Re: [rsyslog] Rsyslog imkafka

2017-02-02 Thread David Lang 
The omkafka module was contributed to rsyslog, so the same thing would need to 
be done for an imkafka module. It's not something that's on Rainers list of 
things to do.


So this needs to be a call for Kafka users to see who would be interested in 
this.


David Lang

On Thu, 2 Feb 2017, mostolog--- via rsyslog wrote:


Ping!


El 20/01/17 a las 15:19, mosto...@gmail.com escribió:


Hi.

Just started deploying kafka for testing with omkafka. Have anyone 
considered doing an *imkafka* module?


So far, we have:

  * RELP->rsyslog->omelasticsearch->elasticsearch
  * RELP->rsyslog->omkafka

Otherwise, I'll go for logstash.

Regards

___
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of 
sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE 
THAT.

Re: [rsyslog] Rsyslog imkafka

2017-02-02 Thread mostolog--- via rsyslog 

Ping!


El 20/01/17 a las 15:19, mosto...@gmail.com escribió:


Hi.

Just started deploying kafka for testing with omkafka. Have anyone 
considered doing an *imkafka* module?


So far, we have:

  * RELP->rsyslog->omelasticsearch->elasticsearch
  * RELP->rsyslog->omkafka

Otherwise, I'll go for logstash.

Regards



___
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of 
sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE 
THAT.

Re: [rsyslog] rsyslog and fail2ban

2017-02-02 Thread James 
That appears to have fixed it. Thank you again for your help.

On 1 February 2017 at 09:53, David Lang  wrote:

> On Wed, 1 Feb 2017, James wrote:
>
> Thank you both Jacob and David. I misunderstood the example on
>> http://www.rsyslog.com/doc/v8-stable/configuration/filters.html
>>
>> I was trying to make my filters apply to only the daemon facility level,
>> is
>> that possible with these legacy filters? I note more complex if-then
>> options are available with newer versions of rsyslog.
>>
>
> no, the older style of filters do not allow you to specify multiple
> conditions. That requires the if..then style filters (or other features
> only available in newer versions)
>
> David Lang
>
> ___
> rsyslog mailing list
> http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
> http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
> What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
> NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad
> of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you
> DON'T LIKE THAT.
>
___
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of 
sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE 
THAT.