Re: Behavioral differences between versions.

2010-07-22 Thread Paul Slootman
On Wed 21 Jul 2010, Jeff Cleverley wrote:
 
 1.  When using the -z option, does rsync actually use
 /usr/bin/compress or does it use gzip?  The man pages say it
 compresses data but doesn't specify what it compresses with.

It uses the gzip algorithm but implements it internally; it doesn't call
any external program. That wouldn't be at all practical on a
communication link which is effectively interactive (one side sends
data, the other side reacts).

 2.  I was looking for detailed documentation on behavioral changes of
 arguments between rsync versions.

I suggest examining the NEWS and OLDNEWS files in the rsync source.


Paul
-- 
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html


Re: Behavioral differences between versions.

2010-07-22 Thread Jeff Cleverley
Paul,

Thanks for the information.  I'll see what I can find in the NEWS and
OLDNEWS.  Hopefully that will give me what I'm looking for on most of
the questions.

Am I correct in my assumption that Redhat does not tweak the rsync it
ships with its distribution?

Thanks,

Jeff

On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 3:20 AM, Paul Slootman paul+rs...@wurtel.net wrote:
 On Wed 21 Jul 2010, Jeff Cleverley wrote:

 1.  When using the -z option, does rsync actually use
 /usr/bin/compress or does it use gzip?  The man pages say it
 compresses data but doesn't specify what it compresses with.

 It uses the gzip algorithm but implements it internally; it doesn't call
 any external program. That wouldn't be at all practical on a
 communication link which is effectively interactive (one side sends
 data, the other side reacts).

 2.  I was looking for detailed documentation on behavioral changes of
 arguments between rsync versions.

 I suggest examining the NEWS and OLDNEWS files in the rsync source.


 Paul
 --
 Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
 To unsubscribe or change options: 
 https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
 Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html




-- 
Jeff Cleverley
Unix Systems Administrator
4380 Ziegler Road
Fort Collins, Colorado 80525
970-288-4611
-- 
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html


Re: Behavioral differences between versions.

2010-07-22 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 12:42 -0600, Jeff Cleverley wrote:
 Am I correct in my assumption that Redhat does not tweak the rsync it
 ships with its distribution?

The way to find out is to ask Red Hat or look in their SRPMs.  Choose
either client or server (they seem to be the same in this case--are they
always?):

http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/5Client/en/os/SRPMS/rsync-2.6.8-3.1.src.rpm
http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/5Server/en/os/SRPMS/rsync-2.6.8-3.1.src.rpm

It looks like there's one bug fix related to memory allocation for
extended attributes, but that's all.

-- 
Matt

-- 
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html


Re: Behavioral differences between versions.

2010-07-22 Thread Jeff Cleverley
Matt,

Thanks for the information.  I've found Red Hat often slow and
difficult to get an answer from.  I'll check the differences between
the rhel4 and rhel5 versions in the SRPMs.  I'll also check the bug
tracking.  I have found one issue I thought was probably just a change
in behavior that was reported as a bug.

Jeff

On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 8:34 PM, Matt McCutchen m...@mattmccutchen.net wrote:
 On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 12:42 -0600, Jeff Cleverley wrote:
 Am I correct in my assumption that Redhat does not tweak the rsync it
 ships with its distribution?

 The way to find out is to ask Red Hat or look in their SRPMs.  Choose
 either client or server (they seem to be the same in this case--are they
 always?):

 http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/5Client/en/os/SRPMS/rsync-2.6.8-3.1.src.rpm
 http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/5Server/en/os/SRPMS/rsync-2.6.8-3.1.src.rpm

 It looks like there's one bug fix related to memory allocation for
 extended attributes, but that's all.

 --
 Matt





-- 
Jeff Cleverley
Unix Systems Administrator
4380 Ziegler Road
Fort Collins, Colorado 80525
970-288-4611
-- 
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html


Re: Behavioral differences between versions.

2010-07-22 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 21:50 -0600, Jeff Cleverley wrote:
 I've found Red Hat often slow and difficult to get an answer from.

That's not our problem.

-- 
Matt

-- 
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html


Behavioral differences between versions.

2010-07-21 Thread Jeff Cleverley
Greetings,

We are upgrading systems in our lab from rhel4 to rhel5.  We've
noticed a number of differences in behavior while using the same
arguments on the same data set.  We get different sent and received
counts.  We also had one case with some data corruption that was only
fixed after telling rsync to checksum everything.

I was hoping someone in the list can point me to some better
information. There are 2 points of interest.

1.  When using the -z option, does rsync actually use
/usr/bin/compress or does it use gzip?  The man pages say it
compresses data but doesn't specify what it compresses with.

2.  I was looking for detailed documentation on behavioral changes of
arguments between rsync versions.

If I can't find anything in the documentation I'll post more details
about specific behaviors later.

Thanks,

Jeff

-- 
Jeff Cleverley
Unix Systems Administrator
4380 Ziegler Road
Fort Collins, Colorado 80525
970-288-4611
-- 
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html