Re: Diff between using "-i" and not using "-i"
Hi, thanks for the information. Shall I file a bug report at https://github.com/RsyncProject/rsync/issues ? Yours lopiuh Am Mo., 3. Juni 2024 um 15:57 Uhr schrieb Paul Slootman via rsync : > > On Mon 03 Jun 2024, Kevin Korb via rsync wrote: > > > It appears that xattr changes (that is what the x mens) never made it into > > the verbose output. I would call that a bug but I would rather it be fixed > > by making -v include -i. > > I think -v only shows when file data is transferred (or files / > directories created / deleted). > Just a permission change is also not shown with -v, but is with -i. > > > Paul > > -- -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Re: Diff between using "-i" and not using "-i"
On Mon 03 Jun 2024, Kevin Korb via rsync wrote: > It appears that xattr changes (that is what the x mens) never made it into > the verbose output. I would call that a bug but I would rather it be fixed > by making -v include -i. I think -v only shows when file data is transferred (or files / directories created / deleted). Just a permission change is also not shown with -v, but is with -i. Paul -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Re: Diff between using "-i" and not using "-i"
It appears that xattr changes (that is what the x mens) never made it into the verbose output. I would call that a bug but I would rather it be fixed by making -v include -i. On 6/3/24 05:22, - via rsync wrote: Hi, Version: sync version 3.3.0 protocol version 31 If I do a I get: = sending incremental file list var/log/journal/ sent 263,31K bytes received 1,14K bytes 528,90K bytes/sec total size is 294,92M speedup is 1.115,21 (DRY RUN) = including option <-i>: rsync -avhHXASDin --del /mnt/ /foo/mnt/ I get: = sending incremental file list .fx usr/bin/ping .d...a. var/log/journal/ sent 263,31K bytes received 1,14K bytes 528,90K bytes/sec total size is 294,92M speedup is 1.115,21 (DRY RUN) = How is that, that "usr/bin/ping" is not included / included in results? That is no feature, is it? Yours lopiuh -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Re: Diff between using "-i" and not using "-i"
Hi, Version: sync version 3.3.0 protocol version 31 If I do a I get: = sending incremental file list var/log/journal/ sent 263,31K bytes received 1,14K bytes 528,90K bytes/sec total size is 294,92M speedup is 1.115,21 (DRY RUN) = including option <-i>: rsync -avhHXASDin --del /mnt/ /foo/mnt/ I get: = sending incremental file list .fx usr/bin/ping .d...a. var/log/journal/ sent 263,31K bytes received 1,14K bytes 528,90K bytes/sec total size is 294,92M speedup is 1.115,21 (DRY RUN) = How is that, that "usr/bin/ping" is not included / included in results? That is no feature, is it? Yours lopiuh -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
