnt N:613
07/14/2003 11:52 AM - CMD: /var/mwt/rrdtool/bin/rrdtool update 
/var/mwt/htdocs/cacti/rra/in1cnt_9.rrd --template in1cnt N:620


rrdtool fetch AVERAGE output:

1058197320: 1.83e-01
1058197380: 1.505556e-01
1058197440: 1.50e-01
1058197500: 1.50e-01
1058197560: 1.663889e-01
1058197620: 1.502778e-01
1058197680: 1.336111e-01
1058197740: 1.33e-01
1058197800: 1.66e-01
1058197860: 1.4785974499e-01

MAX and MIN both have the same output (why is that?)

I'm sampling data (and updating rrdtool) once a minute, and the step 
value for this datasource is 60 seconds:


/var/mwt/rrdtool/bin/rrdtool create \
/var/mwt/htdocs/cacti/rra/in1cnt_9.rrd \
--step 60  \
DS:in1cnt:COUNTER:120:0:1000 \
RRA:AVERAGE:0.5:1:1440 \
RRA:AVERAGE:0.5:10:2016 \
RRA:AVERAGE:0.5:60:1440 \
RRA:MIN:0.5:1:1440 \
RRA:MIN:0.5:10:2016 \
RRA:MIN:0.5:60:1440 \
RRA:MAX:0.5:1:1440 \
RRA:MAX:0.5:10:2016 \
RRA:MAX:0.5:60:1440 \


I would think that I should be seeing 9,9,9,10,etc. on the graph, 
instead of .18 .15 etc that's actually showing up. Do I have something 
messed up here? Do I just not understand how it works? Or is there 
actually a problem here?

Thanks

ttyl, greg

--
Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Helpmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-users
WebAdminhttp://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi


[rrd-users] Re: strange numbers w/ counter

2003-07-14 Thread Alex van den Bogaerdt
On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 12:14:13PM -0400, Greg MacLellan wrote:

 07/14/2003 11:42 AM - CMD: /var/mwt/rrdtool/bin/rrdtool update 
 /var/mwt/htdocs/cacti/rra/in1cnt_9.rrd --template in1cnt N:532
 07/14/2003 11:43 AM - CMD: /var/mwt/rrdtool/bin/rrdtool update 
 /var/mwt/htdocs/cacti/rra/in1cnt_9.rrd --template in1cnt N:541

difference in time: few seconds (60 or so, not very accurate due to N)
difference in value: 9

 1058197320: 1.83e-01

value in the range of 0.18 per second.

9/60 == .15
-- correct range when compared to 0.18 alike values.

 MAX and MIN both have the same output (why is that?)

min(x) == avg(x) == max(x)

It only matters if you have more than one sample:

min(x,y) = avg(x,y) = max(x,y)
min(x,y,z) == avg(x,y,z) == max(x,y,z)

and so on.

This will show up in the other RRAs.

 /var/mwt/rrdtool/bin/rrdtool create \
 /var/mwt/htdocs/cacti/rra/in1cnt_9.rrd \
 --step 60  \
 DS:in1cnt:COUNTER:120:0:1000 \

COUNTER:   range = diff(value)/diff(time)
see the docs, the faq, the tutorial and the mail archives.

 RRA:AVERAGE:0.5:1:1440 \
 RRA:AVERAGE:0.5:10:2016 \
 RRA:AVERAGE:0.5:60:1440 \
 RRA:MIN:0.5:1:1440 \
 RRA:MIN:0.5:10:2016 \
 RRA:MIN:0.5:60:1440 \
 RRA:MAX:0.5:1:1440 \
 RRA:MAX:0.5:10:2016 \
 RRA:MAX:0.5:60:1440 \

the RRAs with only 1 sample per range will not differ between min,max and avg.
The other RRAs will differ.  Your setup does however make it easy to use the
same grapher script for all of min, avg and max.

HTH
Alex
-- 
Received on my linux server: Increase the speed of your PC in minutes! Stop
windows from crashing, improve internet security and optimize your computers
performance with just a few easy mouse clicks!

--
Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Helpmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-users
WebAdminhttp://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi


[rrd-users] Re: strange numbers w/ counter

2003-07-14 Thread Greg MacLellan
Alex van den Bogaerdt wrote:
 difference in time: few seconds (60 or so, not very accurate due to N)
 difference in value: 9
 value in the range of 0.18 per second.

Like I said, this was probably my fault. I was thinking about it as per 
minute instead of per second. I'm used to dealing with rrdtool with 5 
minute intervals, I guess I had a brainfart trying to think of it in 
terms of 1 minute.


 min(x) == avg(x) == max(x)
 
 It only matters if you have more than one sample:

This makes sense, too. I just got confused when I got the same output, 
but it's exactly as you say, the reason that's there is to be able to 
use the same scripts no matter what interval or consolidation function.

Probably a bad day for me to be programming... :p

Thanks for the help

ttyl, greg

(btw, sorry about duplicate posts.. mozilla told me it couldn't send, 
and apparently sent it anyways..)

--
Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Helpmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-users
WebAdminhttp://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi