DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6240] rsync 3.0.x -x/--one-file-system regression?
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6240 --- Comment #1 from m...@lbl.gov 2009-03-31 18:40 CST --- Sorry, that should've said 3.0.4 and 3.0.5. I have not tested 3.0.6 or 3.1 (which have not yet been released AFAIK). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6240] rsync 3.0.x -x/--one-file-system regression?
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6240 way...@samba.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED Version|3.0.5 |3.0.6 --- Comment #2 from way...@samba.org 2009-03-31 22:29 CST --- This was a very simple fix: receiver-side directories were not being marked with a content-dir flag, so the mount-marking code was ignoring the mount differences. I've checked in a fix that will go out in 3.0.6. Thanks for the test case -- that made duplicating the issue a breeze! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6240] rsync 3.0.x -x/--one-file-system regression?
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6240 --- Comment #3 from way...@samba.org 2009-03-31 22:30 CST --- Created an attachment (id=4041) --> (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=4041&action=view) The one-word fix for the issue This fixes the issue in both 3.0.6dev and 3.1.0dev. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6240] rsync 3.0.x -x/--one-file-system regression?
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6240 m...@lbl.gov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED --- Comment #4 from m...@lbl.gov 2009-04-01 14:31 CST --- Applied patch to 3.0.5 and re-ran test case. The problem is indeed resolved. Thanks for the quick fix! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6240] rsync 3.0.x -x/--one-file-system regression?
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6240 --- Comment #5 from m...@lbl.gov 2009-04-02 19:32 CST --- Is this something that could be added to the test suite? I notice that this behavior has come up and been fixed before, albeit with a different cause and solution. But since regression on the -x behavior can very easily result in data loss (as seen here), it might be useful to check for that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
