Re: With rsync --link-dest, how can you tell how much space is actually used?
Thanks Fredrick. That certainly clarifies the matter. Now if I could only remember to use info once in a while. Oh yeah, the navigation. ;) (coming from a long time vi user) -- -Eric 'shubes' On 10/22/2011 10:41 PM, Frederick Grose wrote: On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 12:14 AM, Kevin Korb k...@sanitarium.net mailto:k...@sanitarium.net wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Well, I just looked at 'man du' and you are right about it. I could swear that it used to say something more useful about the subject but I couldn't quote it. info du If two or more hard links point to the same file, only one of the hard links is counted. The FILE argument order affects which links are counted, and changing the argument order may change the numbers that `du' outputs. In general the man pages for GNU tools suck. On 10/23/11 00:05, Eric Shubert wrote: I've read the man page: -s, --summarize display only a total for each argument Leaves a bit to interpretation, I think. Could go either way, no? After all, the name says: du - estimate file space usage I guess du estimates better than I assumed. Thanks for setting me straight Kevin. :) -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Re: With rsync --link-dest, is it possible to determine which files are new?
SHA1 You may also find fingerprint to be a useful tool. However, it will require ruby. --- This email is protected by LBackup http://www.lbackup.org -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
unpack_smb_acl() errors
Hi All, I have been noticing this in stderr recently. Is this a problem? Standard OSX patches on 3.0.7 - everything working perfectly otherwise. Best, Rob Calling unpack_smb_acl() on /Users/astrid Calling unpack_smb_acl() on /Users/astrid/Desktop Calling unpack_smb_acl() on /Users/astrid/Documents Calling unpack_smb_acl() on /Users/astrid/Downloads Calling unpack_smb_acl() on /Users/astrid/Library Calling unpack_smb_acl() on /Users/astrid/Movies Calling unpack_smb_acl() on /Users/astrid/Music Calling unpack_smb_acl() on /Users/astrid/Pictures Calling unpack_smb_acl() on /Users/astrid/Public Calling unpack_smb_acl() on /Users/astrid/Sites etc etc etc….. -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Re: unpack_smb_acl() errors
In 20665313-68cb-416c-a4f9-02b6f5644...@comcast.net, on 10/23/11 at 11:16 AM, Robert DuToit rdut...@comcast.net said: I have been noticing this in stderr recently. Is this a problem? Standard OSX patches on 3.0.7 - everything working perfectly otherwise. Calling unpack_smb_acl() on /Users/astrid Offhand, I'd say this is leftover debug code. I don't see it in the unpatched sources. Take a look in acls.c for the message. Regards, Steven -- -- Steven Levine stev...@earthlink.net eCS/Warp/DIY etc. www.scoug.com www.ecomstation.com -- -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
