[Bug 15254] rsync performs full replication with option -I since last upgrade to version 3.2.3 protocol version 31

2022-12-01 Thread just subscribed for rsync-qa from bugzilla via rsync
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15254

--- Comment #7 from Frank B  ---
Yes, it has. The crontab was unchanged for months and directly after the update
of rsync via apt, it started performing full replications. It's clearly a
result of the new binary.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
-- 
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html


[Bug 15254] rsync performs full replication with option -I since last upgrade to version 3.2.3 protocol version 31

2022-12-01 Thread just subscribed for rsync-qa from bugzilla via rsync
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15254

--- Comment #6 from Kevin Korb  ---
I can confirm that something did change...

# mkdir /tmp/src /tmp/dest
# touch /tmp/src/a /tmp/src/b /tmp/src/c
# rsync -vai /tmp/src/ /tmp/dest/
sending incremental file list
.d..t.. ./
>f+ a
>f+ b
>f+ c

sent 211 bytes  received 76 bytes  574.00 bytes/sec
total size is 0  speedup is 0.00
# touch /tmp/dest/b
# /usr/src/rsync-3.2.0/rsync -vai -nIu /tmp/src/ /tmp/dest/
sending incremental file list

sent 77 bytes  received 12 bytes  178.00 bytes/sec
total size is 0  speedup is 0.00 (DRY RUN)
# /usr/src/rsync-3.2.7/rsync -vai -nIu /tmp/src/ /tmp/dest/
sending incremental file list
>f. a
>f. c

sent 97 bytes  received 22 bytes  238.00 bytes/sec
total size is 0  speedup is 0.00 (DRY RUN)

Guess that is up to Wayne if this is a fix or a regression.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
-- 
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html


[Bug 15254] rsync performs full replication with option -I since last upgrade to version 3.2.3 protocol version 31

2022-12-01 Thread just subscribed for rsync-qa from bugzilla via rsync
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15254

--- Comment #5 from Kevin Korb  ---
I had the same knee jerk reaction as Wayne to this question.  -I means re-copy
everything (or at least re-diff everything unless --whole-file).  But I never
attempted to mix it with -u so I held my tongue.  Is it possible that in the
past -I + -u meant re-copy everything but don't overwrite anything newer and
now that exception is no longer honored?  If that is the case I am not even
sure whether this would be a regression or not.  I have always considered -I to
mean re-copy everything as an alternative to the even worse option of
--checksum.  But I can see a possible use case for it interacting with -u to
redefine "everything".

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
-- 
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html


[Bug 15254] rsync performs full replication with option -I since last upgrade to version 3.2.3 protocol version 31

2022-12-01 Thread just subscribed for rsync-qa from bugzilla via rsync
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15254

--- Comment #4 from Wayne Davison  ---
No it didn't.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
-- 
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html


[Bug 15254] rsync performs full replication with option -I since last upgrade to version 3.2.3 protocol version 31

2022-12-01 Thread just subscribed for rsync-qa from bugzilla via rsync
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15254

--- Comment #3 from Frank B  ---
The behavior still changed as this was working for months and clearly changed
directly after upgrading to the new binary but it's okay for me. Looks like the
I should have been l in my case due to a copy and paste issue and different
font appearances.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
-- 
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html