Is it possible to specify the destination filename for every file being synced with rsync
E.g. I have a directory with 10,000 files, and I want to sync them to a remote server, but I want to map the source filenames to a different set of filenames on the server. Is there a way to create an input file for rsync to use that specifies a src/dst pair? thanks -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
map destination files files based on meta data
I am in the process of designing a photo synchronization application - basically I want to be able to copy all of the images captured throughout my home's infrastructure to a central repository. The problem that I foresee is that there may be collisions between filenames between the various computers where my family members sync their photos, movies, etc. So doing a simple rsync won't work. This is especially true of how iPhoto stores photos synced from iphones, ipads, etc. What I want to do is have the ability to map source files to a destination location / name based on meta information contained in the files. This could include exif data, or simple file meta information such at date / time. I don't want to hardcode the destination paths, because I want all of the files to be organized / copied into the same destination folder, so that it's easy to grab copies of all the files pertaining to that folder (e.g. month when photo was taken. is it possible to introduce a 'filter' or hook into rsync to compute the destination file name based on meta information. Is this a worthwhile feature to develop, or is there something already present that I have missed? -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Perhaps there should be a way for rsync to encode file names?
Someone just posted an issue raining from ext4 to ntfs. It would be useful to have an option whereby rsync maps file names. Perhaps urlencoding? -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Re: rsync takes a long time to start doing any transfers
Thanks so much for the info. It does appears as though rsync scans the entire subdir before doing anything, which seems pretty inefficient, perhaps this will be improved in a future release. Although, maybe it has to be this way, so that the --delete commands can work? On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Lars Ellenberg lars.ellenb...@linbit.comwrote: On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 01:51:43PM -0400, Cary Lewis wrote: I want to use rsync with a cloud based rsync provider to do off-site backing up of a large (1TB) dataset which consists of 32 million+ files spread out in 300 directories. So the amount of files in any one directory can be quite large (upwards of 2 million). You realize that stat() is a costly operation, especially if the inodes are cache cold, even more so if something else stresses the IO and VM subsystems on the box. On a moderately loaded box, recursively stating 3 million files occasionally took 90 minutes and more. Doing the same once the inodes are cache-hot takes the same box under the same overall stress 30 to 90 *seconds*. Holding 3 Millon dentries and inodes cache-hot requires (on that box, anyways) ~ 5 Gigabyte of slab memory (of 128 G available...). So if you want to regularly recursively stat (and that's what rsync needs to do) 32 millon files, you better add more ram, much more ram, to your box. Also, you mention Cygwin. IIRC, by default, that will still treat file names as case*in*sensitive, so you get really bad (maybe O N^2?) behaviour when walking large directories. There was some setting which I do not remember right now, to tell rsync and/or cygwin to treat this as casesensitive, which can seriously improve behaviour with large directories. Rsync doesn't seem to cope with this well - even doing local copies in a directory with several thousands of files takes a long time to initiate any transferring. I'm speculating here. But I thought the file list generation is still per sub-directory, so would need to scan the current subdir fully before starting to work on the resulting partial file list. I though that with version 3, rsync was supposed to start transferring before fully testing all of the files in a directory? I am using version 3.0.9 under Cygwin. Is there a command line switch I am supposed to use to force rsync to start transferring more quickly? Any insight / suggestions would be most appreciated. -- : Lars Ellenberg : LINBIT | Your Way to High Availability : DRBD/HA support and consulting http://www.linbit.com -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
rsync takes a long time to start doing any transfers
I want to use rsync with a cloud based rsync provider to do off-site backing up of a large (1TB) dataset which consists of 32 million+ files spread out in 300 directories. So the amount of files in any one directory can be quite large (upwards of 2 million). Rsync doesn't seem to cope with this well - even doing local copies in a directory with several thousands of files takes a long time to initiate any transferring. I though that with version 3, rsync was supposed to start transferring before fully testing all of the files in a directory? I am using version 3.0.9 under Cygwin. Is there a command line switch I am supposed to use to force rsync to start transferring more quickly? Any insight / suggestions would be most appreciated. Thank you. -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
