Re: Status of rsync on win32
Wayne Davison [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 10:15:55AM -0500, Misha Bergal wrote: rsync on the server machine makes System process to consume about 90% of CPU time. If you are sending over a fast network, using -W (--whole-file) will save you CPU (and disk I/O). In addition (or alternately), if you're using an encrypted transport (such as ssh), try switching it to a faster cipher (e.g. -e ssh -c arcfour) or use an unencrypted transport (such as rsh or a direct rsync daemon setup). I am sending file through rather slow network. I am not using ssh. -- Misha Bergal MetaCommunications Engineering -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Re: Status of rsync on win32
Is it a known problem? Is anybody else having it too? What steps do I need to take to resolve it? Maybe you have same problem like I Cygwin sleep() is messing something with windows threads Posted already to cygwin mailing list http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2005-08/msg01136.html Raul Metsma -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Re: Status of rsync on win32
On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 10:15:55AM -0500, Misha Bergal wrote: rsync on the server machine makes System process to consume about 90% of CPU time. If you are sending over a fast network, using -W (--whole-file) will save you CPU (and disk I/O). In addition (or alternately), if you're using an encrypted transport (such as ssh), try switching it to a faster cipher (e.g. -e ssh -c arcfour) or use an unencrypted transport (such as rsh or a direct rsync daemon setup). ..wayne.. -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Status of rsync on win32
Hi, For the past day I've been trying to set up file synchronization between two Windows 2000 servers using rsync 2.6.6 (distributed in cwRsync package - http://www.itefix.no). Unfortunately I've encountered a major showstopper - rsync on the server machine makes System process to consume about 90% of CPU time. In addition (or as a result), rsync performance is significantly worse that I would expect. Is it a known problem? Is anybody else having it too? What steps do I need to take to resolve it? Thanks in advance. -- Misha Bergal MetaCommunications Engineering -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
